Araştırma Makalesi

PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3 15 Aralık 2024
PDF İndir
TR EN

PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY

Öz

Employees need a healthy environment and working conditions in their workplaces. This need is a legal obligation that must be met by employers. Ergonomics is concerned with improving the compatibility between humans and their environment. Considering that humans are psychosocial beings, addressing the field of ergonomics independently of psychology can be seen as a limitation. Therefore, examining the perspectives of psychologists working in workplaces regarding the field of ergonomics is valuable. This study aims to understand the perspectives on ergonomics of psychologists from different specialties and sectors in Turkey. Fifteen experts working in various cities across Turkey participated in the research. The study is qualitative, and the perspectives of the experts were explored through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was chosen as the method, and the analysis revealed three different themes regarding perspectives on the field of ergonomics: (i) psychologists' knowledge of ergonomics, (ii) psychologists' experiences with ergonomics-related work, and (iii) psychologists' perspectives on the intersection of psychology and ergonomics. The results of the study indicate that the knowledge and experiences of experts regarding ergonomics are limited. Furthermore, it was found that psychologists do not have structured written job descriptions assigned by their workplaces, leading to role conflict and role ambiguity.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ergonomics, psychology, industrial psychology, organizational psychology, work psychology

Etik Beyan

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Teşekkür

I would like to thank the psychologists who were participated and contributed fot this study.

Kaynakça

  1. Alblihed Åberg, M., Staats, E., Robertson, J., Schiöler, L., Torén, K., LaMontagne, A. D., Söderberg, M., Waern, M., & Nyberg, J. (2022). Psychosocial Job Stressors and Risk of Suicidal Behavior: An Observational Study Among Swedish Men. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 48(6), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.4039
  2. American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Industrial and organizational psychology. American Psychological Association. Retrieved 2024, November 1, from https://www.apa.org/ed/graduate/specialize/industrial
  3. American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs): An opportunity to diversify your practice. APA Services. Retrieved November 4, 2024, from https://www.apaservices.org/practice/business/marketing/building/employee-assistance
  4. American Psychological Association. (2014). Education and training in industrial and organizational psychology. https://www.apa.org/education-career/guide/subfields/organizational/education-training.pdf
  5. Arık, E. (2015, November 23–25). The impact of 2023 targets on psychology departments [Oral presentation]. 14th National Social Sciences Congress, Ankara, Turkey.
  6. Arıkan, S. (2022). The career adaptability of psychology students: The roles of demographic variables, personality, and positive psychological capital. Studies in Psychology, 42(2), 427-471. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2022-997542
  7. Aycan, Z. (1998). Endüstri ve Örgüt Psikolojisi Alanında Etik Uygulamalar. Türk Psikolojisi Dergisi, 13(42), 47-50.
  8. Backhaus, I., Lohmann-Haislah, A., Burr, H., & et al. (2024). Organizational change: Challenges for workplace psychosocial risks and employee mental health. BMC Public Health, 24, 2477. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19815-w
  9. Berjot, S., Altintas, E., Grebot, E., & Lesage, F.-X. (2017). Burnout risk profiles among French psychologists. Burnout Research, 7, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.10.001
  10. Bouzikos, S., Afsharian, A., Dollard, M., & Brecht, O. (2022). Contextualizing the Effectiveness of an Employee Assistance Program Intervention on Psychological Health: The Role of Corporate Climate. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(9), 5067. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095067

Kaynak Göster

APA
Mamacı, M. (2024). PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. Ergonomi, 7(3), 236-249. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.1534603
AMA
1.Mamacı M. PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. ERGONOMİ. 2024;7(3):236-249. doi:10.33439/ergonomi.1534603
Chicago
Mamacı, Merve. 2024. “PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”. Ergonomi 7 (3): 236-49. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.1534603.
EndNote
Mamacı M (01 Aralık 2024) PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. Ergonomi 7 3 236–249.
IEEE
[1]M. Mamacı, “PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”, ERGONOMİ, c. 7, sy 3, ss. 236–249, Ara. 2024, doi: 10.33439/ergonomi.1534603.
ISNAD
Mamacı, Merve. “PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”. Ergonomi 7/3 (01 Aralık 2024): 236-249. https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.1534603.
JAMA
1.Mamacı M. PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. ERGONOMİ. 2024;7:236–249.
MLA
Mamacı, Merve. “PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY”. Ergonomi, c. 7, sy 3, Aralık 2024, ss. 236-49, doi:10.33439/ergonomi.1534603.
Vancouver
1.Merve Mamacı. PERSPECTIVES OF PSYCHOLOGISTS TOWARDS THE FIELD OF ERGONOMICS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. ERGONOMİ. 01 Aralık 2024;7(3):236-49. doi:10.33439/ergonomi.1534603