An Investigation on Students Academic Performance for Junior Secondary Schools in Botswana

Abstract

The major purpose of the study was to investigate factors which contribute to the decline in students’ academic performance in junior secondary schools in Botswana since 2010. The study was mainly quantitative and used the positivist inquiry paradigm. The study employed critical theory for its theoretical framework. Questionnaires were used to gather data from two hundred participants. Some documents were analyzed to supplement the information collected through the questionnaire. Data were analysed using the computer package known as Statisti- cal Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 15. The findings of the study showed that there were several factors that can contribute toward students’ low academic performance ranging from low staff morale to students unpreparedness for the examinations. The study, therefore, recommends that high teacher’s morale, availability of resources and parental in- volvement are critical for the attainment of high quality education in Botswana secondary schools. Furthermore, the findings of the study have implications for research and practice.

Keywords

• Academic performance, Botswana, quality education, parental involvement, instructional leadership, junior secondary schools

References

1. Afe, J. O. (2001). Reflection on becoming a teacher and the challenges of teacher education:Inaugural lecture series 64. Benin City: University of Benin.
2. Akiri, A. A. & Ugborugbo, N.M. (2009).Teachers’ effectiveness and students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Delta States, Nigeria. Stud home comm sci, 3(2) 107 -113.
3. Anderson, G. (1997). Fundamentals of educational research. London: Falmer.
4. Baker, L. M. (2011). The relationships between leadership practice and teacher motivation, capacity, and work setting as related to change in literacy instruction. Retrieved 27March, 2013 from:http://udini.proquest.com/view/the-relationships-between- pqid:2550133691/
5. Baker, D. P. & Lentedre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: world culture and the future of schooling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Basit, T. N. (2010). Conducting research in educational contexts. London: Continuum
7. Bell, M. J. (2013). Define academic performance. Retrieved 17April, 2013 from:http://www.ehow.com/about_4740750_define-academic-performance.html.
8. Bishay, A. (1996). Teacher motivation and job satisfaction: A study employing the experience Sampling Method. Journal of Undergraduate Sciences, 3, 147-154.

9. Buckley, J. F. (2013). Team teaching – Advantages, disadvantages. Education Encyclopedia, State University. Retrieved 4 September, 2013 from: http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2493/team-teaching.html#ixzz2dtgGQcC9.
10. Christie, K. (2005). Changing the nature of parent involvement. Phi Delta Kappa, 86(9), 645-646.
11. Cohen, L. Manion, L. & Morris, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed). London: Routledge.
12. Department of Education and Employment., (2000). Professional development. London: DfEE.
13. Edvantia. (2007). What research says about the value of homework: Research review. Centre for PublicEducation. Retrieved 15 August, 2013 from: http://www.centreforpubliceducation.org/site/apps/nlnet/content3.aspx?=1vIXIiNOJwE&b=5113503&ct=6857715¬oc=1#researchmeans.
14. Elsworth, S. (2013). Do Language barriers affect student performance in school? Retrieved 8 June, 2013 from: http://everydaylife.globalpost.com/language-barriers-affect-student- performance-school-
15. Emerson, C. & Goddard, I. (1993). Managing staff in school. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
16. Epstein, J.L. & Jansorn, N.R. (2004). School, family and community partnership link the plan. Education digest, 69(6), 19-23.
17. Fernandes, L. (2011). Home has a positive effect on students’ achievement: Duke study. Retrieved 04 September, 2013 from: http://link.servicedisqus.com/api/click?format=go&key=Cfdfcf52dffdOa70296/bad275
18. Gay, L.R. & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. London: Pearson Education.
19. Gazette., (2013). Poor junior certificate examination results. Gaborone: The Botswana Gazette.
20. Gorman, L. (2007). Teacher incentives and students’ performance. Retrieved 3 September, 2013 from http://www.nber.org/digest/jun07/w12627.html.
21. Halsey, P.A. (2004). Nurturing parent involvement: two middle level teachers share their secrets. The clearing House, 77(4), 135-137.
22. Kimani, G. N., Kara, A. M. & Njagi, L. W. (2013). Teachers’ factors influencing students’ academic achievement in secondary schools in Nyandarua County, Kenya. International journal of education and research, 1(3), 1-14.
23. Lee, J.Y. (2013). Private tutoring and its impact on students’ academic achievement, formal schooling, and educational inequality in Korea (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University.
24. MacNeil, A. & McClanahan, A. (2005). Shared leadership. Retrieved 14 May, 2013 rom:http://conx.org/content/m12923/latest/
25. Matambo, O. K. (2013). 2013 Budget speech. Gaborone: Government Printers
26. Kgosikebatho, K. (2013). Experts pinpoint causes of poor results. Retrieved 19 August, 2013 from www.thepatriotonsunday.co.bw/experts-pinpoint-causes-of-poor-results.
27. Monyatsi, P.P. (2001). An investigation of the effectiveness of the current teacher appraisal system as practised in Botswana secondary schools(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UNISA.
28. Neuman, W.L. (1997). Social research methods-qualitative and quantitative approaches.Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Ngcelwane, M. J. (2008). A critical assessment of the implementation of performance management in the Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality (Unpublished master's thesis). Rhodes Investec Business School.
30. Nichols, B. & Sutton, C. (2013). Improving academic performance through the enhancement of teacher/student relationships: The relationship teaching model. A journal of the international Christian community for teacher education, 1(2), 1-2.
31. O’cala, M. (2010). Factors that affect student achievement. Retrieved 17 September, 2013 from: http//voices.yahoo.com/ factors-that-affect-student-achievement- 738248.html?cat=4.
32. Oppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Printer Publishers.
33. Radzka, K. (2010). Factors that affect student achievement. Retrieved 17 September, 2013 from: http//www.educationspace360.com/index.php/factors-that-affect-student-achievement.
34. Republic of Botswana., (1994). Revised National Policy on Education (RNPE). Gaborone: Government Printer.
35. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2005). Critical theory. Retrieved 15April, 2013 from:http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/critical-theory/
36. Strauss, V. (2013).School principals and the rhetoric of ‘instructional leadership’. Retrieved 27 August 2013 from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/04/18
37. Taal, A. H. S. (1996). Teacher education and training in Sub-Saharan Africa: Teacher education in Africa, past, present and future. Dakar: UNESCO.
38. Tella, A. (2007). The impact of motivation on student’s academic achievement in mathematics among secondary school students in Nigeria. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science & technology education, 3(2), 149-156.
39. Verial, D. (2013). Relationship between parenting styles and academic achievement. Retrieved 08 June, 2013 from http://everydaylife.globalpost.com/relation-between-parenting-styles-academic-achieve...
40. Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches.London: Continuum.
41. WikiEducator (2013). Teacher motivation. Retrieved April 12, 2013,from: http://wikieducator.org/teacher­­­-motivation.
42. Yusuf, A. F. (2012). Influence of principals’ leadership styles on students’ academic achievement in secondary schools. Journal of innovative research in management and humanities, 3(1), 113 -121.