EVRENSEL CEZA YARGILAMASI

Abstract

Bu makalenin yayınlanma tarihi itibariyle öz bölümü bulunmamaktadır.

Keywords

• evrensellik ilkesi
• evrensel yargılama yapma
• ceza yargılaması

Universal Criminal Jurisdriction

Abstract

As of the publication date, this article does not have an abstract section.

Keywords

• criminal jurisdiction
• Universal Criminal Jurisdriction

References

1. Act to Introduce German Code of Crimes against Intemational Law, http://www.iuscomp.org/gla/statutesN oeStGB.pdf, erişim tarihi: 26.11.2007.
2. Ali Timur Demirbaş, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Seçkin, Ankara 2007.
3. Ali Timur Demirbaş/Mustafa R. Erdem, Ceza Hukuku Pratik Çalışmaları, Seçkin, Ankara 2007.
4. Andrea Bianchi, 'Immunity versus Human Rights: The Pinochet Case', European Journal of International Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1999, s. 237-277.
5. Antonio Cassesse, International Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001.
6. Arzu Oğuz, Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk, Yetkin, Ankara 2003.
7. Aslan Gündüz, Milletlerarası Hukuk Temel Belgeler- Örnek Kararlar, Beta, İstanbul 2000.
8. Bahri Öztürk./Mustafa R. Erdem, Uygulamalı Ceza Hukuku ve Güvenlik Tedbirleri Hukuku. Seçkin, Ankara 2006.

9. Brigitte Stern, 'French Tribunal de grande instance (Paris)' in 'International Decisions: in re Pinochet', American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 4, 1999, s. 696-700.
10. Carla Fretsman, 'The Approach of the United Kingdom to Crimes under International Law: The Application of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction' in Wolfgang Kaleck / Michael Ratner / Tobias Singelnstein / Peter Weiss (eds.) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes, Springer, Berlin 2006, s. 149-158.
11. Chandra Lekha Sriram, 'Exercising Universal Jurisdiction: Contemporary Disparate Practice', International Journal of Human Rights, Vol 6, No.4, 2002, s. 49-76.
12. Christian Tomuschat, 'Issues of Universal Jurisdiction in the Scilingo Case', Journal oflnternational Criminal Justice, Vol. 3, 2005, sl074-1081.
13. Durmuş Tezcan, 'Ulusal Mahkemelerin Evrensel Yargı Yetkisi ve Belçika Örneği' in Hukuk Kurultayı 2004, Ankara Barosu, Ankara 2004, s.128-145.
14. Enver Bozkurt/ Yasin Poyraz Y./M. Akif Kütükçü,Devletler Hukuku Pratik Çalışmaları, Asil, Ankara 2004.
15. Erdem Denk, 'Pinochet ve(silesiyle) Evrensel Yargı', Birikim, No. 213, 2007, s. 22-25.
16. Erwin van der Borght, 'Prosecution of International Crimes in The Netherlands: An Analysis of Recent Case Law', Criminal Law Forum, Vol 18, 2007, s. 87-136.
17. Ezeli Azarkan, Nuremberg'ten La Haye'ye: Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemeleri, Beta, İstanbul 2003.
18. Gabrial Bottini, 'Universal Jurisdiction After the Creation of the International Criminal Court' ,International Law and Politics, Vol. 36, No. 503, 2004, s. 503-562.
19. George Windell Berge, 'The Case of the S. S. Lotus', Michigan Law Review,Vol. 26, No. 4, 1928, s. 361-382.
20. Hakan Hakeri, Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Seçkin, Ankara 2007.
21. Hans Heinrich Jescheck, 'General Principles of lntemational Criminal Law Set Out in Nuremberg as Mirrored in the ICC Statute', Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2004, s. 38-55.
22. Hans Köchler, 'Universal Jurisdiction and lntemational Power Politics: ideal versus Real', Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2006, s. 195-200.
23. Hüseyin Pazarcı, Uluslararası Hukuk Dersleri, iV. Kitap, Turhan, Ankara 2000.
24. İHİÖ, Universal Jurisdiction in Europe The State of The Art. Vol. 18, 5(D), 2006, http://hrw.org/reports/2006/ij 0606/ ij 0606webwcover.pdf, erişim tarihi: 21.11.2007.
25. İzzet Özgenç, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Seçkin, Ankara 2007.
26. Jeanne Sulzer, 'lmplementing the Principle of Universal Jurisdiction in Wolfgang Kaleck / Michael Ratner / Tobias Singelnstein / Peter Weiss (eds.) International Prosecution of Human Rights Crimes, Springer, Berlin 2006, s.125- 137.
27. Kai Ambos, 'lntemational Core Crimes, Universal Jurisdiction and § 153f of the German Criminal Procedure Code: a Commentary on the Decisions of the Federal Prosecutor General and the Stuttgart Higher Regional Court in the Abu Ghraib/Rumsfeld Case', Criminal Law Forum, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2007, s. 43-58.
28. Kemal Oğuzman/Nami Barlas,Medeni Hukuk, Beta, İstanbul 2005.
29. Lordlar Kamarası, Judgment - Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet Regina v. Evans and Another and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet (On Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen's Bench Division, 24 Mart 1999, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ldl99899/ldjudgmt/jd990324/pino l .htm, erişim tarihi: 05.11.2007.
30. Luc Reydams, 'Belgian Tribunal of First lnstance of Brussels (investigating magistrate), November 8, 1998' in 'lntemational Decisions: in re Pinochet', American Journal of International Law. Vol. 93, No.4, 1999, s. 700-703.
31. Luc Reydams, 'Universal Criminal Jurisdiction: Belgian State of Affairs'. Criminal Law Forum, Vol. 11, 2000, s. 183-216.
32. M. Fatih Çınar, Uluslararası Ceza Mahkemelerinin Gelişimi Işığında Uluslararası Ceza Divanı, Kazancı, İstanbul 2004.
33. Madeline H. Morris, 'Universal Jurisdiction in a Divided World: Conference Remarks', New England Law Review, Vol. 35, No.2, 2001, s. 337- 361.
34. Mahmut Koca/İlhan Üzülmez, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, Seçkin, Ankara 2008.
35. Maria del Carmen Marquez Carrasco/Joaquin Akaide Femandez, 'Spanish National Court, Criminal Division (Plenary Session) Case 19/97, November 4, 1998; Case 1/98, November 5, 1998' in 'Intemational Decisions: in re Pinochet', American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 4, 1999, s. 690-696.
36. Michael P. Scharf, 'Application of Treaty-Based Universal Jurisdiction to Nationals of Non-Party States', New England Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2001, s. 363-382.
37. Murat Önok, Tarihi Perspektifiyle Uluslararası Ceza Divanı, Turhan, Ankara 2003.
38. Naomi Roth-Arriza, 'The Pinochet Precedent and Universal Jurisdiction', New EnglandLaw Review. Vol. 35, No. 2, 2001, s. 311-319.
39. Nur Centel /Hamide Zafer/Özlem Y enerer Çakmut, Türk Ceza Hukukuna Giriş, Beta, İstanbul 2006.
40. Özden N. Sav, 'Ulusal Mahkemelerin Evrensel Yargı Yetkisi' in Hukuk Kurultayı 2004, Ankara Barosu, Ankara 2004, s. 146-166.
41. Redress, Universal Jurisdiction in Europe: Law and Cases in Ten Countries, 1999, http://www.redress.org/documents/annex.html, erişim tarihi: 21.11.2007.
42. Roger O'Keefe, 'Universal Jurisdiction Clarifying the Basic Concept', Journal oflnternational Criminal Justice, Vol. 2, 2004, s. 735-760.
43. S. Sinan Kocaoğlu, 'Evrensel Yetki', TBB Dergisi, No. 60, 2005, s. 189- 213.
44. Seventeenth Commission Universal Criminal Jurisdiction with Regard to the Crime of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes Resolution, madde 1, http://www.idi iil.org/idiE/resolutionsE/2005 _kra _ 03 _ en.pdf, erişim tarihi: 26.11.2007.
45. Sulhi Dönmezer, Genel Ceza Hukuku Dersleri, Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Yayınlan, İstanbul 2003.
46. Sulhi Dönmezer/Feridun Yenisey, Ceza Hukuku Genel Dersleri, yayınlanmamış baskı,2007.
47. Türk Ceza Kanunu Madde Gerekçeleri, http://www.cezabb.adalet.gov .tr/mevzuat/maddegerekce .doc, erişim tarihi: 26.11.2007.
48. UAD, Yakalama Emri Kararı, 2000, http://www.icjcij.org/docket/fıles/121/ 8126.pdf, para. 21, erişim tarihi: 03.11.2007.
49. UAD, Yakalama Emri Kararında Yargıç Guillaume'nin kişisel görüşü, 2000,
50. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/fıles/121/8128. pdf, para. 9, erişim tarihi: 03.11.2007.
51. UAD, Yakalama Emri Kararında Yargıç Higgins, Koojmans ve Buergenthal'm birleşik kişisel görüşleri, 2000, http://www.icj-cij.org/ docket/ fıles/121/8136.pdf, para. 57, erişim tarihi: 03.11.2007.
52. UAD, Yakalama Emri Kararında Yargıç Van den Wyngaert'in karşı görüşü, 2000, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/fıles/121/8144.pdf, para. 44, erişim tarihi: 03.11.2007.
53. UAÖ 'Chapter Two: The Evolution of The Practice of Universal Jurisdiction' in Universal Jurisdiction: The duty to enact and enforce legislation, 2001, http://web.amnesty.org/library/pdf/I0R53004200lENGLISH/$File/ IOR5300401.pdf, erişim tarihi: 19 Kasım 2007.
54. UDAD, Lotus Kararı, 1927, http://www.worldcourts.com/pcij/eng/ decisions/1927.09.07 _lotus/, erişim tarihi: 19.11.2007.
55. Uğur Bayıllıoğlu, 'Uluslararası Adalet Divanı'nın Tutuklama Müzekkeresi Davası Hakkında Kararına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme', AÜHFD, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2006, s. 27-63.
56. Yana Shy Kraytman, 'Universal Jurisdiction - Historical Roots and Modem Implications', BSIS Journal of International Studies, Vol. 2, 2005, s. 94-129.
57. Zeki Hafızoğullan, Türk Ceza Hukuku Ders Notları, Ankara 2007, http://www.baskent.edu.tr/-zekih/ogrenci/CezaHukuku.pdf, erişim tarihi: 28.11.2007.