Regulations regarding biopiracy in the World and in Turkiye

Abstract

The term "biopiracy" refers to the unauthorized and uncompensated utilization of genetic resources or traditional knowledge from one country by another country or corporation for commercial purposes. As a nation rich in biodiversity, Turkey faces significant vulnerabilities to biopiracy. This study aims to analyze Turkey's policies on biopiracy while drawing on global examples of effective strategies to combat this issue. The findings reveal that numerous countries actively engage in combating biopiracy. However, Turkey lacks international patent cases or notable initiatives addressing biopiracy. The study concludes that Turkey's current policies and approaches may be inadequate to prevent potential biopiracy incidents or foreign patents on its genetic resources, underscoring the urgent need for a more comprehensive and proactive strategy.

Keywords

• Biopiracy
• biodiversity
• biotechnology
• Türkiye

References

1. M. Lopez and F. Paramo, “The identification of biopiracy in patents,” World Patent Information, Vol. 47, pp. 67-74, 2016.
2. V. Shiva, “Biopiracy: The Plunder Of Nature And Knowledge,” Noth Atlantic Books, 2016.
3. J. Ragnar, “Biopiracy, the CBD and tips-prevention of biopiracy,” (Unpublished master's thesis). Sweeden, Faculty of the Law University of Lund, (2004).
4. İ. Şatıroğlu, “Indigenous peoples and environmental justice,” (Unpublished master's thesis). Ankara University Institute of Social Sciences, (2002).
5. E. Güler, and A. Mutlu, “The problem of biopiracy and policies towards biopiracy in Turkey,” Journal of Administrative Sciences, pp. 271-300, 2022.
6. T. Soysal, “Traditional knowledge as a category of ıntellectual property rights and biopiracy as exploitation of traditional knowledge,” Terazi Law Journal, Vol. 14(156), pp. 1630-1644, 2019.
7. Ü. Birben and G. Gençay, “Bio-smuggling in Turkey,” Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 71, pp. 345-364, 2018.
8. J. Reid, “Biopiracy: The struggle for traditional knowledge rights,” American Indian Law Review, Vol. 34/1, pp. 77-98, 2009.

9. Ministry of Forestry and Water Management (2015). Anti-Biosmuggling Guide. http://www.nuhungemisi.gov.tr/Giris/index.aspx, [Online]. Available 2022.
10. Diplomatic Conference to Conclude an International Legal Instrument Relating to Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources, https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/gratk_dc/gratk_dc_7.pdf.
11. S. Lemeire, “Biopiracy,” (Unpublished master thesis). Faculteit Rechtgeleerdheid Universiteit Gent, (2013).
12. G. Alkan and B. Gurakan, “Protection of Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge with Intellectual Property Rights - Current Developments and Turkey's Position”, Intellectual Agenda, 29, pp. 15-24, 2024.
13. V. Danley, “Biopiracy in the Brazilian Amazon: Learning from International and Comparative Law Successes and Shortcomings to Help Promote Bidiversity Conservation in Brazil”, Florida A&M University Review, 7, pp. 291-327, 2012.
14. A. Zahariev, “Biopiracy and intellectual property rights-to what extent biopiracy represent a threat to traditional knowledge and how the international legal system allows it,” (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Amsterdam Faculty of Law, (n.d.).
15. M. DeGeer, “Biopiracy: The Appopration of Indigenous People Cultural Knowledge”, New Eng J. Int & Comp. L., Vol. 9, pp. 179-208, 2002.
16. [J. Garcia, “Fighting biopiracy: The legislative protection of traditional knowledge,” Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 5-14, 2007.
17. V. Shiva, "Bioprospecting as Sophisticated Biopiracy," Sings, 32, 2007, pp. 307-313, 2016).
18. M. Gebara, S. Suominen and M. Schmidlehner, “Indigenous Knowledge in the Amazon's Bioeconomy: Unveiling Bioepistemicide through the case of Kambo Medicine," Forest Policy and Economics, 154, pp. 1-11, 2023.
19. M. Muller, “Experıences in the protection of traditional knowledge: The case of Peru (law 27811),” https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_iptk_ge_15/wipo_iptk_ge_15_presentations_mr_manuel_ruiz.pdf2020.
20. Öcalan, Emre, “The International Dimension of the Protection of Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folkloric Expressions with Intellectual Property, Controversial Issues and the Current Situation in Our Country,” Turkish Patent Institute Patent Department Specialist Thesis, Ankara, 2014.
21. E. Hammond, “Amid Controversy And Irony, Costa Rica’s Inbio Surrenders Biodiversity Collections And Lands To The State”, https://www.twn.my/title2/biotk/2015/btk150401.htm.
22. C. Invernizzi, “Biodiversity, bioprospecting and patents: A case study of traditional knowledge in french guiana,” (Unpublished master thesis). Bournemouth University, (2017).
23. Y. Imran, N. Wijekoon, L. Gonawala, Y. Chiang, K. Silva, “Biopiracy: Abolish corporate hijacking of ındigenous medicinal entities”, Scientific World Journal, 1, pp. 1-8, 2021.
24. S. Çağlar, “Biodiversity and the status of turkey,” Kekibeç, 18, pp. 119-138, 2004.
25. Ö. Bilir, “Biotechnology in terms of conservation of plant genetic resources,” Turkish Journal of Scientific Review, 9 (2), pp. 29-33, 2016.
26. H. Torlak, “Endemic plants of turkey,” Ministry Of Culture And Tourism, 2010.
27. A. Oğuz, “Intellectual property rights and legal protection of traditional knowledge (local) and folklore,” FMR, 9 (3), pp. 10-52, 2009.
28. T. Yorulmaz, “Biological smuggling and our vertebrate animals,” Nature and Human, Vol. 187, pp. 3-12, 2014.
29. Y. Aydemir, “The situation and prevention of biocorruption in Artvin,” (Unpublished master's thesis). Çoruh University, (2019).
30. F. Bucak, “Examples of biotrafficking in the field,” Biotrafficking Workshop Final Report, Istanbul, 2014.
31. K. Eralp, Genetic resources & traditional knowledge. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_iptk_ank_16/wipo_iptk_ank_16_presentation_eralp.pdf, [Online]. Available (2016).
32. E. Güler, and A. Mutlu, “The problem of biopiracy in Turkey: The case of Küre mountains national park” [Paper presentation]. 12th International Public Administration Symposium, Kırıkkale, (2018, 25-27 October).
33. H. Özçelik, “Thoughts on biosmuggling and its consequences in Turkey” [Paper presentation]. 23rd National Biology Congress, Gaziantep, (2016).
34. G. Başaran, (2017), “Biosmuggling in Turkey”, Kütahya Dumlupinar University,
35. A.Karagöz, et al. “Protection and utilisation of plant genetic resources” VII. Technical Congress of Turkish Agricultural Engineering, Ankara, pp. 155-175, 2010.
36. TGNA. (2018). “Minutes of the meeting of the study visit to the ministry of agriculture and forestry of the environment commission”, https://www.tbmm.gov.tr.
37. E. Ulker, “International regulation for genetic resources and developing countries”, I.Ü.Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 2002.
38. J. Merson, “Bio-prospecting or bio-piracy: ıntellectual property rights and biodiversity in a colonial and postcolonial context”, Osiris, 15, pp. 282-296, 2000.
39. D. Downes, “Integrating ımplementation of the convention on biological diversity and the rules of the world trade organization”, IUCN- The World Conservation Union, 1999.
40. J. Tabari, “TRIPs & Biodiversity, cuts centre for ınternational trade, economics & environment (CUTS-CITEE)”, Viewpoint, 3, CUTS International, pp. 1-2, 2005.