Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PETROL FİYATLARI, GSYİH VE DÖVİZ KURU DEĞİŞİMİNİN ULAŞTIRMA SEKTÖRÜNE ETKİLERİ: BİST ULAŞTIRMA ENDEKSİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 151 - 173, 29.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.942075

Abstract

Ulaştırma ve lojistik faaliyetleri ülkelerin ekonomik kalkınmasında, istihdam yaratmada ve rekabetçiliğin arttırılmasında büyük öneme sahiptir. Türkiye, konumu itibari Ulaştırma ve Lojistik faaliyetlerinin yoğun olarak gerçekleştiği bir noktadadır. Bu araştırmada da Ulaştırma ve Lojistik sektörünün, ülkenin ekonomik büyümesinde etkili olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla sektörün etkilediği yada etkilendiği düşünülen makroekonomik değişkenler kullanılarak Granger (1969) ve Hsiao (1979) nedensellik analizleri yapılmıştır. 2002/Q1 ve 2020/Q4 dönem aralığında verilerde Lee ve Strazicich (2003, 2004) testleri ile anlamlı yapısal kırılmalar tespit edilmiş olup, seriler analiz öncesi kırılmalardan arındırılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre Ulaştırma ve Lojistik sektörü ekonomik büyümenin nedeni değildir ancak ekonomik büyüme sektörü etkilemektedir. Dolayısıyla tek yönlü bir ilişki mevcuttur. Ayrıca petrol fiyatları ve kurdan, sektöre doğru tek yönlü nedensellik mevcuttur.

References

  • Aggarwal, R., Akhigbe, A. ve Mohanty, S. K. (2012). Oil price shocks and transportation firm asset prices. Energy Economics, 34(5), 1370-1379.
  • Altınay, Galip ve Karagöl, Erdal. (2005). Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics, 27. pp.849-856.
  • Aschauer DA (1991) Transportation spending and economic growth: the effects of transit and highway expenditures. American Public Transportation Association.
  • Ayvaz, Ö. (2006). Döviz kuru ve hisse senetleri fiyatları arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 1-14.
  • Banerjee A, Duflo E ve Qian N. (2012) On the road: access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China (No. 17897). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Banister D. ve Berechman Y. (2001) Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography 9(3):209–218.
  • Chu Z (2012) Logistics and economic growth: a panel data approach. The Annals of Regional Science 49(1):87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0434-0
  • Demir, M. (2013). Enerji ithalati cari açık ilişkisi, Var analizi ile Türkiye üzerine bir inceleme. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 5(9), 2-27.
  • Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. ve Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, 64, 813-836.
  • Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu [EPDK] , (2020). Petrol Piyasası 2019 Yılı Sektör Raporu.
  • European Commission (2015). Blending in the transport sector. Tools and Methods Series Reference Document No 20. Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development European Commission. Brussels Luxembourg, November 2015. Erişim adresi https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/file/29928/download?token=qd5BoGj6
  • Fernald JG (1999) Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Econonomic Review 89(3):619–638.
  • Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 424-438.
  • Hayaloglu, P. (2015). The impact of developments in the logistics sector on economic growth: The case of OECD countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 523-530.
  • Hong J, Chu Z ve Wang Q (2011) Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: evidence from China. Transportation 38(5):737–752.
  • Hsiao, C. (1979). Causality tests in econometrics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1(4), 321-346.
  • Hwang, D. B. ve Gum, B. (1991). The causal relationship between energy and GNP: the case of Taiwan. The Journal of Energy and Development, 219-226.
  • Kaya, S. (2008). Türkiye’de ulaştırma sektörünün genel görünümü ve sorunları. İzmir Ticaret Odası, Ar-Ge Bülten 2008 Şubat–Sektörel, İzmir.
  • Kiraci, K. (2020). BİST Ulaştırma endeksi ile dolar endeksi ve petrol fiyatları arasındaki ilişkinin ampirik olarak analizi. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 12(22), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.688344
  • Lean HH, Huang W ve Hong J (2014) Logistics and economic development: experience from China. Transport Policy 32:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.003
  • Lee, J., ve Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089.
  • Lee, J., ve Strazicich, M. C. (2004). Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, 33(4), 2483-2492.
  • Marazzo M, Scherre R ve Fernandes E (2010) Air transport demand and economic growth in Brazil: a time series analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46 (2):261–269
  • Mohmand YT, Wang A ve Saeed A (2017) The impact of transportation infrastructure on economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Transportation Letters, The International Journal of Transportation Research 9(2):63–69
  • Öksüzler, O. ve İpek, E. (2011). Dünya petrol fiyatlarındaki değişimin büyüme ve enflasyon üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(14).
  • Phillips, P. C., ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Pradhan RP ve Bagchi TP (2013) Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: the VECM approach. Research in Transportation Economics 38(1):139–148
  • Rokhim, R., Tolangga, F. G. ve Astrini, M. R. (2021). Does the volatility of oil prices influence the transportation sector in ASEAN countries?. Siska Noviaristanti (Ed.) Contemporary Research on Business and Management içinde (s. 337). Jakarta, Indonesia: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003035985
  • Sarıtaş, H., Genç, A. ve Avcı, T. (2018). Türkiye’de enerji ithalatı, cari açık ve büyüme ilişkisi: VAR ve Granger nedensellik analizi. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(2), 181-200.
  • Sturm JE, Jacobs J ve Groote P (1999) Output effects of infrastructure investment in the Netherlands, 1853–1913. Journal of Macroeconomics 21(2):355–380
  • Thornton, D. L. ve Batten, D. S. (1985). Lag-length selection and tests of Granger causality between money and income. Journal of Money, credit and Banking, 17(2), 164-178.
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu [TÜİK] (2021, Nisan 23). Erişim adresi https://data.tuik.gov.tr
  • Uysal, D., Yılmaz, K. ve Taş T. (2015). Enerji ithalatı ve cari açık ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 63-78.
  • Yıldırım, S., Ertuğrul, H. M., ve Soytaş, U. (2015). Türkiye’de aylık istihdam serisinin durağanlığı: Geleneksel, yapısal kırılmalı ve mevsimsel birim kök test uygulamaları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(4), 91-102.
  • Yurdakul, A. (2017). Türkçe ulaştırma terminolojisinin biçim bilimsel açıdan standartlaştırılması üzerine”. Türk Dili, Temmuz 2017, 67(787).

THE EFFECTS OF OIL PRICE, GDP AND EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON THE TRANSPORT SECTOR: AN APPLICATION ON THE BIST TRANSPORT INDEX

Year 2022, Issue: 61, 151 - 173, 29.04.2022
https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.942075

Abstract

Transport and logistics activities are great importance in economic development, employment creation and increasing competitiveness. In this research, the relationship between Transport and Logistics sector and economic growth has been investigated. In light of the findings obtained, we aimed to advise the sector representatives and to raise awareness, and inform them about the risks that may be encountered and the opportunities that may arise. For this purpose, Granger (1969) and Hsiao (1979) causality analyzes have conducted using macroeconomic variables that are influenced or thought to be influenced by the sector. Significant structural breaks have been detected. According to the analysis results, the Transport and Logistics sector is not the cause of economic growth, but economic growth affects the sector. Therefore, there is a one-way relationship. In addition, there is one-way causality from oil prices and exchange rates towards the sector. This study, which examines the Borsa İstanbul Transportation (XULAS) index, contributes to the literature in terms of the variables examined, the time interval of the variables, the methodology used, and the findings obtained.

References

  • Aggarwal, R., Akhigbe, A. ve Mohanty, S. K. (2012). Oil price shocks and transportation firm asset prices. Energy Economics, 34(5), 1370-1379.
  • Altınay, Galip ve Karagöl, Erdal. (2005). Electricity consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics, 27. pp.849-856.
  • Aschauer DA (1991) Transportation spending and economic growth: the effects of transit and highway expenditures. American Public Transportation Association.
  • Ayvaz, Ö. (2006). Döviz kuru ve hisse senetleri fiyatları arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 1-14.
  • Banerjee A, Duflo E ve Qian N. (2012) On the road: access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China (No. 17897). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Banister D. ve Berechman Y. (2001) Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography 9(3):209–218.
  • Chu Z (2012) Logistics and economic growth: a panel data approach. The Annals of Regional Science 49(1):87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0434-0
  • Demir, M. (2013). Enerji ithalati cari açık ilişkisi, Var analizi ile Türkiye üzerine bir inceleme. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD), 5(9), 2-27.
  • Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. ve Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, 64, 813-836.
  • Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu [EPDK] , (2020). Petrol Piyasası 2019 Yılı Sektör Raporu.
  • European Commission (2015). Blending in the transport sector. Tools and Methods Series Reference Document No 20. Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development European Commission. Brussels Luxembourg, November 2015. Erişim adresi https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/file/29928/download?token=qd5BoGj6
  • Fernald JG (1999) Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Econonomic Review 89(3):619–638.
  • Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 424-438.
  • Hayaloglu, P. (2015). The impact of developments in the logistics sector on economic growth: The case of OECD countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 523-530.
  • Hong J, Chu Z ve Wang Q (2011) Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: evidence from China. Transportation 38(5):737–752.
  • Hsiao, C. (1979). Causality tests in econometrics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1(4), 321-346.
  • Hwang, D. B. ve Gum, B. (1991). The causal relationship between energy and GNP: the case of Taiwan. The Journal of Energy and Development, 219-226.
  • Kaya, S. (2008). Türkiye’de ulaştırma sektörünün genel görünümü ve sorunları. İzmir Ticaret Odası, Ar-Ge Bülten 2008 Şubat–Sektörel, İzmir.
  • Kiraci, K. (2020). BİST Ulaştırma endeksi ile dolar endeksi ve petrol fiyatları arasındaki ilişkinin ampirik olarak analizi. Finansal Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 12(22), 180-189. https://doi.org/10.14784/marufacd.688344
  • Lean HH, Huang W ve Hong J (2014) Logistics and economic development: experience from China. Transport Policy 32:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.003
  • Lee, J., ve Strazicich, M. C. (2003). Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089.
  • Lee, J., ve Strazicich, M. C. (2004). Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break. Manuscript, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, 33(4), 2483-2492.
  • Marazzo M, Scherre R ve Fernandes E (2010) Air transport demand and economic growth in Brazil: a time series analysis. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46 (2):261–269
  • Mohmand YT, Wang A ve Saeed A (2017) The impact of transportation infrastructure on economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Transportation Letters, The International Journal of Transportation Research 9(2):63–69
  • Öksüzler, O. ve İpek, E. (2011). Dünya petrol fiyatlarındaki değişimin büyüme ve enflasyon üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye örneği. ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(14).
  • Phillips, P. C., ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Pradhan RP ve Bagchi TP (2013) Effect of transportation infrastructure on economic growth in India: the VECM approach. Research in Transportation Economics 38(1):139–148
  • Rokhim, R., Tolangga, F. G. ve Astrini, M. R. (2021). Does the volatility of oil prices influence the transportation sector in ASEAN countries?. Siska Noviaristanti (Ed.) Contemporary Research on Business and Management içinde (s. 337). Jakarta, Indonesia: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003035985
  • Sarıtaş, H., Genç, A. ve Avcı, T. (2018). Türkiye’de enerji ithalatı, cari açık ve büyüme ilişkisi: VAR ve Granger nedensellik analizi. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(2), 181-200.
  • Sturm JE, Jacobs J ve Groote P (1999) Output effects of infrastructure investment in the Netherlands, 1853–1913. Journal of Macroeconomics 21(2):355–380
  • Thornton, D. L. ve Batten, D. S. (1985). Lag-length selection and tests of Granger causality between money and income. Journal of Money, credit and Banking, 17(2), 164-178.
  • Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu [TÜİK] (2021, Nisan 23). Erişim adresi https://data.tuik.gov.tr
  • Uysal, D., Yılmaz, K. ve Taş T. (2015). Enerji ithalatı ve cari açık ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 63-78.
  • Yıldırım, S., Ertuğrul, H. M., ve Soytaş, U. (2015). Türkiye’de aylık istihdam serisinin durağanlığı: Geleneksel, yapısal kırılmalı ve mevsimsel birim kök test uygulamaları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(4), 91-102.
  • Yurdakul, A. (2017). Türkçe ulaştırma terminolojisinin biçim bilimsel açıdan standartlaştırılması üzerine”. Türk Dili, Temmuz 2017, 67(787).
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ahmet Zelka 0000-0002-1694-1660

Sultan Kuzu Yıldırım 0000-0001-6577-1584

Early Pub Date April 28, 2022
Publication Date April 29, 2022
Acceptance Date November 25, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2022 Issue: 61

Cite

APA Zelka, A., & Kuzu Yıldırım, S. (2022). PETROL FİYATLARI, GSYİH VE DÖVİZ KURU DEĞİŞİMİNİN ULAŞTIRMA SEKTÖRÜNE ETKİLERİ: BİST ULAŞTIRMA ENDEKSİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(61), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.942075

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.