Rootstock Breeding and Rootstock-Scion Interaction in Prunus Species

Öz

Temperate climate fruit species are important fruit groups both in the world and in Turkey. Most of these fruit species because cannot be propagated by seeds due to the long generation period are propagated by grafting. Rootstocks affect many factors in cultivars such as growth vigor, yield and quality, and maturation time. Thanks to the rootstocks selected in grafting, resistance to soil-borne diseases and pests and resistance to abiotic stress conditions can be achieved. Ideal rootstocks should show compatibility very well with the varieties they are grafted on. Graft incompatibility is a major problem in rootstock breeding studies. The reasons for graft incompatibility have not been fully explained. Although anatomical studies on graft incompatibility give important opinions, there are many studies proving that biochemical analyzes also provide important results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Compatibility
• grafting
• prunus
• rootstock
• scion.

References

1. Andrews, P. K., Marquez, C. S. 2010. Graft incompatibility. Horticultural reviews, 15, 183-232.
2. Bennett, R., Wallsgrove, R.M., 1994. Secondary metabolites in plant defense mechanisms, New Phytologist, 127, 617-633.
3. Bolat,I.,Ak,B.E.,Acar,I.,Ikıncı,A.2017. Plum culture ın Turkey. Acta Horticultureae.1715:15-18.
4. Chin SW, Shaw J, Haberle R, Wen J, Potter D (2014) Diversification of almonds, peaches, plums and cherries— molecular systematics and biogeographic history of Prunus (Rosaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 76:34–48.
5. Cooman, L.D., E. Everaert, P. Curir And M. Dolci 1996. The possible role of phenolics in incompatibility expression in Eucalyptus gunnii micrografts”, Phytochemical Analysis, 7, 92-96.
6. Darikova, J.A., Savva, Y.V., Vaganov, E.A., Grachev, A.M., Kuznetsova, G.V., 2011. Grafts of woody plants and the problem of incompatibility between scion and rootstocks (a review), Journal of Siberian Federal University Biology, 4, 54–63.
7. Davis, A.R., Perkins-Veazie, P., 2008. Grafting effects on vegetable quality, Hortscience 4 (6), 1670-1672.
8. Dogra, K., Kour, K., Kumar, R., Bkshi, P., Kumar, V., 2018. Graft-incompatibility in horticultural crops, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7 (2), 1805-1820.

9. Ercisli, S. (2004). A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genet. Resource Crop Evol. 51 (4), 419–435.
10. Errea, P., Felipe, A., Herrero, M., 1994. Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus spp., Journal of Experimental Botany, 393-401.
11. Errea, P., Gutmann, M., Feucht, W., 2000. Physiological implications of flavan-3-ols in apricot-rootstock combination, Advances in Horticultural Science, 14, 126-134.
12. Feucht, W., Treutter, D., 1991. Phenol gradients in opposing cells of Prunus heterografts, Advances in Horticultural Science, 5, 107-111.
13. Feucht, W., Treutter, D., Schmıd, P.P.S. 1988: Inhibition of growth and xylogenesis and promotion of vacuolation in Prunus callus by the flavanone prunin, Plant Cell Reports, 7, 189-192.
14. Gogorcena, Y., J. Abadı., A. Abadı. 2004. A new technique for screening iron efficient genotypes in peach rootstocks elicitation of root ferric chelate reductase by manipulation of external iron concentrations, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 27,1701-1715.
15. Guclu, S. F. 2019. Identification of polyphenols in homogenetic and heterogenetic combination of cherry graftings. Pak. J. Bot, 51(6), 2067-2072.
16. Guclu, S. F., Koyuncu, F. 2012. Peroxidase isozyme profiles in some sweet cherry rootstocks and ‘0900 Ziraat’cherry variety. African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(3), 678-681.
17. Gürkan B., Uğur R., Gürkan T.2018. Bazı erik anaçlarının Meloidogyn incognita ırk 1 ve Meloidogyn javanica ırk 1’e karşı reaksiyonlarının belirlenmesi, Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 64-70.
18. Hartmann, H.T., Kester, D.E., Davies, F.T., Geneve, R.L., 2002. 411-460 pp. Plant propagation. Principles and practices. New Jersey Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
19. Herrero, J. 1951. Studies of compatible and incompatible graft combinations with special reference to hardy fruit trees, Journal of Horticulturae Science. 26, 186-237.
20. Jimenes, I.M., Mayer, N.A., Dias, C.T.S., Scarpare Filho, J.A., da Silva, S.R. 2018b. Influence of clonal rootstocks on leaf nutrient content, vigor and productivity of young ‘Sunraycer’ nectarine trees, Scientia Horticulturae, 235, 279-285.
21. Jiménez, S., J. Pinochet, A. Abadı´a, M.A. Moreno, and Y. Gogorcena. 2018a. Tolerance response to iron chlorosis of Prunus selections as rootstocks, HortScience 43, 304-309.
22. Lee, J.M., Kubota, C., Tsao, S.J., Bie, Z., Echevarria, P.H., Morra, L., Oda, M., 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques,automation, Scientia Horticulturae, 127, 93-105.
23. Magalhães-Filho, J.R., Amaral, L.R., Machado, D.F.S.P., Medina, C.L., Machado, E.C. 2008. “Deficiência hídrica, trocas gasosas e crescimento de raízes em laranjeira ‘valência’ sobre dois tipos de porta-enxerto”, Bragantia 67, 75-82.
24. Mehdi-Tounsi, H., Chelli-Chaabouni, A., Mahjoub-Boujnah, D., Boukhris, M. 2017. Long term field response of pistachio to irrigation water salinity, Agricultural Water Management, 185, 1-12.
25. Melo, E.T., Pio, R., Balbi, R.V., Ferreira, C.A., Mori, F.A. 2017. Anatomic compatibility of pear and quince trees grafted on Pyrus calleryana and Chaenomeles sinensis rootstocks, Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 52(10), 877-886.
26. Mngomba, S.A., Du Toit, E.S., Akinnifesi, F.K., 2008.The relationship between graft incompatibility and phenols in Uapaca kirkiana Muell Arg., Scientia Horticulturae, 117, 212-218.
27. Moreno, M.A., M.C. Tabuenca, and R. Cambra. 1995. Adesoto 101, a plum rootstock for peaches and other stone fruit, HortScience, 30, 1314-1315.
28. Moreno, M.A., Moing, A., Lansac, M., Gaudillère, J.P., Salesses, G., 1993. Peach/ Myrobalan plum graft incompatibility in the nursery, Journal of Horticultural Science, 68 (5), 705-714.
29. Mosse, B., 1962.Graft incompatibility in fruit trees,Horticultural Plant Crops, 28, 1-36.
30. Musacchi, S., Pagliuca, G., Kindt, M., Piretti, M.V., Sansavini, S., 2000. “Flavonoids as markers for pear-quince graft incompatibility”, Journal of Applied Botany, 74, 206-211.
31. Okatan, V. 2018. Phenolic compounds and phytochemicals in fruits of black mulberry (L.) genotypes from the Aegean region in Turkey. Folia Horticulturae, 30(1), 93-101.
32. Pina, A., Errea, P., Martens, H.J. 2012. Graft union formation and cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata in compatible and incompatible stem unions of Prunus spp, Scientia Horticulturae, 143, 144-150.
33. Pina, A., Errea, P., Schulz, A., Martens, H.J., 2009. Cell-to-cell transport through plasmodesmata in tree callus cultures, Tree Physiology, 29, 809-818.
34. Pinochet, J., Calvet, C., Hernandez-Dorrego, A., Bonet, A., Felipe, A., Moreno, M.A. 1999. Resistance of peach and plum rootstock from Spain, France, and Italy to root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica, HortScience. 34, 1259-1262.
35. Ramírez-Gil, J.G., Ramelli, E.G., Osorio, J.G.M. 2017. Economic impact of the avocado (cv. Hass) wilt disease complex in Antioquia, Colombia, crops under different technological management levels, Crop Protection, 101, 103-115.
36. Rowe, R.N. and D.V. Beardsell. 1973. Waterlogging of fruit trees, Horticultural Abstract, 43, 534-548. Simard, M.H., Olivier, G., 1999. Julior-Ferdor et variétés d’abricotier, L’Arboriculture Fruitière 523, 39-42.
37. Webster, A.D., 1995. Rootstock and interstock effects on deciduous fruit tree vigour, precocity, and yield productivity. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. 23, 373-382.
38. Yaman, M. 2022. Evaluation of genetic diversity by morphological, biochemical and molecular markers in sour cherry genotypes. Molecular Biology Reports, 1-9.
39. Yaman, M., Uzun, A. 2021. Farklı Tozlayıcıların Precoce de Tyrinthe Kayısı Çeşidinin Bazı Meyve Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 36 (1), 93-100. (In Turkish). Yilmaz, K. U., Gurcan, K. 2012. Genetic diversity in apricot. Genetic Diversity in Plants, 249-270.
40. Yilmaz, K. U., Kargi, S. P.,Kafkas, S.2012. Morphological diversity of the Turkish apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) germplasm in the Irano-Caucasian ecogeographical group. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 36(6), 688-694.
41. Yin, H., B. Yan, J. Sun, P. Jia, Z. Zhang, X. Yan, et al. 2012. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell–cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation, Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 4219-4232.
42. Yonemoto, Y., Matsumoto, K., Furukawa, T., Asakawa, M.; Okuda, H.; Takahara, T. 2004. Effects of rootstock and crop load on sap flow rate in branches of 'Shirakawa Satsuma' mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.), Scientia Horticulturae, 102, 295-300.
43. Zarrouk, O., Pinochet, J., Gogorcena, Y., Moreno, M.A., 2006. Graft compatibility between peach cultivars and Prunus rootstocks, HortScience 41 (6), 1389-1394.
44. Zarrouk, O., Testillano, P.S., Risueño, M.C., Moreno, M.Á., Gogorcena, Y. 2010. Changes in Cell/Tissue organization and peroxidase activity as markers for early detection of gfart incompatibility in peach/plum combinastions, Journal of American Society Horticultural Science, 135(1), 9-17.
45. Zhou, K., Jerszurki, D., Sadka, A., Shlizerman, L., Rachmilevitch, S., Ephrath, J., 2018. Effects of photoselective netting on root growth and development of young grafted orange trees under semi-arid climate, Scientie Horticulturae, 238, 272-280.