Türkiye'nin Ekonomik Özgürlük Performansının Bütünleşik Crisus-Critic Tabanlı Topsis Modeliyle Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'nin 2017-2025 yılları arasındaki ekonomik özgürlük performansını Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemleri aracılığıyla analiz etmektir. Analiz sürecinde, Heritage Foundation tarafından belirlenen 12 ekonomik özgürlük göstergesinin ağırlıkları CRISUS ve CRITIC yöntemlerinin entegre edildiği hibrit bir modelle objektif olarak hesaplanmış ve alternatiflerin sıralaması TOPSIS prosedürüyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Hibrit ağırlıklandırma modeli sonuçlarına göre, performanstaki değişimi belirleyen en yüksek öneme sahip kriterlerin sırasıyla Yargı Etkinliği (0,164), Parasal Özgürlük (0,115) ve Mülkiyet Hakları (0,102) olduğu; en düşük etkinin ise Finansal Özgürlük (0,036) kriterinde toplandığı saptanmıştır. TOPSIS analizi sonucunda elde edilen performans skorları incelendiğinde, Türkiye'nin en yüksek yakınlık katsayısı ile 2021 yılında (0,854) zirve seviyeye ulaştığı, takip eden yıllarda yaşanan düşüş ile birlikte 2024 (0,199) ve 2025 (0,209) yıllarında tarihi dip seviyelere gerilediği istatistiksel olarak ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışma, elde edilen bu sayısal bulgular ışığında, ekonomik özgürlüğün yeniden tesisi için yargı bağımsızlığı ve rasyonel para politikasında yapısal reformlara ihtiyaç duyulduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

• Ekonomik Özgürlük
• ÇKKV
• Türkiye
• Performans Değerlendirmesi

Supporting Institution

Destekleyici kurum yoktur

Ethical Statement

Etik durum yoktur

An Evaluation of Türkiye's Economic Freedom Performance Using The Crisus-Critic-Based Topsis Model

Abstract

TThe purpose of this study is to analyze Türkiye’s economic freedom performance between 2017 and 2025 using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. During the analysis process, the weights of the 12 economic freedom indicators identified by the Heritage Foundation were objectively calculated using a hybrid model integrating the CRISUS and CRITIC methods, and the ranking of alternatives was performed using the TOPSIS procedure. According to the results of the hybrid weighting model, the criteria with the highest significance in determining changes in performance were, in order, Judicial Efficiency (0.164), Monetary Freedom (0.115), and Property Rights (0.102); while the lowest impact was found in the Financial Freedom (0.036) criterion. An examination of the performance scores obtained from the TOPSIS analysis reveals that Türkiye reached its peak level in 2021 with the highest proximity coefficient (0.854), and following a decline in subsequent years, it fell to historic lows in 2024 (0.199) and 2025 (0.209). Based on these numerical findings, the study highlights the need for structural reforms in judicial independence and rational monetary policy to reestablish economic freedom.

Keywords

• Economic Freedom
• MCDM
• Performance Evaluation
• Türkiye

References

1. Acikgoz, B., Amoah, A., & Yılmazer, M. (2016). Economic freedom and growth: A Panel cointegration approach. Panoeconomicus, 63(5), 541-562.
2. Adalar, I., & Işık, Ö. (2025). Criterion importance based on sum of squares (CRISUS): A novel objective weighting method and its implementation in multidimensional sustainability performance measurement. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 59(2).
3. Akyüz, Y., & Kaya, Z. (2013). Türkiye’de hayat dışı ve hayat/emeklilik sigorta sektörünün finansal performans analiz ve değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(26), 355-371.
4. Altın, H. (2020). Ekonomik Özgürlük Endeksinin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Analizi. Uluslararası Ekonomi, İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 4(2), 441-460.
5. Altıntaş, F. F. (2022). Ekonomik Özgürlük Faktörleri Arasındaki İlişkilerin Çoklu Uyum Analizi ile Değerlendirilmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 21(82), 674-694.
6. Asadzadeh, A., Kötter, T., Salehi, P., & Birkmann, J. (2017). Operationalizing a concept: The systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 25, 147-162.
7. Berggren, N. (1999). Economic freedom and equality: Friends or foes? Public Choice, 100(3–4), 203–223.
8. Böyükaslan, A., & Ecer, F. (2021). Determination of drivers for investing in cryptocurrencies through a fuzzy full consistency method-Bonferroni (FUCOM-F’B) framework. Technology in Society, 67, 1-16.

9. Cabello, J. M., Ruiz, F., & Pérez-Gladish, B. (2021). An alternative aggregation process for composite indexes: An application to the Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index. Social Indicators Research, 153(2), 443-467.
10. Campbell, N., & Snyder, T. (2012). Economic growth, economic freedom, and the resource curse. Journal of Private Enterprise, 28(1), 23-46.
11. Chauffour, J.-P. (2011). On the relevance of freedom and entitlement in development: New empirical evidence (1975–2007). The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper 5660, 1-37.
12. Ciftci, C., & Ciftci, D. D. (2022). Economic freedom, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: The role of sub-components of freedom. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 31(2), 233-254.
13. De Haan, J., Lundstrom, S., & Strum., J.-E. (2006). Market-oriented institutions and policies and economic growth: A critical survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 157-191.
14. Demircioğlu, M., & Coşkun, İ. T. (2018). CRITIC-MOOSRA yöntemi ve UPS seçimi üzerine bir uygulama. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 27(1), 183-195.
15. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & operations research, 22(7), 763-770.
16. Dinç, S. C., & Erilli, N. A. (2022). Mekânsal Ekonometri Tabanlı Karma Sıralama Önerisi: Avrupa Ekonomik Özgürlükler Örneği. Ekoist: Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 36, 205-233.
17. Ecer, F. (2014). A hybrid banking websites quality evaluation model using AHP and COPRAS-G: A Turkey case. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(4), 758-782.
18. Ecer, F. (2018). Third-party logistics (3PLs) provider selection via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 615-634.
19. Ecer, F., & Zolfani, S. H. (2022). Evaluating economic freedom via a multi-criteria MEREC-DNMA model-based composite system: case of OPEC countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(4), 1158-1181.
20. El Gibari, S., Gómez, T., & Ruiz, F. (2019). Building composite indicators using multicriteria methods: A review. Journal of Business Economics, 89(1), 1-24.
21. Erilli, N. A. (2018). Economic freedom index calculation using FCM. Alphanumeric Journal, 6(1) , 93-116.
22. Feldmann, H. (2007). Economic freedom and unemployment around the world. Southern Economic Journal, 74(1), 158-176.
23. Feldmann, H. (2021). Economic freedom and people’s regard for education. Social Indicators Research, 154(1), 235-256.
24. Galik, A., Bąk, M., Bałandynowicz-Panfil, K., & Cirella, G. T. (2022). Evaluating labour market flexibility using the TOPSIS method: Sustainable industrial relations. Sustainability, 14(1), 1-20.
25. Graafland, J. (2020). When does economic freedom promote well being? On the moderating role of long‐term orientation. Social Indicators Research, 149(1), 127-153.
26. Gušavac, B. A., & Savić, G. (2021). Operations research problems and data envelopment analysis in agricultural land processing – A review. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business & Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 26(1), 1-13.
27. Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Gartzke, E. (2005). Economic freedom of the world: 2005 annual report. The Fraser Institute, Canada.
28. Hall, J., & Lawson, R. (2014). Economic freedom of the world: an accounting of the literature. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(1), 1-19.
29. Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications, Berlin: Springer.
30. Ismail, N. (2010). Income inequality, economic freedom and economic growth. European Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Sciences, 25, 144-157.
31. Kalkan, Y. (2024). Spatial analysis of economic risk, economic freedom index, corruption perceptions index and human development index. Sosyoekonomi, 32(61), 213-241.
32. Kane, T., Holmes, K. R., & O’Grady, M. A. (2007). 2007 index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation/The Wall Street Journal, Washington DC.
33. Kara, M. A. (2025). NATO Üyesi Ülkelerin Ekonomik Özgürlük Endekslerinin MEREC, GİA ve EDAS Yöntemleri ile Analizi. Turkish Studies – Economy, 20(1), 259-284.
34. Karaköy, Ç., Çakmaktepe, N. E., & Ulutaş, A. (2023). Eski S.S.C.B. Ülkelerinin Ekonomik Özgürlük Endekslerinin SD ve CoCoSo Yöntemleri ile Analizi. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 276-290.
35. Karakuş, T. F., & Özekenci, E. K. (2025). Assessment of political stability, human development and economic freedom performance of BRICS-T countries: A hybrid MCDM approach. Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 10(2), 483-505.
36. Kazan, H., & Özdemir, O. (2014). Financial performance assessment of large scale conglomerates via TOPSIS and CRITIC methods. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3(4), 203-224.
37. Kılıç, C., & Arıca, F. (2014). Economic freedom, inflation rate and their impact on economic growth: A panel data analysis. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, XVII (1) , 160-176.
38. Kitzan, R., Stivers, A., & Dutta, N. (2025). Fortune favors the bold and patient: How economic freedom impacts economic preferences. Contemporary Economy Policy, 1-29.
39. Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992.
40. Kreft, S., & Sobel, R. (2005). Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom. Cato Journal, 25(3), 595-616.
41. Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multicriteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596-609.
42. Lipford, J. W. (2007). Short Run Macroeconomic Performance and Economic Freedom: Can Economic Growth Rates be Higher and More Stable? Journal of Private Enterprise, 23(1), 3-29.
43. Miller, T., Holmes, K. R., & Feulner, E. J. (2012). Highlights of the 2012 index of economic freedom promoting economic opportunity and prosperity. The Heritage Foundation/The Wall Street Journal, Washington DC, 1-12.
44. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Giovannini, E., & Hofman, A. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Technical report., OECD, Paris.
45. Nijkamp, P., & van Delft, A. (1977). Multi-criteria analysis and regional decision-making (Vol. 8). Springer Science & Business Media.
46. Nikolaev, B. (2014). Economic freedom and quality of life: evidence from the OECD’s your better life index. Journal of Private Enterprise, 29(3), 61-96.
47. Orhan, B., & Şimşek, M. (2025). İnsani Kalkınmaya Yeni Bir Bakış: İnsani Gelişme Endeksi Çerçevesine Özgürlük Göstergelerinin Entegrasyonu. Kesit Akademi Dergisi, 11(44), 388-413.
48. Pamucar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry, 10(9), 393.
49. Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Cirovic, G., & Arlasheedi, M. A. (2020). Application of improved best worst method (BWM) in real-world problems. Mathematics, 8(8), 1-19.
50. Rode, M., & Coll, S. (2012). Economic freedom and growth. Which policies matter the most? Constitutional Political Economy, 23(2), 95-133.
51. Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. European Commission.
52. Simic, V., Gokasar, I., Deveci, M., & Karakurt, A. (2021). An integrated CRITIC and MABAC based Type-2 neutrosophic model for public transportation pricing system selection. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 80, 1-22.
53. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2009). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 9(2), 189-212.
54. Sobel, R. (2008). Testing Baumol: institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641-655.
55. Taşçı, M., & Özarı, Ç. (2019). OECD Ülkelerinin Özgürlük Göstergelerinin k-Ortalamalar Kümeleme Yönetmi ve Gri İlişkisel Yöntemi ile Analizi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(96), 464-488.
56. Torkayesh, A. E., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2021). Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 1-13.
57. Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2022). Analysis of the level of energy security in the three seas initiative countries. Applied Energy, 311, 1-25.
58. Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press.
59. Ünlü, U., Yalçın, N., & Yağlı, İ. (2017). Kurumsal yönetim ve firma performansi: TOPSIS yöntemi ile BİST 30 firmalari üzerine bir uygulama. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(1), 63-81.
60. Williamson, C., & Mathers, R. (2011). Economic freedom, culture, and growth. Public Choice, 148(3‐4), 313-335.
61. Yalcin, N., & Ünlü, U. (2018). A multi-criteria performance analysis of Initial Public Offering (IPO) firms using CRITIC and VIKOR methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 534-560.
62. Yay, G., Taştan, H., & Oktayer, A. (2016). Globalization, economic freedom, and wage inequality: A panel data analysis. Panoeconomicus, 63(5), 581-601.
63. Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501-2519.
64. Yılmaz, S., & Koca, G. (2021). Ülkeleri İnsani Kalkınma Endeksi Açısından Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleriyle Değerlendirme. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(4), 719-734.
65. Yousefi, A., & Hadi-Vencheh, A. (2010). An integrated group decision making model and its evaluation by DEA for automobile industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8543-8556.
66. Zhang, F., Hall, J., & Yao, F. (2018). Does economic freedom affect the production frontier? A semiparametric approach with panel data. Economic Inquiry, 56(2), 1380–1395.
67. Zu, J., Peng, Z., & Chen, F. (2022). Overseeing road safety progress using CV-PROMETHEE II-JSS: A case study in the EU context. Expert Systems with Applications, 195, 1-16