PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Cite

Year 2008, Volume 0, Issue 31, 199 - 223, 11.05.2015

Abstract

References

  • ANDRIOF, Jörg; (2002), Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement, Warwick Business School, S. Waddock: Boston College Carroll School of Management Greenleaf Publishing, Boston, 32s.
  • BARNEY, Jay; (1997), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Addison- Wesley Reading, MA, 314s.
  • BERMAN Shawn.; Andrew WICKS ve Thomas M. JONES; (1999) “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between stakeholder Management models and firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 488-506.
  • BRADLEY, Mitchell; Mitchell RONALD ve Jeffrey SONNENFELD; (1999) “Who Matters To CEO’s? An Investigation Of Stakeholder Attributes And Salience, Corporate Performance And CEO Values”, Academy Of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 507-525.
  • CLARKSON, Max B. E.; (1995) “A Stakeholder Framework for Analizing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance” Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 92-117.
  • CLEMENT, Ronald; (2005) “The Lessons From Stakeholder Theory For U.S. Business Leaders” İnternet adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science_ ob, Erişim tarihi: 11.05.2006
  • DONALDSON, Thomas; (1999), “Making Stakeholder Theory Whole”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 237-241.
  • DONALDSON, Thomas ve Lee. E. PRESTON; (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 65-91.
  • DRISCOLL, Cathy ve Mark STARIK; (2004), “The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing The Conceptual Consideration Of Stakeholder Status For The Natural Environment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), ss. 55– 73.
  • FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1999), “Divergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 233-236.
  • FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1984), “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach”, Pitman, Boston, 276s.
  • FROOMAN, Jeff; (1999), “Stakeholder Influence Strategies”, Academy Of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 191-204.
  • GARRIGA, Elisabet ve Mele DOME`NEC; (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory” Journal of Business Ethics, 53 ss. 51–71.
  • GOODPASTER, Kenneth E.; (1991), “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis” Business ethics quarterly, 1(1), ss. 53-73.
  • HILL, C.W.L. ve Thomas M. JONES; (1992), “Stakeholder-Agency Theory” Journal of Management Studies, 29, ss. 131-154.
  • JONES, Thomas M.; (1995), “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis Of Ethics And Economics” Academy Of Management Review, 20(2), ss. 404-437.
  • JONES, Thomas M. ve Andrew C. WICKS; (1999), “Convergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss.206–221.
  • JONKER, Jan ve David FOSTER; (2002), “ Stakeholder Excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), ss.187-195.
  • JOYCE, van der Laan Smith; Adhikari AJAY ve H. Tondkar RASOUL; (2005), “Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective” İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect .com, Erişim tarihi: 02.02.2006.
  • LORN, R. Sheehan ve Brent R. RICHE, “Destination Stakeholders Exploring Identity and Salience”, İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com, Erişim tarihi: 25.03.2006.
  • MITCHELL, Ronald. K.; Bradley R. AGLE ve Donna J. WOOD; (1997), “Toward A Theory Of Identification And Salience: Defining The Principle Of Who And What Really Counts”, Academy Of Management Review, 22(4), ss.853-886
  • MORI, Key; (2000), “Goodwill Hunting-The Importance of Stakeholder Relationships to Business Success” Audience Research Programme; İnternet Adresi: http://www.mori.com/polls/1999/keyaud.shtml, Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2006
  • PEKKOLA, Juhani ve Kimmo PEKKOLA; (2001), “Theoretical essence of business ethics Classification of approaches, cultural and business environmental impacts on ethics” İnternet adresi: http:/www.unext.fi, Erişim tarihi: 19.06.2006.
  • POLONSKY, Michael Jay; (1995) “Incorporating The Natural Environment İn Corporate Strategy: A Stakeholder Approach”, İnternet adresi: http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj02/polon01.html, Erişim tarihi: 21.04.2006
  • GRANT Savage; Timothy W. NIX, Carlton J. WHİTEHEAD ve John D. BLAIR; (1991), "Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders" Academy of Management Executive, (5)2, ss.51-75
  • SCHOLL, Hans J. Jochen; (2004), “Applying Stakeholder Theory to E- Government: Benefits and Limits”, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 262(1-10) İnternet adresi: http://www.sciencedirect. com Erişim tarihi: 14.11.2006
  • WATKINS, Miles, (1997), “Maximising Environmental Management Capacity Through Stakeholder Participation” Warwick Business School İnternet adresi: http://users.wbs.warwick.ac.uk/CCU Erişim tari- hi: 11.02.2006
  • WHYSALL, Paul; (2000), “Addressing Ethical İssues in Retailing: A Stakeholder Perspective” Int. Rev. of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3), July, ss. 305–31
  • YAMAK Sibel ve Ömür SÜER; (2005) “State As A Stakeholder” Emerald Publishing, 5(2), ss. 111-120.

-

Year 2008, Volume 0, Issue 31, 199 - 223, 11.05.2015

Abstract

-

References

  • ANDRIOF, Jörg; (2002), Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement, Warwick Business School, S. Waddock: Boston College Carroll School of Management Greenleaf Publishing, Boston, 32s.
  • BARNEY, Jay; (1997), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Addison- Wesley Reading, MA, 314s.
  • BERMAN Shawn.; Andrew WICKS ve Thomas M. JONES; (1999) “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between stakeholder Management models and firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 488-506.
  • BRADLEY, Mitchell; Mitchell RONALD ve Jeffrey SONNENFELD; (1999) “Who Matters To CEO’s? An Investigation Of Stakeholder Attributes And Salience, Corporate Performance And CEO Values”, Academy Of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 507-525.
  • CLARKSON, Max B. E.; (1995) “A Stakeholder Framework for Analizing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance” Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 92-117.
  • CLEMENT, Ronald; (2005) “The Lessons From Stakeholder Theory For U.S. Business Leaders” İnternet adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science_ ob, Erişim tarihi: 11.05.2006
  • DONALDSON, Thomas; (1999), “Making Stakeholder Theory Whole”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 237-241.
  • DONALDSON, Thomas ve Lee. E. PRESTON; (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 65-91.
  • DRISCOLL, Cathy ve Mark STARIK; (2004), “The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing The Conceptual Consideration Of Stakeholder Status For The Natural Environment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), ss. 55– 73.
  • FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1999), “Divergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 233-236.
  • FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1984), “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach”, Pitman, Boston, 276s.
  • FROOMAN, Jeff; (1999), “Stakeholder Influence Strategies”, Academy Of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 191-204.
  • GARRIGA, Elisabet ve Mele DOME`NEC; (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory” Journal of Business Ethics, 53 ss. 51–71.
  • GOODPASTER, Kenneth E.; (1991), “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis” Business ethics quarterly, 1(1), ss. 53-73.
  • HILL, C.W.L. ve Thomas M. JONES; (1992), “Stakeholder-Agency Theory” Journal of Management Studies, 29, ss. 131-154.
  • JONES, Thomas M.; (1995), “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis Of Ethics And Economics” Academy Of Management Review, 20(2), ss. 404-437.
  • JONES, Thomas M. ve Andrew C. WICKS; (1999), “Convergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss.206–221.
  • JONKER, Jan ve David FOSTER; (2002), “ Stakeholder Excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), ss.187-195.
  • JOYCE, van der Laan Smith; Adhikari AJAY ve H. Tondkar RASOUL; (2005), “Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective” İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect .com, Erişim tarihi: 02.02.2006.
  • LORN, R. Sheehan ve Brent R. RICHE, “Destination Stakeholders Exploring Identity and Salience”, İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com, Erişim tarihi: 25.03.2006.
  • MITCHELL, Ronald. K.; Bradley R. AGLE ve Donna J. WOOD; (1997), “Toward A Theory Of Identification And Salience: Defining The Principle Of Who And What Really Counts”, Academy Of Management Review, 22(4), ss.853-886
  • MORI, Key; (2000), “Goodwill Hunting-The Importance of Stakeholder Relationships to Business Success” Audience Research Programme; İnternet Adresi: http://www.mori.com/polls/1999/keyaud.shtml, Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2006
  • PEKKOLA, Juhani ve Kimmo PEKKOLA; (2001), “Theoretical essence of business ethics Classification of approaches, cultural and business environmental impacts on ethics” İnternet adresi: http:/www.unext.fi, Erişim tarihi: 19.06.2006.
  • POLONSKY, Michael Jay; (1995) “Incorporating The Natural Environment İn Corporate Strategy: A Stakeholder Approach”, İnternet adresi: http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj02/polon01.html, Erişim tarihi: 21.04.2006
  • GRANT Savage; Timothy W. NIX, Carlton J. WHİTEHEAD ve John D. BLAIR; (1991), "Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders" Academy of Management Executive, (5)2, ss.51-75
  • SCHOLL, Hans J. Jochen; (2004), “Applying Stakeholder Theory to E- Government: Benefits and Limits”, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 262(1-10) İnternet adresi: http://www.sciencedirect. com Erişim tarihi: 14.11.2006
  • WATKINS, Miles, (1997), “Maximising Environmental Management Capacity Through Stakeholder Participation” Warwick Business School İnternet adresi: http://users.wbs.warwick.ac.uk/CCU Erişim tari- hi: 11.02.2006
  • WHYSALL, Paul; (2000), “Addressing Ethical İssues in Retailing: A Stakeholder Perspective” Int. Rev. of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3), July, ss. 305–31
  • YAMAK Sibel ve Ömür SÜER; (2005) “State As A Stakeholder” Emerald Publishing, 5(2), ss. 111-120.

PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ

Year 2008, Volume 0, Issue 31, 199 - 223, 11.05.2015

Abstract

Paydaş yönetimi ‘İş ve Toplum’ alanında ortaya konulan en önemli yaklaşımlardan biridir. Pazarlama, kurumsal finans ve stratejik yönetim gibi çeşitli alanlarda gerçekleştirilen pek çok çalışmanın hareket noktası olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada ise stratejik yönetim anlayışından hareketle işletme performansının paydaşların tatmin boyutu ile ölçülebileceği ve teorisyenlerin paydaş yönetiminin başarı yolunda hem bir amaç hem de bir araç olduğu konusundaki görüşleri irdelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda teorinin gelişimi, işletmeler için öncelikli paydaş sınıflandırmaları ve bu paydaşların işletme ile ilişkileri boyutunda çeşitli stratejiler ele alınmakta, kurulan ilişkinin kalitesi doğrultusunda da hem işletme hem de paydaşlar açısından karşılıklı değerdeki artışa yönelik önermeler konu edilmektedir.

References

  • ANDRIOF, Jörg; (2002), Unfolding Stakeholder Engagement, Warwick Business School, S. Waddock: Boston College Carroll School of Management Greenleaf Publishing, Boston, 32s.
  • BARNEY, Jay; (1997), Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, Addison- Wesley Reading, MA, 314s.
  • BERMAN Shawn.; Andrew WICKS ve Thomas M. JONES; (1999) “Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship between stakeholder Management models and firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 488-506.
  • BRADLEY, Mitchell; Mitchell RONALD ve Jeffrey SONNENFELD; (1999) “Who Matters To CEO’s? An Investigation Of Stakeholder Attributes And Salience, Corporate Performance And CEO Values”, Academy Of Management Journal, 42(5), ss. 507-525.
  • CLARKSON, Max B. E.; (1995) “A Stakeholder Framework for Analizing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance” Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 92-117.
  • CLEMENT, Ronald; (2005) “The Lessons From Stakeholder Theory For U.S. Business Leaders” İnternet adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science_ ob, Erişim tarihi: 11.05.2006
  • DONALDSON, Thomas; (1999), “Making Stakeholder Theory Whole”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 237-241.
  • DONALDSON, Thomas ve Lee. E. PRESTON; (1995), “The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications”, Academy of Management Review, 20(1), ss. 65-91.
  • DRISCOLL, Cathy ve Mark STARIK; (2004), “The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing The Conceptual Consideration Of Stakeholder Status For The Natural Environment”, Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), ss. 55– 73.
  • FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1999), “Divergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 233-236.
  • FREEMAN, R. Edward; (1984), “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach”, Pitman, Boston, 276s.
  • FROOMAN, Jeff; (1999), “Stakeholder Influence Strategies”, Academy Of Management Review, 24(2), ss. 191-204.
  • GARRIGA, Elisabet ve Mele DOME`NEC; (2004), “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory” Journal of Business Ethics, 53 ss. 51–71.
  • GOODPASTER, Kenneth E.; (1991), “Business Ethics and Stakeholder Analysis” Business ethics quarterly, 1(1), ss. 53-73.
  • HILL, C.W.L. ve Thomas M. JONES; (1992), “Stakeholder-Agency Theory” Journal of Management Studies, 29, ss. 131-154.
  • JONES, Thomas M.; (1995), “Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis Of Ethics And Economics” Academy Of Management Review, 20(2), ss. 404-437.
  • JONES, Thomas M. ve Andrew C. WICKS; (1999), “Convergent Stakeholder Theory”, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), ss.206–221.
  • JONKER, Jan ve David FOSTER; (2002), “ Stakeholder Excellence? Framing the evolution and complexity of a stakeholder perspective of the firm” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), ss.187-195.
  • JOYCE, van der Laan Smith; Adhikari AJAY ve H. Tondkar RASOUL; (2005), “Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective” İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect .com, Erişim tarihi: 02.02.2006.
  • LORN, R. Sheehan ve Brent R. RICHE, “Destination Stakeholders Exploring Identity and Salience”, İnternet Adresi; http://www.sciencedirect.com, Erişim tarihi: 25.03.2006.
  • MITCHELL, Ronald. K.; Bradley R. AGLE ve Donna J. WOOD; (1997), “Toward A Theory Of Identification And Salience: Defining The Principle Of Who And What Really Counts”, Academy Of Management Review, 22(4), ss.853-886
  • MORI, Key; (2000), “Goodwill Hunting-The Importance of Stakeholder Relationships to Business Success” Audience Research Programme; İnternet Adresi: http://www.mori.com/polls/1999/keyaud.shtml, Erişim tarihi: 15.01.2006
  • PEKKOLA, Juhani ve Kimmo PEKKOLA; (2001), “Theoretical essence of business ethics Classification of approaches, cultural and business environmental impacts on ethics” İnternet adresi: http:/www.unext.fi, Erişim tarihi: 19.06.2006.
  • POLONSKY, Michael Jay; (1995) “Incorporating The Natural Environment İn Corporate Strategy: A Stakeholder Approach”, İnternet adresi: http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/egj02/polon01.html, Erişim tarihi: 21.04.2006
  • GRANT Savage; Timothy W. NIX, Carlton J. WHİTEHEAD ve John D. BLAIR; (1991), "Strategies for Assessing and Managing Organizational Stakeholders" Academy of Management Executive, (5)2, ss.51-75
  • SCHOLL, Hans J. Jochen; (2004), “Applying Stakeholder Theory to E- Government: Benefits and Limits”, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 262(1-10) İnternet adresi: http://www.sciencedirect. com Erişim tarihi: 14.11.2006
  • WATKINS, Miles, (1997), “Maximising Environmental Management Capacity Through Stakeholder Participation” Warwick Business School İnternet adresi: http://users.wbs.warwick.ac.uk/CCU Erişim tari- hi: 11.02.2006
  • WHYSALL, Paul; (2000), “Addressing Ethical İssues in Retailing: A Stakeholder Perspective” Int. Rev. of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 10(3), July, ss. 305–31
  • YAMAK Sibel ve Ömür SÜER; (2005) “State As A Stakeholder” Emerald Publishing, 5(2), ss. 111-120.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Fatmanur ERTUĞRUL This is me

Publication Date May 11, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2008, Volume 0, Issue 31

Cite

Bibtex @ { erciyesiibd77885, journal = {Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1301-3688}, eissn = {2630-6409}, address = {}, publisher = {Erciyes University}, year = {2015}, volume = {0}, pages = {199 - 223}, doi = {}, title = {PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ}, key = {cite}, author = {Ertuğrul, Fatmanur} }
APA Ertuğrul, F. (2015). PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ . Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi , 0 (31) , 199-223 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erciyesiibd/issue/5888/77885
MLA Ertuğrul, F. "PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ" . Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 0 (2015 ): 199-223 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/erciyesiibd/issue/5888/77885>
Chicago Ertuğrul, F. "PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ". Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 0 (2015 ): 199-223
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ AU - Fatmanur Ertuğrul Y1 - 2015 PY - 2015 N1 - DO - T2 - Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 199 EP - 223 VL - 0 IS - 31 SN - 1301-3688-2630-6409 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Erciyes University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ %A Fatmanur Ertuğrul %T PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ %D 2015 %J Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1301-3688-2630-6409 %V 0 %N 31 %R %U
ISNAD Ertuğrul, Fatmanur . "PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ". Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 0 / 31 (May 2015): 199-223 .
AMA Ertuğrul F. PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 0(31): 199-223.
Vancouver Ertuğrul F. PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015; 0(31): 199-223.
IEEE F. Ertuğrul , "PAYDAŞ TEORİSİ VE İŞLETMELERİN PAYDAŞLARI İLE İLİŞKİLERİNİN YÖNETİMİ", Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 0, no. 31, pp. 199-223, May. 2015

google-scholar.jpgTR_Dizin_logo_live-e1586763957746.pngopen-access-logo-1024x416.pngdownload.jpgqMV-nsBH.pngDRJI-500x190.jpgsobiad_2_0.pnglogo.pnglogo.png  arastirmax_logo.gif17442EBSCOhost_Flat.png?itok=f5l7Nsj83734-logo-erih-plus.jpgproquest-300x114.jpg

ERÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 2021 | iibfdergi@erciyes.edu.tr

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır. 

 88x31.png