Poliorketik: “Kuşatma Savaşı ve Demetrios Poliorketes İlişkisi”

Abstract

Poliorketika (πολιορκητικά), Antik Yunan’dan gelen ve özellikle askeri stratejiyle ilgili bir terim olup; “polis” (şehir) ve “orkein” (kuşatmak) kelimelerinin birleşiminden türetilmiştir. Poliorketik, şehirlerin veya surların kuşatılmasıyla ilgili stratejileri ve teknikleri tanımlamakla birlikte, kentin korunması için geliştirilen çeşitli yöntem ve yapıları da içermektedir. Buradan da anlaşılacağı üzere Poliorketik kavramı, hem saldırı hem de savunma sanatını bir araya getiren iki ana başlığın birleşim noktasıdır. Saldırı sanatı ile; tahkimatları yıkmak ve kenti ele geçirmek amaçlanırken; savunma sanatıyla da kenti veya tahkimatlı mevzileri düşman saldırılarına karşı koruma çabası öne çıkmaktadır. Poliorketik disiplini içerisinde ele alınan teknolojik gelişmeler ve bu gelişmelere tepki amaçlı ortaya çıkan savunma yapıları elbette bazı yazarların seçkin bilgisine tanıklık eden bir takım önemli yayınların hazırlanmasına neden olmuştur, bu çalışmaların kapsamı ve değerinin farkında olarak, poliorketiğin tüm alanlarında yenilikçi bir yaklaşım iddiasında değiliz, Çalışmanın özgünlük iddiası, arkeoloji literarüründe poliorketik sanatının sadece savunma mimarisinden ibaret olduğu ve ilk uygulayıcısının I. Demetrios Poliorketes olarak bilinmesinin önüne geçilecek olması ve bu sanatın aslında I. Demetrios Poliorketes ile başlamadığı, aksine kökeninin Mezopotamya uygarlıklarına dayandığının antik kaynaklar ve Arkeolojik veriler ışığında okuyucular ile buluşturacak olmasıdır.

Keywords

• Poliorketik
• Kuşatma
• Savunma
• Demetrios
• Mezopotamya.

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışmanın, özgün bir çalışma olduğunu; çalışmanın hazırlık, veri toplama, analiz ve bilgilerin sunumu olmak üzere tüm aşamalarından bilimsel etik ilke ve kurallarına uygun davrandığımı; bu çalışma kapsamında elde edilmeyen tüm veri ve bilgiler için kaynak gösterdiğimi ve bu kaynaklara kaynakçada yer verdiğimi; kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir değişiklik yapmadığımı, çalışmanın Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)' in tüm şartlarını ve koşullarını kabul ederek etik görev ve sorumluluklara riayet ettiğimi beyan ederim. Herhangi bir zamanda, çalışmayla ilgili yaptığım bu beyana aykırı bir durumun saptanması durumunda, ortaya çıkacak tüm ahlaki ve hukuki sonuçlara razı olduğumu bildiririm. Ahmet SÖĞÜT

Poliorcetics: “The Siege War and its Connection to Demetrios Poliorcetes”

Abstract

Poliorcetics (πολιορκητική) is a term originating from Ancient Greece and particularly related to military strategy. It is derived from the combination of the words ‘polis’ (city) and ‘orkein’ (to besiege). Poliorcetics describes strategies and techniques related to the siege of cities or walls, but also encompasses various methods and structures developed for the protection of the city. As can be understood from this, the concept of poliorcetica is the meeting point of two main headings that bring together both the art of attack and the art of defence. The art of attack aims to destroy fortifications and capture the city, while the art of defence emphasises the effort to protect the city or fortified positions against enemy attacks. Technological developments within the discipline of poliorketica and the defensive structures that emerged in response to these developments have naturally led to the preparation of several important publications that bear witness to the distinguished knowledge of certain authors. Being aware of the scope and value of these studies, we do not claim to have an innovative approach in all areas of poliorcetica. The originality of this work lies in challenging the notion prevalent in archaeological literature that poliorketica art is solely defensive architecture and that its first practitioner was Demetrios Poliorketes. Instead, it will present readers with archaeological evidence showing that this art did not begin with Demetrios Poliorcetes, but rather has its origins in Mesopotamian civilisations. Among these civilisations, the Assyrians and Persians stand out. Both ancient sources and archaeological evidence confirm that these two civilisations used siege weapons. Therefore, the success of the Greeks in siege warfare in the 5th century BC is undoubtedly the result of this inherited legacy. It is also a fact that the Greeks redesigned, developed and optimised the poliorcetica weapons they acquired through interaction or field experience. This study will explain that the foundations of Greek poliorcetica lie in Mesopotamian civilisations, but that the art of poliorcetica was made more functional by Demetrios.

Keywords

• Polyorketic
• Siege
• Defence
• Demetrius
• Mesopotamia.

Ethical Statement

This study is an original work; I have adhered to scientific ethical principles and rules in all stages of the study, including preparation, data collection, analysis, and presentation of information; I have cited all sources for any data and information not obtained within the scope of this study and included these sources in the bibliography; I have not made any changes to the data used, and I declare that I have complied with all the terms and conditions of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and adhered to ethical duties and responsibilities. I hereby declare that I accept all moral and legal consequences that may arise should any situation contrary to this declaration regarding the study be identified at any time. Ahmet SÖĞÜT

References

1. Abad, R. S. (2004). La Polıorcétıca En El Mundo Antıguo, Memorıa Presentada Para Optar Al Grado De Do Revue des Études ctor Por, Facultad De Geografía E Hıstorıa, Departamento de Ciencias y Técnicas Historiográficas y de Arqueología, 2004.
2. Abad, R. S. (2011). La poliorcética en el Imperio Neoasirio, Poliorcetic in Neo-assyrian Empire.
3. Aeneas Tacticus. Énée le Tacticien: Poliorcétique, ed. A. Dain, trans. A.-M. Bon (Paris 1967).
4. Aiglun A. (1882). l’artillerie chez les anciens, Bulletin Monumental, X, Paris, (pp. 154-177).
5. Ammien Marcellin. Rerum gestarum ibri - Livre XXIII, Texte traduit et commenté par E. W. MARSDEN, Greek aroman artillery: technical treatises, Oxford, 1971. (Edition et traduction partielle : (XXIII, 4, 1-3), pp. 237-240 ; (XXIII, 4, 4-7), pp. 250-254). Archaic and Classical Periods. Leukosia.
6. Apollodorus of Damascus. Poliorketika (R. Schneider, Ed.). Berlin: Weidmann, 1908.
7. Athenaeus Mechanicus. Peri mechanematon (E. W. Marsden, Ed. & Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.
8. Bailly, A. (1894). Dictionnaire grec-français. Paris: Hachette.

9. Battistini, O. (1994). La guerre, Paris.
10. Bikai, P. M. (1992). “Phoenician Tyre,” Martha Sharp Joukowsky (ed.), The Heritage of Tyre: Essays on the History, Archaeology and Preservation of Tyre. Dubeque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt Publishing Co.
11. Biton. (1971). Construction of war machines and artillery (E. W. Marsden, Ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press,
12. Blume, W. H. (1855). Polyän’s Kriegslisten. Stuttgart, 1855.
13. Boivin, P. (2018). Les traités grecs et romains de poliorcétique Etude d’une tradition littéraire (c. 360/355 avant J.-C. – c. 386 après J.-C.)
14. Briant, P. (1994). À propos du boulet de Phocée. Revue des É tudes Anciennes 96: 111–14.
15. Campbell, D. B. (2003). Greek and Roman artillery, 399 BC–AD 363. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Campbell, D. B. (2004). Ancient siege warfare: Persians, Greeks, Carthaginians and Romans, 546–146 BC. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Campbell, D. B. (2005). Ancient siege warfare: Persians, Greeks, Carthaginians and Romans, 546–146 BC. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Campbell, D. B. (2011). Ancient catapults: Some hypotheses reexamined. Hesperia, 80(2), 225–260.
19. Chevedden, P. (2000). The invention of the counterweight trebuchet: A study in cultural diffusion. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
20. Connolly, P. (1998). Greece and Rome at war, Oxford – Londres.
21. Cuomo, S. (2004). The sinews of war: ancient catapults. Science 303 (5659) 771-72.
22. Cuomo, S. (2007). Technology and culture in Greek and Roman antiquity. Key Themes in Ancient History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Daın, A. (1967). Centre de recherches d’histoire et civilisation byzantines, Paris.
24. De Baker, F. (2013). L’art du siège néo-assyrien. Leiden: Brill.
25. Diodorus. Library of history (C. H. Oldfather, Trans.; Vols. 4–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann.
26. Drevillon, H. (2007). Batailles: Scènes de guerre de la Table ronde aux tranchées. Leiden: Seuil.
27. Ebeling, E. (1932). Reallexikon der Assyriologie: A–B. Berlin: W. de Gruyter. (éd.) et alii, Reallexikon des Assyriologie A-Bepašte, Berlin, W. de Gruyter, 1932.
28. Eph’al, I. (2009). The City Besieged, Siege and Its Manifestations in the Ancient Near, 2009.
29. Fields, N. (2006). Ancient Greek fortifications 500-300 BC, Osprey Publishing, Oxford.
30. Frederiksen, R. (2011). Greek city walls of the Archaic period, 900–480 BC. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Frederiksen, R. (2016). Focus on fortifications: New research on fortifications in the ancient Mediterranean and the Near East (Monographs of the Danish Institute at Athens, Vol. 18). Athens: Danish Institute at Athens.
32. Garlan, Y. (1974). Recherches de poliorcetique grecque, París.
33. Garlan, Y. (1975). War in the ancient world: A social history (Ancient Culture and Society, Vol. 3). London: Thames and Hudson.
34. Garlan, Y. (1984). War and siegecraft. In F. W. Walbank, A. E. Astin, M. W. Frederiksen, & R. M. Ogilvie (Eds.), The Cambridge ancient history (Vol. VII, Part 1: The Hellenistic World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Garlan, Y. (1992). “La poliorcètique”, Les Dossiers de l´ Archeologie, 172, pp. 28 – 36.
36. Garlan, Y. (2003). La guerra en la antigüedad. Madrid: Alderabán Ediciones.
37. Gillmann, N. (2005). Les camps fortifiés assyriens et leurs représentations dans les bas-reliefs. Orient-Express, 2, 44–51.
38. Gomme, A. W. (1945). A historical commentary on Thucydides. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. Heckel, (1984). Demetrios Poliorketes and the Diadochoi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Herodotos (1991). Herodot Tarihi. Çev. M. Ökmen-A. Erhat, İstanbul.
41. Heron (1971). Τὰ βελοπίίκά, Texte traduit et commenté par E. W. MARDEN, Greek and roman artillery: technical treatises, Oxford.
42. Hornblower, S. (1996). A commentary on Thucydides (Vol. 2: Books IV–V.24). Oxford: Clarendon Press commentary on Thucydides, volume II: books IV-V.24, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
43. Hunter, L. W. (1927). Aeneas on siegecraft. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Kern, P. B. (1999). Ancient siege warfare. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
45. Ksenophon (1998). Anabasis, revised edn, trans. CL Brownson, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.
46. Ksenophon (1918). Hellenica, trans. CL Brownson, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts. B. Secondary Sources.
47. Ksenophon (1914). Cyropaedia, Volume I: Books 1-4. Translated by Walter Miller. Loeb Classical Library 51. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Lawrence, A. W. (1979). Greek aims in fortification. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
49. Luckenbill, D. (1924). The annals of Sennacherib. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
50. Madhloom, T. (1965). Assyrian siege-engines. Sumer, 21, 9–15.
51. Maier, (1961). In Eranion Festschrift für Tübingen.
52. Maier, F. - Karageorghis, V. (1984). Paphos: History and archaeology. Nicosia: Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation.
53. Maier, F. G. (1959). Griechische Mauerbauinschriften (Vol. 1). Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
54. Maier, F. G. (1974). Ausgrabungen in Alt-Paphos: Sechster vorläufiger Bericht über die Grabungskampagnen 1971 und 1972. Archäologischer Anzeiger, 1974, 1–44.
55. Marsden, E. W. (1969). Greek and Roman artillery: Historical development. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
56. Marsden, E. W. (1971). Greek and Roman artillery: Technical treatises. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
57. McNicoll, A. (1997). Hellenistic fortifications from the Aegean to the Euphrates. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58. Mierjezewski, A. (1973). La technique de siège assyrienne aux IXe et VIIIe siècles avant notre ère. Études et Travaux, 7, 20–30.
59. Morton, A. S. (2011). Unconventional weapons, siege warfare, and the hoplite ideal (Unpublished master’s thesis). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
60. Nadali, D. (2001-03). Guerra e morte: l’annullamento del nemico nella condizione di vinto, Scienze dell’Antichità 11: 51-70.
61. Nadali, D. (2004). La campagna di Assurbanipal contro gli Arabi: proposta di lettura delle dinamiche di una battaglia in campo aperto, SMEA XLVI/1: 59-78.
62. Nadali, D. (2005). The Assyrian army: The representations of foreign soldiers and their employment. In W. H. van Soldt (Ed.), Ethnicity in ancient Mesopotamia (pp. 209–222). Leiden: Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten.
63. Nadali, D. (2019). Images of Assyrian sieges: What they show, what we know, what can we say. In J. Armstrong & M. Trundle (Eds.), Brill’s companion to sieges in the ancient Mediterranean. Boston: Brill.rill’s Companion to Sieges in the Ancient Mediterranean Edited by Jeremy Armstrong Matthew Trundle- BOSTON/2019, Images of Assyrian Sieges: What They Show, What We Know, What Can We Say
64. Nossov, K. (2005). Ancient and Medieval Siege Weapons: A Fully Illustrated Guide to Siege Weapons and Tactics. Lyons Press, 2005.
65. Ober, J. (1987). “Early Artillery Towers: Messenia, Boiotia, Attica, Megarid”, AJA 91 (1987): 569-604.
66. Özyiğit, Ö. (1991). On the Dating of the City Walls of Ephesos. Erol Atalay Memorial, Arkeoloji Dergisi Özel Sayı (1). 456
67. Özyiğit, Ö. (1994). The city walls of Phokaia. Revue des Études Anciennes, 96(1–2), 77–109.
68. Özyiğit, Ö. (2003). Phokaıa’da Akurgal’ın Kazıları Işığında Son Dönem Çalışmaları, Anadolu /Anatolia 25, 2003.
69. Paksoy, S. (2019). Antik dönemde “Geländemauer” (Hattı Balâ) tipi kent surlarının ortaya çıkışı ve gelişimi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi, Muğla.
70. Payen, P. (2018). La guerre dans le monde grec (VIIIe–Ier siècles av. J.-C.). Malakoff: Armand Colin.
71. Philon of Byzantium (1919). Mechanica (H. Diels & E. Schramm, Eds.), IV (Belopoeika). Leipzig: Teubner.
72. Pımouguet-Pedarros, (2011). La cité à l’épreuve des rois: Le siège de Rhodes par Démétrios Poliorcète (303–304 av. J.-C.). Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
73. Plinius the Elder. (1960). Natural History (H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. Plutarkhos. The age of Alexander: Nine Greek lives (Trans. I. Scott-Kilvert). London: Penguin Books.
75. Plutarkhos. Yaşamlar: Perikles ve Fabius Maximus (Çev. M. Mete). İstanbul: İdea Yayınevi.
76. Polyain (1855). (Strategemata) Kullanılan Metin ve Çeviriler: Polyän’s Kriegslisten. Trans.: W.H. Blume - C. Fuchs. Stuttgart.
77. Polybius. (1889). Histories (E. S. Shuckburgh, Trans.). London & New York: Macmillan.
78. Rey, S. (2012). Mesopotamıan Polıorcetıcs Before Assyrıa: Genesıs Of The Art Fortıfıcatıon And Sıege Warfare. 2012.
79. Rihll, E. (2009). Ancient technology. In A. Erskine (Ed.), A companion to ancient history (pp. 486–496). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing.
80. Rose, T. C. (2019). Demetrius the Besieger (and Fortifier) of Cities- Chapter 9 (p.169-187), Thomas C. Rose- BOSTON-2019.
81. Santosuosso, A. (1997). Soldiers, citizens, and the symbols of war: From classical Greece to Republican Rome, 500–167 B.C. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
82. Singh, U. (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century. p. 451.
83. Stuart, D. (1989). “Ezekiel” Lloyd J. Ogilvie, General editor, The Communicator’s Commentary. Dallas: Word Books.
84. Stylianou, P. J. (1989). The age of the kingdoms: A political history of Cyprus in the Archaic and Classical periods. Nicosia: Archbishop Makarios III Foundation.
85. Thukydides. Peloponnesos Savaşı. Çev. T. Gökçöl. İstanbul.
86. Vegetius (1996). Epitoma rei militaris (N. P. Milner, Trans.). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
87. Vitruvius (2005). Mimarlık Üzerine On Kitap. Çev. S. Güven. İstanbul.
88. Wescher, C. (1867). La poliorcétique des Grecs. Paris: Imprimerie Impériale.
89. Wheatley, P. (2020). Demetrius the Besieger. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90. Winter, F. E. (1971). Greek fortifications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
91. Winter, F. W. (1994). ‘Problems of tradition and innovation in Greek fortifications in Asia Minor, late fifth to third century B.C.’, REA 96.1, pp.29-52
92. Wycherley, R. E. (1976). How the Greeks built cities: The relationship of architecture and town planning to everyday life in ancient Greece (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.