Research Article

Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ

Volume: 5 Number: 2 June 30, 2022
EN

Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ

Abstract

In this study, solid waste characterisation of high-income, middle-income, low-income regions and market areas in Tekirdağ Metropolitan Municipality was carried out in winter and summer, 2016. As a result, the amount of organic wastes (kitchen wastes, park and green wastes) and packaging waste (paper, cardboard, bulky cardboard, plastics, glass, metals and bulky metals) in Tekirdağ were determined as 41.02% and 32.4% respectively, by waste sampling. When waste characterisation was analysed based on the districts, it was seen that paper and plastic waste is mostly produced from the Çorlu district. The reason for this could be the high level of welfare of the citizens living in Çorlu and the high number of working people compared to other districts due to the high density of industrial facilities. It was also seen that the ash percentage of waste is high in the districts of Hayrabolu, Şarköy, Muratlı, Marmaraereğlisi, Malkara and Saray, which are the districts not covered by natural gas distribution grid. Waste samples were characterised in the Tubitak Energy Institute Laboratory to determine the moisture content, calorific value and glow loss. The results showed that there is a high moisture and organic matter in the wastes, which makes the incineration method not suitable for the treatment of solid wastes in Tekirdağ. The results of this study highlighted that there is a potential for introducing recycling schemes especially in high income regions in Tekirdağ. To initiate such programmes, collected municipal waste could be separated in two streams in place; organics and co-mingled dry-recyclables.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

NA

Project Number

NA

Thanks

The authors would like to thank the directors and employees of Tekirdağ Metropolitan Municipality for their contributions to providing the data used in the study.

References

  1. [1]. S.S. Chung, and C.S. Poon, “Characterisation of municipal solid waste and its recyclable contents of Guangzhou,” Waste Management and Research, Vol. 19 (6), 2001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X0101900603
  2. [2]. M.A. Sufian, and B.K. Bala, “Modeling of urban solid waste management system: The case of Dhaka city,” Waste Management, Vol. 27 (7), pp. 858-868, 2007
  3. [3]. N. Aydın, “Electricity generation potential of municipal solid wastes produced in the province of Edirne,” Sustainable Engineering and Innovation, Vol. 3 (1), pp.61-67, 2021. https://doi.org/10.37868/sei.v3i1.id 138
  4. [4]. A. Hanedar, B. Gül, E. Güneş, G. Kaykıoğlu, and Y. Güneş, “Waste management and zero waste practices in educational institutions,” Environmental Research and Technology, Vol.4 (2), pp. 126 – 133, 2021
  5. [5]. H. Sarı, “Assessment of Nutrient Status of Soil Around Municipal Soil Waste Disposal Site in Çorlu District of Tekirdağ Using GIS,” Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, Vol. 7 (2), pp. 377-383, 2019. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i2.377-383.2372
  6. [6]. L Salami, and A.A. Susu, “Characterisation Study of Solid Wastes: A Case of Lagos State,” International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, Vol. 1 (3), 2011
  7. [7]. J.O. Okeniyi and E.U. Anwan, “Solid Wastes Generation in Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria: Characterisation and Implication for Sustainable Waste Management,” J. Mater. Environ. Sci., Vol. 3 (2), pp. 419-424, 2012
  8. [8]. E. Lebon, N. Madushele, and L. Adelard, “Municipal Solid Wastes Characterisation and Waste Management Strategy Evaluation in Insular Context: A Case Study in Reunion Island,” Waste and Biomass Valorization, Vol. 11, pp. 6443–6453, 2020

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Environmental Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 30, 2022

Submission Date

December 7, 2021

Acceptance Date

March 9, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Güneş, E., Gümüş Bayındır, K., Aydın, N., & Cifci, D. İ. (2022). Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ. Environmental Research and Technology, 5(2), 148-154. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1033588
AMA
1.Güneş E, Gümüş Bayındır K, Aydın N, Cifci Dİ. Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ. ERT. 2022;5(2):148-154. doi:10.35208/ert.1033588
Chicago
Güneş, Elçin, Kübra Gümüş Bayındır, Nesli Aydın, and Deniz İzlen Cifci. 2022. “Characterisation Study of Solid Wastes: A Case of Districts in Tekirdağ”. Environmental Research and Technology 5 (2): 148-54. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1033588.
EndNote
Güneş E, Gümüş Bayındır K, Aydın N, Cifci Dİ (June 1, 2022) Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ. Environmental Research and Technology 5 2 148–154.
IEEE
[1]E. Güneş, K. Gümüş Bayındır, N. Aydın, and D. İ. Cifci, “Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ”, ERT, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 148–154, June 2022, doi: 10.35208/ert.1033588.
ISNAD
Güneş, Elçin - Gümüş Bayındır, Kübra - Aydın, Nesli - Cifci, Deniz İzlen. “Characterisation Study of Solid Wastes: A Case of Districts in Tekirdağ”. Environmental Research and Technology 5/2 (June 1, 2022): 148-154. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1033588.
JAMA
1.Güneş E, Gümüş Bayındır K, Aydın N, Cifci Dİ. Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ. ERT. 2022;5:148–154.
MLA
Güneş, Elçin, et al. “Characterisation Study of Solid Wastes: A Case of Districts in Tekirdağ”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 5, no. 2, June 2022, pp. 148-54, doi:10.35208/ert.1033588.
Vancouver
1.Elçin Güneş, Kübra Gümüş Bayındır, Nesli Aydın, Deniz İzlen Cifci. Characterisation study of solid wastes: A case of districts in Tekirdağ. ERT. 2022 Jun. 1;5(2):148-54. doi:10.35208/ert.1033588

Cited By