Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

YENİ SANAYİLEŞEN ÜLKELERDE (N11) ENERJİ YOKSULLUĞU VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ

Year 2023, Issue: 64, 47 - 51, 27.04.2023

Yusuf Kemal Öztürk , Bekir Çelik

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1216699
Cited By: 2

Abstract

Ülkelerin ekonomik büyüme hedeflerini gerçekleştirmelerinde enerji önemli bir araçtır. Enerjiye erişim, endüstrileşmenin temel konuları arasındadır. Dolayısıyla yeni sanayileşen ülkelerin (N11) enerji yoksulluğu ile ekonomik büyüme ilişkisinin incelenmesi bu çalışmanın temel amacını oluşturmaktadır. N11 ülkelerinin 2000-2019 dönemine ait verileri; Westerlund panel eşbütünleşme, FMOLS (Fully modified ordinary least squares), DOLS (Dynamic ordinary least squares) ve Dumitrescu-Hurlin nedensellik testleri kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, enerji yoksulluğu ile ekonomik büyüme arasında eşbütünleşme ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Enerji yoksulluğunda yaşanacak %1’lik artışın ekonomik büyümeyi %0.45 (FMOLS), %0.34 (DOLS) artıracağı tespit edilmiştir. Son olarak, enerji yoksulluğu ve ekonomik büyüme arasında çift yönlü nedensellik vardır hipotezi istatistiki olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Bu sonuçlardan hareketle, enerji yoksulluğunun azaltılması adına; yenilebilir enerji kaynaklarının artırılması, elde edilen enerjinin etkin ve verimli kullanılması konusunda politika yapıcılara önerilerde bunulmuştur.

Keywords

Enerji yoksulluğu ekonomik büyüme N11 ülkeleri Energy poverty economic growth N11 countries

References

  • Acharya, R. H., & Sadath, A. C. (2019). Energy poverty and economic development: Household-level evidence from India. Energy and Buildings, 183, 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2018.11.047
  • Adusah-Poku, F., & Takeuchi, K. (2019). Energy poverty in Ghana: any progress so far? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 853–864.
  • Aigheyisi, O., & Oligbi, B. O. (2020). Energy poverty and economic development in Nigeria: Empirical analysis. KIU Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 183–193.
  • Alam, M. S., Miah, M. D., Hammoudeh, S., & Tiwari, A. K. (2018). The nexus between access to electricity and labour productivity in developing countries. Energy Policy, 122, 715–726.
  • Altıntaş, H., & Koçbulut, Ö. (2015). Türkiye’de Elektrik Tüketiminin Dinamikleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Sınır Testi ve Nedensellik Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 0(43), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.18070/EUIIBFD.83502
  • Amin, A., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Chandio, A. A., Rasool, S. F., Luo, J., & Zaman, S. (2020). How does energy poverty affect economic development? A panel data analysis of South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25), 31623–31635. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-09173-6/TABLES/8
  • Amri, F. (2017). Intercourse across economic growth, trade and renewable energy consumption in developing and developed countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.230
  • Ansari, M. A., Villanthenkodath, M. A., Akram, V., & Rath, B. N. (2022). The nexus between ecological footprint, economic growth, and energy poverty in sub-Saharan Africa: a technological threshold approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2022, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-022-02377-5
  • Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.09.002
  • Brini, R., Amara, M., & Jemmali, H. (2017). Renewable energy consumption, International trade, oil price and economic growth inter-linkages: The case of Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.03.067
  • Cherni, A., & Essaber Jouini, S. (2017). An ARDL approach to the CO2 emissions, renewable energy and economic growth nexus: Tunisian evidence. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(48), 29056–29066. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2017.08.072
  • Dagoumas, A., & Kitsios, F. (2014). Assessing the impact of the economic crisis on energy poverty in Greece. Sustainable Cities and Society, 13, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2014.02.004
  • Doğanalp, N., Ozsolak, B., & Aslan, A. (2021). The effects of energy poverty on economic growth: a panel data analysis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(36), 50167–50178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14185-x
  • González-Eguino, M. (2015). Energy poverty: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.03.013
  • Groh, S. (2014). The role of energy in development processes—The energy poverty penalty: Case study of Arequipa (Peru). Energy for Sustainable Development, 18(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2013.12.002
  • Husnain, M. I. ul, Nasrullah, N., Khan, M. A., & Banerjee, S. (2021). Scrutiny of income related drivers of energy poverty: A global perspective. Energy Policy, 157, 112517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2021.112517
  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2016). World Energy Outlook 2006. Paris. Tarihinde adresinden erişildi https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2006
  • Ito, K. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from panel data for developing countries. International Economics, 151, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTECO.2017.02.001
  • Kahia, M., Ben Aïssa, M. S., & Charfeddine, L. (2016). Impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth: New evidence from the MENA Net Oil Exporting Countries (NOECs). Energy, 116, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2016.07.126
  • Lawson, S., Heacock, D., & Stupnytska, A. (2007). Beyond the BRICS: A look at the “Next 11”. BRICS and Beyond, 131–164.
  • Manga, M. (2020). Enerji Yoksulluğu ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 5(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.25229/BETA.812850
  • Munyanyi, M. E., & Churchill, S. A. (2022). Foreign aid and energy poverty: Sub-national evidence from Senegal. Energy Economics, 108, 105899.
  • Narayan, S., & Doytch, N. (2017). An investigation of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus using industrial and residential energy consumption. Energy Economics, 68, 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2017.09.005
  • Onuonga, S. M. (2020). Economic growth, electricity access, and remittances in Kenya. Management and Economics Research Journal, 6(2), 1–13.
  • Onyeji, I. (2010). On the Determinants of Energy Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa Ijeoma Onyeji. African Institute for Applied Economics, (5), 37.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAE.951
  • Rafindadi, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: Evidence from combined cointegration test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.11.093
  • Reddy, A. K. N. (2015). Energy and Social Issues. Içinde J. Goldemberg (Ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (ss. 39–61). New York: UNDP. Tarihinde adresinden erişildi https://www.undp.org/publications/world-energy-assessment-energy-and-challenge-sustainability
  • Rehman, A., & Deyuan, Z. (2018). Investigating the linkage between economic growth, electricity access, energy use, and population growth in Pakistan. Applied sciences, 8(12), 2442.
  • Rehman, A., Deyuan, Z., Chandio, A. A., & Hussain, I. (2018). An empirical analysis of rural and urban populations’ access to electricity: evidence from Pakistan. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8(1), 1–9.
  • Sathaye, J., Lucon, O., Rahman, A., Christensen, J., Denton, F., Fujino, J., … Schlaepfer, A. (2011). Renewable energy in the context of sustainable development.
  • Shafiee, S., & Topal, E. (2008). An econometrics view of worldwide fossil fuel consumption and the role of US. Energy Policy, 36(2), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2007.11.002
  • Singh, K., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2021). The role of energy poverty on economic growth in sub-Saharan African countries. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 10(1), 105–122.
  • Tatlı, H., & Barak, D. (2019). Elektriğe Erişimin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye’deki Kanıtlar. 2. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve İnovasyon Kongresi, 345–356. Elazığ.
  • Ullah, S., Khan, M., & Yoon, S. M. (2021). Measuring Energy Poverty and Its Impact on Economic Growth in Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(19), 10969. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU131910969
  • Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAE.967
  • Zhang, R. J., & Razzaq, A. (2022). Influence of economic policy uncertainty and financial development on renewable energy consumption in the BRICST region. Renewable Energy, 201, 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2022.10.107

THE NEXUS BETWEEN ENERGY POVERTY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NEW INDUSTRIALIZING COUNTRIES (N11)

Year 2023, Issue: 64, 47 - 51, 27.04.2023

Yusuf Kemal Öztürk , Bekir Çelik

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1216699
Cited By: 2

Abstract

Energy is an important tool for countries to achieve their economic growth goal. Access to energy is among the main issues of industrialization. Therefore, analyzing the relationship of newly industrialized countries (N11) with energy poverty and economic growth constitutes the main purpose of this study. Data of N11 countries for the period 2000-2019; was investigated using Westerlund panel cointegration, FMOLS (Fully modified ordinary least squares), DOLS (Dynamic ordinary least squares) and Dumitrescu-Hurlin causality tests. According to the result, a cointegration relationship was determined between energy poverty and economic growth. An 1% increase in energy poverty will increase economic growth by 0.45% (FMOLS) and 0.34% (DOLS). Finally, the hypothesis that there is bidirectional causality between energy poverty and economic growth valid and statistically significant. Based on these results, in order to reduce energy poverty; has been made recommendations to policy makers on increasing renewable energy resources and using the energy obtained effectively and efficiently.

Keywords

Energy poverty economic growth N11 countries

References

  • Acharya, R. H., & Sadath, A. C. (2019). Energy poverty and economic development: Household-level evidence from India. Energy and Buildings, 183, 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2018.11.047
  • Adusah-Poku, F., & Takeuchi, K. (2019). Energy poverty in Ghana: any progress so far? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 112, 853–864.
  • Aigheyisi, O., & Oligbi, B. O. (2020). Energy poverty and economic development in Nigeria: Empirical analysis. KIU Interdisciplinary Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 183–193.
  • Alam, M. S., Miah, M. D., Hammoudeh, S., & Tiwari, A. K. (2018). The nexus between access to electricity and labour productivity in developing countries. Energy Policy, 122, 715–726.
  • Altıntaş, H., & Koçbulut, Ö. (2015). Türkiye’de Elektrik Tüketiminin Dinamikleri ve Ekonomik Büyüme: Sınır Testi ve Nedensellik Analizi. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 0(43), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.18070/EUIIBFD.83502
  • Amin, A., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Chandio, A. A., Rasool, S. F., Luo, J., & Zaman, S. (2020). How does energy poverty affect economic development? A panel data analysis of South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25), 31623–31635. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-020-09173-6/TABLES/8
  • Amri, F. (2017). Intercourse across economic growth, trade and renewable energy consumption in developing and developed countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 527–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.230
  • Ansari, M. A., Villanthenkodath, M. A., Akram, V., & Rath, B. N. (2022). The nexus between ecological footprint, economic growth, and energy poverty in sub-Saharan Africa: a technological threshold approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2022, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10668-022-02377-5
  • Apergis, N., & Payne, J. E. (2010). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 656–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2009.09.002
  • Brini, R., Amara, M., & Jemmali, H. (2017). Renewable energy consumption, International trade, oil price and economic growth inter-linkages: The case of Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2017.03.067
  • Cherni, A., & Essaber Jouini, S. (2017). An ARDL approach to the CO2 emissions, renewable energy and economic growth nexus: Tunisian evidence. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(48), 29056–29066. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2017.08.072
  • Dagoumas, A., & Kitsios, F. (2014). Assessing the impact of the economic crisis on energy poverty in Greece. Sustainable Cities and Society, 13, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2014.02.004
  • Doğanalp, N., Ozsolak, B., & Aslan, A. (2021). The effects of energy poverty on economic growth: a panel data analysis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(36), 50167–50178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14185-x
  • González-Eguino, M. (2015). Energy poverty: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 377–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2015.03.013
  • Groh, S. (2014). The role of energy in development processes—The energy poverty penalty: Case study of Arequipa (Peru). Energy for Sustainable Development, 18(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2013.12.002
  • Husnain, M. I. ul, Nasrullah, N., Khan, M. A., & Banerjee, S. (2021). Scrutiny of income related drivers of energy poverty: A global perspective. Energy Policy, 157, 112517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2021.112517
  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2016). World Energy Outlook 2006. Paris. Tarihinde adresinden erişildi https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2006
  • Ito, K. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from panel data for developing countries. International Economics, 151, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTECO.2017.02.001
  • Kahia, M., Ben Aïssa, M. S., & Charfeddine, L. (2016). Impact of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on economic growth: New evidence from the MENA Net Oil Exporting Countries (NOECs). Energy, 116, 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2016.07.126
  • Lawson, S., Heacock, D., & Stupnytska, A. (2007). Beyond the BRICS: A look at the “Next 11”. BRICS and Beyond, 131–164.
  • Manga, M. (2020). Enerji Yoksulluğu ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi. Bulletin of Economic Theory and Analysis, 5(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.25229/BETA.812850
  • Munyanyi, M. E., & Churchill, S. A. (2022). Foreign aid and energy poverty: Sub-national evidence from Senegal. Energy Economics, 108, 105899.
  • Narayan, S., & Doytch, N. (2017). An investigation of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus using industrial and residential energy consumption. Energy Economics, 68, 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENECO.2017.09.005
  • Onuonga, S. M. (2020). Economic growth, electricity access, and remittances in Kenya. Management and Economics Research Journal, 6(2), 1–13.
  • Onyeji, I. (2010). On the Determinants of Energy Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa Ijeoma Onyeji. African Institute for Applied Economics, (5), 37.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAE.951
  • Rafindadi, A. A., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Impacts of renewable energy consumption on the German economic growth: Evidence from combined cointegration test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, 1130–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2016.11.093
  • Reddy, A. K. N. (2015). Energy and Social Issues. Içinde J. Goldemberg (Ed.), World Energy Assessment: Energy and the Challenge of Sustainability (ss. 39–61). New York: UNDP. Tarihinde adresinden erişildi https://www.undp.org/publications/world-energy-assessment-energy-and-challenge-sustainability
  • Rehman, A., & Deyuan, Z. (2018). Investigating the linkage between economic growth, electricity access, energy use, and population growth in Pakistan. Applied sciences, 8(12), 2442.
  • Rehman, A., Deyuan, Z., Chandio, A. A., & Hussain, I. (2018). An empirical analysis of rural and urban populations’ access to electricity: evidence from Pakistan. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8(1), 1–9.
  • Sathaye, J., Lucon, O., Rahman, A., Christensen, J., Denton, F., Fujino, J., … Schlaepfer, A. (2011). Renewable energy in the context of sustainable development.
  • Shafiee, S., & Topal, E. (2008). An econometrics view of worldwide fossil fuel consumption and the role of US. Energy Policy, 36(2), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2007.11.002
  • Singh, K., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2021). The role of energy poverty on economic growth in sub-Saharan African countries. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 10(1), 105–122.
  • Tatlı, H., & Barak, D. (2019). Elektriğe Erişimin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye’deki Kanıtlar. 2. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve İnovasyon Kongresi, 345–356. Elazığ.
  • Ullah, S., Khan, M., & Yoon, S. M. (2021). Measuring Energy Poverty and Its Impact on Economic Growth in Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(19), 10969. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU131910969
  • Westerlund, J. (2008). Panel cointegration tests of the Fisher effect. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(2), 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAE.967
  • Zhang, R. J., & Razzaq, A. (2022). Influence of economic policy uncertainty and financial development on renewable energy consumption in the BRICST region. Renewable Energy, 201, 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2022.10.107
There are 37 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Yusuf Kemal Öztürk 0000-0001-8918-0500

Bekir Çelik 0000-0002-6345-4064

Early Pub Date April 18, 2023
Publication Date April 27, 2023
Acceptance Date February 14, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 64

Cite

APA Öztürk, Y. K., & Çelik, B. (2023). YENİ SANAYİLEŞEN ÜLKELERDE (N11) ENERJİ YOKSULLUĞU VE EKONOMİK BÜYÜME İLİŞKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(64), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1216699

Cited By

Finansal Sistemin Yenilenebilir Enerjiye Bakışı: Bist Finans Şirketleri Örneği
Alanya Akademik Bakış
https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1329106
Is precarity a fate for women in Türkiye? Rethinking energy poverty from a gender perspective
Eurasian Economic Review
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00242-y
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.