BibTex RIS Cite

OECD ÜLKELERİNDE SAĞLIK HARCAMALARI: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 117 - 137, 18.05.2015

Zafer Çalışkan

Abstract

Sağlık harcamaları bütün OECD ülkelerinde son otuz yıl içinde yalnızca artmakla kalmayıp aynı zamanda giderek farklılaşmaktadır. Bu gelişmeler OECD ülkeleri arasındaki farklılığı açıklayabilmek için sağlık harcamalarını belirleyen faktörlerin analiz edilmesine neden olmaktadır. Bu nedenle bu çalışma sağlık harcamalarındaki farklılıkları kişi başına sağlık harcamaları ile iktisadi ve iktisadi olmayan diğer faktörlerle ilişkilendirerek açıklamaktadır. Panel veri analizi yöntemine dayanan çalışma 1984-2005 yıllarını kapsamaktadır. Ampirik sonuçlar kişi başına GSYİH ile diğer değişkenler kişi başına sağlık harcamalarındaki değişiklikleri güçlü bir şekilde açıklamaktadır. Aynı zamanda ampirik sonuçlar OECD ülkelerinde sağlık hizmetlerinin teknik olarak lüks değil ihtiyaç olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Sağlık Harcamaları Kişi Başına GSYİH Panel Veri Analizi

References

  • BALTAGI, Badi H.; (2001), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley, New York, 304s.
  • BARROS, Pedro Pita; (1998), “The Black Box of Health Care Expenditure Growth Determinants”, Health Economics, 7, ss. 533–544.
  • BLOMQVIST, G. Ake ve Robin A. L. CARTER; (1997), “Is Health Care Really a Luxury?”, Journal of Health Economics, 16(2), ss. 207–229.
  • BUSSE, Reinhard; (2001), “Expenditure on Health Care in the EU: Making Projections for the Future Based on the Past”, The European Journal of Health Economics, 2(4), ss. 158-161.
  • CANTARERO, David ve Santiago LAGE-PENAS; (2010), “The Determinants of Health Care Expenditure: a Reexamination”, Applied Economics Letters, 17 (7), ss. 723–726.
  • CUTLER, M. David ve Mark McCLELLAN; (2001), “Is Technological Change InMedicineWorth It?”, Health Affairs, September-October, ss. 11-29.
  • DI MATTEO, Livio ve Rosanna DI MATTEO; (1998), “Evidence on The De- terminants of Canadian Provincial Government Health Expenditures: 1965–1991” Journal of Health Economics, 17(2), ss. 211–228.
  • DI MATTEO, Livio; (2005), “The Macro Determinants of health Expenditure in the Unites States and Canada: Assessing the Impact of Income, Age Distribution and Time”, Health Policy, 71, ss. 23-42.
  • ERDTHAM, Ulf-G ve Mickael LÖTHGREN; (2000), “On Stationarity and Cointegration of International Health Expenditure and GDP”, Journal of Health Economics, 19(4), ss. 461–475.
  • FELDSTEIN, Martin; (1995), “The Economics of Health and Health Care: What Have We Learned? What Have I Learned?”, The American Economic Review, 85 (2), ss. 28-31.
  • GERDTHAM, Ulf-G ve Bengt JÖNSSON; (1991), “Conversion Factor Insta- bility in International Comparisons of Health Care Expenditure”, Journal of Health Economics, 10(2), ss. 227–234.
  • GERDTHAM, Ulf-G ve Bengt JÖNSSON; (2000), International Comparisons of Health Expenditure: Theory, Data and Econometric Analysis, (ed.) Culyer, Anthony J., ve Newhouse, Joseph P., içinde Handbook of health economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 890s.
  • GERDTHAM, Ulf-G; Jes SOGAARD; Fredrik ANDERSSON ve Bengt JÖNSSON; (1992), “An Econometric Analysis of Health Care Expen- diture: A Cross-section Study of The OECD Countries”, Journal of Health Economics, 11(1), ss. 63-84.
  • GETZEN, E. Thomas; (2000), “Health Care is an Individual Necessity and a National Luxury: Applying Multilevel Decision Models to The Analy- sis of Health Care Expenditures”, Journal of Health Economics, 19(2), ss. 259–270.
  • GETZEN, E. Thomas; (2006), “Aggregation and the Measurement of Health Care Costs”, Health Services Research, 41(5), ss. 1938-1954.
  • GOUVEIA, Miguel; (1997), “Majority Rule and The Public Provision of a Pri- vate Good”, Public Choice, 93, ss. 221–244.
  • GREENE, H. Willliam; (1993), Econometric Analysis, McMillan, New York, 791s.
  • HANSEN, Paul ve Alan KING; (1996), “The Determinants of Health Care Ex- penditure: a Cointegration Approach”, Journal of Health Economics, 15(1), ss. 127–137.
  • HAUSMAN, A. Jery; (1978), “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46, ss. 1251 – 1271.
  • HITIRIS, Theodore ve Joseph POSNETT; (1992), “The Determinants and Ef- fects of Health Expenditure in Developed Countries”, Journal of Health Economics, 11(2), ss. 173–181.
  • HITIRIS, Theodore; (1997), “Health Care Expenditure and Integration in The Countries of The European Union”, Applied Economics, 29, ss. 1-6.
  • HSIAO, Cheng; (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd edition, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 384s.
  • HUBER, Manfred ve Eva OROSZ; (2003), “Health Expenditure Trends in The OECD Countries, 1990–2001”, Health Care Financing Review, 25(1), ss. 1–22
  • JONHSTON, Jack ve John DINARDO; (1997), Econometric Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York, 359s.
  • KARATZAS, George; (1992), “On The Effect of Income and Relative Price on The Demand for Health Care – the EEC Evidence: A Comment; Re- ply”, Applied Economics, 24, ss. 1251–1254.
  • KARATZAS, George; (2000), “On the Determinants of US Aggregate Health Care Expenditure”, Applied Economics, 32, ss. 1085 – 1099.
  • L ONARD, Christian, Sabine STORDEUR ve Dominique ROBERFROID; (2009), “Association Between Physician Density and Health Care Con- sumption: A Systematic Review of The Evidence”, Health Policy, 91(2), ss. 121-134.
  • LEU, E. Robert; (1986), The Public-Private Mix and International Health Care Cost, (ed.) Culyer, Anthony J. ve Bengt Jönsson, içinde Public and Private Health Services, B. Blackwell, ss. 41–63.
  • MILNE, Robin ve Hassan MOLANA; (1991), “On The Effect of Income and Relative Price on Demand for Health Care: EC Evidence”, Applied Economics, 23, ss. 1221–1226.
  • MOORE, William J.; Robert J. NEWMAN ve Mohammad FHEILI; (1992), “Measuring The Relationship Between Income and. NHEs”, Health Care Financing Review, 14(1), ss. 133-139.
  • MURTHY N. R. Vasudeva ve Albert A. OKUNADE; (2000), “Managed Care, Deficit Financing, and Aggregate Health Care Expenditure in the United States: A Cointegration Analysis”, Health Care Management Science, (3), ss. 279–285.
  • MURTHY N. R. Vasudeva ve Albert A. OKUNADE; (2009), “The Core De- terminants of Health Expenditure in The African Context: Some Econometric Evidence for Policy”, Health Policy, 91(1), ss. 57-62.
  • NEWHOUSE, P. Joseph; (1977), “Medical Care Expenditure: A Cross-national Survey”, Journal of Human Resources, 12, ss. 115–25.
  • OECD (2007), Health at a Glance 2007, OECD, Paris, 198s.
  • OECD (2008), Health Data 2008, OECD, Paris, 213s.
  • OKUNADE, A. Albert ve Chutima SURARATDECHA; (2000), “Health Care Expenditure Inertia in The OECD Countries: A Heterogeneous Analy- sis”, Health Care Management Science, 3, ss. 31–42.
  • OROSZ, Eva ve David MORGAN; (2004), “SHA-Based National Health Ac- counts in Thirteen OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis”, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 16, OECD, Paris, 148s.
  • PARKIN, David; Alistair McGUIRE ve Brain YULE; (1987), “Aggregate Health Expenditures nd National Income: Is Health Care a Luxury Good?”, Journal of Health Economics, 6, ss. 109-127.
  • SANZ, Ismael ve Francisco J. VELAZQUEZ; (2007), “The Role of Ageing in The Growth of Government and Social Welfare Spending in The OECD”, European Journal of Political Economy, 23, ss. 917–931.
  • SEN, Anindya; (2005), “Is Health Care a Luxury? New Evidence from OECD Data”, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Econom- ics, 5(2), ss. 147-164.
  • ZWEIFEL, Peter; Lucas, STEINMANN ve Patrick EUGSTER; (2005), “The Sisyphus Syndrome in Health Revisited”, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 5(2), ss. 127-145.

Year 2009, Issue: 34, 117 - 137, 18.05.2015

Zafer Çalışkan

Abstract

References

  • BALTAGI, Badi H.; (2001), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley, New York, 304s.
  • BARROS, Pedro Pita; (1998), “The Black Box of Health Care Expenditure Growth Determinants”, Health Economics, 7, ss. 533–544.
  • BLOMQVIST, G. Ake ve Robin A. L. CARTER; (1997), “Is Health Care Really a Luxury?”, Journal of Health Economics, 16(2), ss. 207–229.
  • BUSSE, Reinhard; (2001), “Expenditure on Health Care in the EU: Making Projections for the Future Based on the Past”, The European Journal of Health Economics, 2(4), ss. 158-161.
  • CANTARERO, David ve Santiago LAGE-PENAS; (2010), “The Determinants of Health Care Expenditure: a Reexamination”, Applied Economics Letters, 17 (7), ss. 723–726.
  • CUTLER, M. David ve Mark McCLELLAN; (2001), “Is Technological Change InMedicineWorth It?”, Health Affairs, September-October, ss. 11-29.
  • DI MATTEO, Livio ve Rosanna DI MATTEO; (1998), “Evidence on The De- terminants of Canadian Provincial Government Health Expenditures: 1965–1991” Journal of Health Economics, 17(2), ss. 211–228.
  • DI MATTEO, Livio; (2005), “The Macro Determinants of health Expenditure in the Unites States and Canada: Assessing the Impact of Income, Age Distribution and Time”, Health Policy, 71, ss. 23-42.
  • ERDTHAM, Ulf-G ve Mickael LÖTHGREN; (2000), “On Stationarity and Cointegration of International Health Expenditure and GDP”, Journal of Health Economics, 19(4), ss. 461–475.
  • FELDSTEIN, Martin; (1995), “The Economics of Health and Health Care: What Have We Learned? What Have I Learned?”, The American Economic Review, 85 (2), ss. 28-31.
  • GERDTHAM, Ulf-G ve Bengt JÖNSSON; (1991), “Conversion Factor Insta- bility in International Comparisons of Health Care Expenditure”, Journal of Health Economics, 10(2), ss. 227–234.
  • GERDTHAM, Ulf-G ve Bengt JÖNSSON; (2000), International Comparisons of Health Expenditure: Theory, Data and Econometric Analysis, (ed.) Culyer, Anthony J., ve Newhouse, Joseph P., içinde Handbook of health economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 890s.
  • GERDTHAM, Ulf-G; Jes SOGAARD; Fredrik ANDERSSON ve Bengt JÖNSSON; (1992), “An Econometric Analysis of Health Care Expen- diture: A Cross-section Study of The OECD Countries”, Journal of Health Economics, 11(1), ss. 63-84.
  • GETZEN, E. Thomas; (2000), “Health Care is an Individual Necessity and a National Luxury: Applying Multilevel Decision Models to The Analy- sis of Health Care Expenditures”, Journal of Health Economics, 19(2), ss. 259–270.
  • GETZEN, E. Thomas; (2006), “Aggregation and the Measurement of Health Care Costs”, Health Services Research, 41(5), ss. 1938-1954.
  • GOUVEIA, Miguel; (1997), “Majority Rule and The Public Provision of a Pri- vate Good”, Public Choice, 93, ss. 221–244.
  • GREENE, H. Willliam; (1993), Econometric Analysis, McMillan, New York, 791s.
  • HANSEN, Paul ve Alan KING; (1996), “The Determinants of Health Care Ex- penditure: a Cointegration Approach”, Journal of Health Economics, 15(1), ss. 127–137.
  • HAUSMAN, A. Jery; (1978), “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46, ss. 1251 – 1271.
  • HITIRIS, Theodore ve Joseph POSNETT; (1992), “The Determinants and Ef- fects of Health Expenditure in Developed Countries”, Journal of Health Economics, 11(2), ss. 173–181.
  • HITIRIS, Theodore; (1997), “Health Care Expenditure and Integration in The Countries of The European Union”, Applied Economics, 29, ss. 1-6.
  • HSIAO, Cheng; (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd edition, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 384s.
  • HUBER, Manfred ve Eva OROSZ; (2003), “Health Expenditure Trends in The OECD Countries, 1990–2001”, Health Care Financing Review, 25(1), ss. 1–22
  • JONHSTON, Jack ve John DINARDO; (1997), Econometric Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York, 359s.
  • KARATZAS, George; (1992), “On The Effect of Income and Relative Price on The Demand for Health Care – the EEC Evidence: A Comment; Re- ply”, Applied Economics, 24, ss. 1251–1254.
  • KARATZAS, George; (2000), “On the Determinants of US Aggregate Health Care Expenditure”, Applied Economics, 32, ss. 1085 – 1099.
  • L ONARD, Christian, Sabine STORDEUR ve Dominique ROBERFROID; (2009), “Association Between Physician Density and Health Care Con- sumption: A Systematic Review of The Evidence”, Health Policy, 91(2), ss. 121-134.
  • LEU, E. Robert; (1986), The Public-Private Mix and International Health Care Cost, (ed.) Culyer, Anthony J. ve Bengt Jönsson, içinde Public and Private Health Services, B. Blackwell, ss. 41–63.
  • MILNE, Robin ve Hassan MOLANA; (1991), “On The Effect of Income and Relative Price on Demand for Health Care: EC Evidence”, Applied Economics, 23, ss. 1221–1226.
  • MOORE, William J.; Robert J. NEWMAN ve Mohammad FHEILI; (1992), “Measuring The Relationship Between Income and. NHEs”, Health Care Financing Review, 14(1), ss. 133-139.
  • MURTHY N. R. Vasudeva ve Albert A. OKUNADE; (2000), “Managed Care, Deficit Financing, and Aggregate Health Care Expenditure in the United States: A Cointegration Analysis”, Health Care Management Science, (3), ss. 279–285.
  • MURTHY N. R. Vasudeva ve Albert A. OKUNADE; (2009), “The Core De- terminants of Health Expenditure in The African Context: Some Econometric Evidence for Policy”, Health Policy, 91(1), ss. 57-62.
  • NEWHOUSE, P. Joseph; (1977), “Medical Care Expenditure: A Cross-national Survey”, Journal of Human Resources, 12, ss. 115–25.
  • OECD (2007), Health at a Glance 2007, OECD, Paris, 198s.
  • OECD (2008), Health Data 2008, OECD, Paris, 213s.
  • OKUNADE, A. Albert ve Chutima SURARATDECHA; (2000), “Health Care Expenditure Inertia in The OECD Countries: A Heterogeneous Analy- sis”, Health Care Management Science, 3, ss. 31–42.
  • OROSZ, Eva ve David MORGAN; (2004), “SHA-Based National Health Ac- counts in Thirteen OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis”, OECD Health Working Papers, No. 16, OECD, Paris, 148s.
  • PARKIN, David; Alistair McGUIRE ve Brain YULE; (1987), “Aggregate Health Expenditures nd National Income: Is Health Care a Luxury Good?”, Journal of Health Economics, 6, ss. 109-127.
  • SANZ, Ismael ve Francisco J. VELAZQUEZ; (2007), “The Role of Ageing in The Growth of Government and Social Welfare Spending in The OECD”, European Journal of Political Economy, 23, ss. 917–931.
  • SEN, Anindya; (2005), “Is Health Care a Luxury? New Evidence from OECD Data”, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Econom- ics, 5(2), ss. 147-164.
  • ZWEIFEL, Peter; Lucas, STEINMANN ve Patrick EUGSTER; (2005), “The Sisyphus Syndrome in Health Revisited”, International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics, 5(2), ss. 127-145.
There are 41 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Zafer Çalışkan This is me

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2009 Issue: 34

Cite

APA Çalışkan, Z. (2015). OECD ÜLKELERİNDE SAĞLIK HARCAMALARI: PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(34), 117-137.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.