BibTex RIS Cite

ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖRGÜTSEL SOSYALİZASYON VE KARİYER ÇAPALARINA YÖNELİK ALGILAMALARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ VE BANKA ÇALIŞANLARINA YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2010, Issue: 35, 77 - 97, 16.05.2015

Abstract

Araştırma, bankacılık sektöründe çalışan bireylerin örgütsel sosyalleşme ve kariyer çapalarına yönelik algılamalarıarasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında, İstanbul’un Avrupa Yakası’ndaki beşözel bankanın çalışanlarına yönelik anket düzenlenmiş-tir. Araştırma sonucunda, çalışanların örgütsel sosyalizasyon ile kariyer çapalarına yönelik algılamaları arasında pozitif yönlü orta derecede bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca çalışanların demografik özelliklerine (cinsiyet, eğitim durumu) göre örgütsel sosyalizasyon algılamalarının herhangi bir farklılık göstermediği tespit edilmiştir

References

  • ALLEN, Natalie J. ve John P. MEYER; (1990), “Organizational Socialization Tactics: A Longitudinal Analysis of Links to Newcomers’ Commitment and Role Orientation”, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), ss.847-858.
  • ASHFORTH, Blake E. ve Saks, Alan M.; (1996), “Socialization Tactics: Longitudinal Effects on Newcomer Adjustment”, The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), ss.149-178.
  • ASHFORTH, Blake E.; David M. SLUSS ve Alan M. SAKS; (2007), “Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, ss.447-462.
  • AYTAÇ, Mustafa ve Nuran BAYRAM; “Öğretim Elemanlarının Kariyer Tu- tumlarının Gruplandırılması”, İnternet Adresi: http://idari.cu.edu.tr/ sempozyum/ bil29.htm. Erişim tarihi: 07.08.2009.
  • BALCI, Ali; (2006), Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma: Yöntem, Teknik ve İlke- ler. Pegema Yayıncılık, Ankara. 362s.
  • BIGLIARDI, Barbara; Alberto PETRONI ve Alberto Ivo DORMIO; (2005), “Organizational socialization, career aspirations and turnover intentions among design engineers”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(6), ss.424-441.
  • CHOW, Irene Hau-Siu; (2002). “Organizational socialization and career success of Asian managers”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(4), ss.720–737.
  • CREPEAU, Raymond G.; Connie W. CROOK,, Martin D.GOSLAR ve Mark E. MCMURTREY; (1992), “Career Anchors of Information Systems Personnel”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(2), ss.145-160.
  • CROW, Gary M.; (2007), “The Professional and Organizational Socialization of New English Headteachers in School Reform Contexts”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), ss.51-71.
  • ÇALIK, Temel; (2003). “İşgörenlerin Örgüte Uyumu (Örgütsel Sosyalizas- yon)”, Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), ss.163-178.
  • ERDOĞMUŞ, Nihat (2003). Kariyer Geliştirme. 1. baskı Nobel Yayın- Dağıtım, Ankara, 271s.
  • FELDMAN, Daniel C.; (1989), “Careers in Organizations: Recent Trends and Future Directions,” Journal of Management, 15(2), ss.135-156.
  • FELDMAN, Daniel C. ve Mark C. BOLINO; (2000), “Career Patterns of the Self-Employed: Career Motivations and Career Outcomes”, Journal of Small Business Management, ss.53-67.
  • GRIFFIN, Andrea E.C.; Adrienne COLELLA, ve Srikanth GOPARAJU; (2000), “Newcomer and organizational socialization tactics: an interactionist perspective,” Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), ss.453-474.
  • HASKI-LEVENTHAL, Debbie ve David BARGAL; (2008), “The volunteer stages and transitions model: Organizational socialization of volunteers”, Human Relations, 61 (1), ss.67-102
  • JASKYTE, Kristina; (2005), “The Impact of Organizational Socialization Tactics on Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict of Newly Hired Social Workers”, Administration in Social Work, 29(4), ss.69-87
  • JIANG, James J. ve Gary KLEIN; (2000), “Supervisor Support and Career Anchor Impact on the Career Satisfaction of the Entry-Level Information Systems Professional”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), ss. 219-240.
  • JONES, Gareth R.; (1986), “Socialization Tactics, Self-Efficacy, and Newcomers’ Adjustments to Organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), ss. 262-279.
  • KAYIŞ, Aliye (2005) “Güvenilirlik Analizi”, iç. Şeref KALAYCI (Ed.) SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağı- tım, Ankara, ss.403-419.
  • LIANG, Su-Chiun ve An-Tien HSIEH; (2008), “The Role of Organizational Socialization in Burnout: A Taiwanese Example”, Social Behavior and Personality, 36(2), ss.197-216.
  • MAANEN, John Van ve Edgar H. SCHEIN; “Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization”, İnternet Adresi: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/ 1721.1/1934/1/SWP-0960 03581864. pdf., ss.1-89, Erişim Tarihi 05.05.2009.
  • NELSON, Debra L.; (1987), “Organizational Socialization: A Stress Perspective,” Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, ss.311-324
  • RAMAKRISHNA, H. ve D. Potosky; (2002), “Structural Shifts In Career Anchors of Information Systems Personnel: A Preliminary Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(2), ss.83-89
  • SCHEIN, Edgar H.; (1996), “Career Anchors Revisited: Implications for Career Development in the 21st Century”, Internet Adresi: http://www.solonline.org/ repository/download/10009.html?item_ id=507557#toc. Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2009
  • TAORMINA, Robert J.; (2004); “Convergent validation of two measures of organizational socialization”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1). ss.76-94.
  • TAORMİNA, R.J. (1997), “Organizational Socialization: a Multidomain, Continuous Process Model”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(1), ss.29-47
  • TAORMINA, R. J. ve C.M. LAW; (2000). “Approaches to preventing burnout: the effects of personal stress management and organizational socialization”, Journal of Nursing Management, 8, ss.89-99
  • THOMAS-COOPER, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (2006), “Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices in organizations”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), ss.492-516.
  • THOMAS-COOPER,, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (2005), Neil “Organizational Socialization: A Field Study into Socialization Success and Rate”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(2), ss.116-128.
  • THOMAS-COOPER, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (2002), “Newcomer adjustment: The relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, ss.423-437
  • THOMAS-COOPER, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (1998), “Changes In Newcomers’ Psychological Contracts During Organizational Socialization: A Study Of Recruits Entering The British Army”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, ss. 745-767.
  • TUTTLE, Monica; (2002), “A Review and Critique of Van Manen and Schein’s “Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization” and Implications for Human Resource Development”, Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), ss.66-90.
  • Yİ, Xiang ve Jin Feng UEN; (2006), “Relationship between Organizational Socialization and Organization Identification of Professionals: Moderating Effects of Personal Work Experience and Growth Need Strength,” The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 10(1), ss.362-371.
Year 2010, Issue: 35, 77 - 97, 16.05.2015

Abstract

References

  • ALLEN, Natalie J. ve John P. MEYER; (1990), “Organizational Socialization Tactics: A Longitudinal Analysis of Links to Newcomers’ Commitment and Role Orientation”, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), ss.847-858.
  • ASHFORTH, Blake E. ve Saks, Alan M.; (1996), “Socialization Tactics: Longitudinal Effects on Newcomer Adjustment”, The Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), ss.149-178.
  • ASHFORTH, Blake E.; David M. SLUSS ve Alan M. SAKS; (2007), “Socialization tactics, proactive behavior, and newcomer learning: Integrating socialization models”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, ss.447-462.
  • AYTAÇ, Mustafa ve Nuran BAYRAM; “Öğretim Elemanlarının Kariyer Tu- tumlarının Gruplandırılması”, İnternet Adresi: http://idari.cu.edu.tr/ sempozyum/ bil29.htm. Erişim tarihi: 07.08.2009.
  • BALCI, Ali; (2006), Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma: Yöntem, Teknik ve İlke- ler. Pegema Yayıncılık, Ankara. 362s.
  • BIGLIARDI, Barbara; Alberto PETRONI ve Alberto Ivo DORMIO; (2005), “Organizational socialization, career aspirations and turnover intentions among design engineers”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(6), ss.424-441.
  • CHOW, Irene Hau-Siu; (2002). “Organizational socialization and career success of Asian managers”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(4), ss.720–737.
  • CREPEAU, Raymond G.; Connie W. CROOK,, Martin D.GOSLAR ve Mark E. MCMURTREY; (1992), “Career Anchors of Information Systems Personnel”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(2), ss.145-160.
  • CROW, Gary M.; (2007), “The Professional and Organizational Socialization of New English Headteachers in School Reform Contexts”, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), ss.51-71.
  • ÇALIK, Temel; (2003). “İşgörenlerin Örgüte Uyumu (Örgütsel Sosyalizas- yon)”, Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), ss.163-178.
  • ERDOĞMUŞ, Nihat (2003). Kariyer Geliştirme. 1. baskı Nobel Yayın- Dağıtım, Ankara, 271s.
  • FELDMAN, Daniel C.; (1989), “Careers in Organizations: Recent Trends and Future Directions,” Journal of Management, 15(2), ss.135-156.
  • FELDMAN, Daniel C. ve Mark C. BOLINO; (2000), “Career Patterns of the Self-Employed: Career Motivations and Career Outcomes”, Journal of Small Business Management, ss.53-67.
  • GRIFFIN, Andrea E.C.; Adrienne COLELLA, ve Srikanth GOPARAJU; (2000), “Newcomer and organizational socialization tactics: an interactionist perspective,” Human Resource Management Review, 10(4), ss.453-474.
  • HASKI-LEVENTHAL, Debbie ve David BARGAL; (2008), “The volunteer stages and transitions model: Organizational socialization of volunteers”, Human Relations, 61 (1), ss.67-102
  • JASKYTE, Kristina; (2005), “The Impact of Organizational Socialization Tactics on Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict of Newly Hired Social Workers”, Administration in Social Work, 29(4), ss.69-87
  • JIANG, James J. ve Gary KLEIN; (2000), “Supervisor Support and Career Anchor Impact on the Career Satisfaction of the Entry-Level Information Systems Professional”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), ss. 219-240.
  • JONES, Gareth R.; (1986), “Socialization Tactics, Self-Efficacy, and Newcomers’ Adjustments to Organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), ss. 262-279.
  • KAYIŞ, Aliye (2005) “Güvenilirlik Analizi”, iç. Şeref KALAYCI (Ed.) SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Asil Yayın Dağı- tım, Ankara, ss.403-419.
  • LIANG, Su-Chiun ve An-Tien HSIEH; (2008), “The Role of Organizational Socialization in Burnout: A Taiwanese Example”, Social Behavior and Personality, 36(2), ss.197-216.
  • MAANEN, John Van ve Edgar H. SCHEIN; “Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization”, İnternet Adresi: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/ 1721.1/1934/1/SWP-0960 03581864. pdf., ss.1-89, Erişim Tarihi 05.05.2009.
  • NELSON, Debra L.; (1987), “Organizational Socialization: A Stress Perspective,” Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, ss.311-324
  • RAMAKRISHNA, H. ve D. Potosky; (2002), “Structural Shifts In Career Anchors of Information Systems Personnel: A Preliminary Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(2), ss.83-89
  • SCHEIN, Edgar H.; (1996), “Career Anchors Revisited: Implications for Career Development in the 21st Century”, Internet Adresi: http://www.solonline.org/ repository/download/10009.html?item_ id=507557#toc. Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2009
  • TAORMINA, Robert J.; (2004); “Convergent validation of two measures of organizational socialization”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(1). ss.76-94.
  • TAORMİNA, R.J. (1997), “Organizational Socialization: a Multidomain, Continuous Process Model”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5(1), ss.29-47
  • TAORMINA, R. J. ve C.M. LAW; (2000). “Approaches to preventing burnout: the effects of personal stress management and organizational socialization”, Journal of Nursing Management, 8, ss.89-99
  • THOMAS-COOPER, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (2006), “Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices in organizations”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), ss.492-516.
  • THOMAS-COOPER,, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (2005), Neil “Organizational Socialization: A Field Study into Socialization Success and Rate”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(2), ss.116-128.
  • THOMAS-COOPER, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (2002), “Newcomer adjustment: The relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, ss.423-437
  • THOMAS-COOPER, Helena D. ve Neil ANDERSON; (1998), “Changes In Newcomers’ Psychological Contracts During Organizational Socialization: A Study Of Recruits Entering The British Army”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, ss. 745-767.
  • TUTTLE, Monica; (2002), “A Review and Critique of Van Manen and Schein’s “Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization” and Implications for Human Resource Development”, Human Resource Development Review, 1(1), ss.66-90.
  • Yİ, Xiang ve Jin Feng UEN; (2006), “Relationship between Organizational Socialization and Organization Identification of Professionals: Moderating Effects of Personal Work Experience and Growth Need Strength,” The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 10(1), ss.362-371.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Şule Çerik This is me

Serdar Bozkurt This is me

Publication Date May 16, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2010 Issue: 35

Cite

APA Çerik, Ş., & Bozkurt, S. (2015). ÇALIŞANLARIN ÖRGÜTSEL SOSYALİZASYON VE KARİYER ÇAPALARINA YÖNELİK ALGILAMALARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ VE BANKA ÇALIŞANLARINA YÖNELİK BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(35), 77-97.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.