BAĞLANMA STİLLERİNE VE CİNSİYETE GÖRE ÇATIŞMA YÖNETİMİ VE ALDATMA EĞİLİMİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Year 2012, Volume: 11 Issue: 40, 205 - 219, 01.05.2012

Didar Kantarcı Boğda Gül Şendil

Abstract

Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to investigate married individuals' infidelity tendency and conflict management style in accordance with loyalty and gender. 200 participants of 145 women and 55 men were presented with Personal Information Sheet, Experiences in Close Relationships Scale, Infidelity Tendency Questionnaire and Conflict Management Questionnaire. According to statistical analysis and evaluations, it has been found out that; compared to secure participants, insecure participants' and compared to women, men's infidelity tendency was statistically higher. Comparison with secure participants, insecure participants were found to have higher tendency for negative active and negative passive conflict management styles and women showed out to have higher tendency for positive active conflict management style. Additionally, Infidelity tendency and negative - active conflict management were observed to be positively related.
Key words: Attachment style, infidelity, conflict management, gender.

Keywords

-

INVESTIGATING INFIDELITY TENDENCY AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT BASED ON ATTACHMENT STYLES AND GENDER

Abstract

Öz
Bu araştırmanın amacı, bağlanma stillerinin çatışma çözüm biçimleri ve aldatma eğilimi üzerindeki etkisinde cinsiyetin rolü olup olmadığını; ayrıca aldatma eğilimi ve çatışma yönetim biçimleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir.
Bu amaçla 145 kadın, 55 erkek olmak üzere 200 evli katılımcıya Yakın İlişkilerde Yaşantılar Envanteri, Aldatma Eğilimi Ölçeği ve Çatışma Yönetim Biçimleri Ölçeği verilmiştir. Yapılan analizler sonucunda, güvensiz bağlanma stiline sahip bireylerin, güvenli bağlanma stiline sahip olanlara ve erkeklerin kadınlara göre aldatma eğilimlerinin daha yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Güvensiz bağlama stiline sahip olanların güvenlilere göre daha fazla olumsuz aktif ve olumsuz pasif çatışma yönetimine ve kadınların erkeklere göre daha fazla olumlu aktif çatışma yönetim biçimine yöneldikleri bulunmuştur. Son olarak aldatma eğilimi ile olumsuz aktif çatışma yönetim biçimi arasında da anlamlı ve olumlu yönde ilişkiye rastlanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular literatür ışığında tartışılmıştır.
Anahtar kelimeler: Bağlanma stilleri, aldatma, çatışma yönetimi, cinsiyet

Keywords

Bağlanma stilleri, aldatma, çatışma yönetimi, cinsiyet

References

• Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A psychological study of strange situation, Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
• Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1989). Attachment beyond infancy, American Psychologist, Vol. 44, No: 4, 709 – 716.
• Allen, E. & Baucom, D.K. (2004). Adult attachment and patterns of extra dyadic involvement, Family Process, 43, 4, 467.
• Amidon, A.D. (2007). Intimate relationships: Adult attachment, emotion regulations, gender roles and infidelity, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, USA.
• Atkins, D.C., Baucom, D.H. & Jacobson, N.S. (2001). Understanding infidelity: correlates in a national random sample, Journal of Family Psychology, 15 (4), 735-749.
• Atkins, D.C., Baucom, D.H., Yi, J. & Chistensen, A.(2005). “Infidelity in couples seeking marital therapy, Journal of Family Psychology, 19(3), 470-473.
• Atwood, J. D. & Seifer, M. (1997). Extramarital affairs and constructed meanings: A social constructionist therapeutic approach, American Journal of Family Therapy, 25 (1), 55-75.
• Bahadır, Ş. (2006). Romantik ilişkilerde bağlanma stilleri, çatışma çözme stratejileri ve olumsuz duygu durumunu düzenleme arasındaki ilişki, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Boekhout, B. A., Hendrick, S. S. & Hendrick, C. (2003). Exploring infidelity: Developing the relationship issue scale”, Journal of Loss and Trauma, 8, 283-306.
• Bogaert, A. F. & Sadava, S. (2002). Adult attachment and sexual behaviour, PersonalRelationships, 9, 191-204.
• Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss Volume 1: Attahcment, New York: Basic Books.
• Buunk, B. (1987). Conditions that promote breakups as a consequence of extradyadic involvements, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 271 –284.
• Christensen, A., Shenk, J.L. (1991). Communication, conflict and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic and divorcing couples, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59 (3), 458-463.
• Cramer, R.E., Lepinski, R. E., Meteer, J. D. & Hauska, J.A. (2008). Sex differences in Subjective distress to unfaithfulness: Testing competing evolutionary and violation of Infidelity expectations hypotheses, Journal of Social Psychology, 148 (4), 389- 405.
• Creasey, G. (2002). Associations between working models of attachment and conflict management behaviour in romantic couples, Journal of Counselling Psychology, 49 (3), 365 – 375.
• Crowley, K. A.(2006). The relationship of adult attachment style and interactive conflict styles to marital satisfaction, Unpublished Master Thesis, Texas A & M University, Texas, USA.
• Duba,J. D., Kindsvatter, A. & Lara, T. (2008). Treating infidelity: Considering narratives of Attachment, The Family Journal, 16: 293.
• Egan, V. & Angus, S. (2004). Is social dominance a sex-specific strategy for infidelity? Personality and Individual Differences, 36 (3), 575 – 586.
• Feeney, J.A.& Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (2), 281 – 291.
• Feeney, J.A., Noller, P. & Patty, J. (1993). Adolescents’ interactions with the opposite sex: Influence of attachment style and gender, Journal of Adolescence, 16:2, 169.
• Feeney, J.(1999). Adult romantic attachment and couple relationships. In Handbook of attachment and couple relationships (355-377). New York: Guilford Press.
• Fraley, C.R.& Shaver, P.R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions, Review of General Psychology, 4 (2), 132 –154.
• Hall, J. & Fincham, D.F. (2006). Relationship dissolution following infidelity the roles of Attributions and forgiveness, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25 (5), 508-522.
• Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as adult attachment process”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (3), 511- 524.
• Hojjat, M. (2000). Sex differences and perceptions of conflict in romantic relationships, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17 (4-5): 598 – 617.
• Karaırmak, O. & Duran, N.O. (2005). Üniversite öğrencilerinin bağlanma stilleri ve catışma çözme davranışları üzerine bir calışma, VIII. Ulusal Psikolojik Danısma ve Rehberlik Kongresi Bildiri Ozetleri Kitapcığı, 178.
• Kobak, R. R. & Hazan, C. (1991). Attachment in marriage : Effects of security and accuracy of working models, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60 (6), 861 – 869.
• Napier, A.Y. (1978). The rejection-intrusion pattern: A central family dynamic. Journal of Marriage and Family Counselling, 4, 5-12.
• Norment, L. (1998). Infidelity I: Why man cheat, Ebony, 48.
• Pistole, M.C. & Arricale, F. (2003). The rejection-intrusion pattern: A central family Dynamic. Journal of Marriage and Family Counselling, 4, 5-12.
• Polat, D. (2006). Evli bireylerin evlilik uyumları, aldatma eğilimleri ve çatışma eğilimleri arasındaki ilişkilerin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi, Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Ridley, C.A., Wilhelm, M.S. & Surra, C.A. (2001). Married couples' conflict responses and marital quality, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 517.
• Shi, L. (2003). The association between adult attachment styles and conflict resolution in romantic relationships, The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31:143 -157.
• Simpson, J.A., Rholes, W.S. & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (5), 899 – 914.
• Simpson, J.A., Collins, A., Tran, S. & Haydon, K.C. (2007). Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships: A developmental perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 2, 355 – 367.
• Sprey, J. (1979). Conflict theory and study of marriage and the family. In Contemporary theories about the family. New York: Free Press.
• Sümer, N. (2006). Yetişkin bağlanma ölçeklerinin kategoriler ve boyutlar düzeyinde karşılaştırılması, Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21 (57), 1-22.
• Sümer, G. & Cozzarelli, C. (2004). The impact of adult attachment on partner and self- attributions and relationship quality, Personal Relationships, 11, 355–371.
• Thompson, A.P. (1982). Extramarital relations: Gaining greater awareness, The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 61 (2), 102 – 105.
• Thompson, A. P. (1984). Extramarital sexual crisis common themes and therapy implications, Journal of Sex and MaritalTherapy, 10 (4), 239 - 254.
• Uğurlu, O. (2003). Evli çiftlerde cinsiyet ayrımına ilişkin tutumlar, çatışma yönetim biçimleri ve evlilikte uyum arasındaki ilişki, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• Weil, M. W. (1975). Extramarital reltaionships: A reappraisa Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31 (4), 723 – 725.
• Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey, Journal of Sex Research, 34 (2), 167-174.