BibTex RIS Cite

A Contribution to Phenomenology of Religion: Comprehensive Phenomenology

Year 2005, Volume: 1 Issue: 19, 141 - 155, 01.12.2005

Abstract

In the present time, the basic goal of the phenomenology of religion is to describe the essence of a phenomenon by using its own way, not to locate it. Today, for that aim, different phenomenological approaches which are named such as descriptive phenomenology, typological phenomenology, theological phenomenology, historical phenomenology, hermeneutical phenomenology, philosophical phenomenology and new style phenomenology were developed and applied to some phenomena from different religions. After description and finding out of phenomena, these approaches do not have any mission or function to solve some socio-religious questions appeared in certain societies. However, phenomenology of religion should have a problem solving mission and function of questions arose from any phenomenon. For that reason, in this present article a new approach called by the author as comprehensive phenomenology that adduces to help for finding out of phenomena, will be presented and its applicability will also be discussed

References

  • Allen, Douglas (1987), “Phenomenology of Religion”, Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 11, New York Macmillan Publishing Company, London Collier Macmillan Publishers, ed. M. Eliade, s. 272-285.
  • Bianchi, Ugo (1999), The History of Religion (Dinler Tarihi Araştırma Yöntemleri, çev. M. Ünal, Geçit Yayınları, Kayseri.
  • Cumont, F. (1960), Astrology and Religion Among the Greek and Romans, New Haven: Yale University Press, New York.
  • de la Saussaye, P. D. (1891), Chantepie, Manual of the Science of Religion, Longmans, London.
  • Dhavamony, Mariasusai (1973), Phenomenology of Religion, Gregorian University Press, Rome.
  • Doeve, J. W. (1979), “Official and Popular Religion in Judaism”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg), Mouton Publisher New York, pp.325-339.
  • Eliade, M. (1971) Patterns in Comparative Religion, Sheed and Ward, London (Türkçesi, Dinler Tarihi İnançlar ve İbadetlerin Morfolojisi, çev. Mustafa Ünal, Serhat Yayınları, Konya 2005).
  • Frijhoff, W. and Th. M. (1979), “Official and Popular Religion in Christianity, The Late Middle-Ages and Early Modern Times (13th- 18th Centuries)”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg), Mouton Publisher New York, pp. 71-116.
  • G. J. F. Bouritius (1979), “Popular and Official Religion in Christianity: Three Cases in 19th Century Europe”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg) Mouton Publisher New York, pp. 117-165.
  • Geertz, Clifford (1972), “Religion as a Cultural System”, Reader in Comparative Religion, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, London, 1972 pp. 167- 180.
  • Harman, Ö. Faruk (1993), “Hıristiyanların İslam’a Bakışı”, Asrımızda Hıristiyan- Müslüman Münasebetleri, İslami İlimler Araştırma Vakfı Tartışmalı İlmi Toplantılar Dizisi: 16, İlmi Neşriyat, İstanbul.
  • Huisman, J. A. (1979), “Christianity and Germanic Religion”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg) Mouton Publisher New York, pp. 55-70.
  • Jurji, Edward J. (1963), The Phenomenology of Religion, The Westminster Press Philadelphia.
  • McCutcheon, Russel T. (2003), Manufacturing Religion, The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia, Oxford University Press Oxford, New York.
  • Mensching, Gustav (1994), Dini Sosyoloji (çev. Mehmet Aydın) Tekin Kitabevi Konya.
  • Moreau,A. Scoot (2000), “Phenomenology of Religion”, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology.
  • Musurillo, H. (1972), The Acts of the Christian Martyrs, Oxford University Press Oxford.
  • Palmer, Richard E. (1973/1), “Phenomenology as Foundation for a Post-Modern Philosophy of Literary Interpretation”, Cultural Hermeneutics, SCM Press, s. 207-223.
  • Palmer, Richard E. (2002), Hermenötik, çev. İbrahim Görener, Anka Yay. İstanbul.
  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1972), “Taboo”, Reader in Comparative Religion, An Anthropological Approach, eds. W. A. Lessa, E. Z. Vogt, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, pp. 72-83.
  • Rees, B. R. (1948), “Popular Religion in Graeco-Roman Egypt, I. The Pagan Period”, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 34, pp. 82-97.
  • Rees, B. R. (1950), “Popular Religion in Graeco-Roman Egypt II. The Transition to Christianity”, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 36, pp. 86-100.
  • Reese, William L. (1980), Dictionary of Philosophy and Religion, Eastern and Western Thought. Humanities Press. Atlantic Highlands.
  • Sanders, E. P. (1990), Jewish Law from Jesus to the Mishnah, SCM Press, Philadelphia.
  • Sarıkçıoğlu, Ekrem, (2002/a)Din Fenomenolojisi, SDÜ Yayınları, Isparta.
  • Sarıkçıoğlu, Ekrem (2002/b), Başlangıçtan Günümüze Dinler Tarihi, Fakülte Kitabevi, Isparta.
  • Sharpe, Eric J. (1992), Comparative Religion A History, Duckworth, London.
  • Smart, N., (1989), The World’s Religions Old Traditions and Modern Transformations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Tümer, Günay -Abdurrahman Küçük (1993), Dinler Tarihi, Ocak Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Ünal, Mustafa (1999), Din Fenomenolojisi Tarihçe Yöntem Uygulama, Geçit Yayınları, Kayseri.
  • Van Den Broek, R., “Popular Religious Practices and Ecclesiastical Policies in the Early Church”, in Official and Popular Religion, Mouton Publisher New York, s. 11-54.
  • Vrijhof, P. H. and J. Waardenburg (eds.) (1979), Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies, Mouton Publisher New York New York.
  • Wach, Joachim (1990), Din Sosyolojisi (çev. Ünver Günay), Erciyes Üni Yayınları, Kayseri.
  • Weigall, Arthur (2002), Hristiyanlığımızdaki Putperestlik, Ozan Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Yinger, J. Milton (1970), The Scientific Study of Religion, Macmillan Publishing New York, London.
Year 2005, Volume: 1 Issue: 19, 141 - 155, 01.12.2005

Abstract

Günümüzde din fenomenolojisi, incelemiş olduğu herhangi bir fenomeni kendine has yöntemiyle sadece tasvir eder ve onun özünü anlamaya çalışır. Bunun için değişik din fenomenologları tarafından tasvirci, tipolojik, ilahiyat merkezli, tarihsel, hermenetik, felsefi ve yeni sitil fenomenolojiler gibi değişik adlardaki din fenomenolojisi akımları ortaya konulmuştur. Bunlar, fenomenleri tasvir edip anlamlandırdıktan sonra, söz konusu fenomenin bağlı bulunduğu toplumda bununla ilgili ortaya çıkmış olan sorunları çözmek gibi bir göreve ve işleve sahip olmamışlardır. Halbuki, toplumsal bir vakıa olan fenomenlerden kaynaklanan sorunları çözmek, din fenomenolojisinin de bir görevi ve işlevi olmalıdır. Bunun için, bu makalede, sorunları ortaya koyup onu anlamıyla birlikte kaynaştırarak ilgili sorunları çözmeye yarayacağı ileri sürülen ve kapsayıcı fenomenoloji adı verilen yeni yaklaşım tanıtılıp, uygulanabilirliği tartışılacaktır

References

  • Allen, Douglas (1987), “Phenomenology of Religion”, Encyclopedia of Religion, vol. 11, New York Macmillan Publishing Company, London Collier Macmillan Publishers, ed. M. Eliade, s. 272-285.
  • Bianchi, Ugo (1999), The History of Religion (Dinler Tarihi Araştırma Yöntemleri, çev. M. Ünal, Geçit Yayınları, Kayseri.
  • Cumont, F. (1960), Astrology and Religion Among the Greek and Romans, New Haven: Yale University Press, New York.
  • de la Saussaye, P. D. (1891), Chantepie, Manual of the Science of Religion, Longmans, London.
  • Dhavamony, Mariasusai (1973), Phenomenology of Religion, Gregorian University Press, Rome.
  • Doeve, J. W. (1979), “Official and Popular Religion in Judaism”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg), Mouton Publisher New York, pp.325-339.
  • Eliade, M. (1971) Patterns in Comparative Religion, Sheed and Ward, London (Türkçesi, Dinler Tarihi İnançlar ve İbadetlerin Morfolojisi, çev. Mustafa Ünal, Serhat Yayınları, Konya 2005).
  • Frijhoff, W. and Th. M. (1979), “Official and Popular Religion in Christianity, The Late Middle-Ages and Early Modern Times (13th- 18th Centuries)”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg), Mouton Publisher New York, pp. 71-116.
  • G. J. F. Bouritius (1979), “Popular and Official Religion in Christianity: Three Cases in 19th Century Europe”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg) Mouton Publisher New York, pp. 117-165.
  • Geertz, Clifford (1972), “Religion as a Cultural System”, Reader in Comparative Religion, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, London, 1972 pp. 167- 180.
  • Harman, Ö. Faruk (1993), “Hıristiyanların İslam’a Bakışı”, Asrımızda Hıristiyan- Müslüman Münasebetleri, İslami İlimler Araştırma Vakfı Tartışmalı İlmi Toplantılar Dizisi: 16, İlmi Neşriyat, İstanbul.
  • Huisman, J. A. (1979), “Christianity and Germanic Religion”, in Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies (eds. P. H. Vrijhof and J. Waardenburg) Mouton Publisher New York, pp. 55-70.
  • Jurji, Edward J. (1963), The Phenomenology of Religion, The Westminster Press Philadelphia.
  • McCutcheon, Russel T. (2003), Manufacturing Religion, The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia, Oxford University Press Oxford, New York.
  • Mensching, Gustav (1994), Dini Sosyoloji (çev. Mehmet Aydın) Tekin Kitabevi Konya.
  • Moreau,A. Scoot (2000), “Phenomenology of Religion”, Evangelical Dictionary of Theology.
  • Musurillo, H. (1972), The Acts of the Christian Martyrs, Oxford University Press Oxford.
  • Palmer, Richard E. (1973/1), “Phenomenology as Foundation for a Post-Modern Philosophy of Literary Interpretation”, Cultural Hermeneutics, SCM Press, s. 207-223.
  • Palmer, Richard E. (2002), Hermenötik, çev. İbrahim Görener, Anka Yay. İstanbul.
  • Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1972), “Taboo”, Reader in Comparative Religion, An Anthropological Approach, eds. W. A. Lessa, E. Z. Vogt, Harper and Row Publishers, New York, pp. 72-83.
  • Rees, B. R. (1948), “Popular Religion in Graeco-Roman Egypt, I. The Pagan Period”, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 34, pp. 82-97.
  • Rees, B. R. (1950), “Popular Religion in Graeco-Roman Egypt II. The Transition to Christianity”, Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 36, pp. 86-100.
  • Reese, William L. (1980), Dictionary of Philosophy and Religion, Eastern and Western Thought. Humanities Press. Atlantic Highlands.
  • Sanders, E. P. (1990), Jewish Law from Jesus to the Mishnah, SCM Press, Philadelphia.
  • Sarıkçıoğlu, Ekrem, (2002/a)Din Fenomenolojisi, SDÜ Yayınları, Isparta.
  • Sarıkçıoğlu, Ekrem (2002/b), Başlangıçtan Günümüze Dinler Tarihi, Fakülte Kitabevi, Isparta.
  • Sharpe, Eric J. (1992), Comparative Religion A History, Duckworth, London.
  • Smart, N., (1989), The World’s Religions Old Traditions and Modern Transformations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Tümer, Günay -Abdurrahman Küçük (1993), Dinler Tarihi, Ocak Yayınları, Ankara.
  • Ünal, Mustafa (1999), Din Fenomenolojisi Tarihçe Yöntem Uygulama, Geçit Yayınları, Kayseri.
  • Van Den Broek, R., “Popular Religious Practices and Ecclesiastical Policies in the Early Church”, in Official and Popular Religion, Mouton Publisher New York, s. 11-54.
  • Vrijhof, P. H. and J. Waardenburg (eds.) (1979), Official and Popular Religion Analysis of a Theme for Religious Studies, Mouton Publisher New York New York.
  • Wach, Joachim (1990), Din Sosyolojisi (çev. Ünver Günay), Erciyes Üni Yayınları, Kayseri.
  • Weigall, Arthur (2002), Hristiyanlığımızdaki Putperestlik, Ozan Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
  • Yinger, J. Milton (1970), The Scientific Study of Religion, Macmillan Publishing New York, London.
There are 35 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA77JE46RC
Journal Section Makaleler / Articles
Authors

Mustafa Ünal This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2005
Submission Date December 1, 2005
Published in Issue Year 2005 Volume: 1 Issue: 19

Cite

APA Ünal, M. (2005). A Contribution to Phenomenology of Religion: Comprehensive Phenomenology. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1(19), 141-155.

ERCİYES AKADEMİ | 2021 | sbedergi@erciyes.edu.tr Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.