DUYGUSAL ZEKA (EI) ÜZERNE FARKLI ELEŞTİRİ VE DEĞERLENDİRMELER

Year 2009, Volume: 1 Issue: 26, 333 - 345, 01.06.2009

S.gürşen Otacıoğlu

Abstract

Duygusal zeka ölçüleri hem içerikleri hemde değerlendirme yöntemleri nedeniyle çok geniş ölçüde farklılıklar gösterebilmektedir. Duygusal zeka ölçümleri, özellikle kişilik tabanlı öz-bildirim yaklaşımlar, bilgi yaklaşımları veya yetenek tabanlı değerlendirme prosedürleri kullanma eğilimindedirler. Bu makalede, yaygın olan dört adet duygusal zeka ölçüm tekniğinin(Duygusal yeterlik envanteri/Emotional Competence Inventory, Duygusal oran envanteri/Emotional Quotient Inventory, Çok etkenli duygusal zeka ölçeği/Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso duygusal zeka testleri/Mayer— Salove^Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test) ölçümü ve psikometrik özellikleri gözden geçirilmiş, bu ölçülerin kıyaslanabilirliği değerlendirilmiş ve gelecekteki duygusal zeka araştırmaları için çeşitli sonuçlar ve öneriler ortaya konmuştur.

Keywords

Duygu, Zeka, Kişilik, Gelişim, Duygusal Zeka

A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE MEASURES

Abstract

Emotional intelligence measures vary widely in both their content and in their method of assessment. In particular, emotional intelligence measures tend to use either a self-report personality-based approach, an informant approach, or an ability-based assessment procedure. In this paper, the measurement and psychometric properties of four of the major emotional intelligence measures (Emotional Competence Inventory, Emotional Quotient Inventory, Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale, Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test) are reviewed, the comparability of these measures is examined, and some conclusions and suggestions for future research on emotional intelligence measures are provided.

Keywords

Emotion, Intelligence, Personality, Development, Emotional intelligence

References

• Barchard, K. A. (2003), Does emotional intelligence assist in the prediction of academic success?, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 840.858.
• Bar-On, R. (1997), Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory: Technical manual (EQi). Toronto, Canada: Multi- Health Systems.
• Bar-On, R. (2000), Emotional and social intelligence: insights from the Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i). In R. Bar-On, & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), Handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 363 388). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Boyatzis, R. E., Goleman, D., & Rhee, K. S. (2000), Clustering competence in emotional intelligence. In R. Bar-On, & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence: Theory, development, and assessment, and application at home, school, and in the workplace (pp. 343 362). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Brackett, M. A., & Mayer, J. D. (2003), Convergent, discriminant, and incremental validity of competing measures of emotional intelligence, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1147 1158.
• Caruso, D. R., Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (2002), Relation of an ability measure of motional intelligence to personality, Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 306 320.
• Daus, C. S., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2003), Will the real emotional intelligence please stand up? On deconstructing the emotional intelligence debate , Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 41(2), 69 72.
• Davies, M., Stankov, L., & Roberts, R. D. (1998), Emotional intelligence: in search of an elusive construct, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 989 1015.
• Dawda, D., & Hart, S. D. (2000), Assessing emotional intelligence: reliability and validity of the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i) in university students, Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 797 812.
• Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002), Training in Organizations: Needs Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Goleman, D. (1995), Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York: Bantam. Goleman, D. (1998), Working With Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.
• Gowing, M. K. (2001), Measurement of individual emotional competence, In C. Cherniss, & D. Goleman (Eds.), The emotionally intelligent workplace: How to select for, measure, and improve emotional intelligence in individuals, groups, and organizations (pp. 83 131). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Hunt, T. (1928), The measurement of social intelligence, Journal of Applied Psychology, 12, 317 334.
• Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984), Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72 98.
• Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2001), Psychological Testing: Principles, Applications, and Issues (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2004), Work In The 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Matthews, G., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2002), Emotional Intelligence: Science and Myth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (1999), Emotional intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence, Intelligence, 27, 267 298.
• Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D., & Salovey, P. (2000), Selecting a measure of emotional intelligence: the case for ability scales, In R. Bar-On, & J. D. Parker (Eds.), Handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 320 342). New York: Jossey-Bass.
• Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993), The intelligence of emotional intelligence, Intelligence, 17, 433 442.
• Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997), What is emotional intelligence?, In P. Salovey, & D. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Implications for educators (pp. 3 31). New York: Basic Books.
• Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. (2003), Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT V2.0, Emotion, 3, 97 105.
• Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (2001), Psychological Testing: Principles and Application (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Newsome, S., Day, A. L., & Catano, V. M. (2000), Assessing the predictive validity of emotional intelligence, Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1005 1016.
• Roberts, R. D., Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2001), Does emotional intelligence meet traditional standards for an intelligence? Some new data and conclusions, Emotion, 1, 196 231.
• Sala, F. (2002), Emotional Competence Inventory: Technical manual. Philadelphia, PA: McClelland Center For Research, HayGroup.
• Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D., & Lopes, P. N. (2003), Measuring emotional intelligence as a set of abilities with the Mayer Salovey Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test, In S. J. Lopez, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 251 265). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998), The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings, Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262 274.
• Slaski, M., & Cartwright, S. (2003), Emotional intelligence training and its implications for stress, health, and performance, Stress and Health, 19, 233 239.
• Slaski, M., & Cartwright, S. (2002), Health, performance, and emotional intelligence: an exploratory study of retail managers, Stress and Health, 18, 63 68.
• Thorndike, R. L. (1936), Factor analysis of social and abstract intelligence, Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 231 233.
• Thorndike, R. L., & Stein, S. (1937), An evaluation of the attempts to measure social ntelligence, Psychological Bulletin, 34, 275 285.
• Van Rooy, D. L., & Viswesvaran, C. (2004), Emotional intelligence: a meta- analytic investigation of predictive validity and nomological net, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 71 95.