Public institutions and organizations in Turkey, for their needs
like goods procurement, service procurement, construction, and lea
sing activities, can conduct these either directly through administrati
ve units or by outsourcing to private legal entities. However, unlike
private individuals, administrative authorities are bound to operate
within a set of pre-established rules, a necessity for achieving public
welfare. These rules are generally referred to as public procurement.
Public procurement can be defined as the process and procedures
related to the selection of private legal entities for various activities
such as procurement of goods, services, construction, and leasing.
There are two primary laws governing the procurement activities of
administrative authorities: the State Procurement Law (No. 2886 of1983) and the Public Procurement Law (No. 4734 of 2002), with the
addition of the Public Procurement Contracts Law (No. 4735 of 2002).
The Public Procurement Law has a broader scope than the State Pro
curement Law, both in terms of administrative units and activities
covered. In the context of public procurement contracts, various ad
ministrative sanctions can be applied in certain situations, including
bans from public tenders, removal from office, financial penalties to
public officials, administrative fines for legal entities, compensation
for damages, cancellation and termination of contracts, removal from
public service, and disciplinary actions. Additionally, there are crimes
specifically related to public procurement, such as bid rigging and
fraudulent performance of a contract, outlined in Articles 235 and
236 of the Turkish Penal Code. Apart from these, during the procure
ment process and the execution phase of the contracts, crimes like
forgery, embezzlement, bribery, extortion, and abuse of office can also
occur. However, this study will specifically focus on the crimes of bid
rigging and fraudulent performance of a contract.
In this study, the focus will initially be on both criminal and ad
ministrative sanctions applicable in public procurement processes.
Administrative sanctions are penalties imposed directly by administ
rative authorities without judicial intervention, as allowed by law.
These sanctions are of an administrative nature and are executive in
character. Criminal sanctions, on the other hand, are punishments or
measures imposed by judicial authorities for acts defined as crimes by
law prior to their commission. These can include imprisonment, life
imprisonment, and judicial fines. After discussing the administrative
and criminal sanctions in public procurement, the study will examine
the concept of deferred announcement of verdicts, evaluating its app
lication within the context of criminal sanctions...continued in the article
Public Procurement Administrative Sanctions Public Procurement Crimes Ban on Participation in Public Tenders Suspen sion of the Pronouncement of the Judgement
Kamu ihale suçlarından verilen Hükmün Açıklanmasının Geri Bı-
rakılması (HAGB), mahkûmiyeti askıya alan bir karardır. Onun belli
bir süre daha hukuki sonuç yaratmayacak olması, ihalede gerçekleşti-
rilen yasak fiillerden ötürü uygulanan; kamu ihalelerine katılmaktanyasaklanma, görevden el çektirme, kamu görevlisine para cezası uy-
gulanması, tüzel kişiler hakkında idari para cezası uygulanması, zarar
ziyanın tazmini, ihalenin iptali ve feshi, memuriyetten çıkarılma ve
disiplin cezası gibi idari yaptırımlar üzerinde ‘belirsiz’ bir olumsuz
etkide bulunabilmektedir.
Çalışmamız bir bütün halinde; kamu ihale suçlarından verilen
HAGB kararının, idare hukuku açısından sonuçlarının neler olduğuna
ilişkin bir değerlendirme amacı taşımaktadır. Bu sebeple öncelikle
kamu ihale suçları açısından geçerli olan cezai ve idari yaptırımlar
incelenmiş, daha sonra cezai yaptırımın sonucu olarak uygulanabilen
HAGB kurumu değerlendirilmiş ve nihayetinde HAGB kurumunun
idare hukuku açısından sonuçları üzerinde durulmuştur. Bu bağlamda
konu hakkında hem idare hem ceza hukuku çalışmalarına hem de
güncel yüksek mahkeme kararlarına yer verilmiştir.
Çalışmanın sonuç kısmında, HAGB kurumu ile idari yaptırımların
birbirine uygun hale getirilmesi için yapılması gerekenler konusunda
hem uygulayıcılara hem de Kanun Koyucu’ya yol göstereceğini dü-
şündüğümüz sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır.
Kamu İhalesi İdari Yaptırımlar Kamu İhale Suçları Kamu İhalelerine Katılmaktan Yasaklama Hükmün Açıklan- masının Geri Bırakılması
Primary Language | Turkish |
---|---|
Subjects | Administrative Law |
Journal Section | Kamu Hukuku |
Authors | |
Publication Date | October 28, 2024 |
Submission Date | January 31, 2024 |
Acceptance Date | July 5, 2024 |
Published in Issue | Year 2024 Volume: 19 Issue: 2 |
Erciyes University Journal of Law Faculty by Erciyes University Law Faculty is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0