Fen Lisesi Öğrencilerinin Fiziğe İlişkin Aidiyet Hisleri, Fizik Kimlikleri ve Başarılarının İncelenmesi

Abstract

Aidiyet hissi, öğrencilerin fizik derslerine karşı tutumlarını, notlarını ve motivasyonlarını önemli ölçüde etkilemektedir. Bu çalışma, 271 kız ve 295 erkek olmak üzere 566 fen lisesi öğrencisini ele alarak, cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyine göre fiziğe ilişkin aidiyet hisleri, fizik kimliği ve başarılarındaki farklılıkları araştırmıştır. Veriler, demografik formlar, “Fiziğe İlişkin Aidiyet Hissi” anketi ve “Fizik Kimliği Ölçeği” kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Sonuçlar tek yönlü çok değişkenli varyans analizi (MANOVA) ile analiz edildiğinde, erkek öğrencilerin genel olarak kız öğrencilere kıyasla daha güçlü bir aidiyet duygusu ve daha gelişmiş bir fizik kimliği sergiledikleri ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, analiz, cinsiyetin fizik dersleriyle ilgili duyuşsal değişkenler üzerinde öğrencilerin sınıf seviyesinden daha belirgin bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu bulgular, fizik eğitimindeki duygusal değişkenlerin fizik başarısından bağımsız olarak cinsiyete göre farklılık gösterdiğini vurgulamaktadır.

Keywords

• aidiyet hissi
• fizik kimliği
• fizik eğitimi

Examination of Science High School Students’ Sense of Belonging to Physics, Physics Identity, and Achievement

Abstract

The sense of belonging significantly influences students' attitudes towards physics classes, their grades, and motivation. This study focused on 566 science high school students, 271 females and 295 males, to explore variations in their sense of belonging to physics, physics identity, and achievements based on gender and grade level. Data were collected using demographic forms, a “Sense of Belonging to Physics” questionnaire, and the “Physics Identity Scale.” Analyzing the results with one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that male students generally exhibited a stronger sense of belonging and a more developed physics identity compared to their female counterparts. Additionally, the analysis indicated that gender had a more pronounced effect on the emotional aspects related to physics lessons than the students' grade level. These findings highlight that the affective variables in physics education differ by gender independently of physics achievement.

Keywords

• sense of belonging
• physics identity
• physics education

References

1. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. ve Wong, B. (2015). “Is science for us?” Black students’ and parents’ views of science and science careers. Science Education, 99(2), 199–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21146
2. Avraamidou, L. (2020). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: Rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7
3. Baumeister, R. F. ve Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
4. Carlone, H. B. ve Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
5. Ceylan, E., Sağırekmekçi, H., Tatar, E. ve Bilgin, İ. (2016). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Merak, Tutum ve Motivasyon Düzeylerine Göre Fen Bilgisi Dersi Başarılarının İncelenmesi. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 39-52. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/usaksosbil/issue/21662/232952
6. Cheng, H., Potvin, G., Khatri, R., Kramer, L. H., Lock, R.M. and Hazari, Z. (2018). Examining physics identity development through two high school interventions. Physics Education Research Conference 2018’de sunulmuş bildiri, Washington, DC.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
8. Cwik, S. ve Singh, C. (2022a). Students’ sense of belonging in introductory physics course for bioscience majors predicts their grade. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010139

9. Cwik, S. ve Singh, C. (2022b). Not feeling recognized as a physics person by instructors and teaching assistants is correlated with female students’ lower grades. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010138. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010138
10. Doucette, D., Clark, R. ve Singh, C. (2020). Hermione and the secretary: How gendered task division in introductory physics labs can disrupt equitable learning. European Journal of Physics, 41(3), 035702. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ab7831
11. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
12. Godwin, A., Potvin, G., Hazari, Z. ve Lock, R. (2016). Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(2), 312–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20118
13. Gonsalves, A. J. ve Danielsson, A. T. (2020). Introduction: Why Do We Need Identity in Physics Education Research?. In Physics Education and Gender: Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research, edited by A. J. Gonsalves and A. T. Danielsson, 1–8. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41933-2_1.
14. Goodenow, C., Szalacha, L. ve Westheimer, K. (2006). School support groups, other school factors, and the safety of sexual minority adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 43(5), 573-589. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20173
15. Güden, C. ve Timur, B. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin fen bilimlerine yönelik tutumlarının bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi (Çanakkale örneği). International Journal of Active Learning, 1(1), 4972. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijal/issue/24460/259232 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
16. Güvercin, Ö., Tekkaya, C. ve Sungur, S. (2010). A cross age study of elementary students’ motivation towards science learning. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(39), 233-243. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/hunefd/issue/7799/102178 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
17. Hazari, Z., Brewe, E., Goertzen, R. M. ve Hodapp, T. (2017). The importance of high school physics teachers for female students’ physics identity and persistence. The Physics Teacher, 55(2), 96-99. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4974122
18. Hazari, Z., Chari, D., Potvin, G. ve Brewe, E. (2020). The context dependence of physics identity: Examining the role of performance/competence, recognition, interest, and sense of belonging for lower and upper female physics undergraduates. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(10), 1583-1607. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21644
19. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M. ve Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
20. Hazari, Z., Tai, R. H. ve Sadler, P. M. (2007). Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors. Science Education, 91(6), 847–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20223
21. Huberty, C. J. ve Olejnik, S. (2006). Applied MANOVA and discriminant analysis (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.
22. Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes‐Malach, T. J. ve Singh, C. (2019). Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020119
23. Kang, J., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A. ve Keinonen, T. (2019). Gender study on the relationships between science interest and future career perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021
24. Kapucu, S. ve Bahçivan, E. (2015). High school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, self-efficacy in learning physics and attitudes toward physics: A structural equation model. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1039976
25. Karasar, N. (2022). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (36. baskı). Ankara: Nobel.
26. Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G. L. ve Ito, T. A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4), 420-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317720186
27. Li, Y. ve Singh, C. (2022). Inclusive learning environments can improve student learning and motivational beliefs. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 020147. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020147
28. Li, Y. ve Singh, C. (2023). Sense of belonging is an important predictor of introductory physics students’ academic performance. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020137. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020137
29. Li, Y., Whitcomb, K. ve Singh, C. (2020). How perception of being recognized or not recognized by instructors as a “physics person” impacts male and female students’ self-efficacy and performance. The Physics Teacher, 58(7), 484-487. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0002067
30. Lock, R. M. ve Hazari, Z. (2016). Discussing underrepresentation as a means to facilitating female students’ physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020101
31. Marchand, G. C. ve Taasoobshirazi, G. (2012). Stereotype threat and women’s performance in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3050–3061. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.683461
32. Marshman, E. M., Kalender, Z. Y., Nokes-Malach, T., Schunn, C. ve Singh, C. (2018). Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm?. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020123. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020123
33. Pehlivan, H. (2019). Fen lisesi öğrencilerinin fizik dersine yönelik tutumları ile akademik benlik tasarımlarının incelenmesi. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2257
34. Pehlivan, H. ve Köseoğlu, P. (2010). Ankara fen lisesi öğrencilerinin biyoloji dersine yönelik tutumları ile akademik benlik tasarımları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(38), 225-235. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/hunefd/issue/7798/102157 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
35. Pesen, A., Oral, B. ve Epçaçan, U. (2020). Science high school students’ perceptions of science high schools in Turkey. Journal of Education and Future, 17, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.524932
36. Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
37. Scheel, M. J., Madabhushi, S. ve Backhaus, A. (2009). The academic motivation of at-risk students in a counseling prevention program. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(8), 1147–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009338495
38. Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N., Abramzon, S., Grubb, A. ve Braswell, D. (2018). The longitudinal effects of STEM identity and gender on flourishing and achievement in college physics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0137-0
39. Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L. ve Hodges, S. D. (2013). When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212468332
40. Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M. ve McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women's self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385
41. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education. Topçu, M. S. ve Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin biliş ötesi ve epistemolojik inançlarıyla fen başarıları, cinsiyetleri ve sosyoekonomik durumları. İlköğretim Online, 8(3), 676-693. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/8597/106988 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
42. Ulu, Y. ve Yerdelen-Damar, S. (2022, Ocak). Fizik Benlik Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması. V. Ulusal Fizik Eğitimi Kongresi’nde sunulmuş bildiri, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul. https://ufek2022.bogazici.edu.tr/V-UFEK-ozet-kitapcigi.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
43. Wang, J. ve Hazari, Z. (2018). Promoting high school students’ physics identity through explicit and implicit recognition. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020111
44. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W. ve Davis-Kean, P. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (s. 1–44). Wiley.
45. Wulff, P., Hazari, Z., Petersen, S. ve Neumann, K. (2018). Engaging young women in physics: An intervention to support young women’s physics identity development. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020113
46. Yazıcı, T. ve Kartal, O. Y. (2020). Lise Öğrencilerinin Öğrenme Yaklaşımlarının İncelenmesi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 10(2), 625-641. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.783211