Comparative Analysis of Biopsychosocial Barriers Faced by Disabled and Non-Disabled Individuals in A University Setting: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Purpose: This qualitative study examines the experiences of both disabled and non-disabled individuals within a university setting, illuminating their unique challenges and underscoring the necessity for more inclusive practices. Material and method: Insights were gathered from 28 participants, including 12 diagnosed and 16 non-diagnosed individuals, during the "1st Barrier-Free Afternoon Tea Event." Semi-structured interviews were employed to reveal the shared and distinct barriers faced by both groups. Results: Individuals with disabilities primarily struggled with physical accessibility issues, while non-disabled participants expressed concerns regarding social adaptation and transportation difficulties. Notably, both groups reported communication challenges with administrative staff, albeit in different ways. Disabled individuals highlighted the need for enhanced academic services and improved campus accessibility through dedicated support units. In contrast, non-disabled participants sought broader university support and a wider range of activities. Conclusion: The study notably highlighted a shared willingness among both groups to contribute their unique talents towards fostering a more inclusive environment. This finding underscores the critical importance of comprehensive and inclusive approaches in higher education. By implementing these changes, universities can create a welcoming and equitable learning environment that embraces the diverse experiences and contributions of all community members.

Keywords

• communication barriers
• disabled persons
• education
• psychological adaptation
• social environment

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for the research was received from Cankiri Karatekin University Ethics Committee (unique decision code: 4be893c679d4404f).

Thanks

We would like to thank the administrative staff of Cankiri Karatekin University Faculty of Health Sciences for their help in organising the 1st Barrier-Free Afternoon Tea Event. Furthermore, we acknowledge that none of the researchers involved in this study are native English speakers. To ensure the linguistic quality and fluency of our manuscript, we utilized an artificial intelligence application, Academic Assistant Pro. This tool has been invaluable in refining our language use and enhancing the overall readability of our academic work. Our appreciation extends to all individuals and tools that have supported us in bringing this research to fruition.

Üniversite Ortamında Engelli ve Engelsiz Bireylerin Karşılaştığı Biyopsikososyal Engellerin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi: Nitel Bir Çalışma

Abstract

Amaç: Bu nitel çalışma, engelli ve engelsiz bireylerin üniversite ortamındaki deneyimlerini inceleyerek, bireylerin karşılaştıkları zorlukları ortaya koymak ve daha kapsayıcı uygulamaların gerekliliğini vurgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. Materyal ve yöntem: Çalışmamızda "1. Engelsiz Öğleden Sonra Çayı Etkinliği" sırasında 12'si tanı almış, 16'sı ise tanı almamış olmak üzere toplam 28 katılımcının görüşleri sorgulanmıştır. Her iki grubun da karşılaştığı ortak ve farklı engelleri ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar: Engelli bireyler öncelikle fiziksel erişilebilirlik sorunlarını, engelsiz katılımcılar ise sosyal uyum ve ulaşım zorluklarına ilişkin endişelerini dile getirmiştir. Her iki grupta da dikkat çekici bir şekilde idari personelle iletişimde zorluklar yaşadıklarını bildirmişlerdir. Ancak bu zorluklar farklı şekillerde ortaya çıkmıştır. Engelli bireyler, akademik hizmetlerin iyileştirilmesi ve kampüs erişilebilirliğinin özel destek birimleri aracılığıyla geliştirilmesi gerekliliğini vurgulamıştır. Buna karşın, engelsiz katılımcılar ise daha geniş bir üniversite desteği ve etkinlik çeşitliliğinin artmasını talep etmiştir. Tartışma: Çalışma, her iki grubun da daha kapsayıcı bir ortamın oluşturulmasına yönelik eşsiz yeteneklerini sunma isteğini özellikle vurgulamıştır. Bu bulgu, yükseköğretimde kapsamlı ve kapsayıcı yaklaşımların kritik önemini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu değişikliklerin uygulanmasıyla üniversiteler, tüm topluluk üyelerinin farklı deneyimlerini ve katkılarını kucaklayan, misafirperver ve adil bir öğrenme ortamı yaratabilirler.

Keywords

• iletişim engelleri
• engelli bireyler
• eğitim
• psikolojik uyum
• sosyal çevre

References

1. Al-Shaer, E. A., Aliedan, M. M., Zayed, M. A., Elrayah, M., & Moustafa, M. A. (2024). Mental health and quality of life among university students with disabilities: the moderating role of religiosity and social connectedness. Sustainability, 16(2), 644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020644
2. Belete, S., Duke, C., Hinzen, H., Owusu-Boampong, A., & Khau, H. P. (2022). Community Learning Centres (CLCs) for Adult Learning and Education (ALE): development in and by communities. Int Rev Educ, 68(2), 259-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09954-w
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3(2), 77-101.
4. Bundy, D. A., de Silva, N., Horton, S., Jamison, D. T., & Patton, G. C. (2018). Optimizing education outcomes: high-return investments in school health for increased participation and learning. Disease Control Priorities, 1(8).
5. Chipchase, S. Y., Seddon, A., Tyers, H., & Thomas, S. (2023). Experience of university life by disabled undergraduate students: the need to consider extra-curricular opportunities. Disabil Soc, 39(11), 2817–2834. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2023.2233687
6. Chiwandire, D., & Vincent, L. (2019). Funding and inclusion in higher education institutions for students with disabilities. Afr J Disabil, 8(0), 336. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.336
7. Fenney, D., & Snell, C. (2011). Exceptions to the green rule? A literature investigation into the overlaps between the academic and UK policy fields of disability and the environment. Local Environment, 16(3), 251-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.565468
8. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., & Fernández-Cerero, J. (2022). Access and participation of students with disabilities: the challenge for higher education. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(19), 11918. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911918

9. Ferreira Silva, R. M., Mendonça, C. R., Azevedo, V. D., Raoof Memon, A., Noll, P., & Noll, M. (2022). Barriers to high school and university students' physical activity: a systematic review. PLoS one, 17(4), e0265913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265913
10. Heinicke-Motsch, K., & Sygall, S. (2004). Building an inclusive development community. A manual on including people with disabilities in international development programs.
11. Hsieh, K., Scott, H. M., & Murthy, S. (2020). Associated risk factors for depression and anxiety in adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: five-year follow up. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil, 125(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-125.1.49
12. Jones, N., Seager, J., & Yadete, W. (2021). ‘People Consider Us Devils’: exploring patterns of exclusion facing adolescents with disabilities in Ethiopia. Eur J Dev Res, 33(5), 1303-1327. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00387-z
13. Lal, S., Tremblay, S., Starcevic, D., Mauger-Lavigne, M., & Anaby, D. (2022). Mental health problems among adolescents and young adults with childhood-onset physical disabilities: a scoping review. Front Rehabil Sci, 3, 904586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2022.904586
14. Parpottas, P., Christofi, Y., & Ioannou, I. (2023). Adaptation, academic performance and support: students with and without disabilities and future considerations for counselling psychology. Behav Sci, 13(10), 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100862
15. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Vol. 3). Sage.
16. Prizeman, K., Weinstein, N., & McCabe, C. (2023). Effects of mental health stigma on loneliness, social isolation, and relationships in young people with depression symptoms. BMC Psychiatry, 23(1), 527. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04991-7
17. Rodríguez-Correa, P. A., Valencia-Arias, A., Patiño-Toro, O. N., Oblitas Díaz, Y., & Teodori De la Puente, R. (2023). Benefits and development of assistive technologies for Deaf people's communication: a systematic review. Front Educ, 8,1121597. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1121597
18. Salmi, J., & D’Addio, A. (2021). Policies for achieving inclusion in higher education. Policy Rev High Educ, 5(1), 47-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1835529
19. Smith, M., Calder-Dawe, O., Carroll, P., Kayes, N., Kearns, R., Lin, E.-Y., & Witten, K. (2021). Mobility barriers and enablers and their implications for the wellbeing of disabled children and young people in Aotearoa New Zealand: A cross-sectional qualitative study. Wellb Space Soc, 2, 100028. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2021.100028
20. Tam, K. Y., Zhao, M., Seevers, R. L., Liu, Y., & Bullock, L. M. (2022). Examining physical accessibility of campuses for university students with mobility impairments in China. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 35(2), 161-174.
21. Wolbring, G., & Escobedo, M. (2023). Academic coverage of social stressors experienced by disabled people: a scoping review. Societies, 13(9), 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13090211
22. Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021). Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: a study of architectural design practice. Building Environ, 206, 108352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108352