HANEHALKI TÜKETİM HARCAMALARI İLE KİŞİBAŞINA DÜŞEN MİLLİ GELİR ARASINDAKİ NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2021, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 297 - 308, 31.12.2021

Asiye Tütüncü

Abstract

Bu çalışmada,
hanehalkı tüketim harcamaları ile kişibaşına
düşen milli gelir
arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisi, Türkiye için alternatif yöntemlerle
incelenmiştir. Bu amaçla iki değişken arasındaki ilişki Türkiye için 1987-2018
döneminde, ARDL sınır testi ve TY-VAR nedensellik testi ile analiz edilmiştir.
ARDL sınır testinin sonuçları, değişkenler arasında uzun dönemde pozitif bir
ilişkinin olduğunu gösterirken, TY-VAR nedensellik testi hanehalkı tüketim
harcamalarından kişibaşına
düşen milli gelire
doğru tek yönlü nedenselliğin olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Tüketim Harcamaları

References

• Akekere, J. & Yousuo, P.O.L. (2012). Empirical analysis of change in ıncome on private consumption expenditure in Nigeria from 1981 to 2010. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(11), 321-331.
• Alimi, S.R. (2013). Keynes’ absolute ıncome hypothesis and Kuznets paradox. Erişim Tarihi: 17.10.2016, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49310/1/MPRA_paper_49310.pdf
• Altınöz, U. (2014). Tüketim fonksiyonu ve Türkiye için gelir-tüketim ilişkisinin ampirik analizi. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 1-7.
• Amin, S.B. (2011). Causal relationship between consumption expenditure and economic growth in Bangladesh. World Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 158-169.
• Apere, T.O. (2014). Private consumption expenditure function in Nigeria: Evidence from the Keynes’ absolute income hypothesis. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 4(3), 53-58.
• Campbell J.Y & Mankiw, G.N. (1991). The response of consumption to ıncome: A Cross-Country investigation. European Economic Review, 35, 723-767.
• Cerrat, M., Peretti, C. & Stewart, C. (2008). Is the consumption-ıncome ratio stationary? Evidence from linear and nonlinear panel unit root tests for OECD and Non-OECD countries. Scottish Institute for Research in Economics, 1-27.
• Chioma, N.J. (2009). Causal relationship between gross domestic product and personal consumption expenditure of Nigeria. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 2(8), 179-183.
• Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W.A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
• Do M.K. & Zhang R. (2014). The Granger causality relationship between household consumption and GDP of Vietnam and China. Eastern Academic Forum, 315-322.
• Duesenberry, J.S. (1949). Income, saving and theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of consumption function. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
• Guisan, C.M. (2001). Causality and cointegration between consumption and GDP in 25 OECD countries: Limitations of the cointegration approach. Applied Econometrics and International Development, 1(1), 39-61.
• Guisan, C.M. (2004). A comparison of causality tests applied to the bilateral relationship between consumption and GDP in the USA and Mexico. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 1(1), 115-130.
• Güreşçi-Pehlivan, G. & Utkulu, U. (2007). Türkiye’nin tüketim fonksiyonu: Parçalı hata düzeltme modeli bulguları. Akdeniz İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 14, 39-65.
• Keynes J.M. (1936). The general theory of employment, ınterest and money. London Press.
• Mankiw, G.N. (2010). Makroekonomi. (Çev. Ömer Faruk Çoklak). Efil Yayınevi, Ankara.
• Mishra, P.K. (2011). Dynamics of the relationship between real consumption expenditure and economic growth in India. Indian Journal of Economics & Business, 10(4), 553-563.
• Modigliani, F. & Ando, A. (1963). The life cycle hypothesis of saving: Aggregated implications and test. American Economic Review, 53, 55-84.
• Narayan, P.K. (2005). The saving and ınvestment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990.
• Narayan, P.K. & Smyth, R. (2008). Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: New evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics, 30, 2331-2341.
• Ofwona, A.C. (2013). An estimation of the consumption function for Kenya using Keynes’ absolute income hypothesis for the period 1992-2011. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 4(1), 103-105
• Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y. & Smıth, R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
• Phillips, P.C.B. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
• Tapsın, G. & Hepsag, A. (2014). An analysis of in EA-18. European Scientific Journal, 10(16), 1857-7881.
• Toda, H.Y. & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly ıntegrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1), 225-250.
• Yılancı, V., Zeren, F. & Arı, A. (2013). Tüketim-Gelir oranı Güneydoğu Asya ülkelerinde durağan mı?: Panel birim kök testi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21, 130-139.