Research Article

COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS

Volume: 7 Number: 3 October 20, 2022
EN TR

COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS

Abstract

Physical and chemical properties of coal and its relationship with coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP) have been studied previously. However definitive conclusions have not been reached, primarily due to the complex nature of coal mine dust. It remains unclear exactly which properties of coal mine dust related to the grade of coal cause differences in the exposure–response relationship. The aim of the study is to identify the coal mine environmental factors, and personal factors affecting the severity of CWP. This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study and included total of 116 coal mine workers diagnosed as CWP in a tertiary hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021. Of the cases, 77 (66.4%) worked in a hard coal mine and 39 (33.6%) worked in a lignite mine, and mean age was 60.2 ± 11.5 years. There was a significantly higher prevalence of concomitant pulmonary disease in hard coal mine workers compared to lignite mine workers (p= 0.005). In addition, the prevalence of progressive massive fibrosis (PMF) was higher in hard coal mine workers compared to lignite mine workers, and a statistically significant difference was found (p= 0.004). The value of FEV1 and FEV1/FVC were significantly lower in hard coal mine workers than in lignite mine workers (p= 0.005, p= 0.002). As a conclusion, concomitant lung disease, presence of PMF and impairment in lung functions, which are important causes of mortality and morbidity for CWP, were found to be more common in hard coal mine workers than in lignite mine workers. Therefore, taking into account the type of coal mine while making protective arrangements to prevent pneumoconiosis in coal mines may contribute to reduce the burden of CWP.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Torres Rey CH, Ibañez Pinilla M, Briceño Ayala L, Checa Guerrero DM, Morgan Torres G, Groot de Restrepo H, et al. Underground coal mining: relationship between coal dust levels and pneumoconiosis, in two regions of Colombia, 2014. BioMed research international. 2015;2015.
  2. 2. Cohen RAC, Patel A, Green FHY, editors. Lung disease caused by exposure to coal mine and silica dust2008: © Thieme Medical Publishers.
  3. 3. Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Pneumoconiosis and advanced occupational lung disease among surface coal miners--16 states, 2010-2011. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2012;61(23):431-4.
  4. 4. Pingle S. Occupational safety and health in India: now and the future. Industrial health. 2012;50(3):167-71.
  5. 5. Oyunbileg S, Wang JD, Sumberzul N, Chang YY, Erdenchimeg E. Health impact of pneumoconiosis in Mongolia: estimation of losses in life expectancy and quality adjusted life expectancy. American journal of industrial medicine. 2011;54(4):285-92.
  6. 6. Mo J, Wang L, Au W, Su M. Prevalence of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis in China: A systematic analysis of 2001–2011 studies. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 2014;217(1):46-51.
  7. 7. Swaen G, Meijers J, Slangen J. Risk of gastric cancer in pneumoconiotic coal miners and the effect of respiratory impairment. Occupational and environmental medicine. 1995;52(9):606-10.
  8. 8. Laney AS, Weissman DN. Respiratory diseases caused by coal mine dust. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine/American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2014;56(0 10):S18.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Public Health, Environmental Health

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 20, 2022

Submission Date

June 7, 2022

Acceptance Date

September 12, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 7 Number: 3

APA
Sarı, G. (2022). COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama Ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi, 7(3), 497-505. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.1127594
AMA
1.Sarı G. COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS. ESTUDAM Public Health Journal. 2022;7(3):497-505. doi:10.35232/estudamhsd.1127594
Chicago
Sarı, Gülden. 2022. “COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS”. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama Ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi 7 (3): 497-505. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.1127594.
EndNote
Sarı G (October 1, 2022) COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi 7 3 497–505.
IEEE
[1]G. Sarı, “COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS”, ESTUDAM Public Health Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 497–505, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.35232/estudamhsd.1127594.
ISNAD
Sarı, Gülden. “COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS”. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi 7/3 (October 1, 2022): 497-505. https://doi.org/10.35232/estudamhsd.1127594.
JAMA
1.Sarı G. COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS. ESTUDAM Public Health Journal. 2022;7:497–505.
MLA
Sarı, Gülden. “COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS”. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama Ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 3, Oct. 2022, pp. 497-05, doi:10.35232/estudamhsd.1127594.
Vancouver
1.Gülden Sarı. COAL WORKERS’ PNEUMOCONIOSIS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LIGNITE AND HARD COAL MINE WORKERS. ESTUDAM Public Health Journal. 2022 Oct. 1;7(3):497-505. doi:10.35232/estudamhsd.1127594

Cited By

International Peer Reviewed Journal

Crossref Content Registration logo


The journal adopts Open Access Policy and does not request article proccessing charge (APC), article publishing charge or any other charges.

by-nc.eu.png
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License