ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNDE FLÖRT ŞİDDETİ SIKLIĞI ve ETKİLEYEN ETMENLER - FREQUENCY and EFFECTING FACTORS of DATING VIOLENCE in STUDENTS of a UNIVERSITY

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı bir üniversitenin iki ayrı fakültesinde okuyan üniversite öğrencilerindeki flört şiddeti prevalanslarının saptanması ve etkileyen etmenlerin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Kesitsel tipte olan bu çalışma, araştırmacılar tarafından oluşturulan anketler aracılığıyla, 1 Mayıs- 30 Haziran 2017 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilmiştir.  Basit rastgele örnekleme yöntemiyle 435 öğrenci seçilmiştir. Frekans analizleri, ki-kare ve lojistik regresyon analizleri uygulanmıştır. Toplam 424 öğrenci araştırmaya katılmış ve bunların %21.4’ünde flört şiddeti maruziyeti saptanmıştır. Cinsiyet ve fakülte ile flört şiddeti arasında anlamlı bir ilişki saptanmazken; çocuklukta aile içi şiddete maruz kalanlarda 2.7 kat (%95GA=1.4-5.5; p=0.003) daha fazla maruziyet görülmüştür.  Flört şiddetini engellemek için aile içi şiddeti önlemeye yönelik etkin politikalar uygulanmalı ve üniversite öğrencilerine yönelik danışmanlık ve eğitim hizmetleri verilmelidir.

Keywords

• Flört Şiddeti,Yakın Partner Şiddeti,Aile İçi Şiddet

FREQUENCY and EFFECTING FACTORS of DATING VIOLENCE in STUDENTS of a UNIVERSITY

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the prevalence of dating violence among students in two different faculties of a university and to compare the factors affecting them. This cross - sectional study was performed between 1 May - 30 June 2017 via questionnaires that developed by researches. 435 students were selected by simple random sampling method. Frequency analyzes, chi-square and logistic regression analyzes were applied. In total, 424 students were included in the study and 21.4% of them had dating violence exposure. No significant association was found between dating violence and gender or faculty; 2.7 times (95% CI =1,4-5,5; p=0,003)  more exposure was seen in those who experienced domestic violence in childhood. In order to prevent the dating violence, effective policies should be applied to prevent domestic violence and consultancy and education services should be provided to university students.

Keywords

• Dating violence,intimate partner violence,domestic violence

References

1. 1. Sugarman DB, Hotaling GT. Dating violence: Prevalence, context, and risk markers. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 3-32). New York, NY, England: Praeger Publishers. 1989.
2. 2. Niolon PH, Kearns M, Dills J, et al. Preventing intimate partner violence across the lifespan : a technical package of programs, policies, and practices. Atlanta, Georgia: Division of Violence Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017.
3. 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing Teen Dating Violence. 2017; https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/tdv-factsheet.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 21.02.2019)
4. 4. Shaffer CS, Adjei J, Viljoen JL, Douglas KS, Saewyc EM. Ten-Year Trends in Physical Dating Violence Victimization Among Adolescent Boys and Girls in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518788367
5. 5. Sen S, Bolsoy N. Violence against women: prevalence and risk factors in Turkish sample. BMC Women's Health. 2017;17(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0454-3
6. 6. Toprak S, Ersoy G. Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010. PloS one. 2017; 12(8): e0182409. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182409
7. 7. Holt, NL. Positive youth development through sport, 2nd ed. NY, NY: Routledge. 2016
8. 8. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Türkiye’de Kadına Yönelik Aile İçi Şiddet Araştırması, 2014 Mikro Veri Seti. Tanım ve Kavramlar. (Erişim tarihi: 02.04.2019) http://www.tuik.gov.tr/MicroVeri/KYAS_2014/metaveri/tanim/index.html

9. 9. Türk Tabipleri Birliği. Aile İçi Şiddet. https://www.ttb.org.tr/eweb/adli/6.html (Erişim tarihi: 02.04.2019)
10. 10. Straus MA. Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women. 2004;10(7):790-811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265552
11. 11. Chan KL, Straus MA, Brownridge DA, Tiwari A & Leung WC. Prevalence of dating partner violence and suicidal ideation among male and female university students worldwide. Journal of midwifery & women's health. 2008;53(6):529-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.04.016
12. 12. Aslan D, Vefikuluçay D, Zeyneloğlu S, Erdost T, Temel F & Söztutar E. Ankara’da iki Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu’nun birinci ve dördüncü sınıflarında okuyan öğrencilerin flört şiddetine maruz kalma, flört ilişkilerinde şiddet uygulama durumlarının ve bu konudaki görüşlerinin saptanması araştırması. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kadın Sorunları Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi. 2008.
13. 13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Teen Dating Violence. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/intimatepartnerviolence/teen_dating_violence.html (Erişim tarihi: 21.02.2019)
14. 14. Rakovec-Felser Z. Domestic violence and abuse in intimate relationship from public health perspective. Health psychology research. 2014;2(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/hpr.2014.1821
15. 15. European Commission. White Paper on Sport (COM (2007) 391 final). Brussels: European Commission. 2007.
16. 16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Violence Across the Lifespan: A Technical Package of Programs, Policies, and Practices. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/ipv-technicalpackages.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 02.04.2019)