AN EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM FOR TURKISH ADMINISTRATIVE SYSYTEM: TURKISH NATIONAL POLICE EXAMPLE

Year 2014, Volume: 13 Issue: 49, 426 - 442, 10.09.2014

Serdar Yıldız Sedat Kula

https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.34402

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Abstract
Increasing role of police both in social life and in state over the last decades has made the accurate and scientific measure of the police performance compulsory. In this study, performance appraisal systems of selected United States Law Enforcements were evaluated and compared to the Turkish National Police (TNP) performance appraisal system. Sample form was developed and delivered to 1009 TNP members to obtain their opinions about the potential indicators of performance appraisal system. In the light of the outcomes of this study and other academic and practical works, Turkish National Police Performance Appraisal System was put into effect at the beginning of 2013.
Key Words: Police, Performance, Evaluation, Turkish National Police

Keywords

Police, Performance, Evaluation, Turkish National Police

TÜRK KAMU KURUMLARINDA PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMENİN ETKİN HALE GETİRİLMESİ: EMNİYET TEŞKİLATI ÖRNEĞİ

Abstract

Polisin sosyal hayatta ve devlet mekanizmasında sürekli artan rolü, polis teşkilatlarının performansının bilimsel olarak doğru bir şekilde ölçülmesini de bir mecburiyet haline getirmiştir. Bu çalışmada ilk olarak, çok sayıda Amerikan polis teşkilatları arasından seçilen teşkilatların performans değerlendirme sistemleri incelenerek Türk Polis Teşkilatı performans değerlendirme sistemi ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Türk Polis Teşkilatı için örnek form hazırlanmış ve örnek formda belirtilen hususlara ilişkin toplam 1009 Emniyet Teşkilatı personelin görüşleri alınmıştır. Bu çalışmanın ve bu alanda yapılan diğer akademik ve pratik çalışmaların çıktılarından faydalanılarak 2013 yılında ilk defa uygulanılan Emniyet Teşkilatı Kurum İçi Bireysel Performans Değerlendirme Sistemi hayata geçirilmiştir.

Keywords

Polis, Performans, Değerlendirme, Türk Polis Teşkilatı

References

• Fulton, R. (1999). "Command corner: Don't coddle poor performers". Women Police, 33 (3), 41-44.
• Gaston, K. C., ve King, L. (1995). "Management development and training in the police: A survey of the promotion process." Journal of European Industrial Training,19(7), 20
• Gianakis, G. A. (1994). "Patrol Officer Performance Appraisal; Problems and Prospects". American Journal of Criminal Justice. 18,199-217.
• Golden, J. W. (2000). Productivity and performance evaluation. In Doerner,W. G., and Dantzker, M. L. (2000). Contemporary police organization and Management: issues and trends (s. 89-115). Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Graves, J. P. (1984). "Let’s put appraisal back in performance appraisal". In International City Management Association (1984). Creative personnel practices: new ideas for local government (s.57-74). Washington, D.C.
• Gul, S. K. (2001). "Police Performance Appraisal in the Turkish ational Police and a Survey of Ankara Police Department" Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS) Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, Mart 5, 2003
• Kane, Jeffrey, S. Bernardin, H. Hohn ve Wiatrowski, M. (1995). "Performance Appraisal". In Brewer, N. and Wilson, C., Lawrence Erlbaum (Ed.) Psychology and Policing., Hillsdale , New Jersey: Associates Publishers
• Kramer, M. (1998). "Designing an individualized performance evaluation system". FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 67(3), 20-29.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill. Moore, M. H. ve Braga, A. (2003). "Measuring and improving police performance: The lessons of COMPSTAT and its progeny". Policing, 26.(3),15.
• Roberg, R. R. (1979). "Police Management and Organizational Behavior: A Contingency Approach". St. Paul, MN: West.
• Wolfer, L. ve Baker, T. E. (2000). "Evaluating Small Town Policing: Methodological Issues". Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 15; 52-63.