BibTex RIS Cite

ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIĞIN SAĞLANMASINDA PERSONEL GÜÇLENDİRME VE PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN ETKİSİNE İLİŞKİN BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2009, Issue: 32, 47 - 80, 14.05.2015

Selen Doğan Özge Demiral

Abstract

Sürekli değişimin yaşandığı ve yeniliklerin ortaya çıktığı rekabet çağında, örgütlerin önceden belirlenen hedeflere ulaşabilmeleri ve başarılı sonuçlar elde edebilmelerinin temel koşulu, çalışanların işleriyle ve örgütle bütünleşmelerinin, başka bir deyişle örgütsel bağlılığın sağlanmasıdır. Son zamanlarda iş yaşamında çalışan memnuniyetinin ve bağlılığının sağlanması, örgütlerin karşı karşıya kaldığı en önemli sorunlardan biri olmuş ve pek çok araştırmacı tarafından bu soruna ilişkin farklı çözüm yolları üretilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı da, örgütsel bağlılığın sağlanmasında, personel güçlendirme ve psikolojik sözleşmenin ne derece etkili olduğunu ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmada öncelikle personel güçlendirme, psikolojik sözleşme ve örgütsel bağlılık kavramları açıklanmaya çalışılmış daha sonra ise üniversitelerde görev yapan akademik personeli kapsayan, ankete dayalı bir araştırmaya yer verilmiştir. 

Keywords

Personel Güçlendirme Psikolojik Sözleşme Örgütsel Bağlılık Akademik Personel Akademik Personelin Örgütsel Bağlılığı.

References

  • ALLEN, Natalie J. ve John P. MEYER; (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, ss.1-18.
  • ATAMAN, Göksel; (2001), İşletme Yönetimi Temel Kavramlar ve Yeni Yaklaşımlar, Türkmen Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • BALAY, Refik; (2000), Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • BAŞYİĞİT, Aslıhan; (2006), Örgütsel İletişimin Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kütahya.
  • BOYLU, Yasin; Elbeyi PELİT ve Evren GÜÇER; (2007), “Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, Eylül, 44(511), ss.55-74.
  • BURANAPIN, Siriwut; (2007), Psychological Contract Alignment and Career Effectiveness under a Radical Organizational Change: A Case of Chiang Mai University, School of Management, Boston University.
  • CARROLL, Anna; (1994), “What’s behind “E” Word: Myths about Empowerment and Why You Need It?”, Interaction Design, ss.1-18.
  • CARSON, Kerry D. ve Arthur G. BEDEIAN (1994), “Career Commitment: Construction of a Measure and Examination of Its Psychometric Properties”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, ss.237-262.
  • CEYLAN, Adnan ve Nigar DEMİRCAN; (2002), “Çalışanların Örgüte Bağlılığı ile İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkilere Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), ss.1-13.
  • CHAN, Sow Hup; (2006), “Organizational Identification and Commitment of Members of a Human Development Organization”, Journal of Management Development, 25(3), ss.249-268.
  • COOK, John ve Toby WALL; (1980), “New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-fulfillment”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, ss.39-52.
  • COŞKUN, Recai; (2002), “Gücün ve Sorumluluğun Organizasyona Yayılması: Çalışanı Güçlendirme (Empowerment)”, İsmail DALAY, Recai COŞKUN ve Remzi ALTUNIŞIK (Ed.), Stratejik Boyutuyla Modern Yönetim Yaklaşımları, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, Bölüm 12, ss.219-234.
  • ÇEKMECELİOĞLU, Hülya G.; (2006), “İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Un- surlarının Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkileri”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans İnceleme-Araştırma Dergisi, 2, ss.120-131.
  • ÇETİN, Münevver Ö.; (2004), Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütsel Bağlılık, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • ÇUHADAR, M. Turan; (2005), “Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Personel Güçlendir- me: Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Temmuz-Aralık, 25, ss.1-21.
  • DEMİRCAN, Nigar; Ercan ERGÜN ve Güner ÇÖL; (2004), “Üniversite Perso- nelinin Kendilerini Güçlü Hissetme Algılarının Örgüte Bağlılık Üze- rindeki Etkisi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), ss.1-22.
  • DOĞAN, Selen; (2006), Personel Güçlendirme, Kare Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İs- tanbul.
  • DURNA, Ufuk ve Veysel EREN; (2005), “Üç Bağlılık Unsuru Ekseninde Ör- gütsel Bağlılık”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), ss.210-219.
  • ERDOĞMUŞ, Nihat; (1999), “Kamu Yöneticilerinin Yeni Yönetim Yaklaşım- larına Yönelik Tutumlarının Davranışsal Analizi”, Kamu Yönetimin- de Kalite 2. Ulusal Kongresi, TODAİE Yayınları, No: 296, Ankara, 22-23 Ekim.
  • ERSTAD, Margaret; (1997), “Empowerment and Organizational Change”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 9(73), ss.325-333.
  • GRIMMER, Martin ve Matthew ODDY; (2007), “Violation of the Psychological Contract: The Mediating Effect of Relational Versus Transactional Beliefs”, Australian Journal of Management, 32(1), ss.153-174.
  • GUEST, David E.; (1998), “Is the Pschological Contract Worth Taking Seriously?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, ss.649-654.
  • GUPTA, Kripa S.; (2007), “Empowerment: A Comparative Study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, October, 6(4), ss.37-52.
  • GÜL, Hasan; (2002), “Örgütsel Bağlılık Yaklaşımlarının Mukayesesi ve Değer- lendirilmesi”, Ege Üniversitesi Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 2(1), ss.37- 55.
  • İBİCİOĞLU, Hasan; (2000), “Örgütsel Bağlılıkta Paradigmatik Uyumun Yeri”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 15(1), ss.13-22.
  • JANSSEN, Onne; (2004), “The Barrier Effect of Conflict with Superiors in the Relationship between Employee Empowerment and Organizational Commitment”, Work & Stres, 18(1), ss.56-65.
  • JENKINS, David; (1996), Managing Empowerment, Century Business, United Kingdom.
  • KAYA, Nihat ve Seçil SELÇUK; (2007), “Bireysel Başarı Güdüsü Organizasyonel Bağlılığı Nasıl Etkiler?”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 8(2), ss.175-190.
  • KESER, Aşkın; (2002), “Çalışma İlişkilerinde Farklı Bir Yaklaşım: Psikolojik Akit”, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Öneri Der- gisi, 5(17), ss. 9-13.
  • KIM, Sang-Wook; (1999), “Behavioral Commitment among the Automobile Workers in South Korea”, Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), ss.419-451.
  • LEVINSON, William A.; (2004), “Empower Your Employees”, Industrial Engineer, December, 36(12), s.28.
  • MEYER, John P. ve Natalie J. ALLEN; (1991), “A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, Human Resource Management Review,1(1), ss.61-89.
  • MORRISON, Elizabeth W. ve Sandra L. ROBINSON; (1997), “When Employees Feel Betrayed: A Model of How Psychological Contract Violation Develops”, Academy of Management Review, 22(1), ss.226-256.
  • NAMASIVAYAM, Karthik ve Xinyuan ZHAO; (2007), “An Investigating of the Moderating Effects of Organizational Commitment on the Relationships between Work-Family Conflict and Job Satisfaction among Hospitality Employees in India”, Tourism Management, 28(5), ss.1212-1223.
  • NG, Thomas W. H.; Marcus M. BUTTS, Robert J. VANDENBERG, David M. DeJOY ve Mark G. WILSON; (2006), “Effects of Management Communication, Opportunity for Learning and Work Schedule Flexibility on Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), ss.474-489.
  • OBENG, Kofi ve Isaiah UGBORO; (2003), “Organizational Commitment among Public Transit Employees: An Assessment Study”, Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 57(2), ss.83-98.
  • ÖZGEN, Hüseyin ve Murat TÜRK; (1997), “Hizmet Sektöründe Rekabette Başarının Anahtarı: Personel Güçlendirme(Empowerment)”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 30(4), ss.75-86.
  • PAUL, Robert J.; Brian NIEHOFF ve William H. TURNLEY; (2000), “Empowerment, Expectations and the Psychological Contract- Managing the Dilemmas and Gaining the Advantages”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(5), ss.471-485.
  • PIERCE, Jon L. ve Randall B. DUNHAM; (1987), “Organizational Commitment: Experiences”, Journal of Management, 13(1), ss.163-178. Propensity and Initial Work
  • RANDOLPH, W. Alan; (2000), “Re-thinking Empowerment: Why Is It So Hard To Achieve?”, Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), ss. 94-107.
  • REDMAN, Tom ve Ed SNAPE; (2005), “Unpacking Commitment: Multiple Loyalties and Employee Behaviour”, Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), ss. 301-328.
  • REICHERS, Arnon E.; (1985), “A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, Academy of Management, 10(3), ss.465-476.
  • ROBINSON, Sandra L.; (1996), “Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, ss.574-599.
  • ROBINSON, Sandra L. ve Denise M. ROUSSEAU; (1994), “Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception but the Norm”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, ss.245-259.
  • ROBINSON, Sandra L. ve Elizabeth W. MORRISON; (2000), “The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), ss.525-546.
  • ROUSSEAU, Denise M.; (1990), “New Hire Perception of Their Own and Their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, ss.389-400.
  • ROUSSEAU, Denise M. ve Snehal A. TIJORIWALA; (1998), “Assessing Psychological Contracts: Issues, Alternatives and Measures”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, ss.679-695.
  • SALANCIK, Gerald R.; (1977), “Commitment is Too Easy”, Organizational Dynamics, 6(1), ss.62-80.
  • SCHERMERHORN, John R.; (1995), Basic Organizational Behaviour, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • SIGLER, Tracey H. ve Christine M. PEARSON; (2000), “Creating an Empowering Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), ss.27-52. the Relationship between
  • SPREITZER, Gretchen M.; (1995), “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace Dimensions, Measurement and Validation”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), ss.1442-1465.
  • SPREITZER, Gretchen M.; Mark A. KIZILOS ve Stephen W. NASON; (1997), “A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness, Satisfaction and Strain”, Journal of Management, September-October.
  • TELLEFSEN, Thomas ve Gloria P. THOMAS; (2005), “The Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational and Personal Commitment in Business Service Relationships”, Industrial Marketing Management, 34(1), ss.23-37.
  • TÜZ, Melek V. ve Füsun Ç. ALTINTAŞ; (2001), “Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlalleri ve Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlallerinin İşgören Davranışlarına Olan Etkisi- ni Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, 9. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organi- zasyon Kongresi, 24-26 Mayıs, ss.717-731.
  • UGBORO, Isaiah O.; (2006), “Organizational Commitment, Job Redesign, Employee Empowerment and Intent to Quit among Survivors of Restructuring and Downsizing, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, April, 7(3), ss.232-257.
  • UYGUÇ, Nermin ve Dilek ÇIMRIN; (2004), “DEÜ Araştırma ve Uygulama Hastanesi Merkez laboratuarı Çalışanlarının Örgüte Bağlılıklarını ve İş- ten Ayrılma Niyetlerini Etkileyen Faktörler”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversite- si İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 19(1), ss.91-99.
  • WALKER, Arlene ve Dorothy M. HUTTON; (2006), “The Application of the Psychological Contract to Workplace Safety”, Journal of Safety Research, 37(5), ss.433-441.
  • WASTI, S. Arzu; (2002), “Affective and Continuance Commitment to the Organization: Test of an Integrated Model in the Turkish Context”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, ss.525-550.
  • WIENER, Yoash; (1982), “Commitment in Organizaitons: A Normative View”, Academy of Management Review, 7(3), ss.418-428.
  • ZEL, Uğur ve H. Nejat BASIM; (2006), “İş Tatmini Arttıkça Bağlılık Artar mı? Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İş Tatmini Kavramları, Kamu ve Özel Sektörde Çalışanların Algı Farklılıklarının Analizi”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans İnceleme-Araştırma Dergisi, 21, ss.72-80.

Year 2009, Issue: 32, 47 - 80, 14.05.2015

Selen Doğan Özge Demiral

Abstract

References

  • ALLEN, Natalie J. ve John P. MEYER; (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, ss.1-18.
  • ATAMAN, Göksel; (2001), İşletme Yönetimi Temel Kavramlar ve Yeni Yaklaşımlar, Türkmen Kitabevi, İstanbul.
  • BALAY, Refik; (2000), Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerde Örgütsel Bağlılık, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • BAŞYİĞİT, Aslıhan; (2006), Örgütsel İletişimin Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerine Etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kütahya.
  • BOYLU, Yasin; Elbeyi PELİT ve Evren GÜÇER; (2007), “Akademisyenlerin Örgütsel Bağlılık Düzeyleri Üzerine Bir Araştırma”, Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, Eylül, 44(511), ss.55-74.
  • BURANAPIN, Siriwut; (2007), Psychological Contract Alignment and Career Effectiveness under a Radical Organizational Change: A Case of Chiang Mai University, School of Management, Boston University.
  • CARROLL, Anna; (1994), “What’s behind “E” Word: Myths about Empowerment and Why You Need It?”, Interaction Design, ss.1-18.
  • CARSON, Kerry D. ve Arthur G. BEDEIAN (1994), “Career Commitment: Construction of a Measure and Examination of Its Psychometric Properties”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, ss.237-262.
  • CEYLAN, Adnan ve Nigar DEMİRCAN; (2002), “Çalışanların Örgüte Bağlılığı ile İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkilere Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), ss.1-13.
  • CHAN, Sow Hup; (2006), “Organizational Identification and Commitment of Members of a Human Development Organization”, Journal of Management Development, 25(3), ss.249-268.
  • COOK, John ve Toby WALL; (1980), “New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Non-fulfillment”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, ss.39-52.
  • COŞKUN, Recai; (2002), “Gücün ve Sorumluluğun Organizasyona Yayılması: Çalışanı Güçlendirme (Empowerment)”, İsmail DALAY, Recai COŞKUN ve Remzi ALTUNIŞIK (Ed.), Stratejik Boyutuyla Modern Yönetim Yaklaşımları, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul, Bölüm 12, ss.219-234.
  • ÇEKMECELİOĞLU, Hülya G.; (2006), “İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Un- surlarının Yaratıcılık Üzerindeki Etkileri”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans İnceleme-Araştırma Dergisi, 2, ss.120-131.
  • ÇETİN, Münevver Ö.; (2004), Örgüt Kültürü ve Örgütsel Bağlılık, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
  • ÇUHADAR, M. Turan; (2005), “Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Personel Güçlendir- me: Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Temmuz-Aralık, 25, ss.1-21.
  • DEMİRCAN, Nigar; Ercan ERGÜN ve Güner ÇÖL; (2004), “Üniversite Perso- nelinin Kendilerini Güçlü Hissetme Algılarının Örgüte Bağlılık Üze- rindeki Etkisi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), ss.1-22.
  • DOĞAN, Selen; (2006), Personel Güçlendirme, Kare Yayınları, 2. Baskı, İs- tanbul.
  • DURNA, Ufuk ve Veysel EREN; (2005), “Üç Bağlılık Unsuru Ekseninde Ör- gütsel Bağlılık”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), ss.210-219.
  • ERDOĞMUŞ, Nihat; (1999), “Kamu Yöneticilerinin Yeni Yönetim Yaklaşım- larına Yönelik Tutumlarının Davranışsal Analizi”, Kamu Yönetimin- de Kalite 2. Ulusal Kongresi, TODAİE Yayınları, No: 296, Ankara, 22-23 Ekim.
  • ERSTAD, Margaret; (1997), “Empowerment and Organizational Change”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 9(73), ss.325-333.
  • GRIMMER, Martin ve Matthew ODDY; (2007), “Violation of the Psychological Contract: The Mediating Effect of Relational Versus Transactional Beliefs”, Australian Journal of Management, 32(1), ss.153-174.
  • GUEST, David E.; (1998), “Is the Pschological Contract Worth Taking Seriously?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, ss.649-654.
  • GUPTA, Kripa S.; (2007), “Empowerment: A Comparative Study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, October, 6(4), ss.37-52.
  • GÜL, Hasan; (2002), “Örgütsel Bağlılık Yaklaşımlarının Mukayesesi ve Değer- lendirilmesi”, Ege Üniversitesi Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 2(1), ss.37- 55.
  • İBİCİOĞLU, Hasan; (2000), “Örgütsel Bağlılıkta Paradigmatik Uyumun Yeri”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 15(1), ss.13-22.
  • JANSSEN, Onne; (2004), “The Barrier Effect of Conflict with Superiors in the Relationship between Employee Empowerment and Organizational Commitment”, Work & Stres, 18(1), ss.56-65.
  • JENKINS, David; (1996), Managing Empowerment, Century Business, United Kingdom.
  • KAYA, Nihat ve Seçil SELÇUK; (2007), “Bireysel Başarı Güdüsü Organizasyonel Bağlılığı Nasıl Etkiler?”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 8(2), ss.175-190.
  • KESER, Aşkın; (2002), “Çalışma İlişkilerinde Farklı Bir Yaklaşım: Psikolojik Akit”, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Öneri Der- gisi, 5(17), ss. 9-13.
  • KIM, Sang-Wook; (1999), “Behavioral Commitment among the Automobile Workers in South Korea”, Human Resource Management Review, 9(4), ss.419-451.
  • LEVINSON, William A.; (2004), “Empower Your Employees”, Industrial Engineer, December, 36(12), s.28.
  • MEYER, John P. ve Natalie J. ALLEN; (1991), “A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, Human Resource Management Review,1(1), ss.61-89.
  • MORRISON, Elizabeth W. ve Sandra L. ROBINSON; (1997), “When Employees Feel Betrayed: A Model of How Psychological Contract Violation Develops”, Academy of Management Review, 22(1), ss.226-256.
  • NAMASIVAYAM, Karthik ve Xinyuan ZHAO; (2007), “An Investigating of the Moderating Effects of Organizational Commitment on the Relationships between Work-Family Conflict and Job Satisfaction among Hospitality Employees in India”, Tourism Management, 28(5), ss.1212-1223.
  • NG, Thomas W. H.; Marcus M. BUTTS, Robert J. VANDENBERG, David M. DeJOY ve Mark G. WILSON; (2006), “Effects of Management Communication, Opportunity for Learning and Work Schedule Flexibility on Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), ss.474-489.
  • OBENG, Kofi ve Isaiah UGBORO; (2003), “Organizational Commitment among Public Transit Employees: An Assessment Study”, Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 57(2), ss.83-98.
  • ÖZGEN, Hüseyin ve Murat TÜRK; (1997), “Hizmet Sektöründe Rekabette Başarının Anahtarı: Personel Güçlendirme(Empowerment)”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 30(4), ss.75-86.
  • PAUL, Robert J.; Brian NIEHOFF ve William H. TURNLEY; (2000), “Empowerment, Expectations and the Psychological Contract- Managing the Dilemmas and Gaining the Advantages”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 29(5), ss.471-485.
  • PIERCE, Jon L. ve Randall B. DUNHAM; (1987), “Organizational Commitment: Experiences”, Journal of Management, 13(1), ss.163-178. Propensity and Initial Work
  • RANDOLPH, W. Alan; (2000), “Re-thinking Empowerment: Why Is It So Hard To Achieve?”, Organizational Dynamics, 29(2), ss. 94-107.
  • REDMAN, Tom ve Ed SNAPE; (2005), “Unpacking Commitment: Multiple Loyalties and Employee Behaviour”, Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), ss. 301-328.
  • REICHERS, Arnon E.; (1985), “A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, Academy of Management, 10(3), ss.465-476.
  • ROBINSON, Sandra L.; (1996), “Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, ss.574-599.
  • ROBINSON, Sandra L. ve Denise M. ROUSSEAU; (1994), “Violating the Psychological Contract: Not the Exception but the Norm”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, ss.245-259.
  • ROBINSON, Sandra L. ve Elizabeth W. MORRISON; (2000), “The Development of Psychological Contract Breach and Violation: A Longitudinal Study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(5), ss.525-546.
  • ROUSSEAU, Denise M.; (1990), “New Hire Perception of Their Own and Their Employer’s Obligations: A Study of Psychological Contracts”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, ss.389-400.
  • ROUSSEAU, Denise M. ve Snehal A. TIJORIWALA; (1998), “Assessing Psychological Contracts: Issues, Alternatives and Measures”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, ss.679-695.
  • SALANCIK, Gerald R.; (1977), “Commitment is Too Easy”, Organizational Dynamics, 6(1), ss.62-80.
  • SCHERMERHORN, John R.; (1995), Basic Organizational Behaviour, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • SIGLER, Tracey H. ve Christine M. PEARSON; (2000), “Creating an Empowering Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), ss.27-52. the Relationship between
  • SPREITZER, Gretchen M.; (1995), “Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace Dimensions, Measurement and Validation”, Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), ss.1442-1465.
  • SPREITZER, Gretchen M.; Mark A. KIZILOS ve Stephen W. NASON; (1997), “A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness, Satisfaction and Strain”, Journal of Management, September-October.
  • TELLEFSEN, Thomas ve Gloria P. THOMAS; (2005), “The Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational and Personal Commitment in Business Service Relationships”, Industrial Marketing Management, 34(1), ss.23-37.
  • TÜZ, Melek V. ve Füsun Ç. ALTINTAŞ; (2001), “Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlalleri ve Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlallerinin İşgören Davranışlarına Olan Etkisi- ni Belirlemeye Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, 9. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organi- zasyon Kongresi, 24-26 Mayıs, ss.717-731.
  • UGBORO, Isaiah O.; (2006), “Organizational Commitment, Job Redesign, Employee Empowerment and Intent to Quit among Survivors of Restructuring and Downsizing, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, April, 7(3), ss.232-257.
  • UYGUÇ, Nermin ve Dilek ÇIMRIN; (2004), “DEÜ Araştırma ve Uygulama Hastanesi Merkez laboratuarı Çalışanlarının Örgüte Bağlılıklarını ve İş- ten Ayrılma Niyetlerini Etkileyen Faktörler”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversite- si İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 19(1), ss.91-99.
  • WALKER, Arlene ve Dorothy M. HUTTON; (2006), “The Application of the Psychological Contract to Workplace Safety”, Journal of Safety Research, 37(5), ss.433-441.
  • WASTI, S. Arzu; (2002), “Affective and Continuance Commitment to the Organization: Test of an Integrated Model in the Turkish Context”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26, ss.525-550.
  • WIENER, Yoash; (1982), “Commitment in Organizaitons: A Normative View”, Academy of Management Review, 7(3), ss.418-428.
  • ZEL, Uğur ve H. Nejat BASIM; (2006), “İş Tatmini Arttıkça Bağlılık Artar mı? Örgütsel Bağlılık ve İş Tatmini Kavramları, Kamu ve Özel Sektörde Çalışanların Algı Farklılıklarının Analizi”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans İnceleme-Araştırma Dergisi, 21, ss.72-80.
There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Selen Doğan This is me

Özge Demiral This is me

Publication Date May 14, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 32

Cite

APA Doğan, S., & Demiral, Ö. (2015). ÖRGÜTSEL BAĞLILIĞIN SAĞLANMASINDA PERSONEL GÜÇLENDİRME VE PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞMENİN ETKİSİNE İLİŞKİN BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(32), 47-80.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.