Üniversite Öğrencileri Arasında Phubbing: Akıllı Telefon ve Sosyal Medya Uygulamaları Kullanımı

Abstract

“Phubbing” kavramı, insanların birbirleri ile yüz yüze konuştuğu sırada akıllı telefonları ile etkileşime geçmesi olarak, teknolojinin kullanımı ve insan hayatına yansıması bağlamında son yıllarda literatüre eklenmiştir. Bu çalışmada üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsiyeti, bulunduğu üniversite ve bölüm çerçevesinde Phubbing davranışlarını ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden tarama modelindedir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, Uşak Üniversitesi Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışmanlık Bölümü öğrencilerinden 10'u ve Munzur Üniversitesi Çocuk Gelişimi bölümü öğrencilerinden 10'u her sınıf düzeyinde katılım sağlanabilmesi ve gönüllülük bağlamında seçilmiştir. Üniversite öğrencilerinin Phubbing davranışlarını ve phubbinge maruz kalma durumlarını belirlemek amacıyla da katılımcılara yarı yapılandırılmış 10 soru yöneltilerek veriler toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilere göre üniversite öğrencileri, arkadaşları dışarıda buluşmaya davet ettiğinde ve arkadaşlarıyla birlikteyken akıllı telefonlarından sosyal medya hesaplarına giriş yaptıklarını belirtmişlerdir. Katılımcılar, yüz yüze buluşmalar esnasında konuşulurken bir başka arkadaşının telefonuna odaklandığını ve konuşulanları dinlemediğini yani Phubbing davranışında bulunduğunu fark ettiğini belirtmiştir.

Keywords

• Phubbing
• akıllı telefon
• sosyal medya uygulamaları
• üniversite öğrencileri

Phubbing Among College Students: Smartphone and Social Media Application Usage

Abstract

The concept of “Phubbing” has been added to the literature in recent years as people interacting with their smartphones while talking face to face, in the context of the use of technology and its reflection on human life. This study aimed to reveal the Phubbing behaviors of college students within the framework of their gender, university and department. The study is a screening model of qualitative research methods. In this context, 10 students from Uşak University Guidance and Psychological Counseling Department and 10 students from Munzur University Child Development Department were selected in the study to ensure participation at every grade level and voluntarily. In order to determine the Phubbing behaviors of college students and their exposure to phubbing, data were collected by asking 10 semi-structured questions to the participants. According to the data obtained, college students stated that they logged into their social media accounts from their smartphones when they invited their friends to meet outside and when they were with their friends. The participants stated that they noticed that another friend focused on their phone and did not listen to what was being said during face-to-face meetings, in other words, they were engaging in Phubbing behavior.

Keywords

• Phubbing
• smartphone
• social media apps
• college students

References

1. Arenz, A., ve Schnauber-Stockmann, A. (2024). Who “phubs”? A systematic meta-analytic review of phubbing predictors. Mobile Media & Communication, 12(3), 637-661.
2. Beyens, I., Frison, E., ve Eggermont, S. (2016). “I don’t want to miss a thing”: Adolescents’ fear of missing out and its relationship to adolescents’ social needs, Facebook use, and Facebook related stress. Computers in Human Behaviour, 64, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.083
3. Braun, V., ve Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
4. Cao, S., Jiang, Y., ve Liu, Y. (2018). Analysis of phubbing phenomenon among college students and ıts solution. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 7(12), 27-32.
5. Chotpitayasunondh, V., ve Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9–18. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
6. Chotpitayasunondh, V., ve Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the generic scale of phubbing (GSP) and the generic scale of being phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88,5–17.
7. Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni. Siyasal kitabevi.
8. Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S. K., Singh, J. V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., ve Przepiórkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of “Phubbing” among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 25(1), 35-42.

9. Dwyer, R. J., Kushlev, K., ve Dunn, E. W. (2018). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233-239.
10. Ergün, N., Göksu, İ., ve Sakız, H. (2020). Effects of phubbing: Relationships with psychodemographic variables. Psychological reports, 123(5), 1578-1613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119889581
11. Escalera-Chávez, M. E., García-Santillán, A., ve Molchanova, V. S. (2020). Phubbing behavior: Is there a gender difference in college students?. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 9(3), 546-551.
12. Gömleksiz, M. N., ve Fidan, E. K. (2011). Pedagojik formasyon programı öğrencilerinin web pedagojik içerik bilgisine ilişkin öz-yeterlik algı düzeyleri. Turkish Studies, 6(4), 593-620.
13. Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Facebook addiction: Concerns, criticism, and recommendations – A response to Andreassen and colleagues. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 518–520.
14. Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Mızrak Şahin, B., Çulha, İ. ve Babadağ Savaş, B. (2016). Sanal dünyanın kronolojik bağımlılığı: Sosyotelizm (phubbing). Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addiction, 3, 223‒269. http://dx.doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0013
15. Kunter, M., ve Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research, 9, 231-251.
16. Kuss, D. J., ve Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction—a review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(9), 3528-3552.
17. Liang, L., Zhou, D., Yuan, C., Shao, A., ve Bian, Y. (2016). Gender differences in the relationship between internet addiction and depression: A cross-lagged study in Chinese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 463–470. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.043
18. Luk, T. T., Wang, M. P., Shen, C., Wan, A., Chau, P. H., Oliffe, J., ve Lam, T. H. (2018). Short version of the smartphone addiction scale in chinese adults: Psychometric properties, sociodemographic, and health behavioral correlates. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 1157-1165.
19. Mieczakowski, A., Goldhaber, T. ve Clarkson, P. (2011). Culture, communication and change: summary of an investigation of the use and ımpact of modern media and technology in our lives, Technical Report. Cambridge: Cambridge Engineering Design Centre.
20. Miles, M. B., ve Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
21. Odacı, H., Erzen, E., ve Yeniçeri, İ. (2024). Predictors of phubbing: interpersonal relationships and family relationships. Trends in Psychology, 1-17.
22. Orhan, A. T. (2023). Teorik yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde phubbing. Business Economics and Management Research Journal, 6(2), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.58308/bemarej.1260128
23. Parmaksız, İ. (2020). İletişimde ve ilişkilerde phubbing. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(2), 359-372.
24. Pendergrass, W. S., ve Town, C. (2017). Phubbing: Communication in the attention economy. Paper presented at the Conference on Information Systems Applied Research, Austin, USA.
25. Plant, S. (2000). The effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. Report commissioned by Motorola. https://smg.media.mit.edu/papers/plant_mobiles.pdf
26. Przybylski, A. K., ve Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237-246.
27. Roberts, J. A., YaYa, L. P., ve Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cellphone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioural Addictions, 3(4), 254–65.
28. Roberts, J.A. ve David, M.E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computer in Human Behaviour, 54, 134–141.
29. Sülü Akgül, C. (2023). İnternet ve akıllı telefon bağımlılığından sosyotelizme: sosyal hizmet perspektifinden derinlemesine bir inceleme. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(31), 69-97. https://doi.org/10.52528/genclikarastirmalari.1328519
30. Ting T’ng, S., Hoong Ho, K., ve Kim Low, S. K. (2018). Are you “phubbing” me? The determinants of phubbing behavior and assessment of measurement ınvariance across sex differences. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 159-190.
31. Wang, X., Zhao, F., ve Lei, L. (2021). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: Self-esteem and marital status as moderators. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3365-3375.
32. Xie, X., Chen, W., Zhu, X., ve He, D. (2019). Parents’ phubbing increases Adolescents’ mobile phone addiction: Roles of parent-child attachment, deviant peers, and gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 105, 104426.
33. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
34. Zhang, H., Gao, T., Hu, Q., Zhao, L., Wang, X., Sun, X., ve Li, S. (2023). Parental marital conflict, negative emotions, phubbing, and academic burnout among college students in the postpandemic era: A multiple mediating models. Psychology in the Schools, 60(5), 1488-1498.