THE ANALYSIS OF THE INTERDEPENDENCE BETWEEN FREEDOM AND RELIGION THROUGH THE WORKS OF JOHN BROWN (1715—1766)

Abstract

In eighteenth century, England and France were considered as the super powers of the world. Due to this competition between them, each empire was trying to preserve their establishment. Apart from political conditions, philosophical and social values that had been changing under the light of Enlightenment were regarded as perils to social order of the kingdoms in Europe. This led some intellectuals and religious men of the period to work on the maintenance of their societies. John Brown (1715-1766) as a religious man was also involved in this mission. Yet, his early works were mostly focus on morality and individuality. In this paper, I analyzed his early works in detail in order to indicate his moral theory which was constructed independently from the principles of Protestantism and Anglicanism. Afterwards the differences between his early works and the later works are examined and the political worries of the English establishment are explained through them. I argue that English establishment aimed to defend the maintenance of their society by making religion as a political instrument in the conditions of the eighteenth century as could clearly be seen in Brown’s works. 

Keywords

• John Brown,morality,virtue,Anglicanism,England

THE ANALYSIS OF THE INTERDEPENDENCE BETWEEN FREEDOM AND RELIGION THROUGH THE WORKS OF JOHN BROWN (1715—1766)

Abstract

In eighteenth century, England and France were considered as the super powers of the world. Due to this competition between them, each empire was trying to preserve their establishment. Apart from political conditions, philosophical and social values that had been changing under the light of Enlightenment were regarded as perils to social order of the kingdoms in Europe. This led some intellectuals and religious men of the period to work on the maintenance of their societies. John Brown (1715-1766) as a religious man was also involved in this mission. Yet, his early works were mostly focus on morality and individuality. In this paper, his early works are analyzed in detail in order to indicate his moral theory which was constructed independently from the principles of Protestantism and Anglicanism. Afterwards the differences between his early works and the later works are examined and the political worries of the English establishment are explained through them. In this paper it is argued that English establishment aimed to defend the maintenance of their society by making religion as a political instrument in the conditions of the eighteenth century as could clearly be seen in Brown’s works. 

Keywords

• John Brown,ahlak,erdem,Anglikanism,İngiltere

References

1. Anonymous. The Necessity of Peace and Union Among the Members of the Church of England (London, 1715).
2. Anonymous. Letters Concerning The Present State Of England: ParticularlyRespecting The Politics, Arts, Manners, And Literature Of The Times (London,1772).Bolingbroke, Henry St. John, Viscount. ―On the Spirit of Patriotism‖ in Letters on the Spirit of Patriotism : On the Idea of a Patriot King and on the State of Parties at the Accession of King George the First (Dublin, 1749).
3. Bolingbroke, Henry St. John, Viscount. “Concerning the true use and advantages of it” in Letters on the Study and Use of History, v.I. (London, 1752).
4. Bolingbroke, Henry St. John, Viscount. The Philosophical Works of the Late Honourable Henry St. John, Lord Viscount Bolingbroke, v. IV (London, 1754).Brown, John. Honour: A Poem (London, 1743).
5. Brown, John. An Essay on Satire: Occasion’d by the Death of Mr. Pope (London, 1745).
6. Brown, John. The Mutual Connexion between Religious Truth and Civil Freedom; betweenSuperstition, Tyranny, Irreligion, and Licentiousness (London, 1746).
7. Brown, John. On Liberty: A Poem (London, 1749).
8. Brown, John. On the Pursuit of False Pleasure (London, 1750).

9. Brown, John. Essays on the Characteristics (London, 1751).
10. Brown, John. On the Use and Abuse of Externals in Religion (London, 1753).
11. Brown, John. Athelstan: A Tragedy (London, 1756).
12. Brown, John. An Estimate of The Manners and Principles of The Times (London, 1757).
13. Brown, John. An Estimate of The Manners and Principles of The Times, Vol. II (London,1757).
14. Brown, John. An Explanatory Defence of The Estimate of The Manners and Principles of TheTimes (London, 1758).Clarke, William and Mackenzie, Robert Shelton. The Georgian Era: Memoirs of the Most Eminent Persons, who have Flourished in Great Britain (London, 1832-34).
15. Cooper, Anthony Ashley, Third Earl of Shaftesbury. Characteristicks of Men,Manners, Opinions, Times 5th edition (London, 1732).
16. Crimmins, James E. “Brown, John (1715–1766)”, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, edited by H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison (Oxford, 2004).
17. Erskine-Hill, Howard. “Pope, Alexander (1688–1744)”, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, edited by H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison (Oxford, 2004).
18. Hume, David. “Of Practical Consequences of Natural Religion” in Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding (London, 1748).
19. Hume, David. “Of Liberty and Necessity” in Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding (London, 1748).
20. Locke, John. A Letter Concerning Toleration (London: T. Tegg and Son, 1740).
21. Mandeville, Bernard. Fable of the Bees: or Private Vices, Public Benefits (Edinburgh, 1772).O’Gorman, Frank. The Long Eighteenth Century British Political and Social History 1688-1832 (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997).
22. Plummer, Alfred. The Church of England in the Eighteenth Century (New York: Methuen, 1910).
23. Sykes, Norman. Edmund Gibson, Bishop of London, 1669- 1748: a study in politics and religion in the eighteenth century (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1926).
24. Sykes, Norman. Church and State in England in the eighteenth century (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1934).
25. Templeman, William, Darby. Warburton and Brown Continue the Battle over Ridicule, The Huntington Library Quarterly, 17/1 (1953), pp. 17-36.
26. The Gentleman’s Magazine vol. 89 (London, 1819).Toland, John. “Mr. Toland’s Letter to a Member of the House of Commons in IRELAND, Dublin, September 3, 1697 in Christianity, not Mysterious: or, a TREATISE Showing, That there is nothing in the GOSPEL Contrary to REASON, Nor above it: And that no Christian Doctrine can be properly call’d a MYSTERY (London: Sam. Buckley, 1702).
27. Walsh, John and Taylor, Stephen. “Introduction: the Church and Anglicanism in the long eighteenth century” in The Church of England 1689-1833: from toleration to Tractarianism, edited by John Walsh, Colin Haydon and Stephen Taylor (Cambridge, 1993).
28. Warburton, William. “Dedication” in The Divine Legation of Moses Demonstrated on the Principles of a Religious Deist (London, 1738).
29. Warburton, William. “The Nature and Condition of Truth” in The Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion occasionally opened and explained in a Course of Sermons, v. I (London, 1753).
30. Warburton, William. A View of Lord Bolingbroke’s Philosophy, Compleat, in four letters to a friend (London, 1756).
31. Warburton, William. Remarks on Mr. DAVID HUME’s Essay on the Natural History of Religion (London, 1757).
32. Warburton, William. Letters from a late eminent prelate to one of his friends (London, 1809).
33. Warburton, William. “Thoughts on Various Subjects” in A Selection from Unpublished Papers of the Right Reverend William Warburton (London, 1841).
34. Yigit, Pervin. John Brown as an Independent Character from Warburton Circle / Warburton Camiası’ndan Bağımsız Bir Karakter Olarak John Brown. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), (2017), pp. 55-68. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1037.
35. Yigit, Pervin & Özkutlu, Seyit. Protestantism as the Guarantee of National Liberty in the Eighteenth-Century Britain. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(6), (2017), pp. 313-327. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i6.1284.
36. Young, Brian W. “Warburton (1698-1779)”, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, edited by H. C. G. Matthew and Brian Harrison (Oxford, 2004).