Abstract
Kore tarihinde Konfüçyanizm’in Kore kültürüne, toplumsal yaşama ve örgüt kültürüne önemli etkileri vardır. Ayrıca Kore’ye özgü politik ortamdan gelen sosyal durum da örgüt kültürü üzerinde rol oynar. Kore, dünyadaki en toplulukçu davranışçı toplumlardan birisidir. Kore’de “şabol (chaebol)”ler, halen kurucuları tarafından yönetilen ve kontrol edilen büyük işletmeler olarak göze çarpmaktadır.
Konfüçyan değerlerin oldukça fazla etkilediği ve şekillendirdiği Kore örgüt kültüründe paradoksal özellikler bulunmaktadır. Grup içinde birlik-beraberlik bağlarısağlamlaştırılırken, grup dışına karşıdaha rekabetçi bir ortam vardır.
Bu çalışmada, Kore örgüt kültürünün kökenleri, analizi, yapısıve işleyişi konularıve bunların üzerinde Konfüçyanizmin etkileri incelenmiştir.
References
- BLACKBURN, Simon; (1994), The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 418s.
- CASTELLS, Manuel; (2005), Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi, Çev: Ebru Kılıç, Birinci Cilt, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1.Baskı, İstanbul, 714s.
- CHANG, Chan Sup ve Nahn Joo CHANG; (1994), The Korean Management System: Cultural, Political, Economic Foundations, Quorum Books, Westport, CT, 204s.
- CHEN, Min; (1995), Asian Management Systems, Routledge, London, 288s.
- CHO, Yung-Ho ve Jeongkoo YOON; (2001), “The Origin and Function of Dynamic Collectivism: An Analysis of Korean Corporate Culture”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Volume 7, ss.70-88.
- CHOI, Du Sig; Paul MITCHELL ve Dayananda PALIHAWADANA; (2008), “Exploring the Components of Success for the Korean Chaebols”, Journal of Business&Industrial Marketing, 23/5, ss.311-322.
- CHOW, Irene Hau-Siu; (2005), “High Performance Work Systems in Asian Companies”, Thunderbird International Business Review, 47(5), ss. 575-599.
- CLEARY, Thomas; (1997), Konfüçyüs Düşüncesinin Temelleri (The Essential Confucius), Çev. Sibel Özbudun, Anahtar Kitaplar Yayıne- vi, İstanbul, 192s.
- CONNOR, Mary E.; (2009), “Korea and Confucianism”, İnternet Adresi: http://sss. cuesta .com/pdf /Korea_and_Confucianism.pdf, Erişim Tarihi:25.02.2009.
- ÇEKİNMEZ, Vural; (2006), “Güney Kore İş Kültürü”, T.C.Başbakanlık Dış Ticaret Müsteşarlığı İhracatı Geliştirme Etüd Merkezi, Çalışma Raporu, 34s.
- ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA, Inc.; (1986), Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, Volume I, Chicago: Encyclopaedia, Inc., 830s.
- FANG, Tony; (2003), “A Critique of Hofstede’s Fifth National Culture Dimension”, Management,3(3), ss. 347-368.
- FUKUYAMA, Francis; (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Hamish Hamilton, London, 463s.
- HALL, Edward T.; (2000), “Intercultural Communication: A Reader”, iç.L. A. SAMOVAR ve R. E. PORTER (Ed.), Context and Meaning, 9th edition, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co, 401s.
- HOFSTEDE, Geert; (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 309s.
- HOFSTEDE, Geert; (1991), Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, London, 436s.
- KIM, Inhye; (2009), “Confucianism Shapes Korean Culture”, İnternet Adresi: www.heidrick.com(NR/rdonlyres/5B133704-932C- 4719B21C10891BA03747/0/HS_ ConfucianismKoreanCulture. pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2009.
- KIM, Tae-Yeol; Debra L. SHAPIRO; Karl AQUINO; Vivien K.G. LIM ve Rebecca J. BENNETT; (2008), “Workplace Offense and Victims’ Reaction: The Effects of Victim-Offender (Dis)similarity, Offense Type, and Cultural Differences”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, ss.425-433.
- LEE, Jeong-Kyu; (2001), “Impact of Confucian Concepts of Feelings
- on Organizational Culture in Korean Higher Education”, Radical
- Pedagogy, 3(1), İnternet Adresi: http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/
- content/issue3_1/ 06Lee.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2009.
- LUTHER, Hans Ulrich; (1984), Güney Kore Bir Model Olabilir Mi?, Çev. Erol Özbek, Belge Yayınları, 1.Baskı, İstanbul, 200s.
- MORDEN, Tony ve David BOWLES; (1998), “Management in South Korea: A Review”, Management Decision, 36(5), ss. 316-330.
- OH, Ingyu ve Hun-Joon PARK; (2001), “Shooting at a Moving Target: Four Theoretical Problems in Explaining the Dynamics of Chaebol”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 7, ss. 44-69.
- PARK, Young-bum; (1992), “Wage-fixing Institutions in the Republic of Korea”, International Institute of Labour Studies, Working Paper, Cenevre, 51s.
- PARK, Won-woo; (2001), “The Corparate Culture Change Campaigns in Korea: Lessons From Their Failures”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 7, ss. 89-110.
- PARK, Hong Y.; Geon-Cheol SHIN ve Sung Hahn SUH; (2008), “Advantages and Shortcomings of Korean Chaebols”, International Business&Economics Research Journal, 7(1), ss. 57-66.
- PUCIK, Vladimir ve Jun-Cheol LIM; (2001), “Transforming Human Resource Management in Korean Chaebol: A Case Study of Samsung”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 7(4), ss. 137-160.
- REID, T.R.;(2006), Kapı Komşum Konfüçyüs (Confucius Lives Next Door), Çev.Sevcan Yılmaz, Aykırı Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 269s.
- TRIANDIS, Harry C.; (1995), Individualism and Collectivism, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 280s.
- THE CONFUCIAN ETHIC: A SYSTEM OF IDEAS IN KOREA, İnternet Ad- resi: http://www.koreasociety.org/download_document/392_bohs_5_ confucian_ethic.pdf.html, Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2009.
- TROMPENAARS, Fons; (1994), Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, Chicago: Irwin Professional Publishing, 281s.
- ZERENLER, Muammer ve Rıfat İRAZ; (2006), “Japon Yönetim Anlayışı ve Şirket Ağları (Keiretsu) Analizi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilim- ler Dergisi, Sayı 16, ss. 757-776.
Abstract
References
- BLACKBURN, Simon; (1994), The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 418s.
- CASTELLS, Manuel; (2005), Ağ Toplumunun Yükselişi, Çev: Ebru Kılıç, Birinci Cilt, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 1.Baskı, İstanbul, 714s.
- CHANG, Chan Sup ve Nahn Joo CHANG; (1994), The Korean Management System: Cultural, Political, Economic Foundations, Quorum Books, Westport, CT, 204s.
- CHEN, Min; (1995), Asian Management Systems, Routledge, London, 288s.
- CHO, Yung-Ho ve Jeongkoo YOON; (2001), “The Origin and Function of Dynamic Collectivism: An Analysis of Korean Corporate Culture”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Volume 7, ss.70-88.
- CHOI, Du Sig; Paul MITCHELL ve Dayananda PALIHAWADANA; (2008), “Exploring the Components of Success for the Korean Chaebols”, Journal of Business&Industrial Marketing, 23/5, ss.311-322.
- CHOW, Irene Hau-Siu; (2005), “High Performance Work Systems in Asian Companies”, Thunderbird International Business Review, 47(5), ss. 575-599.
- CLEARY, Thomas; (1997), Konfüçyüs Düşüncesinin Temelleri (The Essential Confucius), Çev. Sibel Özbudun, Anahtar Kitaplar Yayıne- vi, İstanbul, 192s.
- CONNOR, Mary E.; (2009), “Korea and Confucianism”, İnternet Adresi: http://sss. cuesta .com/pdf /Korea_and_Confucianism.pdf, Erişim Tarihi:25.02.2009.
- ÇEKİNMEZ, Vural; (2006), “Güney Kore İş Kültürü”, T.C.Başbakanlık Dış Ticaret Müsteşarlığı İhracatı Geliştirme Etüd Merkezi, Çalışma Raporu, 34s.
- ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA, Inc.; (1986), Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, Volume I, Chicago: Encyclopaedia, Inc., 830s.
- FANG, Tony; (2003), “A Critique of Hofstede’s Fifth National Culture Dimension”, Management,3(3), ss. 347-368.
- FUKUYAMA, Francis; (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Hamish Hamilton, London, 463s.
- HALL, Edward T.; (2000), “Intercultural Communication: A Reader”, iç.L. A. SAMOVAR ve R. E. PORTER (Ed.), Context and Meaning, 9th edition, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co, 401s.
- HOFSTEDE, Geert; (1980), Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 309s.
- HOFSTEDE, Geert; (1991), Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, London, 436s.
- KIM, Inhye; (2009), “Confucianism Shapes Korean Culture”, İnternet Adresi: www.heidrick.com(NR/rdonlyres/5B133704-932C- 4719B21C10891BA03747/0/HS_ ConfucianismKoreanCulture. pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2009.
- KIM, Tae-Yeol; Debra L. SHAPIRO; Karl AQUINO; Vivien K.G. LIM ve Rebecca J. BENNETT; (2008), “Workplace Offense and Victims’ Reaction: The Effects of Victim-Offender (Dis)similarity, Offense Type, and Cultural Differences”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, ss.425-433.
- LEE, Jeong-Kyu; (2001), “Impact of Confucian Concepts of Feelings
- on Organizational Culture in Korean Higher Education”, Radical
- Pedagogy, 3(1), İnternet Adresi: http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/
- content/issue3_1/ 06Lee.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2009.
- LUTHER, Hans Ulrich; (1984), Güney Kore Bir Model Olabilir Mi?, Çev. Erol Özbek, Belge Yayınları, 1.Baskı, İstanbul, 200s.
- MORDEN, Tony ve David BOWLES; (1998), “Management in South Korea: A Review”, Management Decision, 36(5), ss. 316-330.
- OH, Ingyu ve Hun-Joon PARK; (2001), “Shooting at a Moving Target: Four Theoretical Problems in Explaining the Dynamics of Chaebol”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 7, ss. 44-69.
- PARK, Young-bum; (1992), “Wage-fixing Institutions in the Republic of Korea”, International Institute of Labour Studies, Working Paper, Cenevre, 51s.
- PARK, Won-woo; (2001), “The Corparate Culture Change Campaigns in Korea: Lessons From Their Failures”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 7, ss. 89-110.
- PARK, Hong Y.; Geon-Cheol SHIN ve Sung Hahn SUH; (2008), “Advantages and Shortcomings of Korean Chaebols”, International Business&Economics Research Journal, 7(1), ss. 57-66.
- PUCIK, Vladimir ve Jun-Cheol LIM; (2001), “Transforming Human Resource Management in Korean Chaebol: A Case Study of Samsung”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 7(4), ss. 137-160.
- REID, T.R.;(2006), Kapı Komşum Konfüçyüs (Confucius Lives Next Door), Çev.Sevcan Yılmaz, Aykırı Yayıncılık, İstanbul, 269s.
- TRIANDIS, Harry C.; (1995), Individualism and Collectivism, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 280s.
- THE CONFUCIAN ETHIC: A SYSTEM OF IDEAS IN KOREA, İnternet Ad- resi: http://www.koreasociety.org/download_document/392_bohs_5_ confucian_ethic.pdf.html, Erişim Tarihi: 13.02.2009.
- TROMPENAARS, Fons; (1994), Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, Chicago: Irwin Professional Publishing, 281s.
- ZERENLER, Muammer ve Rıfat İRAZ; (2006), “Japon Yönetim Anlayışı ve Şirket Ağları (Keiretsu) Analizi”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilim- ler Dergisi, Sayı 16, ss. 757-776.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | May 16, 2015 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2010 Issue: 35 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.