BibTex RIS Cite

ASKERİ FABRİKALARDA ÇALIŞAN MÜHENDİS SUBAYLARA YÖNELİK YENİ BİR PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME MODELİ ÖNERİSİ

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 381 - 396, 18.05.2015

Özgür Demirtaş

Abstract

Sanayi ve teknoloji alanındaki baş döndürücü gelişmeler, çalışan insan sayısı faktörünün yerine nitelikli insan faktörünü ön plana çıkarmıştır. Örgütlerin en kıymetli varlığı olan insan ve onun yönetimi, insan kaynakları uygulamalarının en temel konusudur. Bir bilim dalı olan insan kaynakları yönetiminin en önemli konularından birisi de performans değerlendirmesidir. Yapılan bu çalışmada insan kaynakları yönetiminde önemli bir kavram olan performans değerlendirme sistemi ve halen uygulamadaki mevcut Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri performans değerlendirme sistemine yönelik eksiklikler kapsamında mühendis subaylar için yeni bir model önerisi sunulmuştur. Yöntemin geliştirilmesinde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden biri olan Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (AHP) yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Kişisel, askeri ve işe dönük kriterlerden oluşmak üzere kurulan yeni model önerisi bir mühendis subay üzerinde uygulanmıştır.

Keywords

İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Performans Değerlendirme Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi

References

  • AKDO AN, Asuman; (1997), Kayseri Özel Sektör Yönetici Özellikleri, Tic.Od.Yayınları, Kayseri, 353s.
  • BORMAN, Walter; Ilgen DANIEL ve James HEDGE; (1997), “Personnel selection”, Human Resource Management, 299(39), 445s.
  • CHOU, Tzy Yuan ve Gin-shuh LIANG; (2001), “Application of A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Model for Shipping Company Performance Evaluation”, Maritime Policy and Management, 28 (4), ss.375-392
  • DA DEV REN, Metin; Diyar AKAY ve Mustafa KURT; (2004), “ De er- lendirme Üni.Müh.Mim.Fak.Dergisi, 19, 2, ss.131-138 AHP ve Uygulaması”, Gazi
  • D CLE, Ümit; (1982), “Yönetsel ba arının de erlendirilmesi - Türkiye uygula- ması”, Orta Do u Teknik Üniversitesi dari Bilimler Fakültesi Ya- yını, Ankara, 7 (2), ss.11-29
  • FINDIKÇI lhami; (1999), nsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Alfa Yayınları, 3.Baskı, stanbul, 373s.
  • FRENCH, Wandell L.; (1998), Human Resource Management, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, 464s.
  • GIBNEY, Ray ve Jia SHANG; (2007), Decision making in academia:A case of the dean selection process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46, ss.1030-1040
  • GILL, Brian; (1998), “Performance Appraisals-Management”, Human Resource Management-Technique, American Printer, 72(2), 221s.
  • GÜNGÖR, Zülal; (2009), “A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection prob- lem”, Applied Soft Computing, 9, 2, ss.641-646
  • HARKER, Patrich T. ve Luis G. VARGAS; (1987), “ The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process” Management Science, 33, ss.1383-1403
  • HILL, Ronald P. ve Robert L. NYDICK; (1992), “Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure The Supplier Selection Procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Managementt, 28 (2), ss.31-36
  • KÖSE, Erol; (2003), “Garnizon derecelendirme sistemine yönelik bir metedoloji önerisi”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, K.H.O K.lı ı, Ankara, 13-18, ss.46-58
  • LEBLANG, Theodore R.; (1999), “Employee Evaluations Must Detail Performance”, American Druggist, 55(2), 216s.
  • LEPSINGER, Richard ve AnitaDe LUCIA; (1997), The Art and Science of 360 Degree Feedback, Jossey-Bass, ss.264-280
  • LIBERATORE Matthew J; Robert L.NYDICK ve Peter M. SANCHEZ; “The evaluation of research papers”, Interfaces, 22(2), ss.92-100
  • NICOLO A.Machiavelli; (1993), “Suggestions for Achieving a Strategic Partnership”, HR Focus, 70, 9, 298s.
  • OBRIEN, Christine ve Seyed Hassan GHODSYPOUR; (1998), “A Decision Support System for Supplier Selection Using An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear Programming”, International Journal of Production Economics; 56, ss.199-212
  • PETROVIC-LAZEREVIC, Sonja; (2001), Personnel selection fuzzy model, International Transactions in Operational Research, 8, ss.89-105
  • RONG, Chao; Katsuhiko TAKAHASHI ve Jing WANG; (2003), “Enterprise Waste Evaluation Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Set Theory”, Production Planning and Control, 14 (1), ss. 90-103
  • SAATY Thomas L.; (1980), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, McGraw-Hill International Book Company, USA, 357s.
  • SAATY Thomas L.; (1985), Analytical planning, RWS Publications, 443s.
  • SAATY Thomas L.; (2000), “Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with Analytic Hierarchy Process”, AHP Series, Vol:VI, RWS Publications, 481s.
  • SAATY, Thomas L. ve Luis G VARGAS; (1994), “Decision making in economic, political, social and technologial enviroments with the analitical hierarchy prosess”, RWS Publications, Pitssburgh, 503s
  • SAATY, Thomas L. ve Yoram WIND.; (1980), “Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy prosess”, Management Science, 26(7), ss.641-658
  • SÜMER, Canan H.; (2000), “Performans Degerlendirmesine Tarihsel Bir Bakıs ve Kültürel Bir Yaklasım”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, ss.57-90
  • ULUSOY, Saadet ve Zeki ALADA ;(1995), “Lastik sektöründe AHP yöntemi ile ürün geli tirme sürecinin incelemesi” , K.H.O 1.Sistem Mühendis- li i ve Savunma Uygulamaları Sempozyumu, Bildiriler, Ankara, ss. 673-683
  • UYARG L, Cavide; Zeki ADAL; smail Durak ATAAY; Oya ÖZÇEL K ve Lale TÜZENER; (2008), nsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Beta Basım, stanbul, 475s.
  • WANG Ge, Samuel H.HUANG ve John P. DISMUKES; (2004), “Product- Driven Supply Chain Selection Using Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology” International Journal of Production Economics, 91, ss.1-15.

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 381 - 396, 18.05.2015

Özgür Demirtaş

Abstract

References

  • AKDO AN, Asuman; (1997), Kayseri Özel Sektör Yönetici Özellikleri, Tic.Od.Yayınları, Kayseri, 353s.
  • BORMAN, Walter; Ilgen DANIEL ve James HEDGE; (1997), “Personnel selection”, Human Resource Management, 299(39), 445s.
  • CHOU, Tzy Yuan ve Gin-shuh LIANG; (2001), “Application of A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Model for Shipping Company Performance Evaluation”, Maritime Policy and Management, 28 (4), ss.375-392
  • DA DEV REN, Metin; Diyar AKAY ve Mustafa KURT; (2004), “ De er- lendirme Üni.Müh.Mim.Fak.Dergisi, 19, 2, ss.131-138 AHP ve Uygulaması”, Gazi
  • D CLE, Ümit; (1982), “Yönetsel ba arının de erlendirilmesi - Türkiye uygula- ması”, Orta Do u Teknik Üniversitesi dari Bilimler Fakültesi Ya- yını, Ankara, 7 (2), ss.11-29
  • FINDIKÇI lhami; (1999), nsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Alfa Yayınları, 3.Baskı, stanbul, 373s.
  • FRENCH, Wandell L.; (1998), Human Resource Management, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, 464s.
  • GIBNEY, Ray ve Jia SHANG; (2007), Decision making in academia:A case of the dean selection process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46, ss.1030-1040
  • GILL, Brian; (1998), “Performance Appraisals-Management”, Human Resource Management-Technique, American Printer, 72(2), 221s.
  • GÜNGÖR, Zülal; (2009), “A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection prob- lem”, Applied Soft Computing, 9, 2, ss.641-646
  • HARKER, Patrich T. ve Luis G. VARGAS; (1987), “ The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process” Management Science, 33, ss.1383-1403
  • HILL, Ronald P. ve Robert L. NYDICK; (1992), “Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure The Supplier Selection Procedure”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Managementt, 28 (2), ss.31-36
  • KÖSE, Erol; (2003), “Garnizon derecelendirme sistemine yönelik bir metedoloji önerisi”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, K.H.O K.lı ı, Ankara, 13-18, ss.46-58
  • LEBLANG, Theodore R.; (1999), “Employee Evaluations Must Detail Performance”, American Druggist, 55(2), 216s.
  • LEPSINGER, Richard ve AnitaDe LUCIA; (1997), The Art and Science of 360 Degree Feedback, Jossey-Bass, ss.264-280
  • LIBERATORE Matthew J; Robert L.NYDICK ve Peter M. SANCHEZ; “The evaluation of research papers”, Interfaces, 22(2), ss.92-100
  • NICOLO A.Machiavelli; (1993), “Suggestions for Achieving a Strategic Partnership”, HR Focus, 70, 9, 298s.
  • OBRIEN, Christine ve Seyed Hassan GHODSYPOUR; (1998), “A Decision Support System for Supplier Selection Using An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear Programming”, International Journal of Production Economics; 56, ss.199-212
  • PETROVIC-LAZEREVIC, Sonja; (2001), Personnel selection fuzzy model, International Transactions in Operational Research, 8, ss.89-105
  • RONG, Chao; Katsuhiko TAKAHASHI ve Jing WANG; (2003), “Enterprise Waste Evaluation Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Set Theory”, Production Planning and Control, 14 (1), ss. 90-103
  • SAATY Thomas L.; (1980), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, McGraw-Hill International Book Company, USA, 357s.
  • SAATY Thomas L.; (1985), Analytical planning, RWS Publications, 443s.
  • SAATY Thomas L.; (2000), “Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with Analytic Hierarchy Process”, AHP Series, Vol:VI, RWS Publications, 481s.
  • SAATY, Thomas L. ve Luis G VARGAS; (1994), “Decision making in economic, political, social and technologial enviroments with the analitical hierarchy prosess”, RWS Publications, Pitssburgh, 503s
  • SAATY, Thomas L. ve Yoram WIND.; (1980), “Marketing applications of the analytic hierarchy prosess”, Management Science, 26(7), ss.641-658
  • SÜMER, Canan H.; (2000), “Performans Degerlendirmesine Tarihsel Bir Bakıs ve Kültürel Bir Yaklasım”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, ss.57-90
  • ULUSOY, Saadet ve Zeki ALADA ;(1995), “Lastik sektöründe AHP yöntemi ile ürün geli tirme sürecinin incelemesi” , K.H.O 1.Sistem Mühendis- li i ve Savunma Uygulamaları Sempozyumu, Bildiriler, Ankara, ss. 673-683
  • UYARG L, Cavide; Zeki ADAL; smail Durak ATAAY; Oya ÖZÇEL K ve Lale TÜZENER; (2008), nsan Kaynakları Yönetimi, Beta Basım, stanbul, 475s.
  • WANG Ge, Samuel H.HUANG ve John P. DISMUKES; (2004), “Product- Driven Supply Chain Selection Using Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methodology” International Journal of Production Economics, 91, ss.1-15.
There are 29 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Özgür Demirtaş This is me

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 34

Cite

APA Demirtaş, Ö. (2015). ASKERİ FABRİKALARDA ÇALIŞAN MÜHENDİS SUBAYLARA YÖNELİK YENİ BİR PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRME MODELİ ÖNERİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(34), 381-396.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.