BibTex RIS Cite

Poliklinik ve Doğum Hizmeti Veren Hastanelerde Girdi Tıkanıklığı ve Aylak Girdiler

Year 2007, Issue: 28, - 4, 01.05.2007

Öğr. Gör. Dr. M. Ensar Yeşilyurt Arş. Gör. Filiz Yeşilyurt

Abstract

Veri zarflama analizini kullanan çalışmalarda genellikle sadece teknik etkinlik düzeyi hesaplanmaktadır. Fakat girdilerin hangilerinin ne düzeyde etkinsiz kullanıldığı ve nedenlerinin belirlenmesi açısından girdi tıkanıklığı ve aylak girdilerinde belirlenmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmada şimdiye kadar oldukça ihmal edilmiş bu değişkenler hesaplanmıştır. Sonuç olarak incelenen hastanelerde etkinlik düzeyi 0.522 gibi çok düşük düzeye sahip olduğu anlaşılmıştır

Keywords

Veri zarflama analizi hastane girdi tıkanıklığı aylak girdi

References

  • AHN, T., A. CHAMES ve W.W. COOPER; (1988), “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure the Efficiency of Not-for-Profit Organizations: A Critical Evaluation-Comment”, Managerial ve Decision Economics, 9(3), ss. 251-253.
  • BANKER, R. D., A.CHARNES ve W.W.COOPER; (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficincies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30(9), ss. 251-253.
  • BANKER, Rajiv D.; (1993), “Maximum Likelihood, Consisteny and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation” Management Science, 39(10), ss. 1265-1273.
  • BANKER, R. D. ve A. MAINDIRATTA; (1988), “Nonparametric Analysis of Technical and Allocative Efficiencies in Production”, Econometrica, 56(6), ss. 1315-1332.
  • BANKER, R. D. ve A. MAINDIRATTA; (1986), “Piecewise Loglinear Estimation of Efficiency Production Surfaces”, Management Science, 32(1), ss. 126-135.
  • BANKER, R. D., R. F. CONRAD ve R. P. STRAUSS; (1986), “A Comparative Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production”, Management Science, 32(1), ss. 30-44.
  • BAYSAL M. Emin, Hakan ÇERÇİOĞLU ve Bilal TOKLU; (2004), “Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Performans Değerlendirme Çalışması”, Yöneylem Araştırması/Endüstri Mühendisliği, XXIV Ulusal Kongresi, Gazi- antep-Adana.
  • BJÖRKGREN M. A., U. HAKINKEN ve M. LINNA; (2001), “Measuring Efficiency of Long-Term Care Units in Finland”, Health Care Management Sciences, 4(3), ss. 193-200.
  • BOGETOFT P.; (1996), “DEA on Relaxed Convexity Assumptions”, Management Science, 42, ss. 457-465.
  • BOLES, J. N.; (1967), “Efficiency Squared-Efficient Computation of Efficiency Indexes”, Western Farm Economic Association, Pulman, Washington, ss. 137-142.
  • BOLES, J. N.; (1971), The Farrell Efficiecy System-Multiple Products, Multiple Factors, Giovanni Foundation of Agricultural Economics.
  • CHARNES, A., W.W. COOPER ve E. RHODES; (1981), “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficieney: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through”, Management Science,, 27(6), ss. 668-697.
  • COELLI, Tim; (1996), “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1”, CEPA Working Paper.
  • COELLI, T., P. RAO ve G. BATTASE; (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivty Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishes.
  • COOK, W. D., M. KRESS ve L. M. SEIFORD; (1993), “On the Use of Ordinal Data in Data Envelopment Analysis”, The Journal of the Operational Research Sociary, 44(2), ss. 123-129.
  • DELİKTAŞ, Ertuğrul ve Mehmet BALCILAR; (2002), “A Comparative Analysis of Productivity Growth, Catch-up and Convergence in Transition Economies”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(1), ss. 6-28.
  • FARRELL, M. J.; (1957), “The measurement of Production Efficiency”, Journal of The Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120(3), ss. 253- 290.
  • FORSUND, F. F. ve N. SARAFOGLU; (2000), On the Origins Data Envelopment Analysis, Memorandum, No 24-, Depertmant of Economics, Universitey of Oslo, ss. 18-21.
  • GROSSKOPF, S., D. MARGARITIS ve V. VALDMANIS; (2001), “Comparing Teaching and Non-teaching Hospitals: A Frontier Approach (Teaching vs.Non-Teaching Hospitals)”, Health Care Management Sciences, 4(2), ss. 89-107.
  • GROSSKOPF, S. ve V. VALDMANIS; (1987), “Measuring Hospital Performance: A Non-Parametric Approach”, Journal of Health Economics, 6, ss. 608-620.
  • GROSSKOPF, S, J. H. KATHY, L. LORI ve L. WILLIAM; (1999), “Anticipating the Consequences of School Reform: A New Use of DEA”, Management Science, 45(4), ss. 230-243.
  • HELVIG, B. ve I. LAPSLEY; (2001), “On the Efficiencyof Public, Welfare and Private Hospital in Germany over time: A Sectoral Data Envelopment Analysis Study”, Health Service Management Research, 14(4), ss. 263-274.
  • KÖK, Recep ve Ertuğrul DELİKTAŞ; (2003), Endüstri İktisadında Verimli- lik Ölçme ve Strateji Geliştirme Teknikleri.
  • LÖTHGREN, M. ve M. TAMBOUR; (1995), “Bootstrapping DEA-Based Efficiency Measures and Malmquist Indices. A Study of Swedish Eye- Care Service Provision”. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, Stockholm School of Economics, No. 78.
  • PRIOR, D. ve M. SOLA; (2000), “Technical Efficiency and Economies of Diversification in Health Care”, Health Care Management Science, 3, ss. 299-307.
  • REICHMANN, M.S.; (2000), “The Impact of the Austrian Hospital Financing Reform on Hospital Productivity: Empirical Evidence and Efficiency anf Technology Changes Using a Non-Parametric Input Based Malmquist Approach”, Health Care Management Science, 3, ss. 309-321.
  • ROSENMAN, R. ve D. FRIESNER; (2004), “Scope and Scale Inefficiencies in Physician Practies”, Health Economics, 13, ss. 1096-1116.
  • ROSENMAN R., K. SIDDHARTHAN ve M. AHERN; (1997), “Output Effıciency Of Healthmaintenance Organizations in Florida”, Health Economics, 6, ss. 295-302.
  • SİDDHARTHAN, K., M. AHERN ve R. ROSENMAN; (2000), “Data Envelopment Analysis to Determine Efficiencies of Health Maintenance Organizations”, Health Care Management Sciences, 3, ss. 23-29.
  • TAMBOUR, M.; (1999), “The Impact Of Health Care Policy Initiatives on Productivity”, Health Economics, 6, ss. 57-70.
  • TETİK, Semra; (2003), “İşletme Performansını Belirlemede Veri Zarflama Ana- lizi”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 10(2), ss. 1-9.
  • THRALL, R. M.; (1989), “Classification Transitions under Expansion of Inputs and Outputs in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 10(2), ss. 159-162.
  • T. C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Yataklı Tedavi Kurumları İstatistik Yıllığı, 2003.
  • YILDIRIM, Hasan Hüseyin; (2004), Avrupa Birliği’ne Üye ve Aday Ülke Sistemlerinin Verimlilik Performansı Skorları, 2000, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi.

Year 2007, Issue: 28, - 4, 01.05.2007

Öğr. Gör. Dr. M. Ensar Yeşilyurt Arş. Gör. Filiz Yeşilyurt

Abstract

References

  • AHN, T., A. CHAMES ve W.W. COOPER; (1988), “Using Data Envelopment Analysis to Measure the Efficiency of Not-for-Profit Organizations: A Critical Evaluation-Comment”, Managerial ve Decision Economics, 9(3), ss. 251-253.
  • BANKER, R. D., A.CHARNES ve W.W.COOPER; (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficincies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30(9), ss. 251-253.
  • BANKER, Rajiv D.; (1993), “Maximum Likelihood, Consisteny and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation” Management Science, 39(10), ss. 1265-1273.
  • BANKER, R. D. ve A. MAINDIRATTA; (1988), “Nonparametric Analysis of Technical and Allocative Efficiencies in Production”, Econometrica, 56(6), ss. 1315-1332.
  • BANKER, R. D. ve A. MAINDIRATTA; (1986), “Piecewise Loglinear Estimation of Efficiency Production Surfaces”, Management Science, 32(1), ss. 126-135.
  • BANKER, R. D., R. F. CONRAD ve R. P. STRAUSS; (1986), “A Comparative Application of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Methods: An Illustrative Study of Hospital Production”, Management Science, 32(1), ss. 30-44.
  • BAYSAL M. Emin, Hakan ÇERÇİOĞLU ve Bilal TOKLU; (2004), “Sağlık Sektöründe Bir Performans Değerlendirme Çalışması”, Yöneylem Araştırması/Endüstri Mühendisliği, XXIV Ulusal Kongresi, Gazi- antep-Adana.
  • BJÖRKGREN M. A., U. HAKINKEN ve M. LINNA; (2001), “Measuring Efficiency of Long-Term Care Units in Finland”, Health Care Management Sciences, 4(3), ss. 193-200.
  • BOGETOFT P.; (1996), “DEA on Relaxed Convexity Assumptions”, Management Science, 42, ss. 457-465.
  • BOLES, J. N.; (1967), “Efficiency Squared-Efficient Computation of Efficiency Indexes”, Western Farm Economic Association, Pulman, Washington, ss. 137-142.
  • BOLES, J. N.; (1971), The Farrell Efficiecy System-Multiple Products, Multiple Factors, Giovanni Foundation of Agricultural Economics.
  • CHARNES, A., W.W. COOPER ve E. RHODES; (1981), “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficieney: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through”, Management Science,, 27(6), ss. 668-697.
  • COELLI, Tim; (1996), “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1”, CEPA Working Paper.
  • COELLI, T., P. RAO ve G. BATTASE; (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivty Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishes.
  • COOK, W. D., M. KRESS ve L. M. SEIFORD; (1993), “On the Use of Ordinal Data in Data Envelopment Analysis”, The Journal of the Operational Research Sociary, 44(2), ss. 123-129.
  • DELİKTAŞ, Ertuğrul ve Mehmet BALCILAR; (2002), “A Comparative Analysis of Productivity Growth, Catch-up and Convergence in Transition Economies”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 41(1), ss. 6-28.
  • FARRELL, M. J.; (1957), “The measurement of Production Efficiency”, Journal of The Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120(3), ss. 253- 290.
  • FORSUND, F. F. ve N. SARAFOGLU; (2000), On the Origins Data Envelopment Analysis, Memorandum, No 24-, Depertmant of Economics, Universitey of Oslo, ss. 18-21.
  • GROSSKOPF, S., D. MARGARITIS ve V. VALDMANIS; (2001), “Comparing Teaching and Non-teaching Hospitals: A Frontier Approach (Teaching vs.Non-Teaching Hospitals)”, Health Care Management Sciences, 4(2), ss. 89-107.
  • GROSSKOPF, S. ve V. VALDMANIS; (1987), “Measuring Hospital Performance: A Non-Parametric Approach”, Journal of Health Economics, 6, ss. 608-620.
  • GROSSKOPF, S, J. H. KATHY, L. LORI ve L. WILLIAM; (1999), “Anticipating the Consequences of School Reform: A New Use of DEA”, Management Science, 45(4), ss. 230-243.
  • HELVIG, B. ve I. LAPSLEY; (2001), “On the Efficiencyof Public, Welfare and Private Hospital in Germany over time: A Sectoral Data Envelopment Analysis Study”, Health Service Management Research, 14(4), ss. 263-274.
  • KÖK, Recep ve Ertuğrul DELİKTAŞ; (2003), Endüstri İktisadında Verimli- lik Ölçme ve Strateji Geliştirme Teknikleri.
  • LÖTHGREN, M. ve M. TAMBOUR; (1995), “Bootstrapping DEA-Based Efficiency Measures and Malmquist Indices. A Study of Swedish Eye- Care Service Provision”. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, Stockholm School of Economics, No. 78.
  • PRIOR, D. ve M. SOLA; (2000), “Technical Efficiency and Economies of Diversification in Health Care”, Health Care Management Science, 3, ss. 299-307.
  • REICHMANN, M.S.; (2000), “The Impact of the Austrian Hospital Financing Reform on Hospital Productivity: Empirical Evidence and Efficiency anf Technology Changes Using a Non-Parametric Input Based Malmquist Approach”, Health Care Management Science, 3, ss. 309-321.
  • ROSENMAN, R. ve D. FRIESNER; (2004), “Scope and Scale Inefficiencies in Physician Practies”, Health Economics, 13, ss. 1096-1116.
  • ROSENMAN R., K. SIDDHARTHAN ve M. AHERN; (1997), “Output Effıciency Of Healthmaintenance Organizations in Florida”, Health Economics, 6, ss. 295-302.
  • SİDDHARTHAN, K., M. AHERN ve R. ROSENMAN; (2000), “Data Envelopment Analysis to Determine Efficiencies of Health Maintenance Organizations”, Health Care Management Sciences, 3, ss. 23-29.
  • TAMBOUR, M.; (1999), “The Impact Of Health Care Policy Initiatives on Productivity”, Health Economics, 6, ss. 57-70.
  • TETİK, Semra; (2003), “İşletme Performansını Belirlemede Veri Zarflama Ana- lizi”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 10(2), ss. 1-9.
  • THRALL, R. M.; (1989), “Classification Transitions under Expansion of Inputs and Outputs in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Managerial and Decision Economics, 10(2), ss. 159-162.
  • T. C. Sağlık Bakanlığı, Yataklı Tedavi Kurumları İstatistik Yıllığı, 2003.
  • YILDIRIM, Hasan Hüseyin; (2004), Avrupa Birliği’ne Üye ve Aday Ülke Sistemlerinin Verimlilik Performansı Skorları, 2000, Basılmamış Doktora Tezi.
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Öğr. Gör. Dr. M. Ensar Yeşilyurt This is me

Arş. Gör. Filiz Yeşilyurt This is me

Publication Date May 1, 2007
Published in Issue Year 2007 Issue: 28

Cite

APA Yeşilyurt, Ö. G. D. M. . E., & Yeşilyurt, A. G. . F. (2007). Poliklinik ve Doğum Hizmeti Veren Hastanelerde Girdi Tıkanıklığı ve Aylak Girdiler. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(28), 4.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.