BibTex RIS Cite

ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Year 2016, Volume: 25 Issue: 3, 114 - 119, 01.12.2016

Abstract

Çalışmanın amacı; sabit ortodontik tedavilerde kullanılan ortodontik mini vidaların başarılarını etkileyen
faktörlerin incelenmesidir.
Çalışmada 50 kadın ve 26 erkek hastada kullanılan 152
adet ortodontik mini vida değerlendirilmiştir. Hastalar
çalışmaya dâhil edilirken; kullanılan vidanın mekanik
özellikleri ve hastanın sistemik durumu göz önünde
bulundurulmuştur. Ortodontik mini vidalara ait bulgular toplanırken; cinsiyet, yaş, mini vida sayısı, yerleştirme bölgesi, kullanım süresi, kayıp sayıları ve kayıp bölgesi gibi faktörler not edilmiştir.
Elde edilen veriler istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Pearson ki-kare testi değişkenler arasında bağımlılık olup olmadığını değerlendirmek amacıyla kullanılmıştır.
Hastaların %70’e yakınının 13-15 yaş arasında, %
65,8’nin kadın olduğu tespit edildi. Mini vida kullanım
süresinin 1-16 ay arasında değişiklik gösterdiği ancak
genel kullanımın 3 ila 7 ay arasında olduğu saptandı.
Mini vidaların sıklıkla üst ikinci küçük azı ile birinci
büyük azı arası bölgede yerleştirildikleri görüldü. Mini
vidaların % 93,4’ü başarılı bir şekilde kullanılırken kadınlarda mini vida başarı oranları erkeklere oranla daha yüksekti. Alt çenede özellikle büyük azı dişler arası
bölgede mini vida kayıp ihtimalinin diğer bölgelere
göre daha yüksek olduğu ve üst çenenin alt çeneye
oranla daha başarılı bir yerleştirme bölgesi olduğu saptandı.
Ortodontik mini vidalar destek elemanı olarak güvenle
kullanılabilecek aygıtlardır. Hastanın bayan olması, üst
çene yerleşimi mini vida başarısında iyi yönde katkı
yapan faktörlerdir.

References

  • 1. Maino BG, Mura P, Bednar J. Mini screw implants: The spider screw anchorage system. Seminars in Orthodontics 2005, 11:40-46.
  • 2. Hedayati Z, Hashemi SM, Zamiri B, Fattahi HR. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007, 36:588-592.
  • 3. Un-Bong B, Mohamed B, Kwang- Heung H, et al. Evaluation of factors affecting the success rate of orthodontic mini-implants by survival analysis World Journal of Stomatology 2013, 2:56-61.
  • 4. Melsen B, Verna C. Mini screw implants: The Aarhus anchorage system. Seminars in Orthodontics 2005, 11:24-31.
  • 5. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, et al. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 131:68-73.
  • 6. Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Čelar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010, 137:108-113.
  • 7. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic mini screws. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 131:43-51.
  • 8. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: Success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 131:9-15.
  • 9. Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136: 236-242.
  • 10. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, et al. (2003). Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 124:373-378.
  • 11. Viwattanatipa N, Thanakitcharu S, Uttraravichien A, Pitiphat W. Surviva analyses of surgica miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136:29-36.
  • 12. Dobranszki A, Faber J, Scatolino IVMC, et al. Analysis of factors associated with orthodontic micro screw failure. Brazilian Dental Journal 2014, 25:346-351.
  • 13. Antoszewska J, Papadopoulos MA, Park HS, Ludwig B. Five-year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: A retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136:158-159.
  • 14. Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a metaanalysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012, 142:577-595.
  • 15. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, et al. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007, 18:768-775.
  • 16. Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, et al. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 2013, 16:44-55.
  • 17. Santiago RC, de Paula FO, Fraga MR, Assis NMSP, Vitral RWF. Correlation between miniscrew stability and bone mineral density in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136:243-250.
  • 18. Uyanlar A, Öztoprak MO. Sınıf I anterior çapraşıklık tedavisinde kanin retraksiyonu için mini vida kullanımı: Olgu sunumu. 7tepe Klinik 2009, 2:48-50. 19. Önçağ G. Ortodontide mini vida uygulamalarında temel kavramlar. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2010, 31:61-68.

The Evaluation of Factors Affect the Success of Orthodontic Mini Screw

Year 2016, Volume: 25 Issue: 3, 114 - 119, 01.12.2016

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors affecting
the success of orthodontic mini screw used at fixed orthodontic treatment
While including patients in the study, mechanical properties of mini screws and systemic conditions of patients were considered. During the collection of data of
orthodontic mini screw, the sex, age, number of mini
screw, placement area, usage time, loss number and
loss area and etc were noted. All data were statistically
analyzed. Pearson's chi-square test was used to assess
whether there is a dependency between variables.
In this study, 152 mini screws used at 50 woman and 26
man patients were evaluated.
Approximately 70% of patients’ ages were between 13-
15 years and 65.8% of patients were women. It was
determined that usage time of mini screws were changing between 1-16 months but mini screws were used
between 3-7 months generally. It was seen that mini
screws were placed between upper second premolar
and upper first molar mainly. 93.4% of mini screws
were used successfully and success rate of mini screw
at women is higher than men. Loss rate of mini screw
placed in lower jaw especially molar area is higher than
other areas and upper jaw as placement area is more
successful than lower jaw as placement area
Orthodontic mini screws as anchorage unit can be used
successfully. Female sex and upper jaw as placement
area are good factor and they affect the success rate of
mini screws positively

References

  • 1. Maino BG, Mura P, Bednar J. Mini screw implants: The spider screw anchorage system. Seminars in Orthodontics 2005, 11:40-46.
  • 2. Hedayati Z, Hashemi SM, Zamiri B, Fattahi HR. Anchorage value of surgical titanium screws in orthodontic tooth movement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007, 36:588-592.
  • 3. Un-Bong B, Mohamed B, Kwang- Heung H, et al. Evaluation of factors affecting the success rate of orthodontic mini-implants by survival analysis World Journal of Stomatology 2013, 2:56-61.
  • 4. Melsen B, Verna C. Mini screw implants: The Aarhus anchorage system. Seminars in Orthodontics 2005, 11:24-31.
  • 5. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, et al. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 131:68-73.
  • 6. Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Čelar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: Review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010, 137:108-113.
  • 7. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic mini screws. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 131:43-51.
  • 8. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: Success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007, 131:9-15.
  • 9. Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136: 236-242.
  • 10. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, et al. (2003). Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003, 124:373-378.
  • 11. Viwattanatipa N, Thanakitcharu S, Uttraravichien A, Pitiphat W. Surviva analyses of surgica miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136:29-36.
  • 12. Dobranszki A, Faber J, Scatolino IVMC, et al. Analysis of factors associated with orthodontic micro screw failure. Brazilian Dental Journal 2014, 25:346-351.
  • 13. Antoszewska J, Papadopoulos MA, Park HS, Ludwig B. Five-year experience with orthodontic miniscrew implants: A retrospective investigation of factors influencing success rates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136:158-159.
  • 14. Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a metaanalysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012, 142:577-595.
  • 15. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, et al. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2007, 18:768-775.
  • 16. Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, et al. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 2013, 16:44-55.
  • 17. Santiago RC, de Paula FO, Fraga MR, Assis NMSP, Vitral RWF. Correlation between miniscrew stability and bone mineral density in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009, 136:243-250.
  • 18. Uyanlar A, Öztoprak MO. Sınıf I anterior çapraşıklık tedavisinde kanin retraksiyonu için mini vida kullanımı: Olgu sunumu. 7tepe Klinik 2009, 2:48-50. 19. Önçağ G. Ortodontide mini vida uygulamalarında temel kavramlar. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2010, 31:61-68.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA34UU49YP
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Nurhat Özkalaycı This is me

Hande Erener This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2016
Submission Date December 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 25 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Özkalaycı, N., & Erener, H. (2016). ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 25(3), 114-119.
AMA Özkalaycı N, Erener H. ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. JHS. December 2016;25(3):114-119.
Chicago Özkalaycı, Nurhat, and Hande Erener. “ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 25, no. 3 (December 2016): 114-19.
EndNote Özkalaycı N, Erener H (December 1, 2016) ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 25 3 114–119.
IEEE N. Özkalaycı and H. Erener, “ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”, JHS, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 114–119, 2016.
ISNAD Özkalaycı, Nurhat - Erener, Hande. “ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 25/3 (December 2016), 114-119.
JAMA Özkalaycı N, Erener H. ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. JHS. 2016;25:114–119.
MLA Özkalaycı, Nurhat and Hande Erener. “ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ”. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 3, 2016, pp. 114-9.
Vancouver Özkalaycı N, Erener H. ORTODONTİK MİNİ VİDALARIN BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLERİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. JHS. 2016;25(3):114-9.