Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE EFFECT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR TENDENCIES AND PERCEPTIONS OF SELF-EFFICIENCY ON THE FUTURE ANXIETY OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Year 2023, Issue: 64, 1 - 6, 27.04.2023

Aysun Devrim Yemenici , Öznur Bozkurt , Recep Taşkın

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1058734
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Anxiety, which can occur at any moment of life, can negatively affect human life in many respects. The effect of anxiety has a feature that may differ from individual to individual. The perspective of the anxious situation and the methods of struggle can be affected by the person himself or by environmental factors. Anxiety about the future, which is the most common anxiety experienced by the younger generation, can also vary from person to person. In this study, the effect of entrepreneurial behavior and self-efficacy on future anxiety was investigated with the assumption that this anxiety will be experienced less in individuals who are struggling, who do not avoid taking risks and who believe that they can succeed. In addition, the mediating effect of entrepreneurial behavior on the effect of self-efficacy perception on future anxiety was also investigated. The population of the research consists of students studying at Duzce University Faculty of Business Administration. Data were collected through online questionnaires from 250 students selected by convenience sampling from this universe. Hypothesis tests were carried out with structural equation modeling analysis. According to the research findings, it was seen that self-efficacy perception and entrepreneurial behavior had a negative and significant effect on future anxiety. In addition, entrepreneurial behavior tendency has a partial mediating role in the relationship between self-efficacy perception and future anxiety.

Keywords

Self-efficacy entrepreneurial behavior future anxiety university students.

References

  • Akkoç, İ., Çalışkan, A. & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Girişimci davranış: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 14(1): 1-10.
  • Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R.D. (2003). Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1): 7-24.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy, mechanism human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2):122-147.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C. & Regalia, C. (2001). Socio-cognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 125-135.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182.
  • Barrows, J., Dunn, S. & Lloyd, C.A. (2013). Anxiety, self-efficacy, and college exam grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3): 204-208, Doi: 10.13189/ujer.2013.010310.
  • Bostock, L. & Boon, H. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ literacy self-efficacy and literacy competence. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22(1):19-37.
  • Bozkur, B., Kıran, B., & Cengiz, Ö. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin umutsuzluk, belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük, gelecekte iş bulmaya yönelik algı ve öz yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. 1. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(6): 2401- 2409. Doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.702233.
  • Bozkurt, Ö. , Ercan, A. & Yurt, İ. (2018). Bireysel değerler ile girişimcilik eğilimi arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi: düzce üniversitesi örneği. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 13 (1), 43-55
  • Bozkurt, Ö. (2009). Yenilikçi bir faaliyet olarak iç girişimciliğin çalışanların iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisi: Sakarya ili imalat sanayi üzerine bir alan araştırması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Sakarya
  • Bozkurt, Ö. & Ercan, A. (2017). Akademik iyimserlik ile performans arasındaki ilişkinin akademisyenler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, ICMEB17 Özel Sayısı, 251-263
  • Bozkurt, Ö. , Meriç, S. & Bozkurt, İ. (2017). Kişilik özelliklerinin yenilikçilik eğilimi üzerine etkisini belirlemeye yönelik kamuda çalışan yöneticiler üzerinde bir araştırma. Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,7(1), 58-70
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education, (6), New York: Routledge / Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
  • Güler, B. (2006). İşsizlik ve yarattığı psiko-sosyal sorunların öğrenilmiş çaresizlik bağlamında incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 55(1): 373-394.
  • Güllüce, A.Ç., Bozkurt, Ö. ve Meriç, S. (2017). Örgütsel Adalet Algısının İç Gı̇rişimci Davranışlar İle İlişkisi: Otel Yöneticilerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi,12(2), 39-50
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis, (7). Harlow: Pearson New International Edition.
  • Jerusalem, M. & R. Schwarzer (1992). Self-efficacy as resource theory in stress appraisal process, R. Schwarzer (Ed.) Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, 195-213. Hemisphere: Washington DC,
  • Kula, K. Ş. & Saraç, T. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin gelecek kaygısı. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(33): 227-242.
  • Lee, S. & Peterson, S. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation and global competitivene. Journal of World Business, 35(4): 401-416.
  • Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135-172.
  • Morris, M.H. & Kuratko, D.F. (2002). Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development Within Organizations. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt College Publishers.
  • Mulkey, J. R. & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (1999). The effects of test item format on self- efficacy and worry during high-stakes computer-based certification examination. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3-4), 495-506.
  • Nelson, D.W. & Knight, A.E. (2010). The power of positive recollections: reducing test anxiety and enhancing college student efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 732-745.
  • Öner, N. & Le Compte A. (1985). Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri El Kitabı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi. Pearce, J.A., Kramer, T.R. & Robbins, K.D. (1997). Effects of managers’ entrepreneurial behaviour on subordinates. Journal of Business Venturing 12: 147-160.
  • Porter, L. W., Bigley, G. A., & Steers, R. M. (2003). Motivation and Work Behavior. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Rabei, S., Ramadan, S. & Abdallah, N. (2020). Self-efficacy and future anxiety among students of nursing and education colleges of helwan university. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 27:39, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045- 020-00049-6.
  • Samuel, C.C. (2000). Modern Management: Diversity, Quality, Ethics & the Global Environment, Prentice Hall.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1928). The Entrepreneur. M.C. Becker, T. Knudsen, & R. Swedberg (Eds.): 227-260, Standford University Press.
  • Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business A Skill-Building Approach, (7). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Shaheen, N. & Al-Haddad, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial behavior. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7 (10): 2385-2402.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence ıntervals for ındirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. Doi:10.2307/270723.
  • Tayfur, O. (2006). Antecedents of Feedback Seeking Behavior. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). ODTÜ/ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Urgancı, S. & Gürgan, U. (2019). Gençlerde karar verme becerileri ile akademik öz- yeterlik arasındaki ilişkinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD), 6(6):242- 262.
  • Yeşilay, A., Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1996). Turkish adaptation of the general perceived self-efficacy scale: genelleştirilmiş özyeti beklentisi, http://userpage.fu- berlin.de/~health/turk.htm. E.T.: 05.01.2022.
  • Yıldırım, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: a multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150-172.
  • Zampetakis, L.A. & Moustakis. V.S. (2007). Entrepreneurial behaviour in the greek public sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 13(1):19- 38.
  • Zampetakis, L.A. Beldekos, P. & Moustakis V.S. (2009). Day-To-Day entrepreneurship within organisations: the role of trait emotional intelligence and perceived organisational support. European Management Journal, 27:165-175.

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN GELECEK KAYGILARINDA GİRİŞİMCİ DAVRANIŞ EĞİLİMLERİNİN VE ÖZ YETERLİK ALGILARININ ETKİSİ

Year 2023, Issue: 64, 1 - 6, 27.04.2023

Aysun Devrim Yemenici , Öznur Bozkurt , Recep Taşkın

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1058734
Cited By: 1

Abstract

Yaşamın her anında ortaya çıkabilecek olan kaygı durumu, pek çok konuda insan yaşamını olumsuz etkileyebilmektedir. Kaygının oluşturacağı etki ise bireyden bireye farklılık gösterebilecek bir özelliğe sahiptir. Kaygılı duruma bakış açısı ve mücadele yöntemleri kişinin kendinden veya çevresel faktörlerden etkilenebilmektedir. Genç neslin en sık yaşadığı kaygılı durum olan gelecek kaygısı da kişiden kişiye değişebilmektedir. Mücadeleci, risk almaktan kaçınmayan ve başarabileceğine inanan bireylerde bu kaygının daha az yaşanacağı varsayımı ile bu çalışmada, girişimci davranışın ve öz yeterliliğin gelecek kaygısı üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca öz yeterlik algısının gelecek kaygısı üzerindeki etkisinde girişimci davranışın aracılık etkisi de araştırılmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini Düzce Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi’nde öğrenim gören öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Bu evrenden kolayda örnekleme ile seçilen 250 öğrenciden online anketlerle veriler toplanmıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modelleme analizi ile hipotez testleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, öz yeterlik algısının ve girişimci davranışın gelecek kaygısı üzerinde negatif yönlü ve anlamlı bir etki yaptığı görülmüştür. Ayrıca, girişimci davranış eğilimi de öz yeterlik algısı ve gelecek kaygısı arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık rolüne sahiptir.

Keywords

Öz yeterlik girişimci davranış gelecek kaygısı üniversite öğrencileri.

References

  • Akkoç, İ., Çalışkan, A. & Turunç, Ö. (2019). Girişimci davranış: Bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 14(1): 1-10.
  • Antoncic, B. & Hisrich, R.D. (2003). Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(1): 7-24.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy, mechanism human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2):122-147.
  • Bandura, A. (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University.
  • Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C. & Regalia, C. (2001). Socio-cognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 125-135.
  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173- 1182.
  • Barrows, J., Dunn, S. & Lloyd, C.A. (2013). Anxiety, self-efficacy, and college exam grades. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3): 204-208, Doi: 10.13189/ujer.2013.010310.
  • Bostock, L. & Boon, H. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ literacy self-efficacy and literacy competence. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 22(1):19-37.
  • Bozkur, B., Kıran, B., & Cengiz, Ö. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin umutsuzluk, belirsizliğe tahammülsüzlük, gelecekte iş bulmaya yönelik algı ve öz yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. 1. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(6): 2401- 2409. Doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.702233.
  • Bozkurt, Ö. , Ercan, A. & Yurt, İ. (2018). Bireysel değerler ile girişimcilik eğilimi arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi: düzce üniversitesi örneği. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 13 (1), 43-55
  • Bozkurt, Ö. (2009). Yenilikçi bir faaliyet olarak iç girişimciliğin çalışanların iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisi: Sakarya ili imalat sanayi üzerine bir alan araştırması. Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Sakarya
  • Bozkurt, Ö. & Ercan, A. (2017). Akademik iyimserlik ile performans arasındaki ilişkinin akademisyenler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, ICMEB17 Özel Sayısı, 251-263
  • Bozkurt, Ö. , Meriç, S. & Bozkurt, İ. (2017). Kişilik özelliklerinin yenilikçilik eğilimi üzerine etkisini belirlemeye yönelik kamuda çalışan yöneticiler üzerinde bir araştırma. Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,7(1), 58-70
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education, (6), New York: Routledge / Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
  • Güler, B. (2006). İşsizlik ve yarattığı psiko-sosyal sorunların öğrenilmiş çaresizlik bağlamında incelenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 55(1): 373-394.
  • Güllüce, A.Ç., Bozkurt, Ö. ve Meriç, S. (2017). Örgütsel Adalet Algısının İç Gı̇rişimci Davranışlar İle İlişkisi: Otel Yöneticilerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi,12(2), 39-50
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis, (7). Harlow: Pearson New International Edition.
  • Jerusalem, M. & R. Schwarzer (1992). Self-efficacy as resource theory in stress appraisal process, R. Schwarzer (Ed.) Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, 195-213. Hemisphere: Washington DC,
  • Kula, K. Ş. & Saraç, T. (2016). Üniversite öğrencilerinin gelecek kaygısı. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(33): 227-242.
  • Lee, S. & Peterson, S. (2000). Culture, entrepreneurial orientation and global competitivene. Journal of World Business, 35(4): 401-416.
  • Lumpkin, G.T. & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135-172.
  • Morris, M.H. & Kuratko, D.F. (2002). Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development Within Organizations. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt College Publishers.
  • Mulkey, J. R. & O’Neil, H. F., Jr. (1999). The effects of test item format on self- efficacy and worry during high-stakes computer-based certification examination. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3-4), 495-506.
  • Nelson, D.W. & Knight, A.E. (2010). The power of positive recollections: reducing test anxiety and enhancing college student efficacy and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 732-745.
  • Öner, N. & Le Compte A. (1985). Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri El Kitabı. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi. Pearce, J.A., Kramer, T.R. & Robbins, K.D. (1997). Effects of managers’ entrepreneurial behaviour on subordinates. Journal of Business Venturing 12: 147-160.
  • Porter, L. W., Bigley, G. A., & Steers, R. M. (2003). Motivation and Work Behavior. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  • Rabei, S., Ramadan, S. & Abdallah, N. (2020). Self-efficacy and future anxiety among students of nursing and education colleges of helwan university. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 27:39, https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045- 020-00049-6.
  • Samuel, C.C. (2000). Modern Management: Diversity, Quality, Ethics & the Global Environment, Prentice Hall.
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1928). The Entrepreneur. M.C. Becker, T. Knudsen, & R. Swedberg (Eds.): 227-260, Standford University Press.
  • Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business A Skill-Building Approach, (7). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Shaheen, N. & Al-Haddad, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial behavior. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7 (10): 2385-2402.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence ıntervals for ındirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. Doi:10.2307/270723.
  • Tayfur, O. (2006). Antecedents of Feedback Seeking Behavior. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). ODTÜ/ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Urgancı, S. & Gürgan, U. (2019). Gençlerde karar verme becerileri ile akademik öz- yeterlik arasındaki ilişkinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (ASEAD), 6(6):242- 262.
  • Yeşilay, A., Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1996). Turkish adaptation of the general perceived self-efficacy scale: genelleştirilmiş özyeti beklentisi, http://userpage.fu- berlin.de/~health/turk.htm. E.T.: 05.01.2022.
  • Yıldırım, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning strategy use, and achievement: a multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150-172.
  • Zampetakis, L.A. & Moustakis. V.S. (2007). Entrepreneurial behaviour in the greek public sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 13(1):19- 38.
  • Zampetakis, L.A. Beldekos, P. & Moustakis V.S. (2009). Day-To-Day entrepreneurship within organisations: the role of trait emotional intelligence and perceived organisational support. European Management Journal, 27:165-175.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Aysun Devrim Yemenici 0000-0001-9623-1652

Öznur Bozkurt 0000-0002-8846-1850

Recep Taşkın This is me 0000-0002-5853-5062

Early Pub Date April 18, 2023
Publication Date April 27, 2023
Acceptance Date August 8, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 64

Cite

APA Yemenici, A. D., Bozkurt, Ö., & Taşkın, R. (2023). ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN GELECEK KAYGILARINDA GİRİŞİMCİ DAVRANIŞ EĞİLİMLERİNİN VE ÖZ YETERLİK ALGILARININ ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(64), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1058734

Cited By

THE MEDIATORY ROLE OF SELF-ESTEEM IN THE EFFECT OF LEARNED HELPLESSNESS ON FUTURE ANXIETY: A RESEARCH ON FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES STUDENTS
EKEV Akademi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1386781
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.