A REVIEW ON COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD: I. COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD AND STUDIES RELEATED WITH THIS METHOD

Year 2005, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 59 - 83, 01.06.2005

Kemal Doymuş Ümit Şimşek Ufuk Şimşek

Abstract

The real objective of the Education of today is to have students who can keep pace with the rapidly changing world conditions, who have free thinking, having a developed sense of individual responsibility and those who are able to use their knowledge and abilities they gained during their lives. Educators still use a variety of methods for their students gain these skills. Among these methods, Cooperative Learning Method is the newest and most permanent. In this review we aim at presenting the information and area of study of this method, differences between method group and group study, what critical features are and the web sites of this method.

Keywords

Cooperative Learning, Individual accountability, Critic special.

İŞBİRLİKÇİ ÖĞRENME YÖNTEMİ ÜZERİNE DERLEME: I. İŞBİRLİKÇİ ÖĞRENME YÖNTEMİ VE YÖNTEMLE İLGİLİ ÇALIŞMALAR

Abstract

Günümüz eğitiminin asıl amacı, öğrencilerin hızla değişen dünya şartlarına ayak uydurabilen, bağımsız düşünebilen, kişisel sorumluluk duygusu gelişmiş ve elde ettikleri bilgi ve becerileri yaşamı boyunca kullanma yetenekleri kazanmış öğrenciler yetiştirmektir. Öğrencilere bu bilgi ve becerileri kazandırmak için, eğitimciler bir çok öğretim metodu kullanmaktadır. Bu metotlar içinde en yeni ve kalıcı olanı ise işbirlikçi öğrenme (Cooperative Learning) metodudur. Bu derlemede, işbirlikçi öğrenme metodu hakkında bilgi, çalışma alanı, metodun grubu ile küme çalışması grubu arasındaki farkları, metodun kritik özelliklerinin neler olduğu ve metodun web siteleri sunulmaktadır.

Keywords

İşbirlikçi öğrenme, Kişisel sorumluluk, Kritik özellik

References

• Açıkgöz, K.Ü.,1992.İşbirlikli öğrenme: Kuram, araştırma, uygulama. Uğurel Matbaası, 173s, Malatya.
• Açıkgöz, K.Ü., 2003. Aktif öğrenme, Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları, Kanyılmaz Matbaası, 172 s,İzmir.
• Bonaparte, E. P.C., 1990. The effect of cooperative classroom organization for mastery learning on the mathematical achievement and self esteem of urban second-grade pupils. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(7), 1944.
• Box, J.A., Little, D.C., 2003. Cooperative small-group instruction combined with advanced organizers and their relationship to self-concept and social studies achievement of elementary school students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(1), 30-35.
• Brewer, A.S., Klein, D. J. and Mann, K. E., 2003. Using small group learning strategies with adult re-entry students, College Student Journal, 37 (7), 56-
• Büy
• -
• S., ve Çivi, Ç.,1 997. Genel öğretim metotları, Özel Eğitim
• ükkaragöz,
• Yayınları. 120s, İstanbul.
• Chiu, M. M., 2000. Teacher effects on student motivation during cooperative learning. activity level, interventional level, and case study analyses. The Chinese University of Hong Kong National Academy of Education, USA.
• Cooper, J., Mueck, R., 1990. Student involvement in learning: Cooperative learning and college instruction, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 68- 76.
• Coppola, B. P., and Lawton, R.G., 1995. Who has the some substance that I have?.
• A blueprint for collaborative learning activities. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(12), 1120-1122.
• Davis, B.G., 1993. Collaborative learning: Group work and study teams, Tools for Teaching, San Francisco.
• Delen, H., 1998. Temel eğitim beşinci sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde kubaşık öğrenme yönteminin akademik başarıya etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi ,Adana
• Demirel, Ö. ve Ün, K., 1987. Eğitim terimleri, Şafak Matbaası. Ankara.
• Doolittle P., 1997. “Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development as a Theoretical Foundation for Cooperative Learning”, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching; 8(1), 83-103.
• Dougherty, R.C., Bowen, C.W., Berger, T., Rees, W., Mellon, E.K., Pulliam, E., 1995. Cooperative learning and enhanced communication, Journal of Chemical Education, 72(9), 793-797.
• Doymuş, K., Bayrakçeken, S., ve Şimşek, Ü., 2003. İşbirlikçi ödev hazırlamanın başarıya etkisi, Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 70-78.
• Doymuş, K., Şimşek, Ü., ve Bayrakçeken, S., 2004. İşbirlikçi öğrenme yönteminin fen bilgisi dersinde akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(2), 103-115.
• Frierson, H., 1986. Two intervention methods: Effects on groups of predominantly black nursing students’ board scores, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19(1), 18-23.
• Gardener, B. S., and Korth ,S. D., 1996. Using reflection in cooperative learning groups to integrate theory and practice. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 7 (1),17- 30.
• George, P.G., 1994. The effectiveness of cooperative learning trategies in multicultural üniversity classrooms. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 5(1), 21.
• Gömleksiz, M., 1993. Kubaşık öğrenme yöntemi ile geleneksel yöntemin demokratik tutumlar ve erişiye etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Adana.
• Gömleksiz, M. ve Tümkaya, S., 1997. Kubaşık öğrenme yönteminin sınıf öğretmenliği bölümü birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarıları ile öğrenme ve ders çalışma stratejileri üzerindeki etkisi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 230-236.
• Haller, R. C., Gallagher, V.J., Weldon, T.L., Felder, R.M., 2000. Dynamics of peer interactions in cooperative learning, Journal Engineering Education, 89(3), 285-293.
• Johnson, D.W., Marumay, G., Johnson, R.T., Nelson,D. and Skon,L.,1981. Effect of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta- analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429-445.
• Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., Holubec, E.J., and Roy, P., 1984. Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom, Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and curriculum Development, Minnesota.
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., 1988. Circles of Learning : Cooperation in the classroom, USA.
• Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., 1992. Approaches to implementing cooperative learning in the social studies classroom, cooperative learning in the social studies classroom: An Invitation Social study ,R.J., Stahl and R.L., Vansicle Editor : Washington National Council for the social studies. Bulletin No: 87, 44-51.
• Leung, C. D., and Chung, C., 1997. “Student achievement in an educational technology course as enhanced by cooperative learning”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(4), 337-343.
• Mallinger, M., 1998. Collaborative learning across borders: Dealing with student resistance, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching; 9(1), 53-68.
• Mark, E.S., Volk, G.L., and Hinckley, C.C., 1991. Cooperative learning in the undergraduate laboratory, Journal of Chemical Education, 68(5), 413-415.
• Milis, B., 1991. Full filling the promise of the seven principles through cooperative learning: An action agenda for the university classroom, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching; 2, 139-144.
• Nembhard, H.B., 1997. Cooperative learning in simulation, Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, 1390-1393.
• Potthast, M. J., 1999. Outcomes of using small-group cooperative learning experiences in introductory statistics courses, College Student Journal, 33(1), 23-25.
• Quarsitein, V.A., Peterson, P.A., 2001. Assessment of Cooperative Learning: A Goal-Criterion Approach, Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 120-128.
• Ramsay, A., Hanlon, D., and Simith, D., 2000. The association between cognitive style and accounting students’ preference for cooperative learning: an empirical investigation, Journal of Accounting Education, 18, 215-228.
• Scahible, R., and Robinson, B.D., 1995. Collaborating teachers as models for students, Journal on Excellence in college Teaching, 6(1), 9-16.
• Slavin, R.E., 1988. Small group methods, The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, Oxford: Pergamon pres.
• Slavin, R.E, 1990. Comprehensive Cooperative Learning Methods: Embedding Cooperative Learning in the Curriculum and School, Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research Slavin, R.E, 1990, (editor: Shlomo Sahran), New York
• Stockdale, S.L., Williams, R.L., 2004. Cooperative Learning Groups at the College Level: Differential Effects on High, Average and Low Exam Performers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 13(1), 231-240.
• Strohl, M., and Schneck, S., 1991. Native Americans cooperative learning activities, Scholastic Professional Books, Printed in The U.S.A.
• Susan, S.E., and Susan, F.W., 1990. Teaching Strategies “Cooperative Learning Getting Started”, Scholastic Professional Books, Printed in The USA.
• Şimşek, U., Doymuş ,K., Şimşek, Ü., ve Özdemir, Y., 2004. Öğrencilerin demokratik tutumlarına grupla öğrenme yönteminin etkisinin incelenmesi , Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, 387-396.
• Şimşek, Ü., Doymuş ,K., ve Kızıloğlu N., 2005, Lise Düzeyinde Öğrenim Gören Öğrencilere Grupla Öğrenme Yönteminin Kazandırdığı Bilgi ve beceriler, Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi , 13(1), 67-80.
• Şimşek, Ü., 2005, İşbirlikçi Öğrenme Yönteminin Fen Bilgisi Dersinin Akademik Başarı ve Tutumuna Etkisi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi , Erzurum.
• Topsakal, S., 1999. Fen öğretimi, Alfa Basım Yayın Dağıtım, İstanbul.
• Treisman, U., 1985. A study of mathematics performance of black students at University of California, Berkley ( Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkley, 1986), Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(1),
• Veenma 1641.
• enthum, N.van, Bootsma, D., Dieren, J.van,Kemp, N.van der, 2002.
• n, S., B
• Cooperative learning and teacher education, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 87-103.
• Watson, S. B., 1992. The essential elements of cooperative learning, The American Biology Teacher, 54(2), 84-86.
• Webb, N. M., 1985. Student interaction and learning in small groups, learning to cooperate, cooperate to learn, (Edited by Robert Slavin vd.), New York Plenum Pres,
• Webb, N. M. ,Sydney, H., and Farivor, A.M., 2002. Theory in to practice, College of Education, 41(1), 13-20.
• Young, C., and Young, L., 1999. Assessing learning in interactive courses, Journal on Excellence in College Teaching 10 (1), 63-76.