BibTex RIS Cite

İç Girişimcilik ve Temel Belirleyicileri: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve

Year 2007, Issue: 29, - , 01.06.2007

Yrd.doç. Dr. Veysel Ağca Yrd.doç.dr.must Kurt

Abstract

Kısaca faaliyet halindeki organizasyonlardaki girişimcilik eğilim ve faaliyetlerini tanımlamak için kullanılan iç girişimcilik kavramı 1980’lerden bu yana akademisyenlerin ve uygulamacıların dikkatini çekmektedir. Genel olarak, iç girişimcilik organizasyonel ve ekonomik gelişmede önemli bir unsur olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Spesifik olarak da organizasyonların ve performanslarının yeniden canlanmasına ve iyileşmesine pozitif etkileri olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Bu nedenle iç girişimcilik büyük işletmeler için olduğu kadar küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler için de önemli olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kavramsal bir iç girişimcilik yapısı oluşturmak için teorik olarak iç girişimcilik kavramını ve boyutlarını incelemektir. Çalışmada çok boyutlu bir yapı olarak ele alınan iç girişimcilik, mevcut (faaliyet halindeki) işletmelerde yenilikçi fikirlerin yeni ürün, hizmet ve işlere dönüştürülmesi sürecinde işlerin geleneksel yöntemlerden sapılarak daha özerk bireyler ve birimler tarafından yapılması olarak tanımlanmaktadır. İç girişimcilik yenilikçilik, yeni iş girişimleri başlatma, kendini yenileme, hesaplı risk alma, proaktiflik, rekabetçi girişkenlik ve özerklik olmak üzere yedi farklı boyutlu bir yapı olarak ele alınmaktadır. İç girişimciliğin temel belirleyicileri de çevresel ve organizasyonel faktörler olarak incelenmektedir

Keywords

İç Girişimci İç Girişimcilik İç Girişimcilik Boyutları

References

  • AKYOS, M.; (2003), “Firma Düzeyinde Yenilik ve Bilgi Yönetimi”, KalDer Forum,Yıl:3 (12), ss. 17-22.
  • ANTONCIC, B.; (2000), Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and An Integrative Model Development, Thesis for The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy, Department of Marketing and Policy Studies Weatherhead School of Management, School of Graduate Studies, Case Western Reserve University
  • ANTONCIC, B. ve Hisrich, R.D., (2001), “Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (5), ss. 495-527.
  • ANTONCIC, B., ve Hisrich, R.D.; (2003), “Clarifying The Intrapreneurship Concept”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,10 (1) 7-24.
  • BORDEAUX, D.B.; (1987), “Entrepreneurship”, Manage, 39 (1), ss. 2-4.
  • BURGELMAN, R.A.; (1983), “A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in The Diversified Major Firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (2), ss. 223-244.
  • BURGELMAN, R.A.; (1985), “Managing The New Venture Division, Research Findings and Imlications for Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 6 (1), ss. 39-54.
  • CARBONE, T.C.; (1986), “The Making of A Maverick”, Management World, 15 (5), ss. 13-16.
  • CARRIER, C.; (1996), “Intrapreneurship In Small Businesses: An Exploratory Study”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21 (1), ss. 5-20.
  • COVİN, J.G., ve SLEVIN, D.P.; (1989), “Strategic Management of Small Firm in Hostile and Benign Environments”, Strategic Management Journal, 10 (1), ss. 75-87.
  • COVIN, J.G. ve COVIN, T.J.; (1990), “Competitive Agressiveness, Environmental Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,14 (4), ss. 35-50 Small Firm Performance”,
  • COVIN, J.G., ve SLEVIN, D.P.; (1991), “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (1), ss. 7-25.
  • COVIN, J.G., ve MILES, M.P.; (1999), “Corporate Entrepreneurship and Pursuit of Competitive Advantage”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), ss. 47-64.
  • CULHANE, J. H.; (2003), The Entrepreneurial Orientation-Performance Linkage in High Technology Firms: An International Comparative Study, Thesis for The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy, Graduate School of The University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  • DAVIDSSON, P. E.L.; (1990), Continued Entrepreneurship and Small Firm Growth, Thesis for The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy, Handelshogskolan, Stockholm
  • DESS, G.G.; LUMPKIN, G.T., ve COVIN, J.G.; (1997), “Entrepreneurial Strategy Making andFirm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models”, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9), ss. 677-695.
  • DESS, G.G.; LUMPKIN, G.T., ve McGEE, J.E.; (1999), “Linging Corporate Entrepreneurship to Strategy, Structure and Process: Suggested Research Direction”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), ss. 85-102.
  • DRUCKER, P. F.; (1984), “Our Entrepreneurial Economy”, Harvard Business Review, 62 (2), ss. 59-64.
  • FRIEDMAN, J. P., (1994), Dictionary of Business Terms, Second Edition, Barron’s, New York.
  • GUTH, W. D. ve GINSBERG, A.; (1990), “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Strategic Management Journal, 11 (5), ss. 5-15.
  • GÜROL, M. A.; (2000), Türkiye’de Kadın Girişimci ve Küçük İşletmesi: Fırsatlar, Sorunlar, Beklentiler ve Öneriler, Atılım Üniversitesi Ya- yını–2, Ankara.
  • HISRICH, R. D. ve PETERS, M. P.; (2002), Entrepreneurship, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
  • HORNSBY, J.S., KURATKO, D.F. ve ZAHRA, S.A.; (2002), “Middle Managers’ Perception of The Internal Environment For Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing A Measurement Scale”, Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (3), ss. 253-273.
  • HOSTAGER, T.J.; NEİL, T.C., DECKER, R.L., ve LORENTZ, R.D.; (1998), “Seeing Environmental Opportunities: Effects of Intrapreneurial Ability, Efficacy, Motivation and Desirability”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11 (1), ss. 11-25
  • HUFF, J. O.; HUFF, A.S., ve THOMAS, H.; (1992), “Strategic Renewal and The Interaction of Cumulative Stress and Inertia”, Strategic Management Journal, 13, ss. 55-75
  • JENNINGS, D.F., ve LUMPKIN, J.R.; (1989), “Functioning Modeling Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Integrative Analysis”, Journal of Management,15 (3), ss. 485-502.
  • JONES, G.R., ve BUTLER, J.E.; (1992), “Managing Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Agency Theory Perspective”, Journal of Management,18 (4), ss. 733-749.
  • KNIGHT, G.; (1997), “Cross-Cultural Reliability and Validiryof A Scale To Measure Firm Entrepreneurial Orientation”, Journal of Business Venturing, 12 (3), ss. 213-225
  • KOÇEL, T.; (1995), İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Yayınları, 5. Baskı, İstanbul.
  • KURATKO, D. F., ve HODGETTS, R. M.; (2001), Entrepreneurship: A Contemporary Approach, South-Western Thonson Learning, Mason, Ohio.
  • KURATKO, D.F.; MONTAGNO, R.V., ve HORNSBY, J.S.; (1990), “Developing An Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment”, Strategic Management Journal,. 11 (5), ss. 49-58.
  • KURATKO, D.F.; HORNSBY, J.S.; NAFFZİGER, D.W., ve MONTAGNO, R.V.; (1993), “Implement Entrepreneurial Thinking in Established Organizations”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 58 (1), ss. 28- 39.
  • KURATKO, D. F. ve WELSCH, H. P.; (1994), Entrepreneurial Strategy Text and Cases, The Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX.
  • KURATKO, F.K.; HORNSBY, J.S., ve SABATİNE, F.J.; (1999), The Breakthrough Entrepreneurship, Midwest Entrepreneurial Education Center, College of Business Ball State University. A Guide to Corporate
  • LUCHSINGER, V., ve BAGBY, D.R.; (1987), “Entrepreneurship and Intrapreneurship: Behaviors, Comparisons, and Contrasts”, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 52 (3), ss. 10-13.
  • LUMPKIN, G.T., ve DESS, G.G.; (1996), “Clarifying The Entrepreneurial Orientation Cunstruct and Linking It To Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), ss. 135-172.
  • LUMPKIN, G.T., ve DESS, G.G.; (2001), “Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (5), ss. 429-451.
  • MacMILLAN, I.C., ve GEORGE, R.; (1985), “Corporate Venturing: Challengess for Senior Manager”, Journal of Business Strategy, 5 (3), ss. 34-43.
  • McKINNEY, G., ve McKINNEY, M.; (1989), “Forget The Corporate Umbrella- Entrepreneurs Shine in The Rain”, Sloan Management Review, 30 (4), ss. 77-82.
  • MILES, M.P., ve COVIN, J.G.; (2002), “Exploring The Practice of Corporate Venturing: Some Commen Forms and Their Organizational Implications”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (3), ss. 21- 40.
  • MILLER, D., ve FRIESEN, P.H.; (1983), “Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link”, Strategic Management Journal, 4 (3), ss. 221-235.
  • MORRIS, M. H. ve KURATKO, D. F.; (2002), Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development within Organizations, Harcourt College Publishers, Orlando, Florida
  • NAKTİYOK, A.; (2004), İç Girişimcilik, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • PEARCE, J.W.,ve CARLAND, J.W.; (1996), “Intrapreneurship and Innovation In Manufacturing Firms:An Empirical Study of Performance Implications”, Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 1 (2), ss. 87- 96.
  • PINCHOT, G.; (1985), Intrapreneuring, Harper and Row, New York.
  • PINNINGTON, A., ve HASLOP, D.; (1995), “Team Leader Autonomy In New Product Development”,Management Decision, 33 (9), ss. 5-11.
  • PITT, L. F.; EWING, M.T. ve BERTHON, P.R.; (2002), “Proactive Behavior and Industrial Salesforce Performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31 (8), ss. 639-644.
  • RAELIN, J.A.; (1989), An Anotomy of Autonomy: Managing Professionals, The Academy of Management Executive, III (3), 216-228. ROSS, J., (1987), “Corporations and Entrepreneurs: Paradox and Opportunity”, Business Horizons, 30 (4), ss. 76-80.
  • RULE, E.G., ve IRWIN, D.W.; (1988), “Fostering Intrapreneurship: The New Competitive Edge”, The Journal of Business Strategy, 9 (3), ss. 44- 47.
  • RUSSELL, R.D. ve RUSSELL, C.J.; (1992), “An Examination of The Effects of Organizational Norms, Organizational Structure, and Environmental Uncertainity on Entrepreneurial Strategy”, Journal of Management, 18 (4), ss. 639-656.
  • SCHOLLHAMMER, H.; (1982), “Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, ss. 209-229.
  • SHARMA, S., ve CHRISMAN, J.J.; (1999), “Toward A Reconciliation of The Definitional Issues in The Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), ss. 11-27.
  • STEVENSON, H.H., ve JARILLO, J.C.; (1990), “A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship:Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 11(7), ss. 17-27. Management”, Strategic
  • STOPFORD, J.M., ve BADEN-FULLER, C.W.F.; (1994), “Creating Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (7), ss. 521- 536.
  • VESPER, K.H.; (1984), Three Faces of Corporate Entrepreneurship, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
  • VOLBERDA, H.W.; BADEN-FULLER, C., ve van den Bosch, F. A.j.; (2001), “Mastering Stragegic Renewal: Mobilising Renewal Journeys in Multiunit Firms”, Long Range Planning, 34, ss. 159-178.
  • WIKLUND, J., ve SHEPHERD, D.; (2005), “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach, Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (1), ss. 71-91.
  • WILKINSON, I.F.; MATTSSON, L-G, ve EASTON, G.; (2000), “International Competitiveness and Trade Promotion Policy from a Network Perspective,” Journal of World Business, 35 (3), ss. 275-290.
  • ZAHRA, S.A; (1991), “Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Business Venturuing, 6 (4), ss. 259-285.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; (1993a), “Environment, Corporate Entrepreneurship, and Financial Performance: A Taxonomic Approach”, Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (4), ss. 319-340.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; (1993b), “New Product Innovation in Established Companies: Associations with Industry and Strategy Variables”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18 (2), ss. 47-67.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; (1993c), “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior: A Critique and Extension”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17 (4), ss. 5-21.
  • ZAHRA, S.A., ve PEARCE, J.A.; (1994), “Corporate Entrepreneurship in Smaller Firms: The Role of Environment, Strategy and Organization,” Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change, 3 (1), ss. 31-44.
  • ZAHRA, S. A.; (1995), “Corporate Entrepreneurship and Financial Performance: The Case of Management Leveraged Buyouts”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (3), ss. 225-247.
  • ZAHRA, S.A. ve COVIN, J.G.; (1995), “Contextual Influences on The Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (1), ss. 43-58.
  • ZAHRA, S.A., ve GARVIS, D.M.; (2000), “International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility”, Journal of Business Venturing.15 (5-6), ss. 469-492.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; NEUBAUM, D.O., ve HUSE, M.; (2000), “Entrepreneurship in Mesium-Size Companies: Exploring The Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems”, Journal of Management, 26 (5), ss. 947-976.
  • Zajac, E.J.; GOLDEN, B.R., ve SHORTELL, S.M.; (1991), “New
  • Organizational Forms For Enhancing Innovation: The Case of Internal
  • Corporate Joint Ventures”, Management Science, 37 (2), ss. 170-184

Year 2007, Issue: 29, - , 01.06.2007

Yrd.doç. Dr. Veysel Ağca Yrd.doç.dr.must Kurt

Abstract

References

  • AKYOS, M.; (2003), “Firma Düzeyinde Yenilik ve Bilgi Yönetimi”, KalDer Forum,Yıl:3 (12), ss. 17-22.
  • ANTONCIC, B.; (2000), Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and An Integrative Model Development, Thesis for The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy, Department of Marketing and Policy Studies Weatherhead School of Management, School of Graduate Studies, Case Western Reserve University
  • ANTONCIC, B. ve Hisrich, R.D., (2001), “Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross-Cultural Validation”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (5), ss. 495-527.
  • ANTONCIC, B., ve Hisrich, R.D.; (2003), “Clarifying The Intrapreneurship Concept”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development,10 (1) 7-24.
  • BORDEAUX, D.B.; (1987), “Entrepreneurship”, Manage, 39 (1), ss. 2-4.
  • BURGELMAN, R.A.; (1983), “A Process Model of Internal Corporate Venturing in The Diversified Major Firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (2), ss. 223-244.
  • BURGELMAN, R.A.; (1985), “Managing The New Venture Division, Research Findings and Imlications for Strategic Management”, Strategic Management Journal, 6 (1), ss. 39-54.
  • CARBONE, T.C.; (1986), “The Making of A Maverick”, Management World, 15 (5), ss. 13-16.
  • CARRIER, C.; (1996), “Intrapreneurship In Small Businesses: An Exploratory Study”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21 (1), ss. 5-20.
  • COVİN, J.G., ve SLEVIN, D.P.; (1989), “Strategic Management of Small Firm in Hostile and Benign Environments”, Strategic Management Journal, 10 (1), ss. 75-87.
  • COVIN, J.G. ve COVIN, T.J.; (1990), “Competitive Agressiveness, Environmental Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,14 (4), ss. 35-50 Small Firm Performance”,
  • COVIN, J.G., ve SLEVIN, D.P.; (1991), “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (1), ss. 7-25.
  • COVIN, J.G., ve MILES, M.P.; (1999), “Corporate Entrepreneurship and Pursuit of Competitive Advantage”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), ss. 47-64.
  • CULHANE, J. H.; (2003), The Entrepreneurial Orientation-Performance Linkage in High Technology Firms: An International Comparative Study, Thesis for The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy, Graduate School of The University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  • DAVIDSSON, P. E.L.; (1990), Continued Entrepreneurship and Small Firm Growth, Thesis for The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy, Handelshogskolan, Stockholm
  • DESS, G.G.; LUMPKIN, G.T., ve COVIN, J.G.; (1997), “Entrepreneurial Strategy Making andFirm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models”, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9), ss. 677-695.
  • DESS, G.G.; LUMPKIN, G.T., ve McGEE, J.E.; (1999), “Linging Corporate Entrepreneurship to Strategy, Structure and Process: Suggested Research Direction”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), ss. 85-102.
  • DRUCKER, P. F.; (1984), “Our Entrepreneurial Economy”, Harvard Business Review, 62 (2), ss. 59-64.
  • FRIEDMAN, J. P., (1994), Dictionary of Business Terms, Second Edition, Barron’s, New York.
  • GUTH, W. D. ve GINSBERG, A.; (1990), “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Strategic Management Journal, 11 (5), ss. 5-15.
  • GÜROL, M. A.; (2000), Türkiye’de Kadın Girişimci ve Küçük İşletmesi: Fırsatlar, Sorunlar, Beklentiler ve Öneriler, Atılım Üniversitesi Ya- yını–2, Ankara.
  • HISRICH, R. D. ve PETERS, M. P.; (2002), Entrepreneurship, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
  • HORNSBY, J.S., KURATKO, D.F. ve ZAHRA, S.A.; (2002), “Middle Managers’ Perception of The Internal Environment For Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing A Measurement Scale”, Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (3), ss. 253-273.
  • HOSTAGER, T.J.; NEİL, T.C., DECKER, R.L., ve LORENTZ, R.D.; (1998), “Seeing Environmental Opportunities: Effects of Intrapreneurial Ability, Efficacy, Motivation and Desirability”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11 (1), ss. 11-25
  • HUFF, J. O.; HUFF, A.S., ve THOMAS, H.; (1992), “Strategic Renewal and The Interaction of Cumulative Stress and Inertia”, Strategic Management Journal, 13, ss. 55-75
  • JENNINGS, D.F., ve LUMPKIN, J.R.; (1989), “Functioning Modeling Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Integrative Analysis”, Journal of Management,15 (3), ss. 485-502.
  • JONES, G.R., ve BUTLER, J.E.; (1992), “Managing Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Agency Theory Perspective”, Journal of Management,18 (4), ss. 733-749.
  • KNIGHT, G.; (1997), “Cross-Cultural Reliability and Validiryof A Scale To Measure Firm Entrepreneurial Orientation”, Journal of Business Venturing, 12 (3), ss. 213-225
  • KOÇEL, T.; (1995), İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Yayınları, 5. Baskı, İstanbul.
  • KURATKO, D. F., ve HODGETTS, R. M.; (2001), Entrepreneurship: A Contemporary Approach, South-Western Thonson Learning, Mason, Ohio.
  • KURATKO, D.F.; MONTAGNO, R.V., ve HORNSBY, J.S.; (1990), “Developing An Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment”, Strategic Management Journal,. 11 (5), ss. 49-58.
  • KURATKO, D.F.; HORNSBY, J.S.; NAFFZİGER, D.W., ve MONTAGNO, R.V.; (1993), “Implement Entrepreneurial Thinking in Established Organizations”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 58 (1), ss. 28- 39.
  • KURATKO, D. F. ve WELSCH, H. P.; (1994), Entrepreneurial Strategy Text and Cases, The Dryden Press, Fort Worth, TX.
  • KURATKO, F.K.; HORNSBY, J.S., ve SABATİNE, F.J.; (1999), The Breakthrough Entrepreneurship, Midwest Entrepreneurial Education Center, College of Business Ball State University. A Guide to Corporate
  • LUCHSINGER, V., ve BAGBY, D.R.; (1987), “Entrepreneurship and Intrapreneurship: Behaviors, Comparisons, and Contrasts”, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 52 (3), ss. 10-13.
  • LUMPKIN, G.T., ve DESS, G.G.; (1996), “Clarifying The Entrepreneurial Orientation Cunstruct and Linking It To Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 21 (1), ss. 135-172.
  • LUMPKIN, G.T., ve DESS, G.G.; (2001), “Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle”, Journal of Business Venturing, 16 (5), ss. 429-451.
  • MacMILLAN, I.C., ve GEORGE, R.; (1985), “Corporate Venturing: Challengess for Senior Manager”, Journal of Business Strategy, 5 (3), ss. 34-43.
  • McKINNEY, G., ve McKINNEY, M.; (1989), “Forget The Corporate Umbrella- Entrepreneurs Shine in The Rain”, Sloan Management Review, 30 (4), ss. 77-82.
  • MILES, M.P., ve COVIN, J.G.; (2002), “Exploring The Practice of Corporate Venturing: Some Commen Forms and Their Organizational Implications”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (3), ss. 21- 40.
  • MILLER, D., ve FRIESEN, P.H.; (1983), “Strategy-Making and Environment: The Third Link”, Strategic Management Journal, 4 (3), ss. 221-235.
  • MORRIS, M. H. ve KURATKO, D. F.; (2002), Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development within Organizations, Harcourt College Publishers, Orlando, Florida
  • NAKTİYOK, A.; (2004), İç Girişimcilik, Beta Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • PEARCE, J.W.,ve CARLAND, J.W.; (1996), “Intrapreneurship and Innovation In Manufacturing Firms:An Empirical Study of Performance Implications”, Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 1 (2), ss. 87- 96.
  • PINCHOT, G.; (1985), Intrapreneuring, Harper and Row, New York.
  • PINNINGTON, A., ve HASLOP, D.; (1995), “Team Leader Autonomy In New Product Development”,Management Decision, 33 (9), ss. 5-11.
  • PITT, L. F.; EWING, M.T. ve BERTHON, P.R.; (2002), “Proactive Behavior and Industrial Salesforce Performance”, Industrial Marketing Management, 31 (8), ss. 639-644.
  • RAELIN, J.A.; (1989), An Anotomy of Autonomy: Managing Professionals, The Academy of Management Executive, III (3), 216-228. ROSS, J., (1987), “Corporations and Entrepreneurs: Paradox and Opportunity”, Business Horizons, 30 (4), ss. 76-80.
  • RULE, E.G., ve IRWIN, D.W.; (1988), “Fostering Intrapreneurship: The New Competitive Edge”, The Journal of Business Strategy, 9 (3), ss. 44- 47.
  • RUSSELL, R.D. ve RUSSELL, C.J.; (1992), “An Examination of The Effects of Organizational Norms, Organizational Structure, and Environmental Uncertainity on Entrepreneurial Strategy”, Journal of Management, 18 (4), ss. 639-656.
  • SCHOLLHAMMER, H.; (1982), “Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, ss. 209-229.
  • SHARMA, S., ve CHRISMAN, J.J.; (1999), “Toward A Reconciliation of The Definitional Issues in The Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (3), ss. 11-27.
  • STEVENSON, H.H., ve JARILLO, J.C.; (1990), “A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship:Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 11(7), ss. 17-27. Management”, Strategic
  • STOPFORD, J.M., ve BADEN-FULLER, C.W.F.; (1994), “Creating Corporate Entrepreneurship”, Strategic Management Journal, 15 (7), ss. 521- 536.
  • VESPER, K.H.; (1984), Three Faces of Corporate Entrepreneurship, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
  • VOLBERDA, H.W.; BADEN-FULLER, C., ve van den Bosch, F. A.j.; (2001), “Mastering Stragegic Renewal: Mobilising Renewal Journeys in Multiunit Firms”, Long Range Planning, 34, ss. 159-178.
  • WIKLUND, J., ve SHEPHERD, D.; (2005), “Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach, Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (1), ss. 71-91.
  • WILKINSON, I.F.; MATTSSON, L-G, ve EASTON, G.; (2000), “International Competitiveness and Trade Promotion Policy from a Network Perspective,” Journal of World Business, 35 (3), ss. 275-290.
  • ZAHRA, S.A; (1991), “Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Business Venturuing, 6 (4), ss. 259-285.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; (1993a), “Environment, Corporate Entrepreneurship, and Financial Performance: A Taxonomic Approach”, Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (4), ss. 319-340.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; (1993b), “New Product Innovation in Established Companies: Associations with Industry and Strategy Variables”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18 (2), ss. 47-67.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; (1993c), “A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior: A Critique and Extension”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17 (4), ss. 5-21.
  • ZAHRA, S.A., ve PEARCE, J.A.; (1994), “Corporate Entrepreneurship in Smaller Firms: The Role of Environment, Strategy and Organization,” Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change, 3 (1), ss. 31-44.
  • ZAHRA, S. A.; (1995), “Corporate Entrepreneurship and Financial Performance: The Case of Management Leveraged Buyouts”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (3), ss. 225-247.
  • ZAHRA, S.A. ve COVIN, J.G.; (1995), “Contextual Influences on The Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis”, Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (1), ss. 43-58.
  • ZAHRA, S.A., ve GARVIS, D.M.; (2000), “International Corporate Entrepreneurship and Firm Performance: The Moderating Effect of International Environmental Hostility”, Journal of Business Venturing.15 (5-6), ss. 469-492.
  • ZAHRA, S.A.; NEUBAUM, D.O., ve HUSE, M.; (2000), “Entrepreneurship in Mesium-Size Companies: Exploring The Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems”, Journal of Management, 26 (5), ss. 947-976.
  • Zajac, E.J.; GOLDEN, B.R., ve SHORTELL, S.M.; (1991), “New
  • Organizational Forms For Enhancing Innovation: The Case of Internal
  • Corporate Joint Ventures”, Management Science, 37 (2), ss. 170-184
There are 70 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Yrd.doç. Dr. Veysel Ağca Yrd.doç.dr.must Kurt This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2007
Published in Issue Year 2007 Issue: 29

Cite

APA Kurt, Y. D. V. A. Y. (2007). İç Girişimcilik ve Temel Belirleyicileri: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(29).

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.