Miniscrews in Orthodontics

Year 2017, Volume: 26 Issue: 2, 193 - 197, 01.07.2017

İbrahim Yavuz Elif Dilara Şeker

Abstract

Implants which are used practically and reliably for
dental treatments in dentistry have begun to be used
for skeletal anchors to achieve tooth movement in
orthodontics. Anchorage control is an important
requirement in orthodontic treatment of dental and
skeletal malocclusions and is achieved by various
methods. However, the lack of intraoral dental
elements to be used for anchorage or the weak
peripheral bone, difficulties in using extraoral
appliances for the patient and necessity of cooperation
have become an alternative to the mini-screw
orthodontic anchorage methods. Mini screws are
gaining popularity in clinical practice day by day
because of its practicality. The aim of this review is to
examine the advantages, disadvantages and the risks of
the general features, indications, of the mini screws in
orthodontics

Keywords

Mini screw, skeletal anchors, orthodontics

ORTODONTİDE MİNİ VİDALAR

Abstract

Diş hekimliğinde dental tedavilerde pratik ve güvenilir
bir şekilde kullanılan implantlar ortodontide de diş hareketi elde etmek için iskeletsel ankraj amacı ile kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Dental ve iskeletsel
malokluzyonların ortodontik tedavisinde ankraj kontrolü önemli bir gereksinimdir ve çeşitli yöntemlerle sağlanmaktadır. Ancak ankraj amaçlı kullanılacak intraoral
dental elemanların yetersiz olması veya etraflarındaki
kemiğin zayıf yapıda olması, ekstraoral apareylerin kullanımının hasta açısından zor olması ve kooperasyon
gerekliliği, mini vidaları ortodontik ankraj metodlarına
bir alternatif haline getirmiştir. Kullanım kolaylığı nedeniyle mini vidalar her geçen gün klinik uygulamalarda
daha popüler hale gelmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı
ortodontik ankraj amaçlı kullanılan mini vidaların genel
özelliklerinin, endikasyonlarının avantaj-dezavantaj ve
risklerinin incelenmesidir

Keywords

Mini vida, iskeletsel ankraj, ortodonti

References

• 1. Melsen B, Bosch C. Different approaches to anchorage: a survey and an evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997; 67(1):23-30.
• 2. Melsen B, Verna C, editors. Miniscrew implants: the Aarhus anchorage system. Semin Orthod 2005; 11:24-31.
• 3. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Gallerano RL. Temporary anchorage devices for tooth movement: a review and case reports. J Periodontol 2006; 77(10):1613- 1624.
• 4. Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, (eds). Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Practice. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., 1985.
• 5. Gainsforth BL, Higley L. A study of orthodontic anchorage possibilities in basal bone. Am J Orthod Oral Surg 1945; 31(8):406-417.
• 6. Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1983; 17(4):266- 269.
• 7. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997; 31(11):763-767.
• 8. Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: a preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1997; 13(3):201- 209.
• 9. Labanauskaite B, Jankauskas G, Vasiliauskas A, et al. Implants for orthodontic anchorage. Metaanalysis. Stomatologija 2005; 7(4):128-132.
• 10. Wehrbein H, Feifel H, Diedrich P. Palatal implant anchorage reinforcement of posterior teeth: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116(6):678-686.
• 11. Block MS, Hoffman DR. A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107(3):251-258.
• 12. Kärcher H, Byloff F, Clar E. The Graz implant supported pendulum, a technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002; 30(2):87-90.
• 13. Glatzmaier J, Wehrbein H, Peter D. Biodegradable implants for orthodontic anchorage. A preliminary biomechanical study. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18(5):465 -469.
• 14. Celenza F, Hochman MN. Absolute anchorage in orthodontics: direct and indirect implant-assisted modalities. J Clin Orthod 2000; 34(7):397-402.
• 15. De Clerck H, Geerinckx V, Siciliano S. The zygoma anchorage system. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36(8):455- 459.
• 16. Schnelle MA, Beck FM, Jaynes RM, et al. A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. Angle Orthod 2004; 74(6):832-837.
• 17. Prabhu J, Cousley RR. Current products and practice: bone anchorage devices in orthodontics. Journal Orthod 2006; 33(4):288-307.
• 18. Lin JC, Liou EJ, Yeh CL, et al. A comparative evaluation of current orthodontic miniscrew systems. World J Orthod 2007; 8:136-144.
• 19. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L. State of the art in oral implants. J Clin Periodontol 1991; 18(6):474-481.
• 20. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, et al. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995; 29(12):1567-1575.
• 21. Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM, et al. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2003; 37(6):321-328.
• 22. Keles A, Erverdi N, Sezen S. Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage. Angle Orthod 2003; 73(4):471-482.
• 23. Gedrange T, Hietschold V, Mai R, et al. An evaluation of resonance frequency analysis for the determination of the primary stability of orthodontic palatal implants. A study in human cadavers. Clin Oral İmplants Res 2005; 16(4):425- 431.
• 24. Baumgaertel S. Predrilling of the implant site: is it necessary for orthodontic mini-implants? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137(6):825-829.
• 25. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, et al. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129(6):721.e7-12.
• 26. Enacar A, Giray B, Pehlivanoglu M, et al. Facemask therapy with rigid anchorage in a patient with maxillary hypoplasia and severe oligodontia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123(5):571-577.
• 27. Melsen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 2000; 3(1):23-28.
• 28. Carano A, Velo S, Leone P, et al. Clinical applications of the miniscrew anchorage system. J Clin Orthod 2005; 39(1):9-24.
• 29. Lee TC-K, Leung MT-C, Wong RW-K, et al. Versatility of skeletal anchorage in orthodontics. World J Orthod 2008; 9(3):221-232.
• 30. Uysal T. İmplantlar ve Ortodonti. Cum Üniv Diş Hek Fak Dergisi 2005; 8:146-155.
• 31. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131(4):43-51.
• 32. Brisceno CE, Rossouw PE, Carrillo R, et al. Healing of the roots and surrounding structures after intentional damage with miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135(3):292-301.
• 33. Moon CH, Lee DG, Lee HS, et al. Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod 2008; 78(1):101-106.
• 34. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126(1):42-47.
• 35.Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130(1):18-25.
• 36. Melsen B. Mini-implants: where are we? J Clin Orthod 2005; 39(9):539-547.