KÜLTÜREL ZEKÂ: ZEKÂNIN KÜLTÜREL OLARAK KAVRAMSALLAŞTIRILMASI YA DA KÜLTÜREL BAĞLAM İÇİNDE ZEKÂ

Year 2023, , 1939 - 1957, 20.10.2023

Işılay Göktürk

https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1318641

Abstract

Zekâ araştırmaları geniş bir literatür düzlemine yerleşmiştir. Bu düzlem zekânın insan doğasına özgü genetik bağlamına dayanmakla birlikte yine insan doğasına özgü toplumsal bir bağlamı da zorunlu kılmış ve bu bağlam mevcut literatürü oldukça genişletmiştir. Dolayısıyla zekâ yalnızca genetik boyutuyla değil aynı zamanda başta psikoloji olmak üzere eğitim bilimleri, işletme, yönetim organizasyon, örgütlenme araştırmaları, sosyoloji ya da kültürel çalışmalar gibi pek çok farklı araştırma alanının gündemine girmiştir. Zekânın ne olduğu hakkındaki görüşlerin çeşitliliği beraberinde zekâ çeşitlerini gündeme getirmiş ve pek çok zekâ türünden farklı bağlamlar ve açıklamalar üzerinden söz edilmiştir. Mevcut zekâ araştırmaları literatürünün geniş ve uzak tarihsel bağları olsa da kültür ve zekâ arasında kurulmaya çalışılan ilişkinin henüz son yıllarda belirginleştiği ve ‘kültürel zekâ’ tanımlaması ile ele alındığı görülmektedir. Kültürel zekâ bu bağlamda kültürel farkların bireysel yönetimi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalışma da öncelikli olarak kültür ve zekâ kavramları arasındaki ilişkiye dair tartışmaların gündemini ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışma, kültür ve zekâ arasında kurulan arayüzün ve ampirik olarak geçerliliğin test edildiği metodolojik hattın temel çerçevesini çizecek ve bir kavramsallaştırma olarak kültürel zekânın bu çerçeve içindeki sınırlarını ve imkanlarını tartışmaya açacaktır.

Keywords

Zekâ, Kültürel Zekâ, Zekâ Araştırmaları, Zekâ Teorileri

CULTURAL INTELLİGENCE: CULTURAL CONCEPTUALİZATİON OF INTELLİGENCE OR INTELLİGENCE İN CULTURAL CONTEXT

Abstract

Intelligence studies are settled in a wide range of literature. Although this plane is based on the genetic context of intelligence specific to human nature, it also necessitated a social context specific to human nature, and this context greatly expanded the existing literature. Therefore, intelligence has entered the agenda of many different research fields, not only with its genetic dimension, but also psychology, educational sciences, business administration, management organization, organizational research, sociology or cultural studies. The diversity of opinions about what intelligence is, has brought about the types of intelligence and many types of intelligence have been mentioned in different contexts and explanations. Although the current intelligence research literature has wide and distant historical ties, it is seen that the relationship between culture and intelligence has become clear in recent years and is discussed with the definition of 'cultural intelligence'. In this context, cultural intelligence is defined as the individual management of cultural differences. This study primarily aims to reveal the agenda of the discussions on the relationship between the concepts of culture and intelligence. In this direction, the study will draw the basic framework of the interface established between culture and intelligence and the methodological line in which the empirical validity is tested, and will open to discussion the limits and possibilities of cultural intelligence as a conceptualization.

Keywords

Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence, Intelligence Studies, Intelligence Theories

References

• Ang, S.ve diğerleri (2007). Cultural intelligence: its measurement and efects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3, 335-371.
• Ang, S. ve Van Dyne, L. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications. New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
• Ang, S. ve Van Dyne, L. (2008). Conceptualization of cultural ıntelligence definition, distinctiveness, and nomological network. Ang, S. ve Van Dyne, L. (Ed.). Handbook of cultural intelligence theory, measurement and applications içinde (s. 3-15). USA: M. E. Sharpe.
• Ang, S., Van Dyne, Linn ve Tan, Mei Ling. (2011). Cultural Intelligence. Sternberg R. J. ve Kaufman S. B. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of intelligence içinde (s. 582-602). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 269-290.
• Berry, J. W. (1972). Radical cultural relativism and the concept of intelligence. Cronbach L. J. ve Drenth P. J. D. (Ed.). In Mental Test and Cultural Adaptation içinde (s. 77-88). Netherlands: Mouton.
• Berry, J. W. (2022). Intelligence as ecological and cultural Adaptation. Sternberg, R. J. ve Preiss, D. D. (Ed.). Intelligence in Context The Cultural and Historical Foundations of Human Intelligence içinde (s. 7-30). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Berry, J. W. ve diğerleri (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brislin, R., Worthley, R. ve MacNab, B. (2006). Cultural intelligence: understanding behaviors that serve people’s goals. Group and Organization Management, 31(1), 40-55.
• Caputo, A. ve diğerleri (2019). The relationship between cultural values, cultural intelligence and negotiation styles. Journal of Business Research, 99, 23-26.
• Crowne, K. A. (2009). The relationships among social intelligence, emotional intelligence and cultural intelligence, Organization Management Journal, 6(3), 148-163.
• Davis, K. ve diğerleri (2011). The theory of multiple intelligences. Sternberg R. J. ve Kaufman S. B. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of intelligence içinde (s. 485-503). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Earley, P. C., ve Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
• Gardner, H. ve Moran, S. (2006). The science of multiple intelligences theory: a response to lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 41(4), 227-232.
• Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24(1), 13-23.
• Hampden-Turner, C. ve Trompenaars, F. (2006). Cultural intelligence is such a capacity credible?. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 56-63.
• Hunt, E. (2011). Where are we? where are we going? refections on the current and future state of research on intelligence. Sternberg R. J. ve Kaufman S. B. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of intelligence içinde (s. 863-885). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hutchins, E. (2008). The role of cultural practices in the emergence of modern human intlligence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 363, 2011-2019.
• Ng, K. Y., ve Earley, P. C. (2006). Culture + intelligence: old constructs, new frontiers. Group and Organizational Management, 31(1), 4-19.
• Ng, K. Y., Ang, S. ve Rockstuhl, T. (2022). Cultural intelligence: from intelligence in context and across cultures to intercultural contexts. Sternberg, R. J. ve Preiss, D. D. (Ed.). Intelligence in Context The Cultural and Historical Foundations of Human Intelligence içinde (s. 177-200). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Roberts, D. (2015). Can research on the genetics of intelligence be “socially neutral”?. The Genetics of Intelligence: Ethics and the Conduct of Trustworthy Research, Hastings Center Report, 45(5), 50-53.
• Serpell, R. (2000). Determinants of intelligence: culture and intelligence. Kazdin, A. E. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of psychology Vol. 2 içinde (s. 493-496). Oxford University Press.
• Serpell, R. (2004). Intelligence and culture. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). The Handbook of Intelligence içinde (s. 549-577). Cambridge, UK & New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
• Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Intelligence and culture. Kitayama S. ve Cohen D. (Ed.). Handbook of cultural psychology içinde (s. 547-568). New York and London: The Guilford Press.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Successful intelligence as a framework for understanding cultural adaptation. Ang, S. ve Van Dyne, L. (Ed.). Handbook of cultural intelligence theory, measurement and applications içinde (s. 306-317). USA: M. E. Sharpe.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2019). A theory of adaptive intelligence and its relation to general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(23), 1-17.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2011). The Theory of successful intelligence. Sternberg R. J. ve Kaufman S. B. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of intelligence içinde (s. 504-527). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sternberg, R. J. (2021). Adaptive intelligence: intelligence is not a personal trait but rather a person × task × situation interaction. Journal of Intelligence, 9(4), 58.
• Sternberg, R. J., ve Kaufman, J. C. (1998). Human abilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 479-502.
• Sternberg, R. J. ve Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Intelligence and culture: how culture shapes what intelligence means, and the implications for a science of well-being. The Royal Society, 359, 1427-1434.
• Sternberg, R. J. ve Preiss, D. D. (2022). Conclusion: intelligence does not inhere within the individual but rather in person x task x situation interactions, Sternberg, R. J. ve Preiss, D. D. (Ed.). Intelligence in Context The Cultural and Historical Foundations of Human Intelligence içinde (s. 415-431). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Suzuki, L., Caso, J. T. ve Yucel, A. (2022). Re-envisioning intelligence in cultural context. Sternberg, R. J. ve Preiss, D. D. (Ed.). Intelligence in Context The Cultural and Historical Foundations of Human Intelligence içinde (s. 317-338). Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Thomas, David C. ve diğerleri (2015). Cultural intelligence: a theory-based, short form measure. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-20.
• Warne, R. T. (2020). In the know: debunking 36 myths about human intelligence. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.