BibTex RIS Cite

ÖRTÜLÜ BİLGİ KAYNAKLARININ KEŞFİ VE SOMUTLAŞTIRILMASI: ŞİRİNCE ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 339 - 359, 18.05.2015

Süleyman Bolat

Abstract

Bilgi, günümüzün toplumlarını etkileyen vazgeçilmez unsurlardan biridir. Rekabetin ve üstünlüğün temelini oluşturmaktadır. Özellikle taklidi zor, aktarılamayan ve ifade edilemeyen örtülü bilgi, rekabet avantajı yaratmada önemli bir güçtür. Rekabette üstünlüğün elde edilmesi, örtülü bilginin keşfi ve somutlaştırılması ile anlam bulmaktadır.

Bu çalışma bilgi, örtülü bilgi, örtülü bilginin keşfi ve somutlaştırılması konularını kapsamaktadır. Şirince örtülü bir bilgi olduğundan, çalışma Şirince’de yapılmıştır. Şirince’deki örtülü bilgi kaynaklarının keşfi, Şirince’nin ekonomik, sosyal ve kültürel gelişimini etkileyecektir.

Keywords

Bilgi Örtülü Bilgi Rekabet Avantajı Şirince

References

  • AMBROSINI, Veronique ve Cliff BOWMAN; (2001), “Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization”, The Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), ss. 811-839.
  • ARSLANO LU, brahim; (2005), “Kültür ve Medeniyet Kavramları”, nternet Adresi: www.Hbektas.Gazi.Edu.Tr/15.Dergi , Eri im Tarihi: 10.12.2005.
  • BARCA, Mehmet; (2005), “Yeni Ekonomide Bilgi Yönetiminin Stratejik Öne- mi”, nternet Adresi: http://www.Bilgiyonetimi.Org/Cm/ Pages/Mkl_ Gos.Php?Nt=145 Eri im Tarihi: 29.08.2005.
  • BARUTÇUG L, smet; (2002), Bilgi Yönetimi, Kariyer Yayıncılık, stanbul, 232s.
  • BENSGH R, Türksel Kaya; (1996), Bilgi Teknolojileri ve Örgütsel De i im, Todai Yayın No: 274, Ankara, 385s.
  • BLOODGOOD, James M. ve David SALISBURY; (2001), “Understanding The Influence of Organizational Change Strategies On Information Technology and Knowledge Management Strategies”, Decision Sup- port Systems, 31(1), ss. 55-69.
  • BOIRAL, Olivier; (2002), “Tacit Knowledge and Environmental Management”, Long Range Planning, 35(3), ss. 291-317.
  • BOLAT, Süleyman; (2007), Bilgi Ekonomisinde Örtülü Bilginin Önemi ve Rekabet Avantajı Yaratmada Örtülü Bilgi Kaynaklarının Ke fi: irince’de Bir Uygulama, Basılmamı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi SBE, Aydın, 159s.
  • BUCKLEY, Ralf; (2003), “Natural Area Tourism: Ecology Impacts and Man- agement”, Annals of Tourism Research, 30(2), ss. 497-499.
  • CAEGENEM, William Van; (2005), “Inter-firm Migration of Tacit Knowledge: Law and Policy”, Prometheus, 23(3), ss. 285-306.
  • CANO, Lucero Morales ve Avis MYSYK; (2004), “Cultural Tourism, The State and The Day of The Dead”, Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), ss. 879-898.
  • DAWSON, Patrick; (1997), “In at the Deep End: Conducting Processual Re- search on Organizational Change”, Scandinavian Journal of Man- agement, 13(4), ss. 389-405.
  • DIERICKX, Ingemar ve Karel COOL; (1989), “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage”, Management Science, 35(12), ss. 1504-1511.
  • DO AN, Hulusi; (2006), Ahilik ve Örtülü Bilgi, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa, 210s.
  • DUMAS, Angela ve Andrew FENTEM; (1998), “Totemics: New Metaphor Techniques To Manage Knowledge From Discovery To Storage And Retrieval”, Technovation, 18(8-9), ss. 513-521.
  • DURA, Cihan ve Hayriye AT K; (2002), Bilgi Toplumu, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Türkiye, Literatür Yayıncılık, stanbul, 341s.
  • ERKAN, Hüsnü; (1998), Bilgi Toplumu ve Ekonomik Geli me, Türkiye Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 326, Ankara, 251s.
  • GERTLER, Meric S.; (2003), “Tacit Knowledge and The Economic Geography of Context, or The Undefinable Tacitness of Being (there)”, Journal of Economic Geography 3(1), ss. 75-99.
  • GRANT, Robert; 1(991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advan- tage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, 33(3), ss. 114-135.
  • GÜRAK, Hasan; (2005), “Önce Bilgili nsan - Ekonomik Büyüme ve Refahın Gerçek Kaynakları Olan: Üretken Bilgi (Teknoloji) ve Bilgili nsan Üzerine”, nternet Adresi: http://www.Bilgiyonetimi.Org/Cm/Pages/ Mkl_Gos.Php?Nt=280, Eri im Tarihi : 16.09.2005.
  • HAMMAREN, Maria; (2006), “Skill, Storytelling and Language: on Reflection as a Method”, iç. Bo GÖRANZON, Maria HAMMAREN ve Richard ENNALS (Ed.), Dialogue, Skill and Tacit Knowledge, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, England, 357s.
  • HEDLUND, Jennifer; George B. FORSYTHE, Joseph A. HORVATH, Wendy M. WILLIAMS, Scott SNOOK ve Robert J. STERNBERG; (2003), “Identifying And Assessing Tacit Knowledge: Understanding The Practice Intelligence of Military Leaders”, The Leadership Quar- terly, 14(2), ss. 117-140.
  • HOWELLS, Jeremy R.L.; (1996), “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technol- ogy Transfer”, Technology Analysis and Startegic Management, 8(2), ss. 91-106.
  • HOWELLS, Jeremy R. L.; (2002), “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Eco- nomic Geography”, Urban Studies, 39(5-6), ss. 871-884.
  • HUGHES, Howard ve Danielle ALLEN; (2005), “Cultural Tourism In Central And Eastern Europe: The Views of Induced Image Formation Agents”, Tourism Management, 26(2), ss. 173-183.
  • B C O LU, Hasan ve Hulusi DO AN; (2006), letmelerde Örtülü Bilgi ve
  • Önemi, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa, 258s.
  • JOHANNESSEN, Jon-Arild; Bjorn OLSEN ve Johan OLAISEN; (1999), “As- pects of Innovation Theory Based on Knowledge Management”, Inter- national Journal of Information Management, 19(2), ss. 121-139.
  • JOHANNESSEN, Jon-Arild; Johan OLAISEN ve Bjorn OLSEN ; (2001), “Mismanagement of Tacit Knowledge: The Importance of Tacit Knowledge, The Danger of Information Technology And What To Do About It”, International Journal of Information Management, 21(1), ss. 3-20.
  • JONES, Russels Douglass; (2006), “Histories of Tourism: Representation, Iden- tity And Conflict”, Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), ss. 876-878.
  • KAPLAN, Adnan; Erhan KÜÇÜKERBA ve Bülent ÖZKAN; (1997), “ irince Yerle iminin Rekreasyonel Turizm Yönüyle ncelenmesi”, Birinci Uluslararası Geçmi ten Günümüze Selçuk Sempozyumu, Selçuk Be- lediyesi Yayınları, zmir, 397s.
  • KOSKINEN, Kaj U.; (2000), “Tacit Knowledge as a Prometer of Project Suc- cess” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), ss. 41-47.
  • MANN, Pete; (2001), “Tacit Knowledge in an Age of Reform”, The Interna- tional Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(1), ss. 76-90.
  • LAWSON, Clive ve Edward LORENZ; (1998), “Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge And Regional Innovative Capacity”, Regional Studies, 33(4), ss. 305-317.
  • LUBIT, Roy; (2001), “Tacit Knowledge And Knowledge Management: The Keys To Sustainable Competitive Advantages”, Organizational Dy- namics, 29(3), ss. 164-178.
  • MACDONALD, Roberta ve Lee JOLLIFFE; (2003), “Cultural Rural Tourism: Evidence From Canada”, Annals of Tourism Research, 30(2), ss. 307-322.
  • MAJUMDAR, Suprabhat; (2005), “Preservation And Conservation of Literacy Heritage: A Case Study of India”, The International Information & Library Review, 37(3), ss. 179-187.
  • MALONE, David; (2002), “Knowledge Management A Model For Organiza- tional Learning”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(2), ss. 111-123.
  • PERRET, Raphael; Marcos R.S. BORGES ve Flavia Maria SANTORO; (2004), “Applying Group Storytelling In Knowledge Management”, 10. Criwg, Lncs, 3198, ss. 34-41.
  • POLANYI, Michael; (1958), Personel Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 428s.
  • POLANYI, Michael; (1966), Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, New York, 108s.
  • REED, Richard ve Robert J. DEFILLIPPI; (1990), “Casual Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation and Sustainable Competitive Advantages”, Academy of Management Review, 15(1), ss. 88-102.
  • ROBERTS, Joanne; (2001), “The Drive to Codify: Implications for the Knowl- edge-based Economy”, Prometheus, 19(2), ss. 99-116.
  • SAVIOTTI, Pier Paolo; (1998), “On the Dynamics of Appropriability, of Tacit and of Codified Knowledge”, Research Policy, 26(7-8), ss. 843-856.
  • SAYIN, Önal; (1997), “ irince Köyü’ne Sosyolojik Bir Bakı ”, Birinci Ulusla- rarası Geçmi ten Günümüze Selçuk Sempozyumu, Selçuk Belediyesi Yayınları, zmir, 397s.
  • SCHULZ, Martin ve JOBE, A. Lloyd; (2001), “Codification And Tacitness As Knowledge Management Studies: An Empirical Exploration”, Journal of High Technology of Accounting Information Systems, 12(1), ss. 139-165.
  • STYHRE, Alexander; (2004), “Rethinking Knowledge: A Bergsonian Critique of The Notion of Tacit Knowledge”, British Journal of Management, 15(2), ss. 177-188.
  • TAGGART, Geoff; (2002), “Spiritual Literacy And Tacit Knowledge”, Journal of Beliefs & Values, 23(1), ss. 7-17.
  • TÜL, ükrü; (1997), irince, Bir Zamanlar Çirkince, Ege Yayınları No: 10, Gezi Dizisi No: 2, stanbul, 67s.
  • U URO LU, Ay egül; Semra SALGIRLI, Melek ATAKAN ve Selahattin GÜLER; (1983), irince’de Tarihsel Dokunun Korunması ve Tu- rizm Amaçlı Kullanımı, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlı ı (Planlama ve Yatırımlar Dairesi Ara tırma Grup Ba kanlı ı) Yayın No: 1983/3, An- kara, 72s.
  • URAL, Ayhan ve brahim KILIÇ; (2005), Bilimsel Ara tırma Süreci ve SPSS le Veri Analizi, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, 274s.
  • WATSON, John; Steven LYSONSKI, Tamara GILLAN ve Leslie RAYMORE; (2002), “Cultural Values And Important Possessions: A Cultural Analysis”, Journal of Business Research, 55(11), ss. 923-931.
  • WEIGELT, Keith ve Colin CAMERER; (1988), “Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications”, Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), ss. 443-454.
  • WOO, Jeong Han; Mark J. CLAYTON, Robert E. JOHNSON, Benito E. FLORES ve Christopher ELLIS; (2004), “Dynamic Knowledge Map: Reusing Experts’ Tacit Knowledge In The Aec Industry”, Automa- tion In Construction, 13(2), ss. 203-207.

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 339 - 359, 18.05.2015

Süleyman Bolat

Abstract

References

  • AMBROSINI, Veronique ve Cliff BOWMAN; (2001), “Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalization”, The Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), ss. 811-839.
  • ARSLANO LU, brahim; (2005), “Kültür ve Medeniyet Kavramları”, nternet Adresi: www.Hbektas.Gazi.Edu.Tr/15.Dergi , Eri im Tarihi: 10.12.2005.
  • BARCA, Mehmet; (2005), “Yeni Ekonomide Bilgi Yönetiminin Stratejik Öne- mi”, nternet Adresi: http://www.Bilgiyonetimi.Org/Cm/ Pages/Mkl_ Gos.Php?Nt=145 Eri im Tarihi: 29.08.2005.
  • BARUTÇUG L, smet; (2002), Bilgi Yönetimi, Kariyer Yayıncılık, stanbul, 232s.
  • BENSGH R, Türksel Kaya; (1996), Bilgi Teknolojileri ve Örgütsel De i im, Todai Yayın No: 274, Ankara, 385s.
  • BLOODGOOD, James M. ve David SALISBURY; (2001), “Understanding The Influence of Organizational Change Strategies On Information Technology and Knowledge Management Strategies”, Decision Sup- port Systems, 31(1), ss. 55-69.
  • BOIRAL, Olivier; (2002), “Tacit Knowledge and Environmental Management”, Long Range Planning, 35(3), ss. 291-317.
  • BOLAT, Süleyman; (2007), Bilgi Ekonomisinde Örtülü Bilginin Önemi ve Rekabet Avantajı Yaratmada Örtülü Bilgi Kaynaklarının Ke fi: irince’de Bir Uygulama, Basılmamı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi SBE, Aydın, 159s.
  • BUCKLEY, Ralf; (2003), “Natural Area Tourism: Ecology Impacts and Man- agement”, Annals of Tourism Research, 30(2), ss. 497-499.
  • CAEGENEM, William Van; (2005), “Inter-firm Migration of Tacit Knowledge: Law and Policy”, Prometheus, 23(3), ss. 285-306.
  • CANO, Lucero Morales ve Avis MYSYK; (2004), “Cultural Tourism, The State and The Day of The Dead”, Annals of Tourism Research, 31(4), ss. 879-898.
  • DAWSON, Patrick; (1997), “In at the Deep End: Conducting Processual Re- search on Organizational Change”, Scandinavian Journal of Man- agement, 13(4), ss. 389-405.
  • DIERICKX, Ingemar ve Karel COOL; (1989), “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage”, Management Science, 35(12), ss. 1504-1511.
  • DO AN, Hulusi; (2006), Ahilik ve Örtülü Bilgi, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa, 210s.
  • DUMAS, Angela ve Andrew FENTEM; (1998), “Totemics: New Metaphor Techniques To Manage Knowledge From Discovery To Storage And Retrieval”, Technovation, 18(8-9), ss. 513-521.
  • DURA, Cihan ve Hayriye AT K; (2002), Bilgi Toplumu, Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Türkiye, Literatür Yayıncılık, stanbul, 341s.
  • ERKAN, Hüsnü; (1998), Bilgi Toplumu ve Ekonomik Geli me, Türkiye Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Genel Yayın No: 326, Ankara, 251s.
  • GERTLER, Meric S.; (2003), “Tacit Knowledge and The Economic Geography of Context, or The Undefinable Tacitness of Being (there)”, Journal of Economic Geography 3(1), ss. 75-99.
  • GRANT, Robert; 1(991), “The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advan- tage: Implications for Strategy Formulation”, California Management Review, 33(3), ss. 114-135.
  • GÜRAK, Hasan; (2005), “Önce Bilgili nsan - Ekonomik Büyüme ve Refahın Gerçek Kaynakları Olan: Üretken Bilgi (Teknoloji) ve Bilgili nsan Üzerine”, nternet Adresi: http://www.Bilgiyonetimi.Org/Cm/Pages/ Mkl_Gos.Php?Nt=280, Eri im Tarihi : 16.09.2005.
  • HAMMAREN, Maria; (2006), “Skill, Storytelling and Language: on Reflection as a Method”, iç. Bo GÖRANZON, Maria HAMMAREN ve Richard ENNALS (Ed.), Dialogue, Skill and Tacit Knowledge, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, England, 357s.
  • HEDLUND, Jennifer; George B. FORSYTHE, Joseph A. HORVATH, Wendy M. WILLIAMS, Scott SNOOK ve Robert J. STERNBERG; (2003), “Identifying And Assessing Tacit Knowledge: Understanding The Practice Intelligence of Military Leaders”, The Leadership Quar- terly, 14(2), ss. 117-140.
  • HOWELLS, Jeremy R.L.; (1996), “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technol- ogy Transfer”, Technology Analysis and Startegic Management, 8(2), ss. 91-106.
  • HOWELLS, Jeremy R. L.; (2002), “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Eco- nomic Geography”, Urban Studies, 39(5-6), ss. 871-884.
  • HUGHES, Howard ve Danielle ALLEN; (2005), “Cultural Tourism In Central And Eastern Europe: The Views of Induced Image Formation Agents”, Tourism Management, 26(2), ss. 173-183.
  • B C O LU, Hasan ve Hulusi DO AN; (2006), letmelerde Örtülü Bilgi ve
  • Önemi, Ekin Kitabevi, Bursa, 258s.
  • JOHANNESSEN, Jon-Arild; Bjorn OLSEN ve Johan OLAISEN; (1999), “As- pects of Innovation Theory Based on Knowledge Management”, Inter- national Journal of Information Management, 19(2), ss. 121-139.
  • JOHANNESSEN, Jon-Arild; Johan OLAISEN ve Bjorn OLSEN ; (2001), “Mismanagement of Tacit Knowledge: The Importance of Tacit Knowledge, The Danger of Information Technology And What To Do About It”, International Journal of Information Management, 21(1), ss. 3-20.
  • JONES, Russels Douglass; (2006), “Histories of Tourism: Representation, Iden- tity And Conflict”, Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), ss. 876-878.
  • KAPLAN, Adnan; Erhan KÜÇÜKERBA ve Bülent ÖZKAN; (1997), “ irince Yerle iminin Rekreasyonel Turizm Yönüyle ncelenmesi”, Birinci Uluslararası Geçmi ten Günümüze Selçuk Sempozyumu, Selçuk Be- lediyesi Yayınları, zmir, 397s.
  • KOSKINEN, Kaj U.; (2000), “Tacit Knowledge as a Prometer of Project Suc- cess” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 6(1), ss. 41-47.
  • MANN, Pete; (2001), “Tacit Knowledge in an Age of Reform”, The Interna- tional Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(1), ss. 76-90.
  • LAWSON, Clive ve Edward LORENZ; (1998), “Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge And Regional Innovative Capacity”, Regional Studies, 33(4), ss. 305-317.
  • LUBIT, Roy; (2001), “Tacit Knowledge And Knowledge Management: The Keys To Sustainable Competitive Advantages”, Organizational Dy- namics, 29(3), ss. 164-178.
  • MACDONALD, Roberta ve Lee JOLLIFFE; (2003), “Cultural Rural Tourism: Evidence From Canada”, Annals of Tourism Research, 30(2), ss. 307-322.
  • MAJUMDAR, Suprabhat; (2005), “Preservation And Conservation of Literacy Heritage: A Case Study of India”, The International Information & Library Review, 37(3), ss. 179-187.
  • MALONE, David; (2002), “Knowledge Management A Model For Organiza- tional Learning”, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3(2), ss. 111-123.
  • PERRET, Raphael; Marcos R.S. BORGES ve Flavia Maria SANTORO; (2004), “Applying Group Storytelling In Knowledge Management”, 10. Criwg, Lncs, 3198, ss. 34-41.
  • POLANYI, Michael; (1958), Personel Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 428s.
  • POLANYI, Michael; (1966), Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, New York, 108s.
  • REED, Richard ve Robert J. DEFILLIPPI; (1990), “Casual Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation and Sustainable Competitive Advantages”, Academy of Management Review, 15(1), ss. 88-102.
  • ROBERTS, Joanne; (2001), “The Drive to Codify: Implications for the Knowl- edge-based Economy”, Prometheus, 19(2), ss. 99-116.
  • SAVIOTTI, Pier Paolo; (1998), “On the Dynamics of Appropriability, of Tacit and of Codified Knowledge”, Research Policy, 26(7-8), ss. 843-856.
  • SAYIN, Önal; (1997), “ irince Köyü’ne Sosyolojik Bir Bakı ”, Birinci Ulusla- rarası Geçmi ten Günümüze Selçuk Sempozyumu, Selçuk Belediyesi Yayınları, zmir, 397s.
  • SCHULZ, Martin ve JOBE, A. Lloyd; (2001), “Codification And Tacitness As Knowledge Management Studies: An Empirical Exploration”, Journal of High Technology of Accounting Information Systems, 12(1), ss. 139-165.
  • STYHRE, Alexander; (2004), “Rethinking Knowledge: A Bergsonian Critique of The Notion of Tacit Knowledge”, British Journal of Management, 15(2), ss. 177-188.
  • TAGGART, Geoff; (2002), “Spiritual Literacy And Tacit Knowledge”, Journal of Beliefs & Values, 23(1), ss. 7-17.
  • TÜL, ükrü; (1997), irince, Bir Zamanlar Çirkince, Ege Yayınları No: 10, Gezi Dizisi No: 2, stanbul, 67s.
  • U URO LU, Ay egül; Semra SALGIRLI, Melek ATAKAN ve Selahattin GÜLER; (1983), irince’de Tarihsel Dokunun Korunması ve Tu- rizm Amaçlı Kullanımı, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlı ı (Planlama ve Yatırımlar Dairesi Ara tırma Grup Ba kanlı ı) Yayın No: 1983/3, An- kara, 72s.
  • URAL, Ayhan ve brahim KILIÇ; (2005), Bilimsel Ara tırma Süreci ve SPSS le Veri Analizi, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, 274s.
  • WATSON, John; Steven LYSONSKI, Tamara GILLAN ve Leslie RAYMORE; (2002), “Cultural Values And Important Possessions: A Cultural Analysis”, Journal of Business Research, 55(11), ss. 923-931.
  • WEIGELT, Keith ve Colin CAMERER; (1988), “Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Recent Theory and Applications”, Strategic Management Journal, 9(5), ss. 443-454.
  • WOO, Jeong Han; Mark J. CLAYTON, Robert E. JOHNSON, Benito E. FLORES ve Christopher ELLIS; (2004), “Dynamic Knowledge Map: Reusing Experts’ Tacit Knowledge In The Aec Industry”, Automa- tion In Construction, 13(2), ss. 203-207.
There are 54 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Süleyman Bolat This is me

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 34

Cite

APA Bolat, S. (2015). ÖRTÜLÜ BİLGİ KAYNAKLARININ KEŞFİ VE SOMUTLAŞTIRILMASI: ŞİRİNCE ÖRNEĞİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(34), 339-359.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.