Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

DEVLETE GÜVEN VE MALİ YERELLEŞMENİN GÜVEN ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 437 - 452, 29.04.2022

Hilmi Çoban , Eda Balıkçıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1057538

Abstract

Sosyal sermayenin temel belirleyicilerinden birisi toplumdaki bireylerin hem birbirine karşıi hem de devlete arşı duydukları güvenin derecesidir. Birey ve devlet arasındaki bağın güçlenmesi ve yabancılaşma sürecini yavaşlatması bakımından mali yerelleşmenin de güven üzerinde belirgin bir etkiye sahip olduğu kabul edilmektedir. Buna bağlı olarak çalışmada 18 OECD ülkesi için 2011-2022 yılları arasındaki güven endeks değerleri ve mali yerelleşmeye ilişkin yıllık verileri kullanarak ikili logit modeli analizi uygulanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda harcama yönünde mali yerelleşmenin artmasının devlete olan güveni arttırdığı tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Güven Sosyal Sermaye Mali Yerelleşme

References

  • Allison, P.D., (2000), Logistic Regression Using The SAS System, 2. Edition, Cary: SAS Institude.
  • Bahl, R. (1999). Fiscal Decentralization as Development Policy. Public Budgeting & Finance, 19, 59-75.
  • Berg, A.M. (2005). Creating Trust?: A Critical Perspective on Trust-Enhancing Efforts in Public Services. Public Performance & Management Review, 28:4, 465-486.
  • Bhattacharrya, A.,Dunson, D.B., (2011), “Sparse Bayesian Infinite Factor Models”,Biometrika, 98, 291-306.
  • De Mello, L.R. (2004). Can Fıscal Decentralızatıon Strengthen Socıal Capıtal?. Publıc Fınance Revıew, 32(1), 4-35.
  • Dincer, O. (2010). Fiscal Decentralization and Trust. Public Finance Review, 38(2), 178-192.
  • Engel, C., (ve) Ginderachter, J. V. (1993). Trends in Regional and Local Government in the European Community. Leuven/ Amersfoort: acco.
  • Grootaert, C. (ve) Van Bastelaer (2002) Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A MultiDisciplinary Tool for Practitioners. Washington:World Bank.
  • Gujarati, D.N.(1999), Temel Ekonometri (Çev. :Ümit Şenesen, Gülay GünlükŞenesen) 1. Basım, İstanbul: Çevik
  • Hayek, V. F. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review , 35(4), pp. 519- 530.
  • Kara, Ö. K. (2019). Mali Yerelleşmenin Başarı Şansı ve Etkinliği Tartışmaları. Sosyoekonomi, 27(40), 165-184.
  • Karabacak, B.N. ve Karabacak, Y. (2014). Mali Yerelleşme Teorilerinin Temel Yerel Gelir Türlerine Bakışı. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1) 251-266
  • Kim, S., Lee, Y. (ve) Kim, T. (2020). The relationship between fiscal decentralization and trust in government: evidence from the South Korean case. International Review of Administrative Sciences.
  • Ligthart, J. E. (ve) Van Oudheusden, P. (2015). In government we trust: The role of fiscal decentralization. European Journal of Political Economy, 37, 116-128.
  • Lockwood, Ben (2005). Fiscal decentralization : a political economy perspective. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. Warwick economic research papers (No.721).
  • Mauro, L. (ve) Pigliaru, F. (2013). Decentralization, Social Capital and Regional Convergence. FEEM Working Paper No. 57.2013.
  • Musgrave, R. (1969). Theories of Fiscal Federalism. Public Finance, 24(4), 521– 32.
  • Musgrave, R. A (1971) Economics of Fiscal Federalism. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business , 10(4), 3-13
  • Musgrave,R.,The Theory of Public Finance,McGrraw-Hill, New York, 1959.
  • Oates, W.E., 1972. Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,New York
  • Oates, W. E., 1993. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development. National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, 46(2), 237-243
  • Oates, W.E. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149. OECD. (2013). “Trust in Government.” In Government at a Glance 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Porcelli, F. (2009). Fiscal Decentralisation and Efficiency of Government, A Brief Literature Review, Erişim adresi https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.232.4919&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Qibthiyyah, R. M., Zen, F. (ve) Ledi, T.& Dita, A. (2011). Decentralization and Social Capital in Indonesia. MPRA Paper 95857, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Rondinelli, D. (1999) What is Decentralization, Litvack, J. & Seddon, J. (Eds.),"Decentralization Briefing Notes", World Bank Institute, The World Bank Working Paper,1999.
  • Salman, A. Iqbal, N (2011). Social Capital and Fiscal Decentralization. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 31(2), 407-421.
  • Tanny, T. F. (ve) Al-Hossienie, C. A. (2019). Trust in Government: Factors Affecting Public Trust and Distrust. Jahangirnagar Journal of Administrative Studies, Department of Public Administration, 12, 49-63.
  • Tatoğlu, F.Y., (2013), İleri Panel Veri Analizi, Stata Uygulamalı, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Tiebout, C.,M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Local Expenditures, LXIV(5), 416-424.
  • Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416- 424.
  • Vazquez, J. (ve) McNab, R.M. (2001). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth, Working Paper 01-1, Georgia State University.
  • Weingast, B.R. (1995). The Economic Role of Political Institutions:Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 15(1),1-31.
  • Yılmaz, H.H., Emil, M.F., Kerimoğlu, B., (2017), Yerel Yönetimler Maliyesi, PYB Kurumsal Yönetim, Planlama ve Proje Danışmanlık, Ankara.
  • Yin, R. K. (ve) Lucas, W. A. (1973). Decentralization and Alienation. Policy Sciences , 4(3), 327-336.

TRUST İN GOVERNMENT AND EFFECTS OF DECENTRALİZATİON ON TRUST

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 437 - 452, 29.04.2022

Hilmi Çoban , Eda Balıkçıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1057538

Abstract

The degree of trust of individuals in the society both towards each other and to government is one of the main determinants of social capital. It is accepted that the development of financial decentralization has a significant effect on trust in terms of strengthening the bond between the individual and the state and slowing down the alienation process of the individual. Accordingly, in the study, binary logit model analysis was applied for 18 OECD countries by using the confidence index values between the years 2011-2020 and annual data on fiscal decentralization. As a result of the study, it was determined that the trust in the government increased with the increase of fiscal decentralization in terms of expenditure.

Keywords

Trust Social Capital Fiscal Decentralization

References

  • Allison, P.D., (2000), Logistic Regression Using The SAS System, 2. Edition, Cary: SAS Institude.
  • Bahl, R. (1999). Fiscal Decentralization as Development Policy. Public Budgeting & Finance, 19, 59-75.
  • Berg, A.M. (2005). Creating Trust?: A Critical Perspective on Trust-Enhancing Efforts in Public Services. Public Performance & Management Review, 28:4, 465-486.
  • Bhattacharrya, A.,Dunson, D.B., (2011), “Sparse Bayesian Infinite Factor Models”,Biometrika, 98, 291-306.
  • De Mello, L.R. (2004). Can Fıscal Decentralızatıon Strengthen Socıal Capıtal?. Publıc Fınance Revıew, 32(1), 4-35.
  • Dincer, O. (2010). Fiscal Decentralization and Trust. Public Finance Review, 38(2), 178-192.
  • Engel, C., (ve) Ginderachter, J. V. (1993). Trends in Regional and Local Government in the European Community. Leuven/ Amersfoort: acco.
  • Grootaert, C. (ve) Van Bastelaer (2002) Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A MultiDisciplinary Tool for Practitioners. Washington:World Bank.
  • Gujarati, D.N.(1999), Temel Ekonometri (Çev. :Ümit Şenesen, Gülay GünlükŞenesen) 1. Basım, İstanbul: Çevik
  • Hayek, V. F. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. American Economic Review , 35(4), pp. 519- 530.
  • Kara, Ö. K. (2019). Mali Yerelleşmenin Başarı Şansı ve Etkinliği Tartışmaları. Sosyoekonomi, 27(40), 165-184.
  • Karabacak, B.N. ve Karabacak, Y. (2014). Mali Yerelleşme Teorilerinin Temel Yerel Gelir Türlerine Bakışı. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1) 251-266
  • Kim, S., Lee, Y. (ve) Kim, T. (2020). The relationship between fiscal decentralization and trust in government: evidence from the South Korean case. International Review of Administrative Sciences.
  • Ligthart, J. E. (ve) Van Oudheusden, P. (2015). In government we trust: The role of fiscal decentralization. European Journal of Political Economy, 37, 116-128.
  • Lockwood, Ben (2005). Fiscal decentralization : a political economy perspective. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. Warwick economic research papers (No.721).
  • Mauro, L. (ve) Pigliaru, F. (2013). Decentralization, Social Capital and Regional Convergence. FEEM Working Paper No. 57.2013.
  • Musgrave, R. (1969). Theories of Fiscal Federalism. Public Finance, 24(4), 521– 32.
  • Musgrave, R. A (1971) Economics of Fiscal Federalism. Nebraska Journal of Economics and Business , 10(4), 3-13
  • Musgrave,R.,The Theory of Public Finance,McGrraw-Hill, New York, 1959.
  • Oates, W.E., 1972. Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,New York
  • Oates, W. E., 1993. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development. National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, 46(2), 237-243
  • Oates, W.E. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120-1149. OECD. (2013). “Trust in Government.” In Government at a Glance 2013. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Porcelli, F. (2009). Fiscal Decentralisation and Efficiency of Government, A Brief Literature Review, Erişim adresi https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.232.4919&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • Qibthiyyah, R. M., Zen, F. (ve) Ledi, T.& Dita, A. (2011). Decentralization and Social Capital in Indonesia. MPRA Paper 95857, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Rondinelli, D. (1999) What is Decentralization, Litvack, J. & Seddon, J. (Eds.),"Decentralization Briefing Notes", World Bank Institute, The World Bank Working Paper,1999.
  • Salman, A. Iqbal, N (2011). Social Capital and Fiscal Decentralization. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 31(2), 407-421.
  • Tanny, T. F. (ve) Al-Hossienie, C. A. (2019). Trust in Government: Factors Affecting Public Trust and Distrust. Jahangirnagar Journal of Administrative Studies, Department of Public Administration, 12, 49-63.
  • Tatoğlu, F.Y., (2013), İleri Panel Veri Analizi, Stata Uygulamalı, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Tiebout, C.,M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Local Expenditures, LXIV(5), 416-424.
  • Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416- 424.
  • Vazquez, J. (ve) McNab, R.M. (2001). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth, Working Paper 01-1, Georgia State University.
  • Weingast, B.R. (1995). The Economic Role of Political Institutions:Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 15(1),1-31.
  • Yılmaz, H.H., Emil, M.F., Kerimoğlu, B., (2017), Yerel Yönetimler Maliyesi, PYB Kurumsal Yönetim, Planlama ve Proje Danışmanlık, Ankara.
  • Yin, R. K. (ve) Lucas, W. A. (1973). Decentralization and Alienation. Policy Sciences , 4(3), 327-336.
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Hilmi Çoban 0000-0001-6351-6547

Eda Balıkçıoğlu 0000-0002-2525-6745

Early Pub Date April 28, 2022
Publication Date April 29, 2022
Acceptance Date February 28, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 61

Cite

APA Çoban, H., & Balıkçıoğlu, E. (2022). DEVLETE GÜVEN VE MALİ YERELLEŞMENİN GÜVEN ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(61), 437-452. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1057538
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.