Examining the Mentoring Process in Collaborative Project-based Learning of Preservice Instructional Technology Teachers

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 47 - 61, 30.06.2021

Tuğba Kamalı Arslantaş Onur Emre Kocaöz

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to investigate how special education knowledge and practice can be expanded through mentoring activities. In this respect, an interdisciplinary one-to-many mentorship study with Collaborative Project-based Learning (CPBL) was conducted. The mentors were Special Education faculty members who guided preservice teachers from the Instructional Technology department. During this guiding process, the preservice teachers developed animations for teaching daily life skills to students with intellectual disability (ID). The study followed a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. This current study showed that mentoring with CPBL can be effective in equipping both mentors and mentees with a variety of skills. Specifically, mentoring can be an effective process for preservice teachers to construct context-specific knowledge in educating students with special needs. The study’s quantitative findings showed that the mentors were successful during the mentoring process.

Keywords

special education, mentoring, inclusion, collaborative project based learning, preservice teachers

References

• Allen, J. M. (2011). Stakeholders’ perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 742-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.004
• Ambrosetti, A., & Dekkers, J. (2010). The Interconnectedness of the Roles of Mentors and Mentees in Preservice Teacher Education Mentoring Relationships. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n6.3
• Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B. A., & Dekkers, J. (2013). A new vision of mentoring in teacher education. In D. E. Lynch & T. Yeigh (Eds.), Teacher Education in Australia: Investigations into Programming, Practicum and Partnership (pp. 77-93). Oxford Global.
• Ambrosetti, A., Knight, B. A., & Dekkers, J. (2014). Maximizing the potential of mentoring: A framework for pre-service teacher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(3), 224-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.926662
• Andrews, L. (2002). Preparing general education pre-service teachers for inclusion: Web-enhanced case-based instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(3), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016264340201700302
• Angelides, P., & Mylordou, A. (2011). The beneficial outcome of a successful mentoring relationship: the development of inclusive education. Teacher Development, 15(4), 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2011.642650
• Baran, E. (2016). Examining the Benefits of a Faculty Technology Mentoring Program on Graduate Students’ Professional Development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(3), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1169958
• Barrett, R. (2002). Mentor supervision and development: Exploration of lived experience. Career Development International, 7(5), 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430210440109
• Berk, R. A., Berg, J., Mortimer, R., Walton-Moss, B., & Yeo, T. P. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Academic Medicine, 80(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200501000-00017
• Blackwell, J. E. (1989). Mentoring: An action strategy for increasing minority faculty. Academe, 75(5), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/40249734
• Boyer, I., Maney, B., Kamler, B., & Comber, B. (2004). Reciprocal mentoring across generations: sustaining professional development for English teachers. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 32(2), 139-150. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30008765
• Campbell, M. R., & Brummett, V. M. (2007). Mentoring preservice teachers for development and growth of professional knowledge. Music Educators Journal, 93(3), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002743210709300320
• Cawyer, C. S., Simonds, C., & Davis, S. (2002). Mentoring to facilitate socialization: The case of the new faculty member. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390110111938
• Civitillo, S., De Moor, J. M., & Vervloed, M. P. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about inclusive education in the Netherlands: An exploratory study. Support for Learning, 31(2), 104-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12119
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Prentice Hall.
• Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). Utilization of computer technology to facilitate money management by individuals with mental retardation. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(1), 106-112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880189
• De Boer, A., Pijl, S. C., & Minnaert. A. (2011). Regular Primary Schoolteachers’ Attitudes Towards Inclusive Education: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089
• Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H.-K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & Education, 56(2), 441-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.005
• Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005) Collaborative Project-based Learning and Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: a Consideration of Tutor and Student Role in Learner-Focused Strategies. In G. O’Neill, S. Moore, & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (pp. 87-98). AISHE/HEA.
• DuBois, D. L., & Karcher, M. J. (2005). Youth mentoring, theory, research, and practice. In D. L. DuBois & M. J. Karcher (Eds.), Handbook of Youth Mentoring (pp. 2-12). Sage.
• DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(2), 57-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611414806
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers & Education, 64(1), 175-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Bank.
• Feiman-Nemser, S., & Parker, M. (1993). Mentoring in context: A comparison of two U.S. programs for beginning teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 699-718. https://www.education.msu.edu/NCRTL/PDFs/NCRTL/SpecialReports/spring92.pdf
• Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933551
• Giblin, F., & Lakey, B. (2010). Integrating mentoring and social support research within the context of stressful medical training. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 771-796. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2010.29.7.771
• Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: Pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching & Teacher Education, 25(2), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.003
• Hairon, S., Loh, S. H., Lim, S. P., Govindani, S. N., Tan, J. K. T., & Tay, E. C. J. (2019). Structured mentoring: Principles for effective mentoring. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09251-8
• Hall, K. M., R., Draper, R. J., Smith, L. K., & Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2008). More than a place to teach: Exploring the perceptions of the roles and responsibilities of mentor teachers. Mentoring and Tutoring, 16(3), 328-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260802231708
• Healy, L., Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Stewart, D. (2001). Conversations: a means of learning, growth and change. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005494
• House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Wesley.
• Hudson, P. (2004). Specific mentoring: a theory and model for developing primary science teaching practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976042000223015
• Hudson, P. (2013). Mentoring as professional development: ‘growth for both’ mentor and mentee. Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 771-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.749415
• Hudson, P. (2016). Forming the Mentor-Mentee Relationship. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(1), 30-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1163637
• Hudson, P., & Skamp, K. (2002). Mentoring preservice teachers of primary science. The Electronic Journal of Science Education, 7(1), Article 7692. https://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view/7692
• Huizing, R. L. (2012). Mentoring together: A literature review of group mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 20(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645599
• Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2006). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in student’s cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173
• Ishiyama, J. (2007). Expectations and perceptions of undergraduate research mentoring: Comparing first generation, low-income white/Caucasian and African American students. College Student Journal, 41(3), 540-549.
• Izadinia, M. (2016). Student teachers’ and mentor teachers’ perceptions and expectations of a mentoring relationship: do they match or clash? Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.994136
• Jacobowitz, T., & Sudol, K. A. (2010). Literacy strategies that promote democratic skills, attitudes, and behavior in the social studies classroom. Social Studies Research & Practice, 5(3), 62-73.
• Jones, B. (2019). Good practice: Scaffolded, Collaborative Project-based Learning. Journal of the European Honors Council, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.31378/jehc.85
• Kapp, E. (2009). Improving student teamwork in a collaborative project-based course. College Teaching, 57(3), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.57.3.139-143
• Korhonen, H., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Kiviniemi, U., & Tynjala, P. (2017). Student teachers’ experiences of participating in mixed peer mentoring groups of in-service and pre-service teachers in Finland. Teaching & Teacher Education, 61, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.011
• Lentz, E., & Allen, T. D. (2007). Reflections on naturally occurring mentoring relationships. In T. D. Allen & L. T. Eby (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of mentoring: A multiple perspectives approach (pp. 158-162). Blackwell.
• Lopatto, D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 23(3), 139-142. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8b47/f05fecb485b85b17d9c371607a3422a822de.pdf
• Lumpkin, A. (2011). A model for mentoring university faculty. Educational Forum, 75(4), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.602466
• Melekoglu, M. A., Cakiroglu, O., & Malmgren, K. W. (2009). Special education in Turkey. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(3), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110701747769
• Mena, J., Hennissen, P., & Loughran, J. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers’ professional knowledge of teaching: The influence of mentoring. Teaching & Teacher Education, 66, 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.024
• Metsala, J. L., & Harkins, M. J. (2019). An Examination of Preservice Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Beliefs About Inclusive Education. Teacher Education and Special Education. Advance Online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406419873060
• Ministry of National Education. (2018). National Education Statistics Formal Education 2018/’19. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_09/30102730_meb_istatistikleri_orgun_egitim_2018_2019.pdf
• Moberg, S., Muta, E., Korenaga, K., Kuorelahti, M., & Savolainen, H. (2020). Struggling for inclusive education in Japan and Finland: teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(1), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1615800
• Moon, T. R., Callahan, C. M., & Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The effects of mentoring relationships on preservice teachers’ attitudes toward academically diverse students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(2), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300202
• Pamuk, S., & Thompson, A. D. (2009). Development of a technology mentor survey instrument: Understanding student mentors’ benefits. Computers & Education, 53(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.017
• Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L., & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: the effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1177-1194. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556344
• Rakap, S., & Kaczmarek, L. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in Turkey. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(1), 59-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250903450848
• Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041302244
• Sanders, W. L., Wright, S. P., & Horn, S. P. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007999204543
• Sharma, U., Forlin, C., & Loreman, T. (2008). Impact of training on pre‐service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. Disability & Society, 23(7), 773-778. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469271
• Thompson, A. (2007). History of the faculty technology mentoring program. In A. D. Thompson, H. Chuang, & I. Sahin (Eds.), Faculty mentoring: The power of students in developing technology expertise (pp. 29-46). Information Age. . https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/cije/issue/4277/57633
• Volkwein, J. F., King, M. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (1986). Student-faculty relationships and intellectual growth among transfer students. Journal of Higher Education, 57(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1986.11778786
• Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: A critical review. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 481-546. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003481
• Witney, D., & Smallbone, T. (2011). Wiki work: Can using wikis enhance student collaboration for group assignment tasks? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2010.543765
• Yirci, R., Karakose, T., Uygun, H., & Ozdemir, T. Y. (2016). The Turkish Adaptation of the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale: A validity and Reliability Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(4), 821-832. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1440a
• Zagona, A. L., Kurth, J. A., & MacFarland, S. Z. C. (2017). Teachers’ views of their preparation for inclusive education and collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40 (3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417692969