Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Hanehalkı Su Talebini Etkileyen Faktörler: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama

Year 2021, Issue: 60, 399 - 417, 25.12.2021

Gürkan Çalmaşur , Kadir İnan

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.869985

Abstract

Yeryüzündeki su kaynakları giderek azalmaktadır. Zorunlu bir mal niteliğinde olan suyun ikamesi ise bulunmamaktadır. Bununla birlikte su talebinin sağlıklı bir şekilde karşılanabilmesi için hanehalklarının su talep yapısının bilinmesi önem arz etmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de hanehalklarının su taleplerini etkileyen faktörler ve bu faktörlerin su talebini hangi yönde etkilediği araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada 8.336 hanehalkına ait veri seti kullanılmış olup veriler kısmi oransal bahis modeli kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, gelir düzeyi, konut özellikleri ve beyaz eşya kullanımı değişkenlerinin hanehalkı su talebinin önemli belirleyicileri arasında olduğu tespit edilmiştir

Keywords

Hanehalkı Su Talebi Logit Mode Kısmi Oransal Bahis Modeli

References

  • Akdağ, R., & Karahan, M. (2015). Yapay Sinir Ağları Yöntemiyle Diyarbakır İli Kent Merkezi İçme Suyu Talep Tahmini Uygulaması. (Doktora Tezi)Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  • Akpınar, Sümeyra (2018). Gaziantep İli Su Tüketiminin Matematiksel Modellenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gaziantep Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  • Aküzüm, T., Çakmak, B., & Gökalp, Z. (2010). Türkiye’de su kaynakları yönetiminin değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 3(1), 67-74.
  • Ananth, C. V., & Kleinbaum, D. G. (1997). Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. International journal of epidemiology, 26(6), 1323-1333.
  • Arbués, F., Villanúa, I., & Barberán, R. (2010). Household size and residential water demand: an empirical approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(1), 61-80.
  • Basu, M., Hoshino, S., Hashimoto, S., & DasGupta, R. (2017). Determinants of water consumption: A cross-sectional household study in drought-prone rural India. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 24, 373-382.
  • Bıyıklıoğlu, Sinem Ayaz (2013). Çankırı İlinde Sosyo-Ekonomik Yapının Ailelerde Su Tüketimine Etkisi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
  • Cruz, A. O., Alvarez-Chavez, C. R., Ramos-Corella, M. A., & Soto- Hernandez, F. (2017). Determinants of domestic water consumption in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 1901-1910.
  • DSİ. (24.04.2020). Toprak ve Su Kaynakları. Erişim Adresi http://www.dsi.gov.tr/toprak-ve-su-kaynakları
  • Fielding, K. S., Russell, S., Spinks, A., & Mankad, A. (2012). Determinants of household water conservation: The role of demographic, infrastructure, behavior, and psychosocial variables. Water Resources Research, 48(10).
  • Ganguly, I., Koebel, C. T., & Cantrell, R. A. (2010). A categorical modeling approach to analyzing new product adoption and usage in the context of the building-materials industry. Technological forecasting and social change, 77(4), 662-677.
  • Gulyani, S., Talukdar, D., & Kariuki, R. M. (2005). Water for the urban poor: Water markets, household demand, and service preferences in Kenya. Water Supply And Sanitation Sector Board Discussion Paper Series. 5, 1-40.
  • Karadağ, A. A. (2008). Türkiye’deki su kaynaklari yönetimine ilişkin sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. TMMOB 2. Su Politikaları Kongresi. 389-400
  • Karakuş, Emine (2014). Bireylerin Su Tüketimi Tercihlerine Etki Eden Faktörler: Edirne İli Örneği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Kılıç, Selim (2008). Küresel İklim Değişikliği Sürecinde Su Yönetimi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi. (39) 161-186.
  • Kostas, B., & Chrysostomos, S. (2006). Estimating urban residential water demand determinants and forecasting water demand for Athens metropolitan area, 2000-2010. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 1(1), 47-59.
  • Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2002). Residential water demand in the Northwest of Spain. Environmental and resource economics, 21(2), 161-187.
  • Mieno, T., & Braden, J. B. (2011). Residential Demand for Water in the Chicago Metropolitan Area 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 47(4), 713-723.
  • ÖZER, Hüseyin; (2004), Nitel Değişkenli Ekonometrik Modeller Teori ve Bir Uygulama, 1. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Parker, J. M., & Wilby, R. L. (2013). Quantifying household water demand: a review of theory and practice in the UK. Water Resources Management, 27(4), 981-1011.
  • Pınaroğlu, Zuhal (2009). Ailelerin su tüketimine yönelik tutum ve davranışları ve bunları etkileyen faktörler. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Romano, G., Salvati, N., & Guerrini, A. (2014). Estimating the determinants of residential water demand in Italy. Water, 6(10), 2929-2945.
  • Schleich, J., & Hillenbrand, T. (2009). Determinants of residential water demand in Germany. Ecological economics, 68(6), 1756-1769.
  • Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (15.03.2020). Ulusal Su Planı (2019-2023) https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/NHYP%20DEN%C4%B0Z/ULUSAL%20SU%20 PLANI.pdf
  • Topçu, Eral (2009). Bir İnsan Hakkı Olarak Su Hakkı (Doktora Tezi) Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • ÜNSAL, Şerife Seçil (2012). Antalya’da Hanehalkı Su Talebinin Analizi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • TMMOB. (13.03.2020). Küresel Su Politikaları ve Türkiye TMMOB SU RAPORU. Erişim Adresi https://www.tmmob.org.tr/sites/default/files/da80a3d5b344bc4_ek.pdf

The Factors Affecting Household Water Demand: An Application on Turkey

Year 2021, Issue: 60, 399 - 417, 25.12.2021

Gürkan Çalmaşur , Kadir İnan

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.869985

Abstract

Water resources on the earth are decreasing gradually. There is no substitution of water which is a necessary good. Besides, to supply water demand in a correct way, it is important to know the water demand structure of the households. In this study, the factors affecting the water demand of households in Turkey are examined what direction these factors affect water demand. In the study,  data set belonging to 8.336 households were used and the data were analyzed using the partial proportional odds model. As a result, it has been determined that the variables of income level, housing characteristics and use of white goods are among the important determinants of household water demand.

Keywords

Household Water Demand Logit Model Partial Proportional Odds Model

References

  • Akdağ, R., & Karahan, M. (2015). Yapay Sinir Ağları Yöntemiyle Diyarbakır İli Kent Merkezi İçme Suyu Talep Tahmini Uygulaması. (Doktora Tezi)Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
  • Akpınar, Sümeyra (2018). Gaziantep İli Su Tüketiminin Matematiksel Modellenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Gaziantep Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü
  • Aküzüm, T., Çakmak, B., & Gökalp, Z. (2010). Türkiye’de su kaynakları yönetiminin değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 3(1), 67-74.
  • Ananth, C. V., & Kleinbaum, D. G. (1997). Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications. International journal of epidemiology, 26(6), 1323-1333.
  • Arbués, F., Villanúa, I., & Barberán, R. (2010). Household size and residential water demand: an empirical approach. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(1), 61-80.
  • Basu, M., Hoshino, S., Hashimoto, S., & DasGupta, R. (2017). Determinants of water consumption: A cross-sectional household study in drought-prone rural India. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 24, 373-382.
  • Bıyıklıoğlu, Sinem Ayaz (2013). Çankırı İlinde Sosyo-Ekonomik Yapının Ailelerde Su Tüketimine Etkisi (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
  • Cruz, A. O., Alvarez-Chavez, C. R., Ramos-Corella, M. A., & Soto- Hernandez, F. (2017). Determinants of domestic water consumption in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 1901-1910.
  • DSİ. (24.04.2020). Toprak ve Su Kaynakları. Erişim Adresi http://www.dsi.gov.tr/toprak-ve-su-kaynakları
  • Fielding, K. S., Russell, S., Spinks, A., & Mankad, A. (2012). Determinants of household water conservation: The role of demographic, infrastructure, behavior, and psychosocial variables. Water Resources Research, 48(10).
  • Ganguly, I., Koebel, C. T., & Cantrell, R. A. (2010). A categorical modeling approach to analyzing new product adoption and usage in the context of the building-materials industry. Technological forecasting and social change, 77(4), 662-677.
  • Gulyani, S., Talukdar, D., & Kariuki, R. M. (2005). Water for the urban poor: Water markets, household demand, and service preferences in Kenya. Water Supply And Sanitation Sector Board Discussion Paper Series. 5, 1-40.
  • Karadağ, A. A. (2008). Türkiye’deki su kaynaklari yönetimine ilişkin sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. TMMOB 2. Su Politikaları Kongresi. 389-400
  • Karakuş, Emine (2014). Bireylerin Su Tüketimi Tercihlerine Etki Eden Faktörler: Edirne İli Örneği. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Kılıç, Selim (2008). Küresel İklim Değişikliği Sürecinde Su Yönetimi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi. (39) 161-186.
  • Kostas, B., & Chrysostomos, S. (2006). Estimating urban residential water demand determinants and forecasting water demand for Athens metropolitan area, 2000-2010. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 1(1), 47-59.
  • Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2002). Residential water demand in the Northwest of Spain. Environmental and resource economics, 21(2), 161-187.
  • Mieno, T., & Braden, J. B. (2011). Residential Demand for Water in the Chicago Metropolitan Area 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 47(4), 713-723.
  • ÖZER, Hüseyin; (2004), Nitel Değişkenli Ekonometrik Modeller Teori ve Bir Uygulama, 1. Basım, Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Parker, J. M., & Wilby, R. L. (2013). Quantifying household water demand: a review of theory and practice in the UK. Water Resources Management, 27(4), 981-1011.
  • Pınaroğlu, Zuhal (2009). Ailelerin su tüketimine yönelik tutum ve davranışları ve bunları etkileyen faktörler. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Romano, G., Salvati, N., & Guerrini, A. (2014). Estimating the determinants of residential water demand in Italy. Water, 6(10), 2929-2945.
  • Schleich, J., & Hillenbrand, T. (2009). Determinants of residential water demand in Germany. Ecological economics, 68(6), 1756-1769.
  • Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (15.03.2020). Ulusal Su Planı (2019-2023) https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Belgeler/NHYP%20DEN%C4%B0Z/ULUSAL%20SU%20 PLANI.pdf
  • Topçu, Eral (2009). Bir İnsan Hakkı Olarak Su Hakkı (Doktora Tezi) Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • ÜNSAL, Şerife Seçil (2012). Antalya’da Hanehalkı Su Talebinin Analizi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • TMMOB. (13.03.2020). Küresel Su Politikaları ve Türkiye TMMOB SU RAPORU. Erişim Adresi https://www.tmmob.org.tr/sites/default/files/da80a3d5b344bc4_ek.pdf
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Gürkan Çalmaşur 0000-0002-8515-5719

Kadir İnan 0000-0002-6872-0798

Publication Date December 25, 2021
Acceptance Date June 17, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 60

Cite

APA Çalmaşur, G., & İnan, K. (2021). Hanehalkı Su Talebini Etkileyen Faktörler: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(60), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.869985
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.