Research Article

ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options

Volume: 8 Number: 3 September 30, 2025

ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options

Abstract

Ballast water treatment (BWT) is mandatory, and its lifecycle cost increasingly depends on carbon pricing. This study quantifies the energy and cost trade‑offs of three options for a BDELTA‑type handymax bulk carrier (ballast pump 1,600 m3 h-1; 34 operations yr-1): filtration + UV with double pass, filtration + electrochlorination (EC) at 10 mg L-1 TRO, and an exploratory thermal pasteurization case (55 oC) using waste‑heat plus a fired boiler. A 100 kW Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) recovers main‑engine waste heat and supplies BWT electricity; surplus generation is credited to hotel loads. Costs include fuel and EU ETS allowances (80 USD tCO2, 70% coverage in 2025) and are annualized with a 7% discount rate over 20 years. A deterministic model is complemented with a ±10% Monte Carlo analysis of key parameters. ORC output exceeds the electrical demand of UV and EC, leaving substantial surplus. The resulting net annualized costs are 20 kUSD yr-1 for UV+ORC and about -2.9 kUSD yr-1 (a small net saving) for EC+ORC, while thermal pasteurization remains prohibitive at 1.96 MUSD yr-1 because the boiler must supply most of the heat. The ranking is robust in the Monte Carlo results; variations in fuel and ETS price move totals but do not change the preference for UV/EC over thermal. The thermal pathway is presented as a feasibility case rather than a type‑approved solution. Overall, coupling UV or EC with a modest ORC module yields low net operating cost for treatment electricity while reducing ETS exposure through avoided auxiliary‑generator use. Thermal pasteurization is only economically plausible if near‑free, high‑grade heat and effective heat recovery are available, and the approach can be validated under current IMO/USCG protocols. Thermal treatment may be economically plausible only when continuous waste‑heat recirculation (multi‑pass) is used with well‑insulated tanks. In practice, it is unlikely to be viable for short trials.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing During the preparation of this work the author used Open AI ChatGPT in order to improve readability and language. After using this tool, the author reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the publication.

References

  1. K. Dong, W. Wu, J. Chen, J. Xiang, X. Jin, and HuixianWu, “A study on treatment efficacy of ballast water treatment system applying filtration + membrane separation + deoxygenation technology during shipboard testing,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 188(January), p. 114620, 2023.
  2. F. P. Ndlovu, “Trends in Compliance Monitoring Devices (CMDs) in Ships’ Ballast Water Treatment Systems,” Water, Vol. 17(4), p. 584, 2025.
  3. G. Drillet, C. Gianoli, L. Gang, A. Zacharopoulou, G. Schneider, P. Stehouwer, V. Bonamin, R. Goldring, and L. A. Drake, “Improvement in compliance of ships’ ballast water discharges during commissioning tests,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 191(November 2022), p. 114911, 2023.
  4. V. D. Bui, P. Q. P. Nguyen, and D. T. Nguyen, “a Study of Ship Ballast Water Treatment Technologies and Techniques,” Water Conservation and Management, Vol. 5(2), pp. 121–130, 2021.
  5. D. Duan, F. Xu, T. Wang, Y. Guo, and H. Fu, “The effect of filtration and electrolysis on ballast water treatment,” Ocean Engineering, Vol. 268(December 2022), p. 113301, 2023.
  6. J. H. Lee, K. H. Choi, and J. H. Yang, “Effects of physicochemical parameters of water on byproduct formation during electrolysis of ballast water,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, Vol. 11(March), pp. 1–11, 2023.
  7. X. Li, J. Song, F. Xu, Y. Li, T. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Liu, and C. Li, “Performance evaluation of the amperometric total residual oxidant sensor with the electrochlorination-based Ballast Water Management System,” Water Science and Technology, Vol. 91(2), pp. 192–201, 2025.
  8. P. Seridou, E. Kotzia, K. Katris, and N. Kalogerakis, “Ballast water treatment by ozone nanobubbles,” Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, Vol. 99(10), pp. 2139–2148, 2024.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Wastewater Treatment Processes

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2025

Submission Date

August 9, 2025

Acceptance Date

August 25, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Demir, M. E. (2025). ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options. Environmental Research and Technology, 8(3), 724-740. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1761210
AMA
1.Demir ME. ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options. ERT. 2025;8(3):724-740. doi:10.35208/ert.1761210
Chicago
Demir, Murat Emre. 2025. “ORC Assisted Ballast Water Treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative Assessment of UV, Electrochlorination, and Thermal Options”. Environmental Research and Technology 8 (3): 724-40. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1761210.
EndNote
Demir ME (September 1, 2025) ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options. Environmental Research and Technology 8 3 724–740.
IEEE
[1]M. E. Demir, “ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options”, ERT, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 724–740, Sept. 2025, doi: 10.35208/ert.1761210.
ISNAD
Demir, Murat Emre. “ORC Assisted Ballast Water Treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative Assessment of UV, Electrochlorination, and Thermal Options”. Environmental Research and Technology 8/3 (September 1, 2025): 724-740. https://doi.org/10.35208/ert.1761210.
JAMA
1.Demir ME. ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options. ERT. 2025;8:724–740.
MLA
Demir, Murat Emre. “ORC Assisted Ballast Water Treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative Assessment of UV, Electrochlorination, and Thermal Options”. Environmental Research and Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 724-40, doi:10.35208/ert.1761210.
Vancouver
1.Murat Emre Demir. ORC assisted ballast water treatment under the EU ETS: Comparative assessment of UV, electrochlorination, and thermal options. ERT. 2025 Sep. 1;8(3):724-40. doi:10.35208/ert.1761210