Examination of Postgraduate Theses on History Textbooks in Turkey in Terms of Some Variables

Year 2018, Volume: 7 Issue: 2, 225 - 232, 15.04.2018

Eray Alaca

https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.225

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the
postgraduate theses that focused on history textbooks between 1989 and 2017 in
Turkey. The population was composed of 126 postgraduate theses (master’s and
doctoral) which were obtained from Thesis Center of Higher Education Council
(HEC), Republic of Turkey. The document review method was used to evaluate the
theses in the study. Thesis analysis form, which was developed by the
researcher, was used as the data collection tool. This form involved items
related to the theses’ levels, years, universities and institutes, title of the
advisors, focus countries, and research design. The findings were interpreted
making use of percentages and frequencies. The results showed that some
universities in Turkey such as Gazi University distinguished themselves in
terms of the number of theses on history textbooks. The fact that there were
108 master’s theses and 18 doctoral theses raises the importance of the current
study. As a result of this study, discussion and some recommendations were
presented about the theses on history textbooks.

Keywords

Doctorate, postgraduate education, history textbooks, thesis, master’s degree

References

• Adorno, T. W. (2016). Kultur endustrisi [Culture industry]. (Translated. Nihat Ulner, Mustafa Tuzel, Elcin Gen). Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
• Alaca, E. (2017). Tarih egitimine giriş[Introduction to history education]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Althusser, L. (2014). İdeoloji ve devletin ideolojik aygitlari[Ideology and ideological state apparatus]. (Translated. Alp Tumertekin). Istanbul: Ithaki
• Altun, A. (2013). Yapilandirmaci yaklasim, sosyal bilgiler programlari ve ders kitaplari[Constructivist approach, social sciences programs and textbooks].(Ed. Bulent Akbaba).  In Konu Alani Ders Kitabi Inceleme Kilavuzu Sosyal Bilgiler [Subject area course book review guide social sciences] (1-28). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Ata, B.(2006). Bertrand Russell, history education and world peace. Turkish History Education Journal, 5(1), 193-225.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). “Document analysis as a qualitative research method”. Qualitative research journal, 9(2): 27-40.
• Copeaux, E.(2016).Tarih ders kitaplarinda (1931-1993) Turk tarih tezinden Turk-Islam sentezine [In history textbooks (1931-1993) from the Turkish history thesis to the Turkish-İslamic  synthesis].     Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
• Elban, M. (2017). Investigation of the history education researches in turkey in terms of some variables (master's theses and dissertationssample). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9): 1529-1534, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050910
• Ersanli, B. (2015). Iktidar ve tarih[Power and history]. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
• Giorgetti, F. M.(2016). Egitim ritüelleri[Education rituals]. Istanbul: Yeni Insan Yayinevi.
• Guven, I.(2010). Turk egitim tarihi[History of Turkish education]. Ankara: Naturel Yayincilik.
• Hayta, N.&Karabag, S.G.(2003). Tarih ders kitaplari nasil analiz edilmelidir?[How should history textbooks be analyzed?] (Ed. Necdet Hayta). In Konu Alani Ders Kitabi Inceleme Kilavuzu Tarih 9-12[Subject area course book review guide history 9-12] (31-45). Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
• Inal, K. (2004). Egitim ve iktidar[Education and power]. Ankara: Utopya Yayinevi.
• Karasar, N.(2017). Bilimsel arastirma yöntemleri[Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim.
• King, L.G.(2005). Baris ve insan haklari egitimi: bir UNESCO perspektifi(Peace and human rights education: an UNESCO perspective]. (Ed. Deniz Tarba Ceylan&Gurol Irzik). In Nasil Egitiliyoruz?(How are we trained?] (16-22). Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi Yayinlari.
• Koullapis, L. G.(2008). Turkiye’de tarih ders kitaplari ve UNESCO’nun önerileri[History textbooks in Turkey and UNESCO recommendations]. In Tarih Ogretimi ve Ders Kitaplari 1994 Buca Sempozyumu[History teaching and textbooks 1993 Buca symposium] (273-282). Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi Yurt Yayinlari.
• Mayring, P.( 2011). Nitel sosyal arastirmaya giriş[Introduction to qualitative social research]. (Translated. Adnan Gümüş&M. Sezai Durgun). Ankara: Bilgesu Yayincilik.
• McLaren, P.(2011). Okullarda yasam elestirel pedagojiye giriş[Life in schools an introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education]. (Translated. Mustafa Yunus Eryaman, Hasan Arslan). Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Ozturk, M. (2003). Turkiye’de tarih egitiminin temel sorunlari [The fundamental problems of history education in Turkey] . (Ed. Oya Koymen), in Tarih Egitimine Elestirel Yaklasimlar [Critical approaches to history education] (142-152). Istanbul: Turkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Kalkinma Vakfi.
• Pingel, F. (2010). UNESCO guidebook on textbook research and textbook revision. Paris/Braunschweig: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization/Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research.
• Stathis, P. (2014). Yunan [Turk] tarih ders kitaplarinda “ben” ve “oteki” imgeleri [“I” and “other” images in Greek[Turk] history textbooks] , in Tarih Egitimi ve Tarihte “Oteki” Sorunu [History education and “other” problem in history] (125-134). (Ed. Ali Berktay&Hamdi Can Tuncer). Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi Yurt Yayinlari.
• T.C. Maarif Vekilligi (TCMV).(1991). Ikinci maarif surasi 15-21 Subat 1943[Second Educational Board 15-21 February 1943]. Istanbul: Milli Egitim Basimevi.
• Turan, R. (2016). The dynamic of change in history education in Turkey: The history foundation. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 3720-3749.
• Ustel, F. (2009). “Makbul vatandas”in pesinde II. Mesrutiyet’ten bugune vatandaslik eğitimi[Striving fort he “acceptable citizen” citizenship education from the second constitutional monarchy until today]. Istanbul: Iletisim Yayinlari.
• Yazici, F. & Yildirim, T. (2018). History teaching as a nation-building tool in the early republican period in Turkey (1923–1938), Paedagogica Historica, DOI: 10.1080/00309230.2017.1423363
• Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H.(2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yöntemleri[Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.
• Yildirim, T. (2016). Tarih ders kitaplarinda kimlik soylemi [Identity discourse in history textbooks]. Istanbul: Yeni Insan Yayinevi.