BibTex RIS Cite

İZLENİM YÖNETİMİ TAKTİKLERİNDE ÖZ YETERLİLİK ALGISININ ROLÜ

Year 2010, Issue: 35, 255 - 269, 16.05.2015

Fatih Çetin H. Basım

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacıörgütsel bağlamda izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinin sergilenmesinde öz yeterlilik algısının rolünün araştırılmasıdır. Araştırma, İzlenim Yönetimi Taktikleri Ölçeği ve Öz Yeterlilik Algısı Ölçeği kullanılarak 248 banka çalışanından toplanan verilerle yürütülmüştür. Elde edilen veriler Amos 16.0 istatistik programıkullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, öz yeterlilik algısının, izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinden kendini acındırmaya çalışma ve kendi önemini zorla fark ettirme ile negatif; işine sahip çıkmaya çalışma ve niteliklerini tanıtarak kendini sevdirme boyutlarıyla ise pozitif yönlü ilişkiler içinde olduğunu göstermiştir. Böylece yetenekleriyle neler yapılabileceğine yönelik kişisel inancıyüksek kişilerin işine daha çok sahip çıkmaya çalıştıklarıve kendi niteliklerini tanıtarak kendini sevdirme taktiğini daha çok kullandıkları; buna karşın kendini acındırma ve kendi önemini zorla fark ettirmeye çalışma davranışlarından kaçındıklarıortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuç olarak izlenim yönetimi taktiklerinde bir kişilik özelliği olan öz yeterlilik algısının rolü ve önemi ortaya çıkarılmıştır

Keywords

İzlenim Yönetimi Öz Yeterlilik Algısı Kişilik.

References

  • ŞİMŞEK, Ömer F.; (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş, Ekinoks Yayınları, Ankara, 212s.
  • BYRNE, Barbara M.; (2001), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, London, 352s.
  • BANDURA, Albert; (1977), “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change”, Psychological Review, 84, ss. 191-215.
  • BANDURA, Albert; (1995), Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Pres, 352s.
  • BANDURA, Albert; (1997), Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 628s.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat ve İlker TATAR; (2006), “Kamuda İzlenim Yönetimi: Karşı- laştırmalı Bir Çalışma”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 39(4), ss. 225-244.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat; İlker TATAR ve Nesrin H. ŞAHİN; (2006a), “İzlenim Yöne- timinde Kendilik Algısı, Kontrol Odağı, Mesleki Hedeflere Ulaşma Düzeyi ve Stres: Bir Kamu Sektörü Örneği”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21(58), ss. 1-14.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat; İlker TATAR ve Nesrin H. ŞAHİN; (2006b), “Çalışma Ya- şamında izlenim Yönetimi: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 9(18), ss. 1-17.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat; Haluk KORKMAZYÜREK ve A. Osman TOKAT; (2008), “Çalışanların Öz Yeterlilik Algılamasının Yenilikçilik ve Risk Alma Üzerine Etkisi: Kamu Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Selçuk Üniversite- si Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, ss. 121-130.
  • BOLINO, Mark C. ve William H. TURNLEY; (1999), “Measuring Impression Management in Organizations: A Scale Development Based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy”, Organizational Research Methods, 2, ss. 187-206.
  • BOLINO, Mark C. ve William H. TURNLEY; (2003), “Counternormative Impression Management, Likeability, and Performance Ratings: the Use of Intimidation in an Organizational Setting”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, ss. 237–250.
  • BOLINO, Mark C.; (1999), “Citizenship and Impression Management: Good Soldiers or Good Actors?”, Academy of Management Review, 24, ss. 82-98.
  • BOZEMAN, Dennis P. ve K. Michele KACMAR; (1997), “A Cybernetic Model of Impression Management Processes in Organizations”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, ss. 9-30.
  • CRANE, Erinn ve Frederick G. CRANE; (2004), “Usage and Effectiveness of Impression Management Strategies in Organizational Settings”, Journal of Group Psychotherapy Psychodrama and Sociometry, ss. 25-34.
  • FELDMAN, Daniel C. ve Nancy R. KLICH; (1991), “Impression Management and Career Strategies”, iç. Robert A GIACALONE ve Paul ROSENFELD (Ed.), Applied Impression Management, London: Sage Pub, ss.67-79.
  • GARDNER, William L. ve Mark J. MARTINKO; (1988), “Impression Management in Organizations”, Journal of Management, 14, ss. 321-338.
  • GOFFMAN, Erving; (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City, NY: Double Day, 256s.
  • JERUSALEM, Matthias ve Ralf SCHWARZER; (1981), “Self-Efficacy as Resource Theory in Stress Appraisal Process”, iç. Ralf SCHWARZER (Ed.) Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, Washington DC, Hemisphere, ss. 195-213.
  • JONES, Edward Ellsworth; (1990), Interpersonal Perception, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 313s.
  • JONES, Edward E. ve Thane S. PITTMAN; (1982), “Toward A General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation”, iç. Jerry SULS (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum, ss. 231-261.
  • KRAMER, Nicole C. ve Stephan WINTER; (2008), “Impression Management 2.0: The Relationship of Self-Esteem, Extraversion, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Presentation Within Social Networking Sites”, Journal of Media Psychology, 20(3), ss. 106–116.
  • LEARY, Mark R.; (1996), Self-Presentation, Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Oxford: Westview Press, 264s.
  • LIDEN, Robert C. ve Terence R. MITCHELL; (1988), “Ingratiatory Behaviors in Organizational Settings”, Academy of Management Review, 13, ss. 572-587.
  • LUSZCZYNSKA, Aleksandra; Urte SCHOLZ ve Ralf SCHWARZER; (2005), “The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies”, The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), ss. 439-457.
  • ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, Mahmut ve F. Sinem ERDEM; (2008), “İzlenim Yönetimi Davranışı: Örgütsel Açıdan Teorik Çerçeve”, iç. Mahmut ÖZDEVECİOĞLU ve Himmet KARADAL (Ed.), Örgütsel Davranışta Seçme Konular: Organizasyonların Karanlık Yönleri ve Verimlilik Azaltıcı Davranışlar, İlke Yayınevi, Yayın No: 11, Ankara, ss. 33-54.
  • ROSENFELD, Paul; (1990), “Self-Esteem and Impression Management Explanations for Self-Serving Biases”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(4), ss. 495-500.
  • ROSENFELD, Paul; Jonathan EDWARDS ve Marie D. THOMAS; (2005), “Impression Management”, İç. Nigel NICHOLSON; Pino AUDIA, ve Madan PILLUTLA (Ed.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management (2nci baskı), Oxford: Blackwell, ss. 163–165.
  • ROSENFELD, Paul; Robert A GIACALONE ve C. A. RIORDAN; (1995), Impression Management in Organizations, New York: Routhledge, 219s.
  • SCHENKLER, Barry R.; (1980), Impression Management: The Self- Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 344s.
  • SCHUTZ, Astrid; (1998), “Assertive, Offensive, Protective, and Defensive Styles of Self-Presentation: A Taxonomy”, The Journal of Psychology, 132(6), ss. 611-628.
  • SCHNEIDER, David J.; (1981); “Tactical Self-Presentations: Toward a Broader Conception”, iç. James T. TEDESCHI (Ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research, New York, NY: Academic Pres, ss. 23-40.
  • STEVENS, Cynthia Kay, ve Amy L. KRISTOF; (1995), “Making the Right Impression: A Field Study of Applicant Impression Management During Job Interviews”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, ss. 587- 606.
  • WAYNE, Sandy J. ve Shawn A. GREEN; (1993), “The Effects of Leader- Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior”, Human Relations, 46, ss. 1431-1440.
  • WAYNE, Sandy J. ve Robert C. LIDEN; (1995), “Effects of Impression Management on Performance Ratings: A Longitudinal Study”, Academy of Management Journal, 38, ss. 232-260.
  • YEŞİLAY, Ayşin; (2010), Genelleştirilmiş Özyetki Beklentisi, İnternet adresi; http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/turk.htm, Erişim tarihi: 02.07.2010.

Year 2010, Issue: 35, 255 - 269, 16.05.2015

Fatih Çetin H. Basım

Abstract

References

  • ŞİMŞEK, Ömer F.; (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş, Ekinoks Yayınları, Ankara, 212s.
  • BYRNE, Barbara M.; (2001), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: LEA, London, 352s.
  • BANDURA, Albert; (1977), “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change”, Psychological Review, 84, ss. 191-215.
  • BANDURA, Albert; (1995), Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge, Cambridge University Pres, 352s.
  • BANDURA, Albert; (1997), Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, 628s.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat ve İlker TATAR; (2006), “Kamuda İzlenim Yönetimi: Karşı- laştırmalı Bir Çalışma”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 39(4), ss. 225-244.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat; İlker TATAR ve Nesrin H. ŞAHİN; (2006a), “İzlenim Yöne- timinde Kendilik Algısı, Kontrol Odağı, Mesleki Hedeflere Ulaşma Düzeyi ve Stres: Bir Kamu Sektörü Örneği”, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21(58), ss. 1-14.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat; İlker TATAR ve Nesrin H. ŞAHİN; (2006b), “Çalışma Ya- şamında izlenim Yönetimi: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması”, Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 9(18), ss. 1-17.
  • BASIM, H. Nejat; Haluk KORKMAZYÜREK ve A. Osman TOKAT; (2008), “Çalışanların Öz Yeterlilik Algılamasının Yenilikçilik ve Risk Alma Üzerine Etkisi: Kamu Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, Selçuk Üniversite- si Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19, ss. 121-130.
  • BOLINO, Mark C. ve William H. TURNLEY; (1999), “Measuring Impression Management in Organizations: A Scale Development Based on the Jones and Pittman Taxonomy”, Organizational Research Methods, 2, ss. 187-206.
  • BOLINO, Mark C. ve William H. TURNLEY; (2003), “Counternormative Impression Management, Likeability, and Performance Ratings: the Use of Intimidation in an Organizational Setting”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, ss. 237–250.
  • BOLINO, Mark C.; (1999), “Citizenship and Impression Management: Good Soldiers or Good Actors?”, Academy of Management Review, 24, ss. 82-98.
  • BOZEMAN, Dennis P. ve K. Michele KACMAR; (1997), “A Cybernetic Model of Impression Management Processes in Organizations”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, ss. 9-30.
  • CRANE, Erinn ve Frederick G. CRANE; (2004), “Usage and Effectiveness of Impression Management Strategies in Organizational Settings”, Journal of Group Psychotherapy Psychodrama and Sociometry, ss. 25-34.
  • FELDMAN, Daniel C. ve Nancy R. KLICH; (1991), “Impression Management and Career Strategies”, iç. Robert A GIACALONE ve Paul ROSENFELD (Ed.), Applied Impression Management, London: Sage Pub, ss.67-79.
  • GARDNER, William L. ve Mark J. MARTINKO; (1988), “Impression Management in Organizations”, Journal of Management, 14, ss. 321-338.
  • GOFFMAN, Erving; (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City, NY: Double Day, 256s.
  • JERUSALEM, Matthias ve Ralf SCHWARZER; (1981), “Self-Efficacy as Resource Theory in Stress Appraisal Process”, iç. Ralf SCHWARZER (Ed.) Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, Washington DC, Hemisphere, ss. 195-213.
  • JONES, Edward Ellsworth; (1990), Interpersonal Perception, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company, 313s.
  • JONES, Edward E. ve Thane S. PITTMAN; (1982), “Toward A General Theory of Strategic Self-Presentation”, iç. Jerry SULS (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on the Self, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum, ss. 231-261.
  • KRAMER, Nicole C. ve Stephan WINTER; (2008), “Impression Management 2.0: The Relationship of Self-Esteem, Extraversion, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Presentation Within Social Networking Sites”, Journal of Media Psychology, 20(3), ss. 106–116.
  • LEARY, Mark R.; (1996), Self-Presentation, Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Oxford: Westview Press, 264s.
  • LIDEN, Robert C. ve Terence R. MITCHELL; (1988), “Ingratiatory Behaviors in Organizational Settings”, Academy of Management Review, 13, ss. 572-587.
  • LUSZCZYNSKA, Aleksandra; Urte SCHOLZ ve Ralf SCHWARZER; (2005), “The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural Validation Studies”, The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), ss. 439-457.
  • ÖZDEVECİOĞLU, Mahmut ve F. Sinem ERDEM; (2008), “İzlenim Yönetimi Davranışı: Örgütsel Açıdan Teorik Çerçeve”, iç. Mahmut ÖZDEVECİOĞLU ve Himmet KARADAL (Ed.), Örgütsel Davranışta Seçme Konular: Organizasyonların Karanlık Yönleri ve Verimlilik Azaltıcı Davranışlar, İlke Yayınevi, Yayın No: 11, Ankara, ss. 33-54.
  • ROSENFELD, Paul; (1990), “Self-Esteem and Impression Management Explanations for Self-Serving Biases”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 130(4), ss. 495-500.
  • ROSENFELD, Paul; Jonathan EDWARDS ve Marie D. THOMAS; (2005), “Impression Management”, İç. Nigel NICHOLSON; Pino AUDIA, ve Madan PILLUTLA (Ed.), Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management (2nci baskı), Oxford: Blackwell, ss. 163–165.
  • ROSENFELD, Paul; Robert A GIACALONE ve C. A. RIORDAN; (1995), Impression Management in Organizations, New York: Routhledge, 219s.
  • SCHENKLER, Barry R.; (1980), Impression Management: The Self- Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 344s.
  • SCHUTZ, Astrid; (1998), “Assertive, Offensive, Protective, and Defensive Styles of Self-Presentation: A Taxonomy”, The Journal of Psychology, 132(6), ss. 611-628.
  • SCHNEIDER, David J.; (1981); “Tactical Self-Presentations: Toward a Broader Conception”, iç. James T. TEDESCHI (Ed.), Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research, New York, NY: Academic Pres, ss. 23-40.
  • STEVENS, Cynthia Kay, ve Amy L. KRISTOF; (1995), “Making the Right Impression: A Field Study of Applicant Impression Management During Job Interviews”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, ss. 587- 606.
  • WAYNE, Sandy J. ve Shawn A. GREEN; (1993), “The Effects of Leader- Member Exchange on Employee Citizenship and Impression Management Behavior”, Human Relations, 46, ss. 1431-1440.
  • WAYNE, Sandy J. ve Robert C. LIDEN; (1995), “Effects of Impression Management on Performance Ratings: A Longitudinal Study”, Academy of Management Journal, 38, ss. 232-260.
  • YEŞİLAY, Ayşin; (2010), Genelleştirilmiş Özyetki Beklentisi, İnternet adresi; http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/turk.htm, Erişim tarihi: 02.07.2010.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Fatih Çetin This is me

H. Basım This is me

Publication Date May 16, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2010 Issue: 35

Cite

APA Çetin, F., & Basım, H. (2015). İZLENİM YÖNETİMİ TAKTİKLERİNDE ÖZ YETERLİLİK ALGISININ ROLÜ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(35), 255-269.

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.