BIR YENIDEN TASARIM PROJESI: BIR DIŞ MEKAN FITNESS ALETI TASARIMININ KULLANICILARININ ANTROPOMETRIK VE BIOMEKANIK VERILERINE UYGUN OLARAK DÜZELTILMESI

Yıl 2018, , 14 - 28, 30.04.2018

Nazife Aslı Kaya , Önder Erkarslan

https://doi.org/10.33439/ergonomi.440741

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı dış mekan fitness aleti kullanıcılarının
antropometrik ölçülerinin belirlenerek, halihalızırda kullanımda olan bir dış
mekan fitness aletinin kullanıcılarına uygun olarak yeniden tasarlanmasıdır.

Çalışmaya, Eskişehir ilinde ikamet eden 100(50 kadın ve 50 erkek) dış
mekan fitness aleti kullanıcısı gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Katılımcıların yaşı
18 ila 79 arasında olup, yaş ortalamaları 31’dir (SD: 1,15277). Çalışmada boy, omuz
yüksekliği, kol yana uzanım mesafesi, yumruk yğksekliği, ön kol uzunluğu, üst
kol uzunluğu, omuz-parmak ucu uzunluğu, diz yüksekliği, aşık kemiği yüksekliği
ve el uzunluğu ölçüleri toplanmıştır. Toplanan ölçüler, herhangi bir
antropometrik uyumsuzluk olup olmadığını belirlemek adına halihazırda
kullanımda olan dış mekan fitness aleti ölçüleriyle karşılaştırılmıştır. Elde
edilen veriler yetişkin kullanıcıların vücut ölçüleriyle, mevcut dış mekan
fitness aleti ölçülerinin birbiriyle uyumlu olmadığını göstermiştir. Sonrasında,
mevcut fitness aletinin hareket çıktısı, biomekanik limitlerle karşılaştırılmıştır.
Karşılaştırma sonucu yaralanmalara neden olabilecek bir uyumsuzluk tespit
edilmiştir. Tespit edilen bu uyumsuzluklar toplum sağlığını tehlikeye attığından,
bir dış mekan fitness aleti, FE02 Stepper, kullanıcılarının antropometrik
verilerine ve biomekanik limitlerine uygun olarak, sonraki tasarımlara örnek
olabilmesi adına, yeniden tasarlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ergonomi, Antropometri, Dış mekan fitness aleti, Endüstriyel Tasarım, Kullanıcı Odaklı Tasarım

A RE-DESIGN PROJECT: CORRECTION OF AN OUTDOOR FITNESS EQUIPMENT’S DESIGN ACCORDING TO ITS USERS’S ANTHROPOMETRIC AND BIOMECHANICAL DATA

Öz

The aim of this study is to determine the anthropometric measurements of the users of outdoor fitness equipment and to re-design of an in-use outdoor fitness equipment according to these measurements.

A total of 100 (50 male and 50 female) outdoor fitness equipment users, living in Eskisehir, Turkey, voluntarily participated in the study. Their ages ranged from 18 to 79 years and the mean of their ages were 31,2 (SD: 1,15277). The following human body dimensions were measured: stature, shoulder height, side-arm reach, fist (knuckle) height, forearm length, upper arm length, shoulder-fingertip length, knee height, malleolus height and hand length. The anthropometric measures of the adults and the outdoor fitness equipment’ dimensions were compared in order to identify any incompatibility between them. The data indicated a mismatch between the adults’ bodily dimensions and the outdoor fitness equipment available to them. Later on, in use fitness equipment’s motion output compared with biomechanical limits. Also, a mismatch was found between the motion output and biomechanical limits which might cause injuries. As these mismatches endanger public health, an outdoor fitness equipment, FE02 Stepper was re-designed according to its users’ anthropometric data and biomechanical limits as an example. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ergonomics, Anthropometry, Outdoor Fitness Equipment, Industrial Design, User-centred design

Kaynakça

• Akın, G., & Sağır, M. (1998). Anthropometric Data for Ergonomic Desk Design For Primary Schools. 6th Ergonomics Congress (s. 68-78). Ankara: MPM Publication.Aspelund, K. (2006). The Design Process. New York: Fairchild Publications, Inc.
• Axelsson, J. (1995). The Use of Some Ergonomics Methods as Tools in Quality Improvement. Proceedings of the 13 th International Conference on Production Research (s. 721-723). Tel Aviv: Freund Publihing House.
• Aydın, T. (2006). Spor Yaralanmalarının Patomekaniği. J Int Med Sci , 2(27) ), pp. 8-17.
• Bayık, A. (1992). An Anthropometric Approach For Determination of Working Areas. Eskişehir: Anadolu University.
• Botha, W. E., Bridger, R. S. (1998). Anthropometric variability, equipment, usability and musculoskeletal pain in a group of nurses in the Western Cape. International Journal of Applied Ergonomics , 29(6) ), pp. 481–490.
• Bulatović, R. R., & Dordević, S. R. (2009). On the optimum synthesis of a four-bar linkage using differential evolution and method of variable controlled deviations . Mechanism and Machine Theory , 44(1) ), pp. 235-246 .
• Burdurlu, E., Usta, İ., İlçe, C., Altun, S., & Elibol, C. (2006). Static Anthropometric Characteristics of 12-15 Age Students Living in Ankara. Hacettepe University e-journal of Sociological Research .
• Dabnicki, P. (1998). Biomechanical tests of sport equipment. Sport Engineering , 93-105.
• Dizdar, N. E. (2001). Kaza Sebeplendirme Yaklaşımları. Türk Tabipleri Birliği Meslek Sağlık ve Güvenlik Dergisi, 7(1), pp. 26-31.
• Eckhardt, H. D. (1998). Kinematic Design of Machines and Mechanisms. McGraw-Hill Professional.
• Ferguson, E. S. (1962). Kinematics of Mechanisms from the Time of Watt. United States National Museum Bulleten, No: 228 , 185-230.
• Gönen, E., & Kalınkara, V. (1993). Analysis Of Anthropometric Characteristics of the Female students Going on University Education. 4th Ergonomics Congress (s. 93-106). İzmir: MPM Publications.
• Imrhan, S. N., Sarder, M. D., & Mandahawi, N. (2009). Hand Anthropometry in Bangladeshis Living in America and Comparisons with Other Populations. Ergonomics , 52(8), pp. 987-998.
• İşeri, A., & Arslan, N. (2009). Estimated anthropometric measurements of Turkish adults and effects of age and geographical regions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 39(5), 860–865.
• Jurgens, H. W., Aune, I. A., Pepier, U. (1990). International Data on Anthropometry, Occupational Safety and Health Series. Geneva: International Labour Office.
• Karakuş, S., & Kılınç, F. (2006). Posture and Sportive Performance. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi , 14(1), pp. 309-322.
• Kayış, B. (1987). Using of the anthropometric Data in Ergonomic Designing of Primary School Buildings. Ankara: The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey.
• Kayış, B. (1986). An anthropometry survey on Turkish primary school children, h128, The Scientific. Ankara: and Technical Research Council of Turkey.
• Kayış, B., & Özok, A. F. (1991). Anthropometry Survey Among Turkish Primary School Children. Applied Ergonomics , 22(1), pp. 55-56.
• Kempe, B. A. (2008). How to Draw a Straight Line. The Project Gutenberg eBook
• Norman, D. A. (2002). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.
• Norton, R. L. (2004). Design of Machinery: An Introduction to the Synthesis and Analysis of Mechanisms and Machines. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Özer, K. (1993). Antropometri Sporda Morfolojik Planlama. Istanbul: Kazan Matbaacilik.
• Özkul, A. E. (1999). Ergonomics. Eskisehir: Anadolu University Publications.
• Panero, J., & Zelnik, M. (1979). Human Dimensions and Interior Space: A Source Book of Design Reference Standarts. London: The Architectural Press Ltd.
• Pennock, G. (2007). James Watt (1736–1819). History of Mechanism and Machine Science, 337-369.
• Phakatkar, H. G. (2009, 4th ed.). Theory of Machines and Mechanisms I. Nirali Prakashan.
• Pheasant, S. (1982). A Technique for Estimating Anthropometric Data from The Parameters of The Distribution of Stature. Ergonomics , 25(11), pp. 981-992.
• Pheasant, S. (1996). Bodyspace-Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work. London: Taylor & Francis.
• Pheasant, S. (1986). Bodyspace-Anthropometry. In: Ergonomics and Design. London: Taylor & Francis.
• Rai, A., Saxena, A., & Mankame, N. (2010). Unified synthesis of compact planar path-generating linkages with rigid and deformable members. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 863-879.
• Reuleaux, F. (1963). The Kinematics of Machinery. New York: Dover Publications.
• Sabancı, A. (1981). A Study on Ergonomic Characteristics of Agricultural Tractors, Ph.D. Thesis,. Ankara: Turkish Agricultural Equipment Association, Agricultural Machines Research Institute.
• Sakallıoğlu, F., Doğan, A. A., Zavallıoğlu, T. M., & Baş, M. (1993). Sporcu ve sporcu olmayan erkek ve bayanların gövde esneklikleri analizi. Spor Kongreleri Bildirileri (s. 135). Erzurum: Ataturk University.
• Sclater, N., & Chironis, N. P. (2001, 3rd ed.). Mechanisms and Mechanical Devices Sourcebook . McGraw-Hill
• Wittenberg, J. D. (1985). Products Liability: Recreation and Sports Equipment. New York: Law Journal Press.