AN ANALYSIS ON THE SELECTED COUNTRIES IN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT FORMS OF GOVERNMENTS’ SUCCESS IN SOLVING THE NEW NORMAL’S COMPLEX PROBLEMS

Abstract

Abstract The Covid 19 pandemic, which started to spread at the beginning of 2020, has led to a new paradigm that has been defined as the 'new normal' in the world with its ongoing effects until today. With this study, it is aimed to determine which of the existing forms of government achieves more success in solving the problems which have deepened with the effect of the pandemic and are getting more and more complex with each passing day as we experience as a result of global environmental problems, wars and the unfavorable international political economy. In this context, the 'new normal' has been defined by drawing the conceptual framework of politics and forms of government that have been implemented until today. Then, today's complex problems are analyzed in global security and economy, income distribution, social security, education, environment socio-cultural and other dimensions. In the following section, the selected government models were compared within the framework of the determined parameters, and the success of the problems in the solution was determined. In the conclusion, the contribution of government models to this success has been questioned, and some solution proposals have stated. It has been determined that the form of government alone is not sufficient in the success of solving today's complex problems, and other variables such as power ability, geopolitics, identity, religion and moral values are also effective. In addition, the importance of the power model in the country as well as the way of prioritizing the problems understood, while the importance of how international and domestic policies have been determined as the allocation of budget resources also has revealed.

Keywords

• Politics
• The New Normal
• Government
• Political Economy
• Pandemic.

YENİ NORMALİN KARMAŞIK SORUNLARINI ÇÖZMEDE MEVCUT HÜKÜMET MODELLERİNİN BAŞARISI BAĞLAMINDA SEÇİLMİŞ ÜLKELER ÜZERİNE BİR ANALİZ

Abstract

2020 yılının başında yayılmaya başlayan Covid 19 pandemisi, bugüne kadar süregelen etkileriyle dünyada ‘yeni normal’olarak tanımlanan yeni bir paradigmaya yol açmasına etki etmiştir. Bu çalışmayla, pandeminin de etkisiyle derinleşen başta küresel çevre sorunlar, savaşlar ve ekonomi politik nedenler sonucunda yaşadığımız ve her geçen gün daha da karmaşıklaşan meselelerin çözümünde mevcut hükümet şekillerinin hangisiyle daha fazla başarı sağlandığının belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda, başlangıçta politika ve günümüze kadar uygulanarak gelmiş olan hükümet şekillerinin kavramsal çereçevesi çizilerek ‘yeni normal’ tanımlanmıştır. Sonrasında günümüzün karmaşık sorunları; ululararası güvenlik, küresel ekonomi ve gelir dağılımı, sosyal güvenlik, çevre, eğitim ve sosyokültürel boyutlarıyla ortaya konmuştur. İlerleyen bölümde, seçilmiş hükümet modelleri belirlenen parametler çerçevesinde karşılaştırılarak, belirlenen sorunların çözümündeki başarısı analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçta, hükümet modellerinin bu başarıya katkısı sorgulanmış ve bazı çözüm önerileri dile getirilmiştir. Günümüzün karmaşık sorunlarının çözümünde yönetim biçiminin tek başına yeterli olmadığı, güç yeteneği, jeopolitik, kimlik, din ve ahlaki değerler gibi diğer değişkenlerin de etkili olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca ülkedeki güç modelinin önemi ve sorunların nasıl önceliklendirildiği anlaşılmış, bütçe kaynaklarının tahsisi kadar uluslararası ve iç politikaların nasıl belirlendiğinin önemi de ortaya çıkmıştır.

Keywords

• Politika
• Yeni Normal
• Hükümet
• Ekonomi Politik
• Pandemi.

References

1. Ankara Ticaret Odası (ATO). (2022). Ülke Raporları, İtalya Cumhuriyeti, https://www.atonet.org.tr/Uploads/Birimler/Internet/Alt%20Tan%C4%B1t%C4%B1m/2020-08-20-%C3%9Clke%20Raporlar%C4%B1/%C4%B0talya.pdf , (Access Date: 18.08.2022).
2. Becker, P.& Raveloson, J. (2008). What is Democracy?, https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/madagaskar/05860.pdf , (Access Date: 14.06.2022).
3. Baehr, P. (2005). Totalitarianism, In M. C. Horowitz (Ed.), New Dictionary of The History of İdeas, 6, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
4. Britanicca, https://www.britannica.com/topic/monarchy , (Access Date: 13.06.2022).
5. Bulmer, Elliot. (2017). Constitutional monarchs in parliamentary democracies, International Institute For Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stocholm, www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/constitutional-monarchs-in-parliamentary-democracies-primer.pdf , (Access Date: 13.06.2022).
6. CIA, Mali, The World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/mali/summaries, (Access Date: 18.08.2022).
7. Çam, T.& Kayaoğlu, M. (2015). Marx’s distinction between socialism and communism, International Journal of Human Sciences, 12 (1), pp.385-391.
8. Dictatorship Countries 2022, https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/dictatorship-countries , (Access Date: 14.06.2022).

9. Eijk, C.V.D. (2018). The Essence of Politics, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press B.V.
10. Engels, F. (1969). The Principles of Communism, Selected Works, 1, Progress Publishers, Moscow, pp. 81-97.
11. Fortune. (2022). https://fortune.com/longform/global-gdp-growth-100-trillion-2022-inflation-china-worlds-largest-economy-2030/, (Access Date: 14.06.2022).
12. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and The Last Man. New York: Free Press.
13. Heywood, A. (2019). Politics. 5th Edition, London: Red Globe Press.
14. Hobbes, T. (2017). Leviathan, London: Penguin Classics.
15. Hoogerwerf, A. (1979). Politicologie, Begrippen En Problemen, Samsom: Alphen Aan Den Rijn.
16. Kainzbauer, M. (2022). The U.S. Government, https://www.grin.com/document/109347 , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
17. Künkler, M. (2012). Theocracy, The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, Princeton University Press, pp. 547-548.
18. Lidén, G. (2014). Theories of Dictatorships: Sub-Types and Explanations, Studies of Transition States and Societies, 6 (1), pp.50-67.
19. Locke, J. (1824). Two Treatises of Government, London: C. Baldwin.
20. Macchievelli, N. (2014). The Prince, London: Penguin Classics.
21. Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1955). The Communist Manifesto, New York: Appleton Century Croffs.
22. Marsicano, C.R. (2022). The political system of the United Kingdom, https://my.vanderbilt.edu/chrismarsicano/files/2016/02/UKPolitics1.pdf , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
23. Munch, G. L. (2016). What is Democracy? A reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy? Democratization, 23 (1), pp.1-24.
24. Rose, R.& Kavanagh, D. (1976). The Monarchy in Contemproray Political Culture, Comparative Politics, 8 (4), pp.548-576.
25. Ridgewell, C. A. (1970). The Popular Concept of Totalitarianism, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Burnaby: Simon Fraser University.
26. Robinson, D. (2022). 13 Biggest Environmental Problems of 2022, https://earth.org/the-biggest-environmental-problems-of-our-lifetime/ , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
27. Semercioğlu, H. (2020). Uluslararası İlişkilerde Yeni Normal: Küreselleşmeden Neo-Orta Çağ’a mı?, International Journal of Social Sciences Academy, 3, pp.1015-1036.
28. Semercioğlu, H. (2022). Turkey-Russia Federation Relations During the Last Pandemic İn The Scope Of Global And Regional Developments, 4th International Congress of Multidisciplinary Social Sciences, Ankara.
29. T.C. Ticaret Bakanlığı. (2022). Çin ülke profili, https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5f3b925713b876ea88e4c9c4/Cin%20_Ulke_Profili_2022.pdf , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
30. UN. (2022). https://www.un.org/en/un75/inequality-bridging-divide , (Access Date: 14.08.2022).
31. UN, Quality Education. (2022). https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/ , (A.D.16.08.2022).
32. Verdery, K. (1996). What was Socialism, and What Comes Next, New Jersey: Princton University Press.
33. World Atlas (2022). 7 Countries With a Theocratic Government Today, https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/countries-with-theocratic-governments-today.html, (Access Date: 14.06.2022).
34. World Inequality Report. (2022). https://wir2022.wid.world/executive-summary/, (Access Date: 14.08.2022).