HİZMET SEKTÖRÜ ETKİNLİĞİNİN MAKRO DÜZEYDE İNCELENMESİ: KARADENİZ EKONOMİK İŞBİRLİĞİ TEŞKİLATI ÜYESİ ÜLKELERİN SAĞLIK SEKTÖRÜ ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ
Abstract
Bu çalışmada Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği Teşkilatı (KEİT) üyesi ülkelerin sağlık hizmeti bakımından etkinlikleri analiz edilmiştir. Etkinlik analizlerinde sıkça kullanılan doğrusal olmayan non-parametrik matematiksel bir model olarak Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA), çalışma kapsamında ülkelerin sağlık hizmeti etkinliklerini incelemek üzere uygulanmıştır. VZA Modeli tanımlanan girdiler ile çıktılar bakımından karar birimlerinin etkinliğini belirlemede kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmadaki karar değişkenleri Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği Teşkilatı üyesi ülkelerdir. Çalışmada kullanılan girdiler: Kişi başına yapılan sağlık harcaması, kişi başına düşen doktor sayısı (binde), kişi başına düşen hastane yatak sayısı (binde), çıktılar ise; nüfus ve sağlıklı beklenen yaş olarak belirlenmiştir.
Keywords
Hizmet Sektörü Sağlık Hizmeti Etkinlik Analizi Veri Zarflama Analizi Karadeniz Ekonomik İşbirliği Teşkilatı.
References
- ANDERSON G.F.; Reinhardt U., Hussey P. ve Petrosyan V.; (2003), “It’s the prices, stupid: Why the United States is so different from other countries”, Health Affairs, 22(3).
- ANELL A. ve Willis M.; (2000), “Intrenational comparision of health care system using resource profiles”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(6), ss.770-778.
- BHAT R.; (2001), “Methodology note: Data Envelopment Analiysis (DEA)”, Journal of Health Management, 3(2), ss.309-328. BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER; İnternet
- Adresi:http://unstats.un.org/unsd/
- default.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 12/06/2007.
- BLENDON, R.J.; Schonen C., Des Roches C., Osborn R. ve Zapert K.; (2003), “Common concerns amid diverse systems: Health care experince in five countries”, Health Affairs, 22(3).
- CHARNES, A.; Cooper W.W. ve Rhodes E.; (1978), "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units." European Journal of Operations Research, ss. 429-444.
- DÜNYA BANKASI; İnternet Adresi: http://devdata.worldbank.org ;. Erişim Tarihi: 15/06/2007.
- DÜNYA SAĞLIK ÖRGÜTÜ; İnternet Adresi:http://www.who.int/en/ , Erşim Tarihi: 12/06/2007.
- EVANS D.B.; Tandon A. Murray C. ve Lauer J.; (2001), “Comparative efficiency of national health systems: Cross national econometric analysis”, BMJ, 233(11), ss.307-310.
- GIOKAS D.; (2002), “The Use Of Goal Programming, Regression Analysis And Data Envelopment Analysis For Estimating Efficient Marginal Costs Of Hospitals”, Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 11, ss.261-268.
- HOFMARCHER M.M; Paterson I. ve Riedel M.; (2002), “Measuring Hospital Efficiency in Austria: A DEA approach”, Health Care Management Science, 5(1), ss.7-14.
- HOLLINGSWORTH B.; Dawson P.J. ve Maniakadis N.; (1999), “Efficiency Measurement Of Health Care: A Review Of Non-Parametric Methods And Applications”, Health Care Management Science, Vol.2, ss. 161- 172.
- KUMBHAKAR, S.C.; (2004), “Efficiency of World Health Systems” Erişim: 10/01/2006; at: http://www.economics.unsw.edu.au/RESEARCH/ SEMINAR/ Visitor/kumbhaker.pdf
- MIRMIRANI, S. ve H.C. Li; (1995), “Health care efficiency measurement: An application of Data Envelopment Analiysis”, International Review of Economics and Business, Vol. XLII, No.3
- MIRMIRANI, S.; (2005), “Health Care Delivery in OECD Countries, 1990- 2000: An Efficiency Assessment” The Business Review Cambridge, 3(2).
- ÖZDEMİR, A.İ.; (2006), “Avrasya Ülkelerinin Sağlık Hizmeti Etkinliklerinin DEA İle Analizi” Uluslar arası Küreselleşme Bağlamında Avrasya Top- lumları Konferansı, Bişkek, Kırgızistan.
- ÖZDEMİR, A.İ.; (2007), “Bağımsızlık Sonarsı BDT ve Kafkas Ülkelerinin Sağlık Hizmeti Etkinliğinin DEA ile Analizi” 2. Caucasus and Central Asie in the Globalization Proveos, Bakü, Azarbaycan, pp. 798-804.
- TANDON, A.; (2005), “Measuring Efficiency of Macro Systems: An Application to Millennium Development Goal Attainment”, Asian Development Review,.22(2), ss.108-125.
- YILDIRIM H.; (2004), “AB Sağlık Politikaları ve AB’ye Üye ve Aday Ülke Sağlık Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Teknik Verimlilik Analizi”, Ha- cettepe Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi.
Abstract
References
- ANDERSON G.F.; Reinhardt U., Hussey P. ve Petrosyan V.; (2003), “It’s the prices, stupid: Why the United States is so different from other countries”, Health Affairs, 22(3).
- ANELL A. ve Willis M.; (2000), “Intrenational comparision of health care system using resource profiles”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78(6), ss.770-778.
- BHAT R.; (2001), “Methodology note: Data Envelopment Analiysis (DEA)”, Journal of Health Management, 3(2), ss.309-328. BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER; İnternet
- Adresi:http://unstats.un.org/unsd/
- default.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 12/06/2007.
- BLENDON, R.J.; Schonen C., Des Roches C., Osborn R. ve Zapert K.; (2003), “Common concerns amid diverse systems: Health care experince in five countries”, Health Affairs, 22(3).
- CHARNES, A.; Cooper W.W. ve Rhodes E.; (1978), "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units." European Journal of Operations Research, ss. 429-444.
- DÜNYA BANKASI; İnternet Adresi: http://devdata.worldbank.org ;. Erişim Tarihi: 15/06/2007.
- DÜNYA SAĞLIK ÖRGÜTÜ; İnternet Adresi:http://www.who.int/en/ , Erşim Tarihi: 12/06/2007.
- EVANS D.B.; Tandon A. Murray C. ve Lauer J.; (2001), “Comparative efficiency of national health systems: Cross national econometric analysis”, BMJ, 233(11), ss.307-310.
- GIOKAS D.; (2002), “The Use Of Goal Programming, Regression Analysis And Data Envelopment Analysis For Estimating Efficient Marginal Costs Of Hospitals”, Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 11, ss.261-268.
- HOFMARCHER M.M; Paterson I. ve Riedel M.; (2002), “Measuring Hospital Efficiency in Austria: A DEA approach”, Health Care Management Science, 5(1), ss.7-14.
- HOLLINGSWORTH B.; Dawson P.J. ve Maniakadis N.; (1999), “Efficiency Measurement Of Health Care: A Review Of Non-Parametric Methods And Applications”, Health Care Management Science, Vol.2, ss. 161- 172.
- KUMBHAKAR, S.C.; (2004), “Efficiency of World Health Systems” Erişim: 10/01/2006; at: http://www.economics.unsw.edu.au/RESEARCH/ SEMINAR/ Visitor/kumbhaker.pdf
- MIRMIRANI, S. ve H.C. Li; (1995), “Health care efficiency measurement: An application of Data Envelopment Analiysis”, International Review of Economics and Business, Vol. XLII, No.3
- MIRMIRANI, S.; (2005), “Health Care Delivery in OECD Countries, 1990- 2000: An Efficiency Assessment” The Business Review Cambridge, 3(2).
- ÖZDEMİR, A.İ.; (2006), “Avrasya Ülkelerinin Sağlık Hizmeti Etkinliklerinin DEA İle Analizi” Uluslar arası Küreselleşme Bağlamında Avrasya Top- lumları Konferansı, Bişkek, Kırgızistan.
- ÖZDEMİR, A.İ.; (2007), “Bağımsızlık Sonarsı BDT ve Kafkas Ülkelerinin Sağlık Hizmeti Etkinliğinin DEA ile Analizi” 2. Caucasus and Central Asie in the Globalization Proveos, Bakü, Azarbaycan, pp. 798-804.
- TANDON, A.; (2005), “Measuring Efficiency of Macro Systems: An Application to Millennium Development Goal Attainment”, Asian Development Review,.22(2), ss.108-125.
- YILDIRIM H.; (2004), “AB Sağlık Politikaları ve AB’ye Üye ve Aday Ülke Sağlık Sistemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Teknik Verimlilik Analizi”, Ha- cettepe Üniversitesi, Doktora Tezi.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 16, 2015 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2009 Issue: 33 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.