Evaluation of the Concepts and Subjects in Biology Perceived to be Difficult to Learn and Teach by the Pre-Service Teachers Registered in the Pedagogical Formation Program

Abstract

This study examines the subjects and concepts in biology perceived to be difficult to learn and teach by 759 pre-service biology teachers registered in the pedagogical formation program at Uludag University Faculty of Education in the academic year of 2005-2016, as well as the associations that word “biology” first calls to their mind. The study was designed as a survey model, and a questionnaire of three scaled questions was used as a data collection tool. The data were classified into 10 different categories based on different branches of biology: Anatomy-Morphology, Biotechnology, Ecology, Evolution, Physiology, Genetics, Histology, Cytology, Systematics and Reproduction and Development. Following the classification, the data were analyzed using frequency and percentages. The subjects and concepts perceived to be difficult to learn by the pre-service teachers are respectively as follows: photosynthesis and its stages, genetics, circulatory system, aerobic respiration, respiratory system, anaerobic respiration, protein synthesis, phanerogams, DNA structure and function, cryptogams, mitosis, plant systematics, endocrine system, meiosis, ETC, urinary system, plant physiology, taxonomy, evolution and digestive system. The subjects and concepts perceived to be difficult to teach by the pre-service teachers are respectively as follows: photosynthesis and its stages, protein synthesis, circulatory system, endocrine system, meiosis, plant systematics, evolution, mitosis, reproduction, genetic crossing over problems, Latinization of names, urinary system, genetics, ecology, aerobic respiration, DNA structure and function, plant tissues, glycolysis and anaerobic respiration. These findings confirm the need for developing undergraduate programs in biology and promoting the research culture at the secondary education level

Keywords

• Biology, learning difficulties, pedagogical formation, teaching difficulties

References

1. Anderson, C. W., Sheldon, T. H., & Dubay, J. (1990). The effects of instruction on college nonmajors' conceptions of respiration and photosynthesis. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 27(8), 761-776.
2. Atilboz, G. N. (2004). Lise 1. sinif ogrencilerinin mitoz ve mayoz bolunme konulari ile ilgili anlama duzeyleri ve kavram yanilgilari [9th grade students’ understanding levels and misconceptions about mitosis and meiosis]. Gazi Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 24 (3), 147-157.
3. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84-86.
4. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 134-141.
5. Cingil Baris, C., & Kirbaslar, F. G. (2015). A study of certain biology and biotechnology concepts in secondary school and high school course books in terms of scientific competency. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.684
6. Campbell, N. A., & Reece, J. B. (2006). Biyoloji (6). (E. Gunduz, A. Demirsoy & I. Turkan, Cev.). Ankara: Palme Yayincilik.
7. Chuang, H. F., & Cheng, Y. J. (2003). A study on attitudes toward biology and learning environment of the seventh grade students. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 171–194.
8. Czihak, G. (1984). Johann Gregor Mendel (1822–1884). Dokumentierte Biographie und Katalog zur Gedächtnisausstellung anläßlich des hundertsten Todestages mit Facsimile seines Hauptwerkes: “Versuche uber PfIanzenhybriden” [Documented biography and catalog of the memorial exhibition on the centenary of the death with facsimile of his main work: "Experiments on plant hybrids"]. Salzburg: Im eigenen Verlag.

9. Cakir, M., & Aldemir, B. (2011). Iki asamali genetik kavramlar tani testi gelistirme ve gecerlik calismasi [Developing and validating a two tier mendel genetics diagnostic test]. Mustafa Kemal Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 8(16), 335-353.
10. Capa, Y. (2000). An analysis of 9th grade student’s misconceptions concerning photosynthesis and respiration in plants. Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
11. DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027.
12. Eisen, Y., & Stavy, R. (1988). Students’ understanding of photosynthesis. The American Biology Teacher, 50(4), 209-212.
13. Ekici, F., Ekici, E., & Aydin, F. (2007). Utility of concept cartoons in diagnosing and overcoming misconceptions related to photosynthesis. International of Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2(4), 111-124.
14. Emre, I., & Bahsi, M. (2006). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin hucre bolunmesiyle ilgili kavram yanilgilari [Misconceptions of science teacher candidates about cell division]. Dogu Anadolu Bolge Arastirmalari, 4(3), 70-73.
15. Enrique, B., & Enrique, A. (2000). Teaching genetics at secondary school: A strategy for teaching about the location of inheritance information. Science Education, 84(3), 313-352.
16. Ergezen, S. S. (2007). Biyoloji egitiminde evrim konusunun ogretimi ve lise biyoloji ogretmenlerinin yeterlikleri [Teaching of evolution topics in biology education and competencies of high school biology teachers]. Biyoloji Egitiminde Evrim Sempozyumu, 173-178.
17. Gul, S., Ozay Kose, E., & Konu, M. (2014). Genetik unitesinin ogretiminde kavram karikaturu kullaniminin biyoloji ogretmeni adaylari uzerine etkisi [The effect of using concept cartoons on pre-service biology teachers in teaching genetic unit]. Fen Egitimi ve Arastirmalari Dernegi Fen Bilimleri Ogretimi Dergisi, 2(1), 1-22.
18. Gunes, M. H., & Gunes, T. (2005). Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin biyoloji konularini anlama zorluklari ve nedenleri [Difficulties and their reasons in learning biology concepts in primary school students]. Gazi Universitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakultesi, 6(2), 169-175.
19. Gunes, T., Sener Dilek, N., Hoplan, M., & Gunes, O. (2014). Ilkogretim 8. sinif ogrencilerinde fotosentez ve solunum konusunda olusan kavram yanilgilari [The misconceptions of grade 8 primary school students about photosynthesis and respiration]. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies In The World, 2(1), 42-47.
20. Haslam, F., & Teagust, D. F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21(3), 203-211.
21. Hurd DeHard, P. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(36), 407-416.
22. Karagoz, M., & Cakir, M. (2011). Genetikte problem cozme: kavramsal ve surecsel zorluklar [Problem solving in genetics: conceptual and procedural difficulties]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 11(3), 1651-1674.
23. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri [Scientific research methods]. 15. Baski. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
24. Kasapoglu, E. (2011). Lise 12. sinif biyoloji dersi protein sentezi konusunun kavram haritalariyla ogretiminin ogrencilerin akademik basarilarina ve tutumlarina etkisi [The effect of teaching protein synthesis using concept maps on the academic achievement and attitudes of 12th grade high school students]. Selcuk Universitesi, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Yuksek Lisans Tezi.
25. Kilic, D., & Saglam, N. (2004). Biyoloji egitiminde kavram haritalarinin ogrenme basarisina ve kaliciligina etkisi [The effect of the concept maps on achievement and retention of learning in biology education]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 27, 155-164. Kilic, D. S., Soran, H., & Graf, D. (2011). Evrim ogretimini etkileyen faktorler [Factors influencing the teaching of evolution]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 41, 255-266.
26. Kilic, D. S. (2012). Biyoloji ogretmen adaylarinin evrim ogretimi niyetleri [Pre-service biology teachers’ intentions to teach evolution]. Hacettepe Universitesi, Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 42, 250-261. Korkut, S. (2000). Canlilarda ureme ve gelisme unitesinin unite program tasarisinin hazirlanmasi [Reproduction at the vigorous and preparation of the growth unit with its programe project organism]. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Balikesir Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu.
27. Kose, S., Ayas, A., & Usak, M. (2006). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinda fotosentez ve bitkilerde solunum konularinda gorulen kavram yanilgilarinin giderilmesinde kavram degisim metinlerinin etkisi [The effect of conceptual change texts instructions on overcoming prospective science teachers’ misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants]. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 1(1), 78-103. Lewis, L., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000a). What’s in a cell?-Young people understanding of the genetic relatioship between cells, within an individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129-133.
28. Lewis, L., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000b). CAll in the genes?- Young people understanding of nature of genes. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 74-79.
29. Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200-206.
30. Marbach-Ad, G. (2001). Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 35(4), 183-190.
31. Miles, M. B., & M. Huberman. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods. 2d Edition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
32. Ozay, E. (2001). Fotosentez konusunda lise ogrencilerinde karsilasilan kavram yanilgilari uzerine arastirmalar [The investigations into high school students'misconceptions of photosynthesis]. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Ataturk Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Erzurum.
33. Ozcan, T., Ozgur, S., Kat, A., & Elgun, S. (2013). Identifiying and comparing the degree of difficulties biology subjects by adjusting it is reasons in elemantary and secondary education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 113-122.
34. Oztas, H., & Oztas, F. (1998). Farkli seviyelerdeki ogrencilerin bazi temel biyolojik terimleri kavrayabilme yetenekleri ile ilgili bir arastirma [A study of the ability of students in different levels to understand some basic biological terms]. III Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Egitimi Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabi, 184-187.
35. Ozyeral-Bakanay, C. D. (2008). Biyoloji ogretmen adaylarinin evrim teorisine yaklasimlari ve bilimin dogasina bakis acilari [Prospective biology teachers? approaches to the theory of evolution in relation to their understandings of the nature of science]. Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Marmara Universitesi.
36. Ozyilmaz-Akamca, G., & Hamurcu, H. (2009). Analojiler, kavram karikaturleri ve tahmin-gozlem-aciklama teknikleriyle desteklenmis fen ve teknoloji egitimi [Science and technology education based on analogies, concept cartoons and predict-observe-explain techniques]. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(4), 1186-1206.
37. Pelaez, N. J., Boyd, D. D., Rojas, J. B., & Hoover, M. A. (2005). Prevalence of blood circulation misconceptions among prospective elementary teachers. Advances in Physiology Education, 29(3), 172-181.
38. Saka, A. (2006). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin genetik konusundaki kavram yanilgilarinin giderilmesinde 5E modelinin etkisi [The effect of 5E model on removing science student teachers' misconceptions about genetics]. Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Trabzon.
39. Saka A., Cerrah, L., Akdeniz, A. R., & Ayas, A. (2006). A cross-age study of the understanding of three genetic concepts: How do they image the gene, DNA and chromosome? Journal of Science and Technology Education, 15(3), 192-202.
40. Sebitosi, E. K. (2007). Understanding genetics and inheritance in rural schools. Journal of Biological Education, 41(2), 56-61.
41. Sinan, O., Yildirim, O., Kocakulah, M. S., & Aydin, H. (2006). Fen bilgisi ogretmen adaylarinin proteinler, enzimler ve protein sentezi ile ilgili kavram yanilgilari [Preservice primary science teachers’ misconceptions about proteins, enzymes and protein synthesis]. Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 26(1), 1-16.
42. Sasmaz-Oren, F., Ormanci, U., Karatekin, P., & Erdem, S. (2010). Ilkogretim 6. 7. ve 8. sinif ogrencilerinin fotosentez-solunum konusundaki kavram yanilgilarinin kavram karikaturleriyle belirlenmesi. International Conference on New Horizons in Education, Famagusta, North Cyprus.
43. Sensoy, O., Aydogdu, M., Yildirim, H. I., Usak, M., & Hancer, A. H. (2005). Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin (6., 7. ve 8. siniflar) fotosentez konusundaki yanlis kavramlarin tespiti uzerine bir arastirma [An investigation to identify the misconceptions of elemantary school students (sixth, seventh and eighth grades) about photosynthesis]. Milli Egitim Dergisi, 33(166), 213-223.
44. Tasci, G., & Soran, H. (2008). Hucre bolunmesi konusunda coklu ortam uygulamalarinin kavrama ve uygulama duzeyinde ogrenme basarisina etkisi [The effects of multimedia applications in cell division subject on the comprehension and application levels of learning achievement]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 34, 233-243. Tatar, N., & Cansungu Koray, O. (2005). Ilkogretim sekizinci sinif ogrencilerinin 'genetik' unitesi hakkindaki kavram yanilgilarinin belirlenmesi [Determination of the misconceptions of the 8th grade students in primary school about “genetics” unit]. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 13(2), 415-426.
45. Tekkaya, C., Capa, Y., & Yilmaz, O. (2000). Biyoloji ogretmen adaylarinin genel biyoloji konularindaki kavram yanilgilari [Preservice biology teachers' misconceptions in general biology concepts]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 18, 140-147.
46. Tekkaya, C., Ozkan, O., & Sungur, S. (2001). Biology concepts percieved as difficult by Turkish high school students. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 21, 145-150.
47. Tekkaya, C., & Balci, S. (2003). Ogrencilerin fotosentez ve bitkilerde solunum konularindaki kavram yanilgilarinin saptanmasi [Determination of students’ misconceptions concerning photosynthesis and respiration in plants]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 24, 101-107. Temelli, A. (2006). Lise ogrencilerinin genetikle ilgili konulardaki kavram yanilgilarinin saptanmasi [Determination of misconceptions concerning genetic subjects of high school students’]. Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 14(1), 73-82.
48. Uzun, N., & Saglam, N. (2005). Genetik konularinin ogreniminde deney uygulamalarinin akademik basariya etkisi [The effect of experimental applications on academic achievement in the learning of genetics]. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi 28, 196-200. Yakisan, M. (2008). Biyoloji ogretiminde bilgisayar animasyonlarinin kullanilmasinin ogrencilerin basari, tutum ve kavram yanilgilari uzerine etkisi (hucre konusu ornegi) [Effect of computer animations upon achievement, attitute and misconceptions of biology education (cell topic)]. Doktora Tezi. Gazi Universitesi, Egitim Bilimleri Enstitusu, Ankara.
49. Yesilyurt, S., & Gul, S. (2012). Ortaogretim ogrencilerinin tasima ve dolasim sistemleri unitesi ile ilgili kavram yanilgilari [Secondary school students’ misconceptions about the “transportation and circulatory systems” unit]. Afyon Kocatepe Universitesi Kuramsal Egitimbilim Dergisi, 5(1), 17-48.
50. Zeren, D. (2005). Ilkogretim fen bilgisindeki ureme ve gelisme konusunun duzenlenmesi ve ogretimine yonelik program gelistirme uzerine bir calisma [A study on the curriculum design for the organization and the teaching on the subject 'reproduction and growth' in primary edu