Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE INFLUENCE OF AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT, ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT, UPPER MANAGEMENT SUPPORT AND EMPOWERMENT ON SERVICE QUALITY: A STUDY OF BANK EMPLOYEES IN KYRGYZSTAN

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 189 - 212, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.62317

Abstract

This paper tests the relationships organizational support, upper management support, affective commitment and employee empowerment has with service quality of employees. Hypotheses are constructed by reviewing literature in the areas of human resource management and services quality. In orders to test two hypotheses, regression models were established. In the first model, independent variables are affective commitment, organizational support and top management support, the dependent variable is the service quality. In the second model, independent variables are three sub-dimensions of empowerment as control, responsiveness and discretion, the depend-ent variable is the service quality. A study comprising 174 employees was conducted in Kyrgyzstans banks. The findings in this research suggest that organizational support, upper management support, empowerment and affective commitment of employees have a direct and positive impact on the service quality delivered. The interesting finding in this research suggests that there is a negative and significant relationship among discretion dimension of empowerment and service quality. 

DUYGUSAL BAĞLILIK, ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK, ÜST YÖNETİM DESTEĞİ VE PERSONEL GÜÇLENDİRMENİN HİZMET KALİTESİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: KIRGIZİSTAN’DA BANKA İŞGÖRENLERİ ÜZERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 189 - 212, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.62317

Abstract

Bu çalışma örgütsel destek, üst yönetim desteği, duygusal bağlılık ve personel güçlendirmenin müşteri ile iletişim içerisinde olan işgörenlerin verdikleri hizmetin kalitesi ile olan ilişkisini araştırmaktadır. Hipotezler insan kaynakları yönetimi ve hizmet kalitesi alanındaki literatür göz önüne alınarak yapılandırılmıştır. Hipotezleri test edebilmek amacı ile iki adet regresyon modeli kurulmuştur. Birinci modelde bağımsız değişkenler, duygusal bağlılık, örgütsel destek ve üst yönetim desteği, bağımlı değişken ise hizmet kalitesidir. İkinci modelde ise bağımsız değişkenler, güçlendirmenin üç alt boyutu olan kontrol, cevap verebilirlik ve serbestliktir. Araştırma Kırgızistan’da bankalarda çalışan 174 kişi üzerinde yapılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar göstermektedir ki, örgütsel destek, üst yönetim desteği, duygusal bağlılık ve personel güçlendirme hizmet kalitesi ile doğrusal ve pozitif yönlü ilişki içerisindedirler. Araştırmada elde edilen ilginç bir sonuç ise hizmet kalitesi ile güçlendirmenin serbestlik boyutu arasında anlamlı ve negatif yönlü bir ilişkinin bulunmasıdır.

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Mehmet Özbek This is me

Gözde Kosa This is me

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 34

Cite

APA Özbek, M., & Kosa, G. (2015). DUYGUSAL BAĞLILIK, ÖRGÜTSEL DESTEK, ÜST YÖNETİM DESTEĞİ VE PERSONEL GÜÇLENDİRMENİN HİZMET KALİTESİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: KIRGIZİSTAN’DA BANKA İŞGÖRENLERİ ÜZERİNDE BİR UYGULAMA. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(34), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.62317

Cited By













High technology export and high technology export impact on growth
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293)
https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v1i3.283





Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.