BibTex RIS Cite

A DRAWBACK IN TURKISH BUDGET CLASSIFICATION: WHERE HAVE PUBLIC INVESTMENTS GONE?

Year 2014, Issue: 43, 175 - 202, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.89236

Abstract

In 2006, Turkish fiscal structure has changed its budgeting and budget classification system from a program based and accordingly classified hybrid one (between Program Budgeting and Planning-Programming-Budgeting systems) to a strategically planned, performance based and analytically classified multi-year budgeting system that was structured in line with European System of Accounts (ESA) and Government Finance Statistics (GFS) which have been shaped by neoliberal praxis. What’s wrong with this new classification is that public investment expenditures cannot be clearly distinguished from other outlays. Pursuant to “non-investor minimal state” approach of the neoliberal thought, the idea of “public investment” is the missing point of new classification system. Here, I make three alternative technical recommendations to fix this drawback.

References

  • BACKER, Larry C.; (2010), “Sovereign Investing in Times of Crisis: Global Regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds, State-Owned Enterprises, and the Chinese Experience”, Transnational Law & Contemporary Prob- lems, 19(3), pp. 3-144.
  • BARNETT, Clive; (2010), “Publics and Markets: What’s wrong with Neoliber- alism?”, Internet Address: http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/ emer- gentpublics/publications/barnett_publicsandmarkets.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 30.04.2014.
  • BRAND, Ralf and Frank GAFFIKIN; (2007), “Collaborative Planning in an Uncollaborative World”, Planning Theory, 6(3), pp. 282-313.
  • BRÜCKNER, Markus and Anita TULADHAR; (2010), “Public Investment As a Fiscal Stimulus: Evidence from Japan’s Regional Spending During the 1990s”, IMF Working Paper (WP/10/110), Internet Address: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp10110.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 30.04.2014.
  • CAVALLO, Eduardo and Christian DAUDE; (2011), “Public Investment in Developing Countries: A Blessing or A Curse?”, Journal of Compara- tive Economics, 39, pp. 65-81.
  • CLARKE, John; (2010), “After Neo-Liberalism? Markets, States and the Rein- vention of Public Welfare”, Cultural Studies, 24(3), pp. 375-394.
  • EASTERLY, William; Timothy IRWIN and Luis SERVÉN; (2008), “Walking up the Down Escalator: Public Investment and Fiscal Stability”, The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1), pp. 37-56.
  • ELLWOOD, Sheila and Susan NEWBERRY; (2007), “Public Sector Accrual Accounting: Institutionalising Neo-Liberal Principles?”; Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), pp. 549-573.
  • European Commission, IMF, OECD, UN and World Bank; (1993), “System of https://unstats.un.org/unsd/ nationalaccount/ docs/1993sna.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014. (SNA-1993)”, Internet Address:
  • European Commission, IMF, OECD, UN and World Bank; (2008), “System of https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014. (SNA-2008)”, Internet Address:
  • European Commission; (1995), “European System of Accounts (ESA-1995)”, Internet Address: http://www.comptanat.fr/en/esa95/sec95.htm, Date of Access: 29.04.2014.
  • European Commission; (2010), “European System of Accounts (ESA-2010)”, Internet Address: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ ITY_OFFPUB/ KS-02-13-269/EN/KS-02-13-269-EN.PDF, Date of Access: 29.04.2014.
  • GOMES, Pedro and Francois POUGET; (2008), “Corporate Tax Competition and the Decline of Public Investment”, CESifo Working Paper, No: 2384, Internet Address: https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstream/ 10419/26429/1/577509802.PDF, Date of Access: 30.04.2014.
  • GRUGEL, Jean and Pía RIGGIROZZI; (2012), “Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis”, Develop- ment and Change, 43(1), pp. 1–21.
  • GUEST, Harold W.; (1930), “Classifications of Public Expenditures”, Ameri- can Economic Review, 20(1), pp. 37-45.
  • HUNDT, David; (2005), “A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea”, The Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), pp. 242-260.
  • IMF; (1986), “Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFS-1986)”,Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/ pubs/ft/gfs/manual/1986/eng/pdf/ ch4a.pdf, Date of Access: 28.04.2014.
  • IMF; (2001), “Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFS-2001)”, Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfs/manual/pdf/all.pdf, Date of Access: 28.04.2014.
  • IMF; (2014), “Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFS-2014)”, Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/np/sta/gfsm/pdf/text14.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 28.04.2014.
  • JACOBS, Davina; Jean-Luc HÉLIS and Dominique BOULEY; (2009), “Budget Classification”, IMF Technical Notes and Manuals: 09/06, Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/tnm/2009/tnm0906.pdf, Date of Access: 29.05.2014.
  • KALAITZIDAKIS, Pantelis and Sarantis KALYVITIS; (2005), “ ‘New’ Public Investment and/or Public Capital Maintenance for Growth? The Canadi- an Experience”, Economic Inquiry, 43(3), pp. 586-600.
  • POTERBA, James M.; (1995), “Capital Budgets, Borrowing Rules, and State Capital Spending”, Journal of Public Economics, 56, pp. 165-187.
  • SECCARECCIA, Mario; (2012), “The Role of Public Investment as Principal Macroeconomic Tool to Promote Long-Term Growth”, International Journal of Political Economy, 40(4), pp. 62–82.
  • SHELTON, Cameron A.; (2007), “The Size and Composition of Government Expenditure”, Journal of Public Economics, 91, pp. 2230–2260.
  • SILVEY, Rachel; (2010), “Development Geography: Politics and ‘The State’ Under Crisis”, Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), pp. 828-834.
  • TANZI, Vito; (2009), “The Economic Role of the State Before and After the Current Crisis”, Plenary Session of the 65th Congress of the Interna- tional Institute of Public Finance, August 13, Cape Town (South Afri- ca), Internet Address: www.iipf.net/speeches/Tanzi_2009.pdf, Date of Access: 30.04.2014.
  • TOOLE, Andrew A. and Calum TURVEY; (2009), “How Does Initial Public Financing Influence Private Incentives for Follow-On Investment in Early-Stage Technologies?”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, pp. 43-58.
  • TÜĞEN, Kâmil; (2011), Devlet Bütçesi, Onuncu Baskı, İzmir: Bassaray Mat- baası.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Development; (2013), “Program for FY-2014: General Economic Targets and Investments” (Turkish), Internet Address: http://www.kalkinma.gov.tr/Lists/GenelEkonomikHedeflerveYatirimlar/ Attach- ments/31/Genel%20Ekonomik%20Hedefler%20ve%20Yat%C4%B1r% C4%B1mlar%202014.pdf, Date of Access: 05.06.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Development; (2014), “Central Government Budget (1999-2013)”, Internet Address: http://www.mod.gov.tr/Lists/ Gen- eralGovernmentStatitisticsSubSector- Based/Attachments/1/Central%20Government%20Budget.xls, Date of Access: 05.06.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Development; (2014), “Central Government Budget (1990-2013)”, Internet Address: http://www.mod.gov.tr/Lists/ Pub- licSectorGeneralBalance/Attachments/2/CENTRAL%20GO VERNMENT%20BUDGET %20(1990-2013).xls, Date of Access: 05.06.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Finance; (2013), “Yearly Economic Report-2013” (Turk- ish), Internet Address: http://www.maliye.gov.tr/ YillikEkonomikRa- por/Y%C4%B1ll%C4%B1k%20Ekonomik%20Rapor%202013.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Finance; (2014), “Guide on Analytical Budget Classifica- tion” (Turkish), Internet Address: http://www.bumko.gov.tr/ Eklen- ti/8280,ekorehberduzeltilmispdf.pdf?0, Date of Access: 02.05.2014.
  • TURRINI, Alessandro; (2004), “Public Investment and the EU Fiscal Frame- work”, European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Econpapers http://ideas.repec.org/p/euf/ecopap/0202.html, Affairs 30.04.2014. 202, Internet Address: Access: Date of
  • VIS, Barbara; Kees van KERSBERGEN and Tom HYLANDS; (2011), “To What Extent Did the Financial Crisis Intensify the Pressure to Reform the Welfare State?”, Social Policy & Administration, 45(2), pp. 338– 353.

TÜRK BÜTÇE SINIFLANDIRMASININ EKSİK HALKASI: KAMU YATIRIMLARI NEREYE KAYBOLDU?

Year 2014, Issue: 43, 175 - 202, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.89236

Abstract

2006 yılında Türk mali yapısı, program temelli ve program sınıflandırma tipine sahip hibrid (Program Bütçe Sistemi ve Planlama-Programlama-Bütçeleme Sistemi arasında) bir bütçe ve sınıflandırma sisteminden, stratejik olarak planlanan, performans esaslı, analitik biçimde sınıflandırılan ve neoliberal praksis tarafından şekillendirilen Avrupa Hesaplar Sistemi (ESA) ile Devlet Finans İstatistiklerine (GFS) uygun olarak yapılandırılmış, çok yıllı bir sisteme geçmiştir. Yeni sınıflandırma sisteminin temel eksikliği, harcamacı kuruluşlarca gerçekleştirilen yatırım harcamalarının açık olarak görülememesidir. Neoliberal öğretinin “yatırımcı olmayan minimal devlet” yaklaşımına uygun olarak, “kamu yatırımı” düşüncesi, yeni sınıflandırma sisteminin kayıp halkası olmuştur. Çalışmada, bu eksikliğin giderilmesine yönelik olarak, üç alternatif teknik öneri ortaya konmuştur

References

  • BACKER, Larry C.; (2010), “Sovereign Investing in Times of Crisis: Global Regulation of Sovereign Wealth Funds, State-Owned Enterprises, and the Chinese Experience”, Transnational Law & Contemporary Prob- lems, 19(3), pp. 3-144.
  • BARNETT, Clive; (2010), “Publics and Markets: What’s wrong with Neoliber- alism?”, Internet Address: http://www.open.ac.uk/socialsciences/ emer- gentpublics/publications/barnett_publicsandmarkets.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 30.04.2014.
  • BRAND, Ralf and Frank GAFFIKIN; (2007), “Collaborative Planning in an Uncollaborative World”, Planning Theory, 6(3), pp. 282-313.
  • BRÜCKNER, Markus and Anita TULADHAR; (2010), “Public Investment As a Fiscal Stimulus: Evidence from Japan’s Regional Spending During the 1990s”, IMF Working Paper (WP/10/110), Internet Address: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp10110.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 30.04.2014.
  • CAVALLO, Eduardo and Christian DAUDE; (2011), “Public Investment in Developing Countries: A Blessing or A Curse?”, Journal of Compara- tive Economics, 39, pp. 65-81.
  • CLARKE, John; (2010), “After Neo-Liberalism? Markets, States and the Rein- vention of Public Welfare”, Cultural Studies, 24(3), pp. 375-394.
  • EASTERLY, William; Timothy IRWIN and Luis SERVÉN; (2008), “Walking up the Down Escalator: Public Investment and Fiscal Stability”, The World Bank Research Observer, 23(1), pp. 37-56.
  • ELLWOOD, Sheila and Susan NEWBERRY; (2007), “Public Sector Accrual Accounting: Institutionalising Neo-Liberal Principles?”; Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(4), pp. 549-573.
  • European Commission, IMF, OECD, UN and World Bank; (1993), “System of https://unstats.un.org/unsd/ nationalaccount/ docs/1993sna.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014. (SNA-1993)”, Internet Address:
  • European Commission, IMF, OECD, UN and World Bank; (2008), “System of https://unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/docs/SNA2008.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014. (SNA-2008)”, Internet Address:
  • European Commission; (1995), “European System of Accounts (ESA-1995)”, Internet Address: http://www.comptanat.fr/en/esa95/sec95.htm, Date of Access: 29.04.2014.
  • European Commission; (2010), “European System of Accounts (ESA-2010)”, Internet Address: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ ITY_OFFPUB/ KS-02-13-269/EN/KS-02-13-269-EN.PDF, Date of Access: 29.04.2014.
  • GOMES, Pedro and Francois POUGET; (2008), “Corporate Tax Competition and the Decline of Public Investment”, CESifo Working Paper, No: 2384, Internet Address: https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstream/ 10419/26429/1/577509802.PDF, Date of Access: 30.04.2014.
  • GRUGEL, Jean and Pía RIGGIROZZI; (2012), “Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis”, Develop- ment and Change, 43(1), pp. 1–21.
  • GUEST, Harold W.; (1930), “Classifications of Public Expenditures”, Ameri- can Economic Review, 20(1), pp. 37-45.
  • HUNDT, David; (2005), “A Legitimate Paradox: Neo-liberal Reform and the Return of the State in Korea”, The Journal of Development Studies, 41(2), pp. 242-260.
  • IMF; (1986), “Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFS-1986)”,Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/ pubs/ft/gfs/manual/1986/eng/pdf/ ch4a.pdf, Date of Access: 28.04.2014.
  • IMF; (2001), “Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFS-2001)”, Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfs/manual/pdf/all.pdf, Date of Access: 28.04.2014.
  • IMF; (2014), “Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFS-2014)”, Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/np/sta/gfsm/pdf/text14.pdf, Date of Ac- cess: 28.04.2014.
  • JACOBS, Davina; Jean-Luc HÉLIS and Dominique BOULEY; (2009), “Budget Classification”, IMF Technical Notes and Manuals: 09/06, Internet Address: www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/tnm/2009/tnm0906.pdf, Date of Access: 29.05.2014.
  • KALAITZIDAKIS, Pantelis and Sarantis KALYVITIS; (2005), “ ‘New’ Public Investment and/or Public Capital Maintenance for Growth? The Canadi- an Experience”, Economic Inquiry, 43(3), pp. 586-600.
  • POTERBA, James M.; (1995), “Capital Budgets, Borrowing Rules, and State Capital Spending”, Journal of Public Economics, 56, pp. 165-187.
  • SECCARECCIA, Mario; (2012), “The Role of Public Investment as Principal Macroeconomic Tool to Promote Long-Term Growth”, International Journal of Political Economy, 40(4), pp. 62–82.
  • SHELTON, Cameron A.; (2007), “The Size and Composition of Government Expenditure”, Journal of Public Economics, 91, pp. 2230–2260.
  • SILVEY, Rachel; (2010), “Development Geography: Politics and ‘The State’ Under Crisis”, Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), pp. 828-834.
  • TANZI, Vito; (2009), “The Economic Role of the State Before and After the Current Crisis”, Plenary Session of the 65th Congress of the Interna- tional Institute of Public Finance, August 13, Cape Town (South Afri- ca), Internet Address: www.iipf.net/speeches/Tanzi_2009.pdf, Date of Access: 30.04.2014.
  • TOOLE, Andrew A. and Calum TURVEY; (2009), “How Does Initial Public Financing Influence Private Incentives for Follow-On Investment in Early-Stage Technologies?”, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, pp. 43-58.
  • TÜĞEN, Kâmil; (2011), Devlet Bütçesi, Onuncu Baskı, İzmir: Bassaray Mat- baası.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Development; (2013), “Program for FY-2014: General Economic Targets and Investments” (Turkish), Internet Address: http://www.kalkinma.gov.tr/Lists/GenelEkonomikHedeflerveYatirimlar/ Attach- ments/31/Genel%20Ekonomik%20Hedefler%20ve%20Yat%C4%B1r% C4%B1mlar%202014.pdf, Date of Access: 05.06.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Development; (2014), “Central Government Budget (1999-2013)”, Internet Address: http://www.mod.gov.tr/Lists/ Gen- eralGovernmentStatitisticsSubSector- Based/Attachments/1/Central%20Government%20Budget.xls, Date of Access: 05.06.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Development; (2014), “Central Government Budget (1990-2013)”, Internet Address: http://www.mod.gov.tr/Lists/ Pub- licSectorGeneralBalance/Attachments/2/CENTRAL%20GO VERNMENT%20BUDGET %20(1990-2013).xls, Date of Access: 05.06.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Finance; (2013), “Yearly Economic Report-2013” (Turk- ish), Internet Address: http://www.maliye.gov.tr/ YillikEkonomikRa- por/Y%C4%B1ll%C4%B1k%20Ekonomik%20Rapor%202013.pdf, Date of Access: 29.04.2014.
  • Turkish Ministry Of Finance; (2014), “Guide on Analytical Budget Classifica- tion” (Turkish), Internet Address: http://www.bumko.gov.tr/ Eklen- ti/8280,ekorehberduzeltilmispdf.pdf?0, Date of Access: 02.05.2014.
  • TURRINI, Alessandro; (2004), “Public Investment and the EU Fiscal Frame- work”, European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Econpapers http://ideas.repec.org/p/euf/ecopap/0202.html, Affairs 30.04.2014. 202, Internet Address: Access: Date of
  • VIS, Barbara; Kees van KERSBERGEN and Tom HYLANDS; (2011), “To What Extent Did the Financial Crisis Intensify the Pressure to Reform the Welfare State?”, Social Policy & Administration, 45(2), pp. 338– 353.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ferhat Akbey This is me

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Issue: 43

Cite

APA Akbey, F. (2015). TÜRK BÜTÇE SINIFLANDIRMASININ EKSİK HALKASI: KAMU YATIRIMLARI NEREYE KAYBOLDU?. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(43), 175-202. https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.89236

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.