BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2014, Issue: 44, 43 - 58, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.75843

Abstract

Innovative consumers are important for corporations and academics because of being first user of a product, sharing first feedback about the product and supplying information by introducing the product to the potential customers. This study investigated the relationship between consumer innovativeness, perceived risk and purchase intention. The data collected from 402 samples by utilizing from motivated consumer innovativeness and perceived risk scales were examined by using structural equation analysis. Research results revealed that there were positive relationship between consumer innovativeness and purchase intention. Whereas there were negative relationship between consumer innovativeness and perceived risk. Also there were negative relationship between perceived risk and purchase intention. Innovativeness has a determining effect on purchase decision of consumer in the direction of rising in sales and risk perception has a determining effect on purchase decision of consumer in the direction of falling in sales

References

  • AFZAL, Sarwat; (2013), “Factors Influencıng Successful Brand Extension Into Related and Unrelated Product Categories”, Asian Economic and Fi- nancial Review, 3(2), pp. 216-226.
  • AKDOĞAN, M. Şükrü ve M. Halid KARAARSLAN; (2013), “Tüketici Yeni- likçiliği”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), ss. 1-20.
  • ALDAS-MANZANO, Joaquin; Carlos LASSALA-NAVARRE; Carla RUIZ- MAFE and Silvia SANZ-BLAS; (2009), “The Role of Consumer Inno- vativeness and Perceived Risk in Online Banking Usage”, Internation- al Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), pp. 53-75.
  • AYDIN, Serkan; (2009), “Kişisel ve Ürün Temelli Yenilikçilik: Cep Telefonu Kullanıcıları Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10(2), ss. 188-203.
  • BIGNE-ALCANIZ, Enrique; Carla Ruiz-MAFE; Joaquin ALDAS-MANZANO and Silvia Sanz-BLAS; (2008), “Influence of Online Shopping Informa- tion Dependency and Innovativeness on Internet Shopping Adoption”, Online Information Review, 32(5), pp. 648-667.
  • BOYLE, Randall J. and Cynthia P. RUPPEL; (2006), “The Effects of Personal Innovativeness, Perceived Risk, and Computer Self-Efficacy on Online Purchasing Intent”, Journal of International Technology and Infor- mation Management, 15(2), pp. 61-73.
  • CHAKRABARTI, Somnath and Rajat K. BAISYA; (2009), “The Influences of Consumer Innovativeness and Consumer Evaluation Attributes in the Purchase of Fashionable Ethnic Wear in India”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, pp. 706–714.
  • COWART, Kelly O.; Gavin L. FOX and Andrew E. WILSON; (2008), “A Structural Look at Consumer Innovativeness and Self-Congruence in New Product Purchases”, Psychology & Marketing, 25(12), pp. 1111- 1130.
  • COX, Donald F. and Stuart U. RICH; (1964), “Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision-Making: The Case of Telephone Shopping”, Journal of Mar- keting Research, 1(4), pp. 32-39.
  • ERYİGİT, Canan ve Bahtışen KAVAK; (2011), “Tüketici Yenilikçiliğinin Tu- tumsal ve Davranışsal Uyumunun İncelenmesi”, H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), ss. 95-113.
  • GOLDSMITH, Ronald E.; (2001), “Using the Domain Specific Innovativeness Scale to Identify Innovative Internet Consumers”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2), pp. 149-158.
  • GOLDSMITH, Ronald E. and Charles F. HOFACKER; (1991), “Measuring Consumer Innovativeness”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), pp. 209-221.
  • GRÜTZMANN, André; Fernanda Maria Felício MACEDO and André Luiz ZAMBALDE; (2013), “Knowledge Management and Innovation: The Role of Virtual Social Networks in Innovative Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8 (Special Issue ALTEC), pp. 209-220.
  • HIRSCHMAN, Elizabeth C.; (1980), “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity”, Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), pp. 283- 295.
  • HIRUNYAWIPADA, Tanawat and Audhesh K. PASWAN; (2006), “Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk: Implications for High Technology Product Adoption”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), pp. 182- 198.
  • HSU, Shu-Hung and Bat-Erdene BAYARSAIKHAN; (2012), “Factors Influ- encing on Online Shopping Attitude and Intention of Mongolian Con- sumers”, The Journal of International Management Studies, 7(2), pp. 167-176.
  • HUR, Won-Moo; Jeong-Ju YOO and Te-Lin CHUNG; (2012), “The Consump- tion Values and Consumer Innovativeness on Convergence Products”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(5), pp. 688-706.
  • IM, Subin; Barry L. BAYUS and Charlotte H. MASON; (2003), “An Empirical Study of Innate Consumer Innovativeness, Personal Characteristics, and New-Product Adoption Behavior”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 31(1), pp. 61-73.
  • JEONG, Naeyang; Youngsang YOO and Tae-Young HEO; (2009), “Moderating Effect of Personal Innovativeness on Mobile-RFID Services: Based on Warshaw's Purchase Intention Model”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, pp. 154–164.
  • LEE, Hyun-Joo and Patricia HUDDLESTON; (2006), “Effects of E-Tailer and Product Type on Risk Handling in Online Shopping”, Journal of Mar- keting Channels, 13(3), pp. 5-28.
  • LI, Guoxin; Ruijin ZHANG and Chao WANG; (2014), “The Role of Product Originality, Usefulness and Motivated Consumer Innovativeness in New Product Adoption Intentions”, Journal of Product Innovation Man- agement, Internet Address: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/ jpim.12169/pdf, Date Of Access: 15.06.2014.
  • MARTÍN, Héctor San and Ángel HERRERO; (2012), “Influence of the User’s Psychological Factors on the Online Purchase Intention in Rural Tour- ism: Integrating Innovativeness to the UTAUT Framework”, Tourism Management, 33, pp. 341-350.
  • MIDGLEY, David. F. and Gahame. R. DOWLING; (1978), “Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement”, Journal of Consumer Research, 4, pp. 229-242.
  • OSTLUND, Lyman E.; (1974), “Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness”, Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), pp. 23-29.

TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ VE ALGILANAN RİSKİN SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİ

Year 2014, Issue: 44, 43 - 58, 18.05.2015
https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.75843

Abstract

Yenilikçi tüketiciler ürünün ilk kullanıcısı olmaları, ürün hakkında ilk geri bildirimleri paylaşmaları ve potansiyel alıcılara ürünü tanıtıp bilgi sağlamaları gibi nedenlerle işletmeler ve akademisyenler için önemlidir. Bu çalışma tüketici yenilikçiliği, algılanan risk ve satın alma davranışı arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmıştır. Güdülenmiş tüketici yenilikçiliği ve algılanan risk ölçeklerinden faydalanılarak 402 örnekten toplanan veriler yapısal eşitlik analizi kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları tüketici yenilikçiliği ile satın alma davranışı arasında pozitif buna karşın tüketici yenilikçiliği ile algılanan risk ve algılanan risk ile satın alma davranışı arasında negatif ilişki bulunduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Tüketicinin satın alma kararı üzerinde yenilikçiliğin satışları artırıcı, risk algılamasının ise satışları azaltıcı yönde önemli bir belirleyici etkisi söz konusudur.

References

  • AFZAL, Sarwat; (2013), “Factors Influencıng Successful Brand Extension Into Related and Unrelated Product Categories”, Asian Economic and Fi- nancial Review, 3(2), pp. 216-226.
  • AKDOĞAN, M. Şükrü ve M. Halid KARAARSLAN; (2013), “Tüketici Yeni- likçiliği”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 27(2), ss. 1-20.
  • ALDAS-MANZANO, Joaquin; Carlos LASSALA-NAVARRE; Carla RUIZ- MAFE and Silvia SANZ-BLAS; (2009), “The Role of Consumer Inno- vativeness and Perceived Risk in Online Banking Usage”, Internation- al Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), pp. 53-75.
  • AYDIN, Serkan; (2009), “Kişisel ve Ürün Temelli Yenilikçilik: Cep Telefonu Kullanıcıları Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 10(2), ss. 188-203.
  • BIGNE-ALCANIZ, Enrique; Carla Ruiz-MAFE; Joaquin ALDAS-MANZANO and Silvia Sanz-BLAS; (2008), “Influence of Online Shopping Informa- tion Dependency and Innovativeness on Internet Shopping Adoption”, Online Information Review, 32(5), pp. 648-667.
  • BOYLE, Randall J. and Cynthia P. RUPPEL; (2006), “The Effects of Personal Innovativeness, Perceived Risk, and Computer Self-Efficacy on Online Purchasing Intent”, Journal of International Technology and Infor- mation Management, 15(2), pp. 61-73.
  • CHAKRABARTI, Somnath and Rajat K. BAISYA; (2009), “The Influences of Consumer Innovativeness and Consumer Evaluation Attributes in the Purchase of Fashionable Ethnic Wear in India”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, pp. 706–714.
  • COWART, Kelly O.; Gavin L. FOX and Andrew E. WILSON; (2008), “A Structural Look at Consumer Innovativeness and Self-Congruence in New Product Purchases”, Psychology & Marketing, 25(12), pp. 1111- 1130.
  • COX, Donald F. and Stuart U. RICH; (1964), “Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision-Making: The Case of Telephone Shopping”, Journal of Mar- keting Research, 1(4), pp. 32-39.
  • ERYİGİT, Canan ve Bahtışen KAVAK; (2011), “Tüketici Yenilikçiliğinin Tu- tumsal ve Davranışsal Uyumunun İncelenmesi”, H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), ss. 95-113.
  • GOLDSMITH, Ronald E.; (2001), “Using the Domain Specific Innovativeness Scale to Identify Innovative Internet Consumers”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11(2), pp. 149-158.
  • GOLDSMITH, Ronald E. and Charles F. HOFACKER; (1991), “Measuring Consumer Innovativeness”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), pp. 209-221.
  • GRÜTZMANN, André; Fernanda Maria Felício MACEDO and André Luiz ZAMBALDE; (2013), “Knowledge Management and Innovation: The Role of Virtual Social Networks in Innovative Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8 (Special Issue ALTEC), pp. 209-220.
  • HIRSCHMAN, Elizabeth C.; (1980), “Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity”, Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), pp. 283- 295.
  • HIRUNYAWIPADA, Tanawat and Audhesh K. PASWAN; (2006), “Consumer Innovativeness and Perceived Risk: Implications for High Technology Product Adoption”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), pp. 182- 198.
  • HSU, Shu-Hung and Bat-Erdene BAYARSAIKHAN; (2012), “Factors Influ- encing on Online Shopping Attitude and Intention of Mongolian Con- sumers”, The Journal of International Management Studies, 7(2), pp. 167-176.
  • HUR, Won-Moo; Jeong-Ju YOO and Te-Lin CHUNG; (2012), “The Consump- tion Values and Consumer Innovativeness on Convergence Products”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(5), pp. 688-706.
  • IM, Subin; Barry L. BAYUS and Charlotte H. MASON; (2003), “An Empirical Study of Innate Consumer Innovativeness, Personal Characteristics, and New-Product Adoption Behavior”, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 31(1), pp. 61-73.
  • JEONG, Naeyang; Youngsang YOO and Tae-Young HEO; (2009), “Moderating Effect of Personal Innovativeness on Mobile-RFID Services: Based on Warshaw's Purchase Intention Model”, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76, pp. 154–164.
  • LEE, Hyun-Joo and Patricia HUDDLESTON; (2006), “Effects of E-Tailer and Product Type on Risk Handling in Online Shopping”, Journal of Mar- keting Channels, 13(3), pp. 5-28.
  • LI, Guoxin; Ruijin ZHANG and Chao WANG; (2014), “The Role of Product Originality, Usefulness and Motivated Consumer Innovativeness in New Product Adoption Intentions”, Journal of Product Innovation Man- agement, Internet Address: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/ jpim.12169/pdf, Date Of Access: 15.06.2014.
  • MARTÍN, Héctor San and Ángel HERRERO; (2012), “Influence of the User’s Psychological Factors on the Online Purchase Intention in Rural Tour- ism: Integrating Innovativeness to the UTAUT Framework”, Tourism Management, 33, pp. 341-350.
  • MIDGLEY, David. F. and Gahame. R. DOWLING; (1978), “Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement”, Journal of Consumer Research, 4, pp. 229-242.
  • OSTLUND, Lyman E.; (1974), “Perceived Innovation Attributes as Predictors of Innovativeness”, Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), pp. 23-29.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Hasan Bülbül This is me

Buket Özoğlu

Publication Date May 18, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Issue: 44

Cite

APA Bülbül, H., & Özoğlu, B. (2015). TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİ VE ALGILANAN RİSKİN SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞINA ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(44), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.18070/euiibfd.75843

Cited By








Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.