Development of Velocity Sensor to Optimize the Energy Yield in a Biogas Plant

Abstract

The number of biogas plants has increased worldwide making the energy from Biomass one of the main renewable energy resources. Along with the increase of number of biogas plants, the prices of the substrates have been increased. Therefore, the optimization of the energy efficiencies in biogas plants has become a crucial subject. An option to improve the efficiency of the biogas plants is by optimizing their stirring system, where up to 51% from the internal energy consumption in biogas plants might be caused by the stirrers. The evaluation of the current mixing performance is done by performing velocity testing with a reliable technology - the bending beam-. The main advantages of this sensor in advance to the simple technology are the cost reliability, accuracy, resistivity against foul and ability to be installed inside the fermenters. The results showed the efficient use of the sensor and an inaccuracy of the range (4-6) %. The effect of the Total Solids content (TS) of the digestate on the mixing inside the fermenter was determined; at higher TS values, the flow of the substrates becomes more uniform than at lower TS values.

Keywords

• Bending Beam,Biogas,Optimization,Sensor,Velocity

References

1. European Biogas Association, EBA, "European Biogas Association," 2016. [Online]. Available: http://european-biogas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Graph-1-Number-of-biogas-plants.png. [Accessed 20 03 2017].
2. Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st century, REN21, "RENEWABLES 2016, GLOBAL STATUS REPORT," Paris, 2016.
3. Clean Energy Wire, "Germany’s greenhouse gas emissions and climate targets," 01 02 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/germanys-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-climate-targets#dossier-references. [Accessed 20 03 2017].
4. H. Naegele, . A. Lemmer, . H. Oechsner and T. Jungbluth , "Electric Energy Consumption of the Full Scale Research Biogas Plant “Unterer Lindenhof”: Results of Longterm and Full Detail Measurements," Energies, vol. 5, no. 12, p. 198–5214, 2012.
5. L. Wiedemann, . F. Conti, T. Janus , M. Sonnleitner and W. Zörner , "Mixing in Biogas Digesters and Development of an Artificial Substrate for Laboratory-Scale Mixing Optimization," Cheical Engineering and Technology, no. 40, p. 238–247, 2017.
6. P. Weiland, "Biogas production: current state and perspectives," Applied microbiology and biotechnology, no. 85, pp. 849-860, 2010.
7. N. Ganidi, S. Tyrrel and E. Cartmell, "Anaerobic digestion foaming causes – A review," Bioresource technology, pp. 5546-5554, 2009.
8. K. Karim, R. Varma , . M. Vesvikar and . M. Al-Dahhan, "Flow pattern visualization ofa simulated digester," Water research, no. 38, p. 3659–3670, 3 June 2004.

9. P. Stroot, K. McMahon , R. Mackie and . L. Raskin, "Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions--I. Digester performance.," Water res., no. 2, 2001.
10. H. M. Sherwin K, Thermofluids, New York: NY: Chapman & Hall, 1996, p. 213.
11. The Engineering Toolbox , "The Engineering Toolbox," [Online]. Available: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/pitot-tubes-d_612.html. [Accessed 21 03 2017].
12. OMEGA Engineering, INC., "Omega," 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.omega.com/prodinfo/anemometers.html. [Accessed 21 03 2017]
13. I. S. o. E. Meeting, Electrochemistry in Molecular and Microscopic Dimensions: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the International Society of Electrochemistry : Jointly Organized with the GDCh-Fachgruppe Angewandte Electrochemie, Düsseldorf, Germany, 15-20 September 2, Elsevier, 2003, p. 3291
14. M. Brehmer and . M. Kraume, "Experimental Study to Develop a Control System for Submersible Mixers in Biogas Plants," Czasopismo Techniczne, no. 84, 18 October 2016.